LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

It's Time To Abolish Teacher's Unions

SgtSpiderMan said:
It's not up to me.

If you had gone to college and are an engineer you would have taken some kind of research class in college.

https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/determine-sample-size/
Click to expand...

Well, it's pretty clear that you're not an engineer, nor do you have any inking of the curriculum one passes through to become one.

But let's take your page and run with it. What data would you collect from those fleeing CA to feed into your statistical equations? How would it be expressed, mathematically? What test would you apply? What would it show?
 
Rightguide said:
It is a collaboration of government employees to threaten the taxpayers with labor stoppages if elected representatives don't do their bidding and increase their benefits and wages. Meanwhile their productivity and worth to the public never increases and the added costs are piled onto the debt for which the taxpayers are forever taxed and their own livelihoods diminished. it's a racket that has crippled CA with a 1.5 trillion dollar debt which has increased by 15% since January 2017. Taxes required to service this debt is the main reason why people are leaving in droves. The state is in an economic death spiral.
Click to expand...

And how does what a police union does differ from that?
 
Bud_Spencer said:
Well, it's pretty clear that you're not an engineer, nor do you have any inking of the curriculum one passes through to become one.

But let's take your page and run with it. What data would you collect from those fleeing CA to feed into your statistical equations? How would it be expressed, mathematically? What test would you apply? What would it show?
Click to expand...

The data would be the sort pollsters collect. By asking those who are changing their state of residence why they're doing it.
 
pecksniff said:
The data would be the sort pollsters collect. By asking those who are changing their state of residence why they're doing it.
Click to expand...

Excellent! And, given the population size, including just 100 people out of those hundreds of thousands gives you a decent idea of why people are getting out of Dodge.
 
Bud_Spencer said:
Well, it's pretty clear that you're not an engineer, nor do you have any inking of the curriculum one passes through to become one.

But let's take your page and run with it. What data would you collect from those fleeing CA to feed into your statistical equations? How would it be expressed, mathematically? What test would you apply? What would it show?
Click to expand...

For the third time, it’s not my claim. It’s up to you to prove it.
 
Wow. Hopefully, Santa treated Dud better than he was treated here today. Being caught in multiple lies on Christmas gets you coal in your stocking.
 
Rotadom said:
Well then please link me to them if they are here. As I said I can't find them.
Click to expand...

Much to Bud's chagrin I found them.

Bud_Spencer said:
From the Lancet study:

Interpretation
Vaccination reduces the risk of delta variant infection and accelerates viral clearance. Nonetheless, fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts. Host–virus interactions early in infection may shape the entire viral trajectory.
Click to expand...

Not Peer-Reviewed.

Bud_Spencer said:
Viral loads in vaccinated people are no different from those who haven't taken the jab, and they can pass it along just as easily as the non-vaccinated. is this all new to you? It's true. The vaccines do, however, provide improved results when one does contract COVID, however.

https://www.ucdavis.edu/health/covi...ar-between-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-people
Click to expand...

Not Peer-Reviewed.

Quell surprise. Either Bud doesn't know what Peer-Reviewed means (most likely) or he is lying (also likely).
 
SgtSpiderMan said:
For the third time, it’s not my claim. It’s up to you to prove it.
Click to expand...

Here's your problem, Sarge: In a typical poitical poll, the sampe size formula you linked to would be employed to convey the integrity of the percentages of each response, expressed in a "margin of error" figure. But in such a poll, the responses are fixed, i.e. the respondents pick from a list of candidates that is bound, with those not liking any of the choises going to a "none of the above" or "undecided" category.

That isn't the case here.

People were asked why they were getting out of CA, and these are the responses they gave. No percentages are shown. We just know that these were the reasons. So, no matter how stable those answers, they are still the answers. If 40% of the respondents were splitting because of Gavin Newsom's oily smile, it'd show up. It didn't.

And, given the hardship of picking up and moving one's life, family and possibly career to another state, the liklihood that the respondent isn't sure of why he's doing it are essentially zero.

So unless you can tell us all why those reasons are not the real reasons people are leaving, these analyses - which all show remarkable consistency - are the reasons people are leaving.
 
Rotadom said:
Much to Bud's chagrin I found them.



Not Peer-Reviewed.



Not Peer-Reviewed.

Quell surprise. Either Bud doesn't know what Peer-Reviewed means (most likely) or he is lying (also likely).
Click to expand...

The studies were published. See Pecky's graphic for how the process works. He literally painted a picture for you.
 
Bud_Spencer said:
The studies were published. See Pecky's graphic for how the process works. He literally painted a picture for you.
Click to expand...

It's a yes or no question. Are the links you provided Peer-Reviewed as you claimed or not? I saw peck's flowchart, see, I'm not the one struggling with the Peer process.

Yes or no?
 
Rotadom said:
It's a yes or no question. Are the links you provided Peer-Reviewed as you claimed or not? I saw peck's flowchart, see, I'm not the one struggling with the Peer process.

Yes or no?
Click to expand...

How about a stroll through a child's garden of syllogisms?
 
Rotadom said:
How about you just admit that you either lied or don't know what Peer-Reviewed means.
Click to expand...

A. Academic papers ae peer-reviewed before publication

B. These papers were published

Therefore.....(I'll let you do the math...let's see if it's too hard for you)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Appeals Court Allows Trump to End Union Bargaining for Some Federal Workers
2
Replies
49
Views
312
ll74
ll74
BabyBoomer50s
Appeals court lifts block on Trump EO targeting federal worker unions
Replies
3
Views
200
Rotadom
Rotadom
Rightguide
It's Now or Never for England
Replies
13
Views
174
Rightguide
Rightguide
B
Int'l Campaign To Abolish Nuclear Weapons upset with US bombing Iran’s nuclear weapons
Replies
1
Views
114
dingdongditchding
D
B
Dominican Republic: Government strengthens immigration checks on businesses employing undocumented foreigners
Replies
0
Views
62
BeatMan
B
Back
Top