Japanese is thirsty for taking a nuclear bomb

[gxnn]

Japanese female Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi calls for military intervention in the event of a Chinese military unification of Taiwan, remaining unrepentant after a strong response from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

It is a barefaced provocation by a defeated country of World War II towards a victorious country. Japanese politicians really underestimate the determination and capability of the Chinese people. They are still living in 1931; they don't even remember how they failed when facing a weakened China in 1945, nor do they understand the combat effectiveness China demonstrated in the Korean War. It seems she is preparing Japan to accept a third nuclear bomb.

It's quite strange that in a country where machismo prevails and women's status is low, a woman should become the head of government. It's also amusing that Japan once had a female defense minister—was she being asked to shoot a porn film in which she is in a uniform? It is well known that Japanese porn film is under the censorship of FBI. Without the FBI warnings placed before the film, the quality of the film is low with key scenes blurred with mosaic. But American people usually just ask police officers to participate in such adult role-playing, without involving the member of military forces.

 

[LLCox]

no

 

[ChloeTzang]

Japanese female Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi calls for military intervention in the event of a Chinese military unification of Taiwan, remaining unrepentant after a strong response from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

It is a barefaced provocation by a defeated country of World War II towards a victorious country. Japanese politicians really underestimate the determination and capability of the Chinese people. They are still living in 1931; they don't even remember how they failed when facing a weakened China in 1945, nor do they understand the combat effectiveness China demonstrated in the Korean War. It seems she is preparing Japan to accept a third nuclear bomb.

It's quite strange that in a country where machismo prevails and women's status is low, a woman should become the head of government. It's also amusing that Japan once had a female defense minister—was she being asked to shoot a porn film in which she is in a uniform? It is well known that Japanese porn film is under the censorship of FBI. Without the FBI warnings placed before the film, the quality of the film is low with key scenes blurred with mosaic. But American people usually just ask police officers to participate in such adult role-playing, without involving the member of military forces.

Multiple issues, of which China's aggressive posture is one.
# North Korea
# Trump has illustrated the USA's unreliability as an ally. End result: Japan needs to build u its military and nukes as insurance
# Taiwan is a major issue for Japan should China invade or take n even more aggressive posture
# Russia- Russia still occupies Japanese territories, just as Russia still occupiie straditional parts of China across the Amur

 

[Rebel5soul]

China's 'thirsty' for a few hundred nuclear bombs. BOOM goes Beijing, BOOM goes Shanghai, we'll save Hong Kong because they never wanted to be part of your Communist nightmare to begin with.

 

[gxnn]

China's 'thirsty' fCome revisit the great achievements and outstanding performances of your ancestors.or a few hundred nuclear bombs. BOOM goes Beijing, BOOM goes Shanghai, we'll save Hong Kong because they never wanted to be part of your Communist nightmare to begin with.

Can you tell me which country you're from, bro? Do you even know you're talking nonsense? Are you sure the alcohol you've been drinking recently isn't fake? The so-called superpowers you're talking about would make even Marvel authors exaggerate less than you.

Saving Hong Kong? So it seems you're a John Bull? With the current overall national strength of your country Britain, be careful that one day India might replace your permanent seat on the UN Security Council. Come revisit the great achievements and outstanding performances of your ancestors. Battle of New Orleans

 

[gxnn]

no

Your answer seems overly simple at first glance, but it actually contains extremely rich content. It gives the impression of saying a lot, yet in reality, it says nothing. It's truly a masterstroke that is flexible and adaptable—able to advance when attacking and retreat when defending, appearing as a person in front but a ghost behind the back.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Can you tell me which country you're from, bro? Do you even know you're talking nonsense? Are you sure the alcohol you've been drinking recently isn't fake? The so-called superpowers you're talking about would make even Marvel authors exaggerate less than you.

Saving Hong Kong? So it seems you're a John Bull? With the current overall national strength of your country Britain, be careful that one day India might replace your permanent seat on the UN Security Council. Come revisit the great achievements and outstanding performances of your ancestors. Battle of New Orleans

Bad editing on your part.

 

[LLCox]

Your answer seems overly simple at first glance, but it actually contains extremely rich content. It gives the impression of saying a lot, yet in reality, it says nothing. It's truly a masterstroke that is flexible and adaptable—able to advance when attacking and retreat when defending, appearing as a person in front but a ghost behind the back.

In America no means no, honey.

 

[Bn2f]

Japanese female Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi calls for military intervention in the event of a Chinese military unification of Taiwan, remaining unrepentant after a strong response from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

It is a barefaced provocation by a defeated country of World War II towards a victorious country. Japanese politicians really underestimate the determination and capability of the Chinese people. They are still living in 1931; they don't even remember how they failed when facing a weakened China in 1945, nor do they understand the combat effectiveness China demonstrated in the Korean War. It seems she is preparing Japan to accept a third nuclear bomb.

It's quite strange that in a country where machismo prevails and women's status is low, a woman should become the head of government. It's also amusing that Japan once had a female defense minister—was she being asked to shoot a porn film in which she is in a uniform? It is well known that Japanese porn film is under the censorship of FBI. Without the FBI warnings placed before the film, the quality of the film is low with key scenes blurred with mosaic. But American people usually just ask police officers to participate in such adult role-playing, without involving the member of military forces.

I, for one, am fascinated and would like to hear more of your critiques on the manufacturing of porn in every individual country.

 

[Rightguide]

Japanese female Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi calls for military intervention in the event of a Chinese military unification of Taiwan, remaining unrepentant after a strong response from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

It is a barefaced provocation by a defeated country of World War II towards a victorious country. Japanese politicians really underestimate the determination and capability of the Chinese people. They are still living in 1931; they don't even remember how they failed when facing a weakened China in 1945, nor do they understand the combat effectiveness China demonstrated in the Korean War. It seems she is preparing Japan to accept a third nuclear bomb.

It's quite strange that in a country where machismo prevails and women's status is low, a woman should become the head of government. It's also amusing that Japan once had a female defense minister—was she being asked to shoot a porn film in which she is in a uniform? It is well known that Japanese porn film is under the censorship of FBI. Without the FBI warnings placed before the film, the quality of the film is low with key scenes blurred with mosaic. But American people usually just ask police officers to participate in such adult role-playing, without involving the member of military forces.

This is an impressive collection of bad history, nationalist cosplay, and whatever that last paragraph was supposed to be. Let’s get after it.

First, Japan isn’t “provoking” China by stating what every serious nation already acknowledges: a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would destabilize the entire region, trigger treaty obligations, and drag half the Pacific into a war Beijing claims it doesn't want. That’s not “1931 thinking.” That’s 2025 geopolitics, where Japan actually has a modern military, a functioning economy, and allies, not a handful of battleships and a death cult.

Second, your WWII victory celebration is cute, but irrelevant. The world does not run on who beat whom 80 or more years ago. If it did, China would still be sending tribute to the Mongols and Japan would be asking the U.S. for permission to buy light bulbs.

Third, the Korean War? The one where China took "catastrophic" casualties just to push the line back to almost the same spot and then spent seventy years pretending that was a grand triumph? Bold choice to cite that one.

Fourth, the nuclear BS: If you think any modern conflict would play out like 1945, with only one side glowing in the dark, you’ve mistaken geopolitics for fan fiction. No one sane wants that outcome, including Japan. But threatening nuclear annihilation every time someone disagrees with Beijing is exactly why Japan and half of Asia are rearming.

Finally, the weird porn tangent, what happened there? You went from grand strategy to “FBI warns Japanese porn” in one breath. With that level of analysis, it's no wonder every point before it sounded like it was drafted in an opium den.
.

 

[eric_erosfan]

This is an impressive collection of bad history, nationalist cosplay, and whatever that last paragraph was supposed to be. Let’s get after it.

First, Japan isn’t “provoking” China by stating what every serious nation already acknowledges: a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would destabilize the entire region, trigger treaty obligations, and drag half the Pacific into a war Beijing claims it doesn't want. That’s not “1931 thinking.” That’s 2025 geopolitics, where Japan actually has a modern military, a functioning economy, and allies, not a handful of battleships and a death cult.

Second, your WWII victory celebration is cute, but irrelevant. The world does not run on who beat whom 80 or more years ago. If it did, China would still be sending tribute to the Mongols and Japan would be asking the U.S. for permission to buy light bulbs.

Third, the Korean War? The one where China took "catastrophic" casualties just to push the line back to almost the same spot and then spent seventy years pretending that was a grand triumph? Bold choice to cite that one.

Fourth, the nuclear BS: If you think any modern conflict would play out like 1945, with only one side glowing in the dark, you’ve mistaken geopolitics for fan fiction. No one sane wants that outcome, including Japan. But threatening nuclear annihilation every time someone disagrees with Beijing is exactly why Japan and half of Asia are rearming.

Finally, the weird porn tangent, what happened there? You went from grand strategy to “FBI warns Japanese porn” in one breath. With that level of analysis, it's no wonder every point before it sounded like it was drafted in an opium den.
.

Geez. I agree with Rightguide??

But I don't think this is a serious account.

 

[Chernosoth]

Japan has nuclear energy plants, which have never been profitable anywhere. In the US, electricity is a side hustle for nuke plants making bomb fuel. Since Japan has the radioactive waste, they might as well start using some of it to make bombs, until the next catastrophic accident that makes another city uninhabitable for decades or centuries.

 

[gxnn]

This is an impressive collection of bad history, nationalist cosplay, and whatever that last paragraph was supposed to be. Let’s get after it.

First, Japan isn’t “provoking” China by stating what every serious nation already acknowledges: a Chinese invasion of Taiwan would destabilize the entire region, trigger treaty obligations, and drag half the Pacific into a war Beijing claims it doesn't want. That’s not “1931 thinking.” That’s 2025 geopolitics, where Japan actually has a modern military, a functioning economy, and allies, not a handful of battleships and a death cult.

Second, your WWII victory celebration is cute, but irrelevant. The world does not run on who beat whom 80 or more years ago. If it did, China would still be sending tribute to the Mongols and Japan would be asking the U.S. for permission to buy light bulbs.

Third, the Korean War? The one where China took "catastrophic" casualties just to push the line back to almost the same spot and then spent seventy years pretending that was a grand triumph? Bold choice to cite that one.

Fourth, the nuclear BS: If you think any modern conflict would play out like 1945, with only one side glowing in the dark, you’ve mistaken geopolitics for fan fiction. No one sane wants that outcome, including Japan. But threatening nuclear annihilation every time someone disagrees with Beijing is exactly why Japan and half of Asia are rearming.

Finally, the weird porn tangent, what happened there? You went from grand strategy to “FBI warns Japanese porn” in one breath. With that level of analysis, it's no wonder every point before it sounded like it was drafted in an opium den.
.

First, we must acknowledge that your analysis is expert-level—at the very least comparable to that of the Smithsonian Institution, if not on par with Goldman Sachs. In contrast, our statements are primarily based on fragmented information scattered across newspapers or self-media, which is roughly at the level of a fifth-grade education. However, it cannot be denied that this represents the cognition of ordinary people. Following I will try to discuss with you point by point following the outline you listed above.

In China's official media during the 1950s to 1980s, strong-toned statements were often published on liberation of Taiwan. However, starting in 1992, various positions began to soften, enhancing communication and exchanges between the two sides, with civilian activities also intensified. Therefore, China does not have the motivation to take military action unless the other side across the Taiwan Strait repeatedly puts forward slogans aiming to change the status quo by relying on external forces. Taiwan has made much profit from doing business with the mainland, yet it tries to deny the fact. Such an ingratitude is the reason why it is seeking undue troubles.

You may not remember how World War II was initiated. The main reason was that the victorious countries of World War I relaxed their supervision over the defeated country Germany. Your logic is also inappropriate. The main reason why the United States can now station troops in Japan is because it complies with the relevant treaties signed after World War II. In addition, according to the same treaties, China also has the right to station troops in Japan, but it was not effectively implemented at that time due to China's weak national strength. After the end of World War II, both Germany and Italy conducted profound reflections on the crimes their countries committed during the war. However, Japan has never admitted its mistakes, especially regarding its aggressions against China and Southeast Asia, and the heinous Nanjing Massacre. Instead, Japan has been covering up and beautifying these crimes by revising history textbooks. Therefore, it is very necessary for the international community to strengthen supervision over Japan. If China were to implement the treaty of Yalta now, it should also be in line with the regulations of the United Nations, and sending troops to Japan at that time would be justified.

According to the statistics and criteria of both China and the United States, it is hard to say who won or lost the Korean War; at the very least, it was a draw. Our records show that the Chinese and North Korean sides faced off against the United Nations Command, which was led by the United States and composed of 17 countries. Moreover, according to Chairman Mao's view, if imperialism could have defeated you, it would not have sat down to negotiate with you. Besides, you should know that China had just concluded a three-year civil war on the mainland, while the United States had rested for five years after the end of World War II in 1945.


The issue of using nuclear weapons is indeed somewhat hasty. After all, major national decisions are made by the highest leadership, but public opinion is as such. You should know that there have been many countries that have fought against China in history, but no country has ever made the entire Chinese people feel so resentful like Japan. Many people say that when it comes to fighting Japan they don't need mobilization; that they would donate all my property and even my life, so we cannot rule out such extreme situation where A-bombs are used.

The last paragraph says that the Japanese are very hypocritical. They have produced so many adult films, yet they add so many mosaics to them. Many experienced people will notice that only those adult films with an FBI warning at the beginning are the real ones, because there are no mosaics blocking normal viewing and listening. The Japanese have to get American approval even to make a film, which is somewhat similar to what you mentioned earlier about them needing American approval to buy a light bulb.

 

[eric_erosfan]

First, we must acknowledge that your analysis is expert-level—at the very least comparable to that of the Smithsonian Institution, if not on par with Goldman Sachs. In contrast, our statements are primarily based on fragmented information scattered across newspapers or self-media, which is roughly at the level of a fifth-grade education. However, it cannot be denied that this represents the cognition of ordinary people. Following I will try to discuss with you point by point following the outline you listed above.

In China's official media during the 1950s to 1980s, strong-toned statements were often published on liberation of Taiwan. However, starting in 1992, various positions began to soften, enhancing communication and exchanges between the two sides, with civilian activities also intensified. Therefore, China does not have the motivation to take military action unless the other side across the Taiwan Strait repeatedly puts forward slogans aiming to change the status quo by relying on external forces. Taiwan has made much profit from doing business with the mainland, yet it tries to deny the fact. Such an ingratitude is the reason why it is seeking undue troubles.

You may not remember how World War II was initiated. The main reason was that the victorious countries of World War I relaxed their supervision over the defeated country Germany. Your logic is also inappropriate. The main reason why the United States can now station troops in Japan is because it complies with the relevant treaties signed after World War II. In addition, according to the same treaties, China also has the right to station troops in Japan, but it was not effectively implemented at that time due to China's weak national strength. After the end of World War II, both Germany and Italy conducted profound reflections on the crimes their countries committed during the war. However, Japan has never admitted its mistakes, especially regarding its aggressions against China and Southeast Asia, and the heinous Nanjing Massacre. Instead, Japan has been covering up and beautifying these crimes by revising history textbooks. Therefore, it is very necessary for the international community to strengthen supervision over Japan. If China were to implement the treaty of Yalta now, it should also be in line with the regulations of the United Nations, and sending troops to Japan at that time would be justified.

According to the statistics and criteria of both China and the United States, it is hard to say who won or lost the Korean War; at the very least, it was a draw. Our records show that the Chinese and North Korean sides faced off against the United Nations Command, which was led by the United States and composed of 17 countries. Moreover, according to Chairman Mao's view, if imperialism could have defeated you, it would not have sat down to negotiate with you. Besides, you should know that China had just concluded a three-year civil war on the mainland, while the United States had rested for five years after the end of World War II in 1945.


The issue of using nuclear weapons is indeed somewhat hasty. After all, major national decisions are made by the highest leadership, but public opinion is as such. You should know that there have been many countries that have fought against China in history, but no country has ever made the entire Chinese people feel so resentful like Japan. Many people say that when it comes to fighting Japan they don't need mobilization; that they would donate all my property and even my life, so we cannot rule out such extreme situation where A-bombs are used.

The last paragraph says that the Japanese are very hypocritical. They have produced so many adult films, yet they add so many mosaics to them. Many experienced people will notice that only those adult films with an FBI warning at the beginning are the real ones, because there are no mosaics blocking normal viewing and listening. The Japanese have to get American approval even to make a film, which is somewhat similar to what you mentioned earlier about them needing American approval to buy a light bulb.

This is a troll account right? It is common knowledge that Japanese porn made for domestic consumption (inside Japan) must be censored to comply with Japanese laws prohibiting the explicit display of genitalia in movies. Japanese porn that is produced for export outside of Japan is not subject to that censorship.

 

[gxnn]

This is a troll account right? It is common knowledge that Japanese porn made for domestic consumption (inside Japan) must be censored to comply with Japanese laws prohibiting the explicit display of genitalia in movies. Japanese porn that is produced for export outside of Japan is not subject to that censorship.

Of course not. Thank you for the introduction. As you know, China has not a very good relation with Japan. So it is normal there are many things in Japan that we in China do not know very well. All Japanese and American people are human beings, why do their democratic governments apply double standard to them?

 

[Rightguide]

Japan has nuclear energy plants, which have never been profitable anywhere. In the US, electricity is a side hustle for nuke plants making bomb fuel. Since Japan has the radioactive waste, they might as well start using some of it to make bombs, until the next catastrophic accident that makes another city uninhabitable for decades or centuries.

This is the kind of comment that sounds bold until you look at it for more than three seconds and realize it’s held together with YouTube conspiracy glue and vibes. Nuclear plants “never profitable anywhere”? Tell that to France, which powers its entire country with them and somehow isn’t bankrupt or secretly running a bomb factory behind every baguette. And the idea that U.S. nuclear plants are just “side hustles” for bomb fuel is so scientifically illiterate it should come with its own nuclear literacy warning.

Japan “might as well” make bombs because they have waste? That’s not how nuclear fuel cycles work, that’s how someone who failed high-school chemistry thinks they work. Also, Japan, the only country ever nuked, has some of the strongest anti-nuclear-weapon sentiment on Earth. But sure, tell us more about your fan-fiction geopolitics. And invoking “another catastrophic accident” like it’s inevitable is way off. Modern reactors aren’t 1970s Soviet engineering projects held together by hope and vodka.

 

[Rightguide]

First, we must acknowledge that your analysis is expert-level—at the very least comparable to that of the Smithsonian Institution, if not on par with Goldman Sachs. In contrast, our statements are primarily based on fragmented information scattered across newspapers or self-media, which is roughly at the level of a fifth-grade education. However, it cannot be denied that this represents the cognition of ordinary people. Following I will try to discuss with you point by point following the outline you listed above.

In China's official media during the 1950s to 1980s, strong-toned statements were often published on liberation of Taiwan. However, starting in 1992, various positions began to soften, enhancing communication and exchanges between the two sides, with civilian activities also intensified. Therefore, China does not have the motivation to take military action unless the other side across the Taiwan Strait repeatedly puts forward slogans aiming to change the status quo by relying on external forces. Taiwan has made much profit from doing business with the mainland, yet it tries to deny the fact. Such an ingratitude is the reason why it is seeking undue troubles.

You may not remember how World War II was initiated. The main reason was that the victorious countries of World War I relaxed their supervision over the defeated country Germany. Your logic is also inappropriate. The main reason why the United States can now station troops in Japan is because it complies with the relevant treaties signed after World War II. In addition, according to the same treaties, China also has the right to station troops in Japan, but it was not effectively implemented at that time due to China's weak national strength. After the end of World War II, both Germany and Italy conducted profound reflections on the crimes their countries committed during the war. However, Japan has never admitted its mistakes, especially regarding its aggressions against China and Southeast Asia, and the heinous Nanjing Massacre. Instead, Japan has been covering up and beautifying these crimes by revising history textbooks. Therefore, it is very necessary for the international community to strengthen supervision over Japan. If China were to implement the treaty of Yalta now, it should also be in line with the regulations of the United Nations, and sending troops to Japan at that time would be justified.

According to the statistics and criteria of both China and the United States, it is hard to say who won or lost the Korean War; at the very least, it was a draw. Our records show that the Chinese and North Korean sides faced off against the United Nations Command, which was led by the United States and composed of 17 countries. Moreover, according to Chairman Mao's view, if imperialism could have defeated you, it would not have sat down to negotiate with you. Besides, you should know that China had just concluded a three-year civil war on the mainland, while the United States had rested for five years after the end of World War II in 1945.


The issue of using nuclear weapons is indeed somewhat hasty. After all, major national decisions are made by the highest leadership, but public opinion is as such. You should know that there have been many countries that have fought against China in history, but no country has ever made the entire Chinese people feel so resentful like Japan. Many people say that when it comes to fighting Japan they don't need mobilization; that they would donate all my property and even my life, so we cannot rule out such extreme situation where A-bombs are used.

The last paragraph says that the Japanese are very hypocritical. They have produced so many adult films, yet they add so many mosaics to them. Many experienced people will notice that only those adult films with an FBI warning at the beginning are the real ones, because there are no mosaics blocking normal viewing and listening. The Japanese have to get American approval even to make a film, which is somewhat similar to what you mentioned earlier about them needing American approval to buy a light bulb.

Your response reads like a museum tour through state-approved mythology rather than an analysis of real geopolitics. China’s “lack of motivation” to use force is contradicted by its own military white papers, daily PLA sorties violating Taiwan’s ADIZ, and Beijing’s explicit refusal to renounce force, none of which are caused by Taiwanese “ingratitude,” but by China’s political need to absorb Taiwan regardless of what Taiwan wants. Taiwan doesn’t “change the status quo” by existing; Beijing changes it every time it asserts ownership over 23 million people who have repeatedly and democratically rejected that claim. And invoking World War II as a justification for modern control over Japan ignores that post-war treaties do not grant China any standing to station troops in Japan today, nor does victimhood from 80 years ago give Beijing a blank check to supervise another sovereign state. This isn’t moral reasoning, it’s historical cosplay.

The sections on Korea and nuclear weapons only underline the problem: national pride is being mistaken for strategic logic. The Korean War was not a “draw” because Mao said so; it was a brutal stalemate that cost China far more proportionally than the U.S., and it ended in negotiations precisely because escalation would have triggered nuclear consequences both sides wanted to avoid—not because “imperialism couldn’t defeat you.” And the idea that “public resentment” makes nuclear attacks on Japan conceivable isn’t an explanation, it’s an indictment. If your argument is that emotional nationalism justifies nuclear war and historical revisionism, you aren’t describing a stabilizing power, you’re proving why China’s neighbors arm themselves. As for the porn-mosaic tangent: if your geopolitical reasoning collapses into complaints about censorship in adult films, it might be time to rethink the argument entirely.

Since you brought up Korea, let's visit a historic aspect of what happened there. The Battle of the Chosin Reservoir could absolutely stand alongside the Battle of Thermopylae, and in several ways surpasses it. At Thermopylae, a small elite force held off a massive army until they were overwhelmed. At Chosin, the 1st Marine Division, outnumbered 4-to-1, fighting in –30° cold, surrounded in brutal mountain terrain, not only held their lines, but fought in every direction, broke out, rescued thousands, and delivered a successful fighting withdrawal. In that process tens of thousands of Chinese soldiers were killed or incapacitated at Chosin. Some historians even suggest the entire 9th Army Group was rendered combat ineffective for months afterward. Thermopylae was a heroic last stand. Chosin was a heroic last stand and a breakout, a rescue, and a refusal to die. If anything, Thermopylae isn’t a mere comparison; it’s the ancient world’s version of Chosin.

 

[gxnn]

When you were conducting your geopolitical analysis, you overlooked the most important point: Taiwan has always been an inalienable part of China. Back in the 17th century when the Qing forces marched south and seized more than half of the Ming dynasty's territory of the now mainland China, the remnants of the Ming army still fought hard to recapture Taiwan from the Dutch, which clearly demonstrates its significance to the Chinese people.

After the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalists or Kuomintang retreated to Taiwan. The Communists were unable to pursue their victory immediately, mainly due to insufficient technology and capabilities, as well as the outbreak of the Korean War, which disrupted related military plans and prevented them from being implemented on schedule. This does not mean that they were willing to accept the reality of national division.

On this basis, what you said about the People's Liberation Army harassing Taiwan cannot stand, because it has always been part of China, just temporarily under the rule of another political party. The Kuomintang based in Taiwan also boasted of counterattacking the mainland and unifying China with the aid of the US in the past. If Taiwan always believes it is part of China and does not seek independence, the aircraft and warships here would not conduct various exercises targeting it.

Regarding the Korean War, both you and I have also conducted reasonable analyses based on the limited information we have access to. Both sides have certain points of reason, of course, but there is also a certain amount of subjectivity involved. After all, no one can truly face failure objectively and calmly; people always find some excuses for themselves, which is understandable.

However, it must also be acknowledged that Chinese people, especially contemporary young people, generally lack logical reasoning abilities. This is because the environment in which they have long lived does not encourage independent thinking, nor does it promote genuine rational judgment. Additionally, they do not have any special ability to obtain more information that differs from mainstream views.

Please do not ignore the power of the group. Things you personally consider foolish can become very reasonable when done collectively, because different people can achieve their own diverse needs through the same cause. Otherwise, there would be no Auschwitz Holocaust of Jews, no Cultural Revolution, and no 'Make America Great Again'. @Rightguide

 

[Strixaluco]

the most important point: Taiwan has always been an inalienable part of China.

You really expect international audience to think that's a valid reasoning?

What Taiwanese think is important, and they do not want to be Chinese. And that makes the Chinese opinion unimportant in the matter. There's no such thing as "inalienable part".

You can't use history and your wants to justify invading Taiwan any more than history justifies Russias attempt to invade Ukraine.

 

[Rightguide]

When you were conducting your geopolitical analysis, you overlooked the most important point: Taiwan has always been an inalienable part of China. Back in the 17th century when the Qing forces marched south and seized more than half of the Ming dynasty's territory of the now mainland China, the remnants of the Ming army still fought hard to recapture Taiwan from the Dutch, which clearly demonstrates its significance to the Chinese people.

After the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalists or Kuomintang retreated to Taiwan. The Communists were unable to pursue their victory immediately, mainly due to insufficient technology and capabilities, as well as the outbreak of the Korean War, which disrupted related military plans and prevented them from being implemented on schedule. This does not mean that they were willing to accept the reality of national division.

Yes, Taiwan has always been part of China, but China wasn’t always the communist chokehold it is today. Before Mao turned the mainland into a totalitarian experiment, there were millions, led by figures like Chiang Kai-shek, who fought, bled, and yearned for a China that embraced order, nationhood, and genuine freedom. The Chinese people weren’t destined for authoritarian rule; they were caught in a historic struggle between two visions of their future. One side wanted centralized ideological control, and the other, flawed as it was, sought a China that could stand strong without crushing the soul of its own people.

Taiwan stands today as one of Asia’s strongest examples of freedom, economic vitality, and democratic resilience, a nation built by people who refused to let authoritarianism define China’s destiny. Its cutting-edge economy, powered by world-leading semiconductor production, high-tech innovation, and a fiercely educated population, makes it a geopolitical giant far beyond its size. And despite Beijing’s threats, Taiwan would be nightmarishly difficult to invade: rugged coastlines, limited beaches for landings, brutal weather patterns, mountainous terrain ideal for defense, and a highly trained military backed by a population that has zero intention of trading liberty for tyranny. Any attempt to capture it wouldn’t be a swift victory, it would be a historic disaster.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Yes, Taiwan has always been part of China, but China wasn’t always the communist chokehold it is today. Before Mao turned the mainland into a totalitarian experiment, there were millions, led by figures like Chiang Kai-shek, who fought, bled, and yearned for a China that embraced order, nationhood, and genuine freedom. The Chinese people weren’t destined for authoritarian rule; they were caught in a historic struggle between two visions of their future. One side wanted centralized ideological control, and the other, flawed as it was, sought a China that could stand strong without crushing the soul of its own people.

Taiwan stands today as one of Asia’s strongest examples of freedom, economic vitality, and democratic resilience, a nation built by people who refused to let authoritarianism define China’s destiny. Its cutting-edge economy, powered by world-leading semiconductor production, high-tech innovation, and a fiercely educated population, makes it a geopolitical giant far beyond its size. And despite Beijing’s threats, Taiwan would be nightmarishly difficult to invade: rugged coastlines, limited beaches for landings, brutal weather patterns, mountainous terrain ideal for defense, and a highly trained military backed by a population that has zero intention of trading liberty for tyranny. Any attempt to capture it wouldn’t be a swift victory, it would be a historic disaster.

And that is exactly why the CCP has to crush it just as they did Hong Kong. It's a living spotlight on their own failures, an embarrassment.

 

[Chernosoth]

Taiwan has always been an inalienable part of China.

China is not always a single nation. When it breaks up into smaller nations, city states, etc., Taiwan may merge with one of those, or take some land as a colony.

 

[Rightguide]

Nearly half of Japanese public supports military intervention to defend Taiwan, poll finds
11/17/2025 // Belle Carter

A recent Kyodo News poll reveals that nearly half of Japan's population would support military intervention in defense of Taiwan if tensions with China escalate into open conflict.

The survey, conducted among over 1,000 respondents, found that 48.8% favored Japan exercising its right to self-defense in the event of hostilities in the Taiwan Strait. Meanwhile, 60.4% of participants urged Tokyo to increase military spending to bolster national defense.

The findings follow a notable shift in Japan's official stance, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi declared last week that any Chinese attempt to forcibly reunify Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" under Japan's security laws—potentially justifying military action. Her remarks mark a departure from previous administrations, which avoided explicit commitments on Taiwan.

China swiftly condemned Takaichi's statement, summoning Japan's envoy in Beijing and denouncing the comments as "extremely malicious" and "blatantly provocative." Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian warned Tokyo to retract its position or "bear all the consequences," reaffirming Beijing's stance that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.

More here: https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-11...upports-military-intervention-for-taiwan.html

 

[Rebel5soul]

Nearly half of Japanese public supports military intervention to defend Taiwan, poll finds
11/17/2025 // Belle Carter

A recent Kyodo News poll reveals that nearly half of Japan's population would support military intervention in defense of Taiwan if tensions with China escalate into open conflict.

The survey, conducted among over 1,000 respondents, found that 48.8% favored Japan exercising its right to self-defense in the event of hostilities in the Taiwan Strait. Meanwhile, 60.4% of participants urged Tokyo to increase military spending to bolster national defense.

The findings follow a notable shift in Japan's official stance, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi declared last week that any Chinese attempt to forcibly reunify Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" under Japan's security laws—potentially justifying military action. Her remarks mark a departure from previous administrations, which avoided explicit commitments on Taiwan.

China swiftly condemned Takaichi's statement, summoning Japan's envoy in Beijing and denouncing the comments as "extremely malicious" and "blatantly provocative." Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian warned Tokyo to retract its position or "bear all the consequences," reaffirming Beijing's stance that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China.

More here: https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-11...upports-military-intervention-for-taiwan.html

This sentiment has been building for a while. When I was over in Japan some years ago there was a lot of discussion on the subject. The triggering agent was little rocket boy and his launching over Japanese territory.

Little known fact, Japan is sitting on the largest stockpile of Plutonium in the world and they have the technical capability to go nuclear in 6 months. Their limiting factor is how quickly they can build launch vehicles.

 

[Rightguide]

This sentiment has been building for a while. When I was over in Japan some years ago there was a lot of discussion on the subject. The triggering agent was little rocket boy and his launching over Japanese territory.

Little known fact, Japan is sitting on the largest stockpile of Plutonium in the world and they have the technical capability to go nuclear in 6 months. Their limiting factor is how quickly they can build launch vehicles.

I don't know if Japan has the largest stockpile of plutonium or not. I know that some of it is held in foreign countries and is "civilian grade" not military grade, but that is not to say that technically any plutonium couldn't be used to build a bomb under the right conditions, technically any plutonium could be used to build a bomb under the right conditions. Should Japan decide to pursue nuclear weapons, it would very likely become China’s foremost regional target, given the significant shift in the balance of power and security dynamics in East Asia.