jesse watters: a woman needs to have married and have been pregnant to be considered 'ripe' enough for presidency

butters

High on a Hill
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Posts
84,451
wthf?

During Thursday night's episode of Fox News’ "The Five," Watters discussed the possibility of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) one day running for president.

"With age comes wisdom and she’s pretty young. That’s my nice way of saying she’s not very smart," Watters told his "The Five" co-hosts.
Watters acknowledged Rep. Ocasio-Cortez's engagement, adding "then you have to get pregnant."
"Why?" Greg Gutfeld, a "The Five" co-host, asked Watters.

"This is how it goes. Just follow me, Greg. You get married. Then you get pregnant and then once you have the baby, you have a family and the media loves it," Watters explained. "They eat it up. And it makes you more of a mature person."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...sedgntp&cvid=9bdafd52b9e34e58aa5cbfd6a510b5ed
 
And a man needs to know how it is to be poor, not to be able to feed his children their next meal, and to be paid less than women for whatever work he does before he can appreciate his responsibilities in elective office.
 
Jesse is right on this. There is a reason why campaign strategists like photo ops of their clients with their spouses, children, and grandkids.
 
Jesse is right on this. There is a reason why campaign strategists like photo ops of their clients with their spouses, children, and grandkids.


One of my former law partners, a homosexual male Liberal, found a divorced woman with two young kids to marry through the Party before running for Parliament.

He went on to be a Cabinet Minister.

Had he run as a single homo he would never have been elected.
 
He wasn't talking about her making it to the white house. He was denegrating her as a woman.

He fucked over his first wife and has no respect for women
His comments spoke to his personal opinion of her intelligence and maturity as well as how the media treats the family aspect of politicians with national aspirations. Certainly her constituents in the Bronx think she’s smart and mature. Lol. Maybe you too. But he’s right that she’s not ripe enough to be taken seriously as a national candidate.
 
His comments spoke to his personal opinion of her intelligence and maturity as well as how the media treats the family aspect of politicians with national aspirations. Certainly her constituents in the Bronx think she’s smart and mature. Lol. Maybe you too. But he’s right that she’s not ripe enough to be taken seriously as a national candidate.
His personal opinion is that women should be subordinate to men and cannot be taken seriously as a candidate until they give their man a family.

Yes, I got that.
 
His personal opinion is that women should be subordinate to men and cannot be taken seriously as a candidate until they give their man a family.

Yes, I got that.
You disagree with his personal opinion. That’s fine. But surely you realize AOC is not mature or smart enough (or as Jessie put it, “ripe” enough) to be taken seriously as a national candidate.
 
You disagree with his personal opinion. That’s fine. But surely you realize AOC is not mature or smart enough (or as Jessie put it, “ripe” enough) to be taken seriously as a national candidate.
Yes, I do...be cause his baseline is.based.on his opinion of women rather than his opinion of her

AOC is just.a.target....not.an actual person to him

She can run and win if she runs a good campaign

She'll be qualified if she runs.
 
The United States elected a homosexual man (James Buchannen) to the Presidency 165 years ago.The women have waited a long time but there's time and talent enough for at least three women to be elected before AOC. She needs some substantive achievement to her name.

Watters is an ass - but that's a given.
 
Not electable. Not happening.
Speculation on your part.

Polls have shown her to have a higher positive, than negative favorability rating. That is reflect by party too. Among Republicans she has a low approval level, but of course the Democratic supports outweighs that. Thus the overall positive approval rating.

Still none of that is what matters. What does is gaining the donors. Cash is needed to run for President, ton's of it. If she can garner that type of dollar brokers, then yes she could run, and could win. I could see the Democrats electing her as their Presidential candidate. Despite your "not happening" claim, you only get one vote out of 170 million or so on that November day...
 
Speculation on your part.

Polls have shown her to have a higher positive, than negative favorability rating. That is reflect by party too. Among Republicans she has a low approval level, but of course the Democratic supports outweighs that. Thus the overall positive approval rating.

Still none of that is what matters. What does is gaining the donors. Cash is needed to run for President, ton's of it. If she can garner that type of dollar brokers, then yes she could run, and could win. I could see the Democrats electing her as their Presidential candidate. Despite your "not happening" claim, you only get one vote out of 170 million or so on that November day...
You and 1174 can check back with me next year.
 
Back
Top