Is cum required?

Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Posts
17
You meet an irrestible guy. You let him know you're "available." He says he finds you attractive but is only available for a blowjob. You tell him you're up for that, thinking you'll get yourself off later while remembering the BJ. Then he tells you he can't cum that way.

Would you give him the BJ anyway? Or would the dry suck hold so little interest you'd tell him no thanks?
 
I dont' get it.
Why does he want the bj?
And, what does your husband think about this?
 
Why were you attracted to this loser in the first place?
 
loves oral wife said:
You meet an irrestible guy. You let him know you're "available." He says he finds you attractive but is only available for a blowjob. You tell him you're up for that, thinking you'll get yourself off later while remembering the BJ. Then he tells you he can't cum that way.

Would you give him the BJ anyway? Or would the dry suck hold so little interest you'd tell him no thanks?

I think you should tell him thanks, but no thanks and keep looking.
 
Originally posted by MrMikelobe1952
I dont' get it.
Why does he want the bj?
And, what does your husband think about this?

yeah, what Mike said, and how can he not cum from a bj?

oh another question, I thought most women didn't like to swallow, isn't that true???
 
Last edited:
loves oral wife said:
You meet an irrestible guy. You let him know you're "available." He says he finds you attractive but is only available for a blowjob. You tell him you're up for that, thinking you'll get yourself off later while remembering the BJ. Then he tells you he can't cum that way.

Would you give him the BJ anyway? Or would the dry suck hold so little interest you'd tell him no thanks?


Why put all the effort into it if there is no reward in the end for either of you is my question...
 
if a BJ can't get him off then its usless unless for foreplay leading up to more
 
It's a premise.

MrMikelobe1952 said:
I dont' get it.
Why does he want the bj?
And, what does your husband think about this?

I've established a premise. Admittedly not a common premise, but a premise none the less.

I can think of all sorts of situations where "sexual" contact is initiated without the prospect of climax for either partner.

You meet a hot girl with gorgeous tits (or at least they appear that way given that she is fully clothed). The two of you start making out. She lets you play with her tits outside her sweater but makes it clear that's as far as she is willing to go.

Do you continue feeling her breasts given neither of you are going to cum and you're most likely going home with blue balls? Many, many guys would. And what's in it for the female? Why's she letting you do it?
 
You've never been...

mansome said:
Why were you attracted to this loser in the first place?

attracted to someone you've just met? Purely physical attraction?

I imagine there are any number of people who'd desire sex with someone they've seen even if a word were never spoken between them. No doubt the risks of sex with perfect strangers would put a damper on actually doing anything but that doesn't change the desire.
 
I just can't grasp the idea on why some guys can not get off from a bj. Wierd!
 
The premise does not apply to everyone

Donsehan said:
yeah, what Mike said, and how can he not cum from a bj?

oh another question, I thought most women didn't like to swallow, isn't that true???

Certainly my premise does not apply to everyone. I have read enough posts, here and other places, from guys who can't get off from a blowjob and girls who can't get their guys off that way.

Why the guy can't get off isn't important. Maybe he's too drunk or on some medication. Who knows why, it's simply a given here.

I'm sure many women don't swallow although that was not part of the premise. The guy isn't going to cum is the premise. Whether the cum was going to end up in the girl's mouth and spit out or in her stomach or as a stain on her little black dress is immaterial.

I'm sure many women woudn't consider blowing a guy they just met period. Others wouldn't consider it unless it led to something else. Hopefully, those women would have left the post realizing the question wasn't for them.

Then there are those who would consider giving the BJ...
 
Re: Re: Is cum required?

~Elizabeth~ said:
Why put all the effort into it if there is no reward in the end for either of you is my question...

So, are you saying that, if the guy would cum you'd do the BJ? Or that you wouldn't do it at all because you'd get nothing out of it? Or are you asking why the guy would want to if he wasn't going to cum?
 
Hummm

The question you posted Loves Oral Wife is one that in most minds could be a dilemma ..if taken just as you wrote it...Who pleasure are you looking at...you say you would enjoy getting yourself off later, you want the BJ to and he can't..situatonally it could happen that you could use other means to get to the point of having him cumming then get you bj if that's what you want and that is even without intercourse. ...sorry I was just setting thinking about your plight.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top