It's Time To Abolish Teacher's Unions

[Rotadom]

A. Academic papers ae peer-reviewed before publication

B. These papers were published

Therefore.....(I'll let you do the math...let's see if it's too hard for you)

A. Not all published papers are Peer-Reviewed

B. lol that you would even say that.

Therefore, you were caught lying again.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

A. Not all published papers are Peer-Reviewed

B. lol that you would even say that.

Therefore, you were caught lying again.

I'll let you call UC Davis and The Lancet to tell them. They'll get a kick out of it.

 

[Rotadom]

I'll let you call UC Davis and The Lancet to tell them. They'll get a kick out of it.

Or you could prove what you said instead of continue to lie while everyone laughs at you.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Or you could prove what you said instead of continue to lie while everyone laughs at you.

The very fact that they are academic papers that were published militates to a conclusion that they were peer-reviewed. We are not privy to that review, regrettably. Of course, by publishing them, they are now open to further review and rebuttal. You could find papers that do that instead of your usual mindless gibberish. Why not do that?

 

[Rotadom]

The very fact that they are academic papers that were published militates to a conclusion that they were peer-reviewed. We are not privy to that review, regrettably. Of course, by publishing them, they are now open to further review and rebuttal. You could find papers that do that instead of your usual mindless gibberish. Why not do that?

lol there is nothing in either of those links that even intimates that they were Peer-Reviewed. Damn, just stop already this is getting terribly pathetic.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

lol there is nothing in either of those links that even intimates that they were Peer-Reviewed. Damn, just stop already this is getting terribly pathetic.

Finally, we agree on something.

Maybe you can address the substance of those papers now. Or do we have to wait for you to get an open sore to see any substance come from you, at long last?

 

[Rotadom]

Finally, we agree on something.

Maybe you can address the substance of those papers now. Or do we have to wait for you to get an open sore to see any substance come from you, at long last?

It's already been pointed out that the non-Peer-Reviewed papers you lied about don't say what you want them to say.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

It's already been pointed out that the non-Peer-Reviewed papers you lied about don't say what you want them to say.

Well, Sarge says that, but Sarge doesn't specify where the parts that do that are, whereas I cite the actual text of the studies that show their conclusions do match my contention.

Maybe you can do better, though I'm not sanguine.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Well, Sarge says that, but Sarge doesn't specify where the parts that do that are, whereas I cite the actual text of the studies that show their conclusions do match my contention.

Maybe you can do better, though I'm not sanguine.

So again, the studies didn't say what you claimed they did, as pointed out in that thread.

And yet in the study he posted, vaccinated people contain viral loads for much less.periods of time. So the number of people they would spread the virus to is much less.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

You almost have to feel for Dud. He shitpisted more than 200 times over the Christmas weekend while getting the crap kicked out of him for his proven lies.

https://i.imgur.com/gSiv8dY.gif

 

[pecksniff]

I've lost track -- what are these papers, peer-reviewed or not, supposed to say, and what does it have to do with teachers' unions?