Jumping into the fire ... Should the entire Non-Con category be eliminated?

[MillieDynamite]

I reluctantly let him fuck me, just to get him to shut up for the two and a half minutes it took.

Exactly.

 

[Kelliezgirl]

This should be enough context. Click on the arrow and you'll see the entire message.

Other people in this thread have called out religious conservatives for censoring, you didn't seem bothered by that.

 

[Baztrachian]

Other people in this thread have called out religious conservatives for censoring, you didn't seem bothered by that.

Frankly, anyone who is a religious conservative should be utterly ignored when they get offended at any erotic story they read.

 

[KittyOfSteele]

Other people in this thread have called out religious conservatives for censoring, you didn't seem bothered by that.

Because they don't have as much political power in my area as the secular politicians. Plus, I already deal with them on a daily basis.

 

[MillieDynamite]

Well, if they read them, or may the gods forbid, write them, they don't admit it!

Frankly, anyone who is a religious conservative should be utterly ignored when they get offended at any erotic story they read.

 

[KittyOfSteele]

Plot bunny of the most conservative mormon writing for T/I and R/NC on LitPorn.

Absolutely a work of fiction. Any similarities with websites, people, and places are all coincidence.

Well, if they read them, or may the gods forbid, write them, they don't admit it!

 

[MillieDynamite]

I see by the small clock in the lower right-hand corner of my screen that I must return to writing or risk not getting paid.

Buy-buy, opps, I mean bye-bye (But if want to buy-buy my stories, please feel free)

 

[Kelliezgirl]

Because they don't have as much political power in my area as the secular politicians. Plus, I already deal with them on a daily basis.

Which is irrelevant to your claim that we should only focus on the censoring, not who is doing it. It seems you just don't want to admit your team is guilty of it.

 

[Baztrachian]

Well, if they read them, or may the gods forbid, write them, they don't admit it!

Old joke:

What's the difference between fundamentalist Christians and perverts?

Perverts read their porn by themselves.

Fundamentalist Christians get together and read it in groups!

 

[KittyOfSteele]

Which is irrelevant to your claim that we should only focus on the censoring, not who is doing it. It seems you just don't want to admit your team is guilty of it.

Who is doing the current censorship of NSFW content worldwide? Feminist movements, politicians across all ends of the spectrum, and corporations, more specifically, payment processors like VISA and MasterCard. As far as I'm concerned, only in the USA is where religious conservatives are joining on the matter, unless the muslim countries decided to stop focusing on the Palestine/Israel war and joined in on the censorship somehow. Every single group that I mentioned have their reasons. Some are religious, some are political, and some are doing it to hoard money.

I never claimed to be part of any team; I'm on my own. I don't like censorship, and I do not care who does it, or why. It's wrong. My entire country has been going through slow censorship since the mid-to-late 00s, and last year it was so peak that police officers stopped you on the streets to check your phone without any warrant. You resist, you get a beating, or get taken into custody. If you had something dubious, you were immediately sent straight into a concentration camp without trial. Forgive me if I don't want this to be the reality of the entire world, because the way these groups that otherwise wouldn't see eye-to-eye with each other, we wouldn't be divided by biases.

 

[Baztrachian]

My entire country has been going through slow censorship since the mid-to-late 00s, and last year it was so peak that police officers stopped you on the streets to check your phone without any warrant. You resist, you get a beating, or get taken into custody.

May I ask which country this is?

 

[KittyOfSteele]

May I ask which country this is?

I am not aware if I'm still being politically persecuted or not because of my involvement in something I couldn't say no to last year, so no, for my own safety, I can't tell.

 

[cw5523729]

Yeah, another story "Eyes of the Dragon" has a king bedding his queen who I think is 14 or something. If that wasn't bad enough, I read that he wrote the fucking story for his preteen daughter

I stand corrected - she's actually 17 and the king 50. This is from page 2 of the book dedicated to his daughter

Sasha of the Western Barony (a very small barony indeed) was then seventeen years old, thirty-three years younger than her husband. She had never seen a man with his drawers off before her wedding night. When, on that occasion, she observed his flaccid penis, she asked with great interest: “What’s that, Husband?” If she had said anything else, or if she had said what she said in a slightly different tone of voice, the events of that night—and this entire history—might have taken another course; in spite of the special drink Flagg had given him an hour before, at the end of the wedding feast, Roland might simply have slunk away. But he saw her then exactly as she was—a very young girl who knew even less about the baby-making act than he did—and observed her mouth was kind, and began to love her, as everyone in Delain would grow to love her.

“It is King’s Iron,” he said.

“It doesn’t look like iron,” said Sasha, doubtfully.

“It is before the forge,” he said.

“Ah!” said she. “And where is the forge?”

“If you will trust me,” said he, getting into bed with her, “I will show you, for you have brought it from the Western Barony with you but did not know it.”


Yes, Stephen King wrote The Eyes of the Dragon for his daughter, Naomi, [age 13 at the time] because she did not like his horror books. He wanted to write something for her that she would be interested in, and she told him she liked dragons, so he wrote a fantasy novel for her

I mean, what in the actual Fuck? You couldn't wait until at least page 3 before talking about a penis?

 

[Baztrachian]

Shit...Stephen King would get banned on Lit.

 

[Kelliezgirl]

Who is doing the current censorship of NSFW content worldwide? Feminist movements, politicians across all ends of the spectrum, and corporations, more specifically, payment processors like VISA and MasterCard. As far as I'm concerned, only in the USA is where religious conservatives are joining on the matter, unless the muslim countries decided to stop focusing on the Palestine/Israel war and joined in on the censorship somehow. Every single group that I mentioned have their reasons. Some are religious, some are political, and some are doing it to hoard money.

I never claimed to be part of any team; I'm on my own. I don't like censorship, and I do not care who does it, or why. It's wrong. My entire country has been going through slow censorship since the mid-to-late 00s, and last year it was so peak that police officers stopped you on the streets to check your phone without any warrant. You resist, you get a beating, or get taken into custody. If you had something dubious, you were immediately sent straight into a concentration camp without trial. Forgive me if I don't want this to be the reality of the entire world, because the way these groups that otherwise wouldn't see eye-to-eye with each other, we wouldn't be divided by biases.

So, it's okay for people to blame religious conservatives, because you don't think they are part of the problem.
But it isn't okay to call out the "diverse and inclusive" crowd, because even though they are part of the problem, they aren't the whole problem.

That is some interesting logic...

 

[kreemi_pi]

You don't have to read non con. Nobody's FORCING you.

Haha get it? FORCING

yeah ok sorry

 

[KittyOfSteele]

So, it's okay for people to blame religious conservatives, because you don't think they are part of the problem.
But it isn't okay to call out the "diverse and inclusive" crowd, because even though they are part of the problem, they aren't the whole problem.

That is some interesting logic...

My point.


































You.

If you didn't read the names of the groups I mentioned, you're either trolling, or you can't read at this point.

 

[cw5523729]

Well, King is a total panster, so he has no written-down plot more than a general idea when he starts writing. Hence, so many dropped characters, abandoned subplots, and characters who serve no purpose at all.

I read that he did a lot of cocaine back in the day to keep up with the insane pace of his writing.


No word on if white chocolate was involved in any books.

 

[MillieDynamite]

Okay, enough. I've just checked back in and now I'm back out to work.

 

[kreemi_pi]

Q: Why did Uncircumcised LitChatters keep going to the room dedicated to family non con?

A: They were confused by the room name: FORCE KIN

 

[kreemi_pi]

Q: Why did Uncircumcised LitChatters keep going to the room dedicated to family non con?

A: They were confused by the room name: FORCE KIN

Yeah ok, that was a reach

 

[Kelliezgirl]

My point.


































You.

If you didn't read the names of the groups I mentioned, you're either trolling, or you can't read at this point.

I read them all... none of this explains why it is wrong to call out a particular group. We had a specific example, with a specific group responsible.
There is zero logical reason not to name and shame.

 

[NaughteeDragon]

I don’t enjoy most non-con, but occasionally something interesting can be found there. I stumbled into it for a Halloween story I wrote, so I read a few to get a quick handle on the tropes. While not great, I find it preferable to Mind Control. At least in R/NC people are allowed to resist.

 

[kreemi_pi]

Can't we all just laugh at my stupid jokes and get along?

 

[cw5523729]

Can't we all just laugh at my stupid jokes and get along?