Jamaica Becomes First Country to Volunteer for Military Operation in Haiti

[BeatMan]

Jamaican Prime Minister Andrew Holness said on Tuesday that his country is willing to join a U.N.-proposed multinational military force to intervene in Haiti and fight the criminal gangs that control most of its territory. Jamaica is the first nation to publicly commit troops to the effort.

“Jamaica will be willing to participate in a multinational security assistance deployment to Haiti under the appropriate jurisdictional parameters to support a return to a reasonable level of stability and peace, which would be necessary for any inclusive democratic process to take root,” Holness said in an address to the Jamaican House of Representatives on Tuesday.

https://www.breitbart.com/latin-ame...t-country-volunteer-military-operation-haiti/

 

[SubzeroGirl]

Good for them. A country willing to stand up to the bullies.

 

[oggbashan]

The UK is not willing to line up for a US inspited action after losing too many in Iraq 1 and 2 and Afghanistan and for what? Our troops died to achieve norhing. The US abandoned its alies in Syria - the Kurds, and pulled out of Afgahnistan with no prior warning to its allies, leaving them to organise a hurried withdrawal.

No one trusts the US policiticans anbd military after that.

 

[VinnyVeritas]

It's Voodoo.

It's why the Dominican Republic prospers while Haiti rots.

Thank you Ogg. We really do feel a lot like that towards Britain and your "King."

Why doesn't Britain just send its military and show us how to do it, or is the current reporting correct in that you have let it languish so much that Britain cannot defend itself, let alone anyone else.

 

[oggbashan]

It's Voodoo.

It's why the Dominican Republic prospers while Haiti rots.

Thank you Ogg. We really do feel a lot like that towards Britain and your "King."

Why doesn't Britain just send its military and show us how to do it, or is the current reporting correct in that you have let it languish so much that Britain cannot defend itself, let alone anyone else.

Thanks to the US and its policies during and after WW1, The UK now longer pretends to have a global role. We pay our full share to NATO, which other European countries haven't always done.

We gave money, material and manpower to Iraq 1, 2 and Afghanistan at the US's request and for what? To be tossed aside as unwanted when the US pulled out. Our war memorials show the cost. It is no wonder we are reluctant to engage in anything else the US suggests.

 

[jaF0]

How many fucking times do we have to say it .... Bleitfart is NOT news.

 

[VinnyVeritas]

Thanks to the US and its policies during and after WW1, The UK now longer pretends to have a global role. We pay our full share to NATO, which other European countries haven't always done.

We gave money, material and manpower to Iraq 1, 2 and Afghanistan at the US's request and for what? To be tossed aside as unwanted when the US pulled out. Our war memorials show the cost. It is no wonder we are reluctant to engage in anything else the US suggests.

The US didn't pull out. The "I want to be just like Europe" Left pulled out. Your beef is properly with them. But we all look alike to you.

 

[oggbashan]

President 45 abnnouced the withdrawal without telling his allies first. President 46 just casrried out the announcement by 45.

Either way it was a clusterfuck that left the US's allies having to go along with an untrealistic timetable. We don't trust the US (either side of politicians) because of Afghanistan.

 

[VinnyVeritas]

President 45 controlled 46's puppet strings?

 

[oggbashan]

President 45 controlled 46's puppet strings?

I have no idea, but the effect was the same. 45 announced the withdrawal. 46 continued with it.

 

[VinnyVeritas]

Once he was sworn in, he could have called it off, but it would have pissed off his base and lame-ducked him instantly.

 

[oggbashan]

We paid a high proice for supporting the US. 457 UK military deaths in Afghanistan. Cost above normal military expenditure £22.7 billion. For what?

So the Afghan women and girls are denied education?

How does the US think it can smash Haiti's gangs when it can't stop US based gangs?

 

[jaF0]

Haiti is a gang infested wasteland that has no government, industry or economy. I can easily ignore it as it is the product of its own internal failures over many decades.


But I guarantee one way the US will become interested is if China does.

 

[Rightguide]

How many fucking times do we have to say it .... Bleitfart is NOT news.

Say it for as long as you wish to be seen as blind and ignorant.

 

[oggbashan]

Or like Rightguide who only notices the news if it supports his view.

Jamaica, like the US, has gang problems. If they can't fix their own, how can they fix Haiti's?

 

[jaF0]

I don't believe they can. I think there's probably some money involved.

DR isn't much better either.

 

[Rightguide]

Or like Rightguide who only notices the news if it supports his view.

Jamaica, like the US, has gang problems. If they can't fix their own, how can they fix Haiti's?

Wrong. I notice all news, but unlike you, I can discern the difference between leftist propaganda and the truth.

 

[Rightguide]

Or like Rightguide who only notices the news if it supports his view.

Jamaica, like the US, has gang problems. If they can't fix their own, how can they fix Haiti's?

The problem is, they have evolved into a Third World shit hole. In 5 or 600 years maybe they'll be able to evolve out of it. Be patient, it's none of our business. On the other hand Mexico being on our southern border in the process of evolving into an inhumane Third World narco-state is a more pressing problem for the US and should have the complete attention of our DOD and our tier one special operations commands.

 

[oggbashan]

The problem is, they have evolved into a Third World shit hole. In 5 or 600 years maybe they'll be able to evolve out of it. Be patient, it's none of our business. On the other hand Mexico being on our southern border in the process of evolving into an inhumane Third World narco-state is a more pressing problem for the US and should have the complete attention of our DOD and our tier one special operations commands.

And drug gangs in the US are less important?

We too are fighting county lines drug gangs in the UK. Why should we divert resources to Haiti?

 

[Rightguide]

And drug gangs in the US are less important?

We too are fighting county lines drug gangs in the UK. Why should we divert resources to Haiti?

They are being engaged here at home although with less enthusiasm under the Democrat rule. The Mexican government for all practical purposes is under the control of Mexican drug cartels that now have military-level heavy weaponry. They control the US southern border and are taking over the drug trade in California and other states from domestic gangs.

 

[oggbashan]

Why intervene in Haiti when we can't solve our own gang problems?

 

[Rightguide]

Why intervene in Haiti when we can't solve our own gang problems?

I don't think we should either, we've been there more than once. The place is hopeless.

 

[oggbashan]

I don't think we should either, we've been there more than once. The place is hopeless.

The UK certainly doesn't want to get involved with Haiti.

 

[Sean Renaud]

America doesn't really have gang problems in too many areas. ARe their gangs? Yes. Are their entire cities that where there is no legit government and you have to deal with MS13 or the Bloods? No, not here are not.

Its true that Biden had no obligation to follow what Trump had put in place and I don't know what did or didn't happen between him and the allies. Like I have no idea why any country would ever accept a peace treaty of any sort from us again knowing there is no reason to think we won't go full nationalist again and go back on it all.

While we're speaking of stupid things how's Brexit goin?

 

[oggbashan]

While we're speaking of stupid things how's Brexit goin?

Slowly as expected.