Joe Being Investigated For Helping Terrorists Enter The US

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
61,986
NATIONAL SECURITY

Lawmakers Want To Know Why Biden Made It Easier for Terrorists To Enter the US

Adam Kredo • July 8, 2022 2:20 pm

Congressional Republicans on Friday launched a formal probe into the Biden administration over its decision to alter federal law so that individuals tied to terrorist organizations can more easily enter the United States.

The investigation, led by House Armed Services Committee member Jim Banks (R., Ind.), comes on the heels of a Washington Free Beacon report last month that detailed how the administration amended federal immigration law to permit foreigners who provided "insufficient material support" to designated terrorist organizations to receive "immigration benefits or other status" inside America.

The State Department said the law was altered to make it easier for vulnerable Afghans who might have worked with terror groups to find refuge in America, but current and former U.S. officials who spoke to the Free Beacon said the rule is so broadly written that it could also apply to those who worked with al Qaeda or Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), the country's paramilitary fighting force that has killed hundreds of Americans.

"These loose and overly broad definitions will open the floodgates for supporters of terrorism to enter the United States," Banks and three Republican colleagues wrote in a letter to the White House that was obtained exclusively by the Free Beacon. "Such a general waiver, if implemented, would create additional difficulty in immigration vetting process, have catastrophic consequences on border security and put American families at increased risk from terrorism."

The lawmakers—Banks and Reps. Claudia Tenney (R., N.Y.), Greg Steube (R., Fla.), and Rob Wittman (R., Va.)—want the administration to provide Congress with information about whether this rule change was implemented as a concession to Iran meant to entice the country into inking a revamped version of the 2015 nuclear accord.

More here: https://freebeacon.com/national-sec...ade-it-easier-for-terrorists-to-enter-the-us/
 
Good political stunt for the GOP ahead of midterms.
 
Then I’m assuming the Biden admin made it easier for Afghan refugees who did some petty jobs for the taliban/Al qaeda under threat of death or family harm to enter the US and get some help.
 
Then I’m assuming the Biden admin made it easier for Afghan refugees who did some petty jobs for the taliban/Al qaeda under threat of death or family harm to enter the US and get some help.
"but current and former U.S. officials who spoke to the Free Beacon said the rule is so broadly written that it could also apply to those who worked with al Qaeda or Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), the country's paramilitary fighting force that has killed hundreds of Americans."

Read the article.
 
Anonymous sources were once wrong and now they're right....weird.
 
"but current and former U.S. officials who spoke to the Free Beacon said the rule is so broadly written that it could also apply to those who worked with al Qaeda or Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), the country's paramilitary fighting force that has killed hundreds of Americans."

Read the article.

Yes, anonymous sources who claim a thing. I guess we’ll find out, but I certainly don’t trust the free beacon to be fair and unbiased.
 
Yes, anonymous sources who claim a thing. I guess we’ll find out, but I certainly don’t trust the free beacon to be fair and unbiased.
Stay ignorant. Keep thinking everyone is full of shit except CNN. I don't give a shit.
 
Stay ignorant. Keep thinking everyone is full of shit except CNN. I don't give a shit.

You‘re funny. You listen only to your Uber right peg the needle sources that omit and distort and tell you what you want to hear, confirming your bias. Then claim all other sources are AOC level left.

CNN skews left, unlike your sources on the right. And you rejected the unbiased sources I linked yesterday, which contradicts your oft claimed “argue the points, don’t dismiss the article”.

And you are wrong ALL THE DAMN TIME, and when you’re beat down in a thread you just disappear only to pop up in another thread with some other crazy shit. So, expect to be mocked and laughed at. Not the first time I’ve noted this, but you’re pretty close to a performance art alt. Which, if is the case, well done! And on that note, I miss Mike Yates.
 
You‘re funny. You listen only to your Uber right peg the needle sources that omit and distort and tell you what you want to hear, confirming your bias. Then claim all other sources are AOC level left.

CNN skews left, unlike your sources on the right. And you rejected the unbiased sources I linked yesterday, which contradicts your oft claimed “argue the points, don’t dismiss the article”.

And you are wrong ALL THE DAMN TIME, and when you’re beat down in a thread you just disappear only to pop up in another thread with some other crazy shit. So, expect to be mocked and laughed at. Not the first time I’ve noted this, but you’re pretty close to a performance art alt. Which, if is the case, well done! And on that note, I miss Mike Yates.
Show me what was omitted and distorted and why the article isn't true. You've never beat me down on any subject. You aren't smart enough.

Who the fuck is Mike Yates? I'll wait.
 
and when you’re beat down in a thread you just disappear only to pop up in another thread with some other crazy shit.

rofl

Not the first time I’ve noted this, but you’re pretty close to a performance art alt. Which, if is the case, well done! And on that note, I miss Mike Yates.
I'm actually starting to think that too
 
Back
Top