Is it me...am I missing something??

[Ebonyfire]

*Is speechless*

Oh, Welcome Back!!!! Welcome Back!!!! You have truly been missed.

He, he he!

Why thank you for the warm welcome! I am in a dropping in mode this week! LOL

Eb

 

[Caitlynne]

He, he he!

Why thank you for the warm welcome! I am in a dropping in mode this week! LOL

Eb

Well then you just made my week.

**plans to hang on every word**

 

[WriterDom]

I'm sorry but I just can't understand all these women who let someone called their Masters.... tell them what to do...Must be I'm too old fashioned...and still believe in equal rights and trust me ...
:

Actually, the old fashioned people had "Obey" in wedding vows. Before the women of the 60s fucked things up.

 

[Ebonyfire]

Actually, the old fashioned people had "Obey" in wedding vows. Before the women of the 60s fucked things up.

After men in the previous centuries fucked things up first by stealing women's dowries and property!

Hi WD, long time no "see"!

Eb

 

[DVS]

After men in the previous centuries fucked things up first by stealing women's dowries and property!

Hi WD, long time no "see"!

Eb

Well, although that all did happen, neither offense was right. Personally, I only "take" knickers or britches from the ladies. It tends to put them into a more randy mood. I don't care for their money. Frankly, if they can take care of me financially, I'm all for it.

Hi, Eb. Where the hell have you been?

 

[raven2]

After men in the previous centuries fucked things up first by stealing women's dowries and property!

Hi WD, long time no "see"!

Eb

Unfortunately, that is not accurate because women couldn't own dowries or property.

 

[Ebonyfire]

Hi, Eb. Where the hell have you been?

I have been smacking the boys, and yourself?

 

[Ebonyfire]

Unfortunately, that is not accurate because women couldn't own dowries or property.

Oh really?

I guess those history books I read must have been wrong. And it is you dear person who is inaccurate!

 

[FurryFury]

I had no problem saying obey, but then that's the way I be.

*snickers*

Fury

 

[DVS]

I had no problem saying obey, but then that's the way I be.

*snickers*

Fury

Well, you know me...you'd obey, even if you were reluctant. But, I enjoy a little struggling in my submissives, now and then. It shows they have spunk! You know...someone like you.

 

[DVS]

I have been smacking the boys, and yourself?

glad you're having fun. I was having my way with the ladies, until recently. But, I'll soon be back on track. I'm sure they're just hiding from me, for a little rest.

 

[M's girl]

If you want to get technical, spanking and hair pulling is considered BDSM activities, though in your example I would just say you two have fun with your sexual selves.

BDSM means Bondage, Discipline, Sadism, Masocism. Its a general term that groups people who like to cause/ recieve physical pain, give / recieve dicipline (Whips, paddles, etc..) and like to be tied up or tie people up. None of these activities necessarily mean that they happen during sex or lead to sex though Id say 90% of the time one leads to another.

This discussion would really fall under the Master(Mistress) /slave or Top/bottom discussion of power exchange. What that pretty much says is that you like to give up your control and allow someone else to control you. This type of relationship sometimes goes hand and hand with BDSM so it is usually grouped under that heading too.

Thanks for explaining...

I would not call it BDSM either.
Still, there are some other aspects that we do which might be on the edge... I don't know. We never tie each other up though and there is no serious control-roleplaying going on.

 

[FurryFury]

Well, you know me...you'd obey, even if you were reluctant. But, I enjoy a little struggling in my submissives, now and then. It shows they have spunk! You know...someone like you.

As you wish, DVS, I shall try my upmost to struggle at least a little.

*looks shy and blushes*

You see me as spunky?

*blushes more and smiles a bit*

Fury

 

[Ebonyfire]

glad you're having fun. I was having my way with the ladies, until recently. But, I'll soon be back on track. I'm sure they're just hiding from me, for a little rest.

I am sure you will be "back in the saddle" again soon (pun intended)!

Eb

 

[Etoile]

I have found that interesting also.

In My case, I do not want an inferior being serving Me. If a man is inferior then what good is his submission? If he is worthless then would that make his submission worthless also?

My slaves and submissives are valuable property. I believe the submission of a successful, confident, and worthy man is very sweet indeed. As my buddy SD says "it tastes like honey". I personally would find the opposite not an attactive proposition. I like and respect the men who kneel to Me, if I did not, they would not be in My presence. If they are scum then I do not want them dirtying up my carpet, lol.

Eb

Okay, now that I've recovered from falling off my chair...welcome back!

I love your perspective on this. I'm glad I'm not the only one who has seen the "women are better, men are scum" style of some female dominants. Your approach - well, it's just perfect. Mutual respect, and a mutually beneficial relationship.

Well when you've been subjected to the idea of your OWN inferiority for millenia, don't you think it might kink your sexuality in interesting ways when you're talking about being in the power position?

Oh yes, certainly! There is definitely something to be said for subverting the dominant paradigm. But it's the women who take that kind of thing for granted that get to me. The idea that "women really ARE better than men" is what makes no sense, because even though women have been "lesser" for a long time...doesn't mean we are now "better" - we are just more equal.

 

[Ebonyfire]

Okay, now that I've recovered from falling off my chair...welcome back!

I love your perspective on this. I'm glad I'm not the only one who has seen the "women are better, men are scum" style of some female dominants. Your approach - well, it's just perfect. Mutual respect, and a mutually beneficial relationship.


Oh yes, certainly! There is definitely something to be said for subverting the dominant paradigm. But it's the women who take that kind of thing for granted that get to me. The idea that "women really ARE better than men" is what makes no sense, because even though women have been "lesser" for a long time...doesn't mean we are now "better" - we are just more equal.

I agree totally!!

I personally do not agree in the superiority of one sex over another. I avoid submissives who have that point of view. Not because I think it is wrong, to each his or her own. But it is not one of my beliefs and I do not want to go there. I like my boys fiesty!

Women now are beginning to find out that we can be as base and as noble as men. And sometimes that is a bitter pill to take.

Eb

 

[AnadaAtSea]

Women now are beginning to find out that we can be as base and as noble as men. And sometmes that is a bitter pill to take.

Eb

How eloquent - may I put that in my sig?

 

[Ebonyfire]

Okay, now that I've recovered from falling off my chair...welcome back!

Thanks, it is good to be back...


Eb

 

[Ebonyfire]

How eloquent - may I put that in my sig?

By all means you may use it all you like!

Eb

 

[FurryFury]

I agree totally!!

I personally do not agree in the superiority of one sex over another. I avoid submissives who have that point of view. Not because I think it is wrong, to each his or her own. But it is not one of my beliefs and I do not want to go there. I like my boys fiesty!

Women now are beginning to find out that we can be as base and as noble as men. And sometimes that is a bitter pill to take.

Eb

How true!

*smiles*

Fury

 

[kayte]

I agree totally!!

I personally do not agree in the superiority of one sex over another. I avoid submissives who have that point of view. Not because I think it is wrong, to each his or her own. But it is not one of my beliefs and I do not want to go there. I like my boys fiesty!

Women now are beginning to find out that we can be as base and as noble as men. And sometimes that is a bitter pill to take.

Eb

Oh my!!!!

Welcome back {{{{{{{{Eb}}}}}}} It is so nice to see you Ma'am.

 

[Ebonyfire]

Oh my!!!!

Welcome back {{{{{{{{Eb}}}}}}} It is so nice to see you Ma'am.

Nice to be back! Hope you are doing fine!

Eb

 

[ladyadonia30]

obedience

I get the point you are making with, " Am I missing something?"
Lovemaking is one thing..but F@#king is another.

Being told what to do is a turn on for me. Not sure exactly what turns me on, perhaps the fact I place trust in my partners hands and allow him to take me beyond the limits..not knowing what he is going to do nor being able to control it.
Some people have a foot fetish, others devle into other things that seem bizzare...but for those who enjoy BDSM and being bound and perhaps blind folded, told what to do....they cum here.

 

[SweetDommes]

I have found that interesting also.

In My case, I do not want an inferior being serving Me. If a man is inferior then what good is his submission? If he is worthless then would that make his submission worthless also?
[snip]
Eb

Amen to that.

Most everyone has been polite in this thread, which is far more than I expected when I saw the OP. I do have to say, though, that posting while drunk is not the wisest of ideas LOL

Personally, I don't understand the mindset of a woman who calls a man "Master" or "Sir" - but I know that they are out there, and I'm happy for them when they can find someone who suits them. Most of the ones who are happy with a Master don't understand why I absolutely cannot call any man "Master" (meaning, if they come in to a chat room and have their screen name as "MasterXYZ" or "Sir123" - I call them "XYZ" "123" whatever ... and if they only have their name as "Master" or "Sir" - I ask them what I can call them ... if they say I have to call them Master/Sir, then I quit talking to them ... normally putting them on ignore/block). As long as others let me live my life my way, then I'm perfectly content to let them live theirs their way.

 

[Ebonyfire]

... and if they only have their name as "Master" or "Sir" - I ask them what I can call them ... if they say I have to call them Master/Sir, then I quit talking to them ... normally putting them on ignore/block). As long as others let me live my life my way, then I'm perfectly content to let them live theirs their way.

Yup.
When anyone approaches me with Mistress, I correct them and tell them that I do not want submissives I do not know or own to call me Mistress. If everyone calls me that, it becomes meaningless. And quite frankly the men who kneel to me have to earn the right to call me Mistress. I just do not care for the overuse of titles especially when they come from strangers. Others may take a different view. To each his or her own.

Eb