Is Loving Wives becoming a dumping ground?

[RedHairedandFriendly]

Took me three tries but I think I got it.
Thanks to both of you
DG Hear

You're welcome and yeah!!!! It works.

 

[nici]

Loving Wives? I don’t know, I think I got the meaning. (Which says a lot!)

LW is about a male fetish involving insecurities with the fidelity of married women. Their motivating reasoning behind their fetish remains the same, even when how they cope (cuckold or revenge) differs.

If I would write a swing story (MFM/MFF), I would definitely post to Group and not LW.

If I would write a romance story between two people married to each other, I would post in romance or EC.

LW readers will always be hypersensitive (and vocal) because LW stories will deal with their own personal insecurities. I doubt anyone can write any form of confrontational story to LW and not be flamed. (I was.)

Any story involving infidelity belongs in LW. I don’t have problems with the “Loving” part of the name, only why just us women being “the bad guys”, the wrongdoers? I do feel the name “Loving Wives” is sexist in nature. Everyone’s interest is in the slut, no one ever uses the term “Rake”?

 

[RedHairedandFriendly]

Loving Wives? I don’t know, I think I got the meaning. (Which says a lot!)

LW is about a male fetish involving insecurities with the fidelity of married women. Their motivating reasoning behind their fetish remains the same, even when how they cope (cuckold or revenge) differs.

If I would write a swing story (MFM/MFF), I would definitely post to Group and not LW.

If I would write a romance story between two people married to each other, I would post in romance or EC.

LW readers will always be hypersensitive (and vocal) because LW stories will deal with their own personal insecurities. I doubt anyone can write any form of confrontational story to LW and not be flamed. (I was.)

Any story involving infidelity belongs in LW. I don’t have problems with the “Loving” part of the name, only why just us women being “the bad guys”, the wrongdoers? I do feel the name “Loving Wives” is sexist in nature. Everyone’s interest is in the slut, no one ever uses the term “Rake”?

YES!!! Bring on the "Loving Husbands" Category.

 

[Darkniciad]

The one I wrote ( as Les ) was centered on a cheating wife, but there were two male characters who were both cheating scumbags floating around in the story too. The nature of the cat demands that the wife's infidelity be the center, but I thought I'd sneak in a couple of references to keep things properly balanced.

Maybe there should be a cheating hubby cat to balance things out. I think a lot of those stories would trend toward romances with the wife getting out, and finding someone who deserves her, though. Could pretty much just go in romance if they went that route.

 

[SlickTony]

Loving Wives? I don’t know, I think I got the meaning. (Which says a lot!)

LW is about a male fetish involving insecurities with the fidelity of married women. Their motivating reasoning behind their fetish remains the same, even when how they cope (cuckold or revenge) differs.

If I would write a swing story (MFM/MFF), I would definitely post to Group and not LW.

If I would write a romance story between two people married to each other, I would post in romance or EC.

LW readers will always be hypersensitive (and vocal) because LW stories will deal with their own personal insecurities. I doubt anyone can write any form of confrontational story to LW and not be flamed. (I was.)

Any story involving infidelity belongs in LW. I don’t have problems with the “Loving” part of the name, only why just us women being “the bad guys”, the wrongdoers? I do feel the name “Loving Wives” is sexist in nature. Everyone’s interest is in the slut, no one ever uses the term “Rake”?

Not so. I used the term just a few weeks ago.

 

[starrkers]

My LW story is about a bloke who roams the country seeking out bored wives to seduce.
It never got flamed properly, just over the use of English style spelling and because it was a bit short. I was a tad disappointed. but it was been voted down quite hard.

 

[nici]

Not so. I used the term just a few weeks ago.

But, the connotations and social implications of the words!

 

[quutoo]

My LW story is about a bloke who roams the country seeking out bored wives to seduce.
It never got flamed properly, just over the use of English style spelling and because it was a bit short. I was a tad disappointed. but it was been voted down quite hard.

Hey Starrkers...don't sweat it. The main thing is you got your ramblings published. If it got voted down it's probably because it didn't say what the lot of nerver been there and never willers, wanted you to say.

I get emails from creeps that seem to think that I should have written about the anguish and insecurities that the Male figure went through. Hell he was just enjoying sucking cock with his wife. He didn't have time to have insecurities of anguish...so what the fuck can you do except to keep shoving your writings down their throats.

 

[Goldie Munro]

Hey Starrkers...don't sweat it. The main thing is you got your ramblings published. If it got voted down it's probably because it didn't say what the lot of nerver been there and never willers, wanted you to say.

I get emails from creeps that seem to think that I should have written about the anguish and insecurities that the Male figure went through. Hell he was just enjoying sucking cock with his wife. He didn't have time to have insecurities of anguish...so what the fuck can you do except to keep shoving your writings down their throats.

LOL love it!