Internet Free Speech Case: Ms Vermont

Pure

Fiel a Verdad
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Posts
15,135
[excerpts] www.nytimes.com

NY Times, June 2, 2003
Internet Battle Raises Questions About the First Amendment

By ADAM LIPTAK

he beauty queen and the cad both have Web sites.
Katy Johnson, who was Miss Vermont in 1999 and again in 2001, uses her site to promote what she calls her "platform of character education."
"She is founder of Say Nay Today and the Sobriety Society," the site says, "and her article `ABC's of Abstinence' was featured in Teen magazine."

Tucker Max's site promotes something like the opposite of character education. It contains a form through which women can apply for a date with him, pictures of his former girlfriends and reports on what Mr. Max calls his "belligerence and debauchery."
Until a Florida judge issued an unusual order last month, Mr. Max's site also contained a long account of his relationship with Ms. Johnson, whom he portrayed, according to court papers, as vapid, promiscuous and an unlikely candidate for membership in the Sobriety Society.

The order, entered by Judge Diana Lewis of Circuit Court in West Palm Beach, forbids Mr. Max to write about Ms. Johnson. It has alarmed experts in First Amendment law, who say that such orders prohibiting future publication, prior restraints, are essentially unknown in American law. Moreover, they say, claims like Ms. Johnson's, for invasion of privacy, have almost never been considered enough to justify prior restraints.

Ms. Johnson's lawsuit also highlights some shifting legal distinctions in the Internet era, between private matters and public ones and between speech and property.

Judge Lewis ruled on May 6, before Mr. Max was notified of the suit and without holding a hearing. She told Mr. Max that he could not use "Katy" on his site. Nor could he use Ms. Johnson's last name, full name or the words "Miss Vermont."

The judge also prohibited Mr. Max from "disclosing any stories, facts or information, notwithstanding its truth, about any intimate or sexual acts engaged in by" Ms. Johnson. That prohibition is not limited to his Web site. Finally, Judge Lewis ordered Mr. Max to sever the virtual remains of his relationship with Ms. Johnson. He is no longer allowed to link to her Web site.
The page of Mr. Max's site that used to contain his rambling memoir now has only a reference to the court order.

Ms. Johnson did not respond to telephone and e-mail messages seeking comment. In her lawsuit, Ms. Johnson maintained that Mr. Max had invaded her privacy by publishing accurate information about her and had used her name and picture for commercial purposes. [...]

"This victory should send a clear message to all parasitic smut peddlers who live off the good names of others," he [Santucci, Ms Lohnson's lawyer] said in the release, which also noted that Ms. Johnson "emphatically denies the story contained on Tucker Max's Web site."
Mr. Santucci did not respond to an e-mail message asking whether his issuing a news release was at odds with his request to seal the court file on privacy grounds.

John C. Carey, a lawyer at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan in Miami, recently agreed to represent Mr. Max. Mr. Carey said he would soon ask Judge Lewis to withdraw her order and dismiss the case.
"Katy Johnson holds herself out publicly, for her own commercial gain, as a champion of abstinence and a woman of virtue," Mr. Carey said. "The public has a legitimate interest in knowing whether or not her own behavior is consistent with the virtuous image that she publicly seeks to promote."
Through his lawyer and his publicity agent, Mr. Max declined to be interviewed.

Ms. Johnson's site is www.katyjohnson .com. Mr. Max's is www.tuckermax.com. Both Ms. Johnson and Mr. Max sell T-shirts and the books they have written on their sites. Ms. Johnson's book is "True Beauty: A Sunny Face Means a Happy Heart." Mr. Max's is "The Definitive Book of Pick-Up Lines."

That the sites are also used to make money should make no difference in whether Mr. Max may be forbidden to write about Ms. Johnson, said Gregg D. Thomas, an expert in First Amendment law at Holland & Knight in Tampa, Fla.

[end excerpts]


Added: see
http://www.pageantcity.com/kaatbio.html
 
Last edited:
Katy, K-k-k-Katy

Does Abstinence mean abstaining from mentioning garderobes, sheep, four foot turds, cake as hat, Earl's age, and Svenska's aversion to having a sex change?

If so, we'd have very little left on this board.

Og
 
Katy J.

Ms Johnson sounds like an exceedingly boring person.
Probably nothing wrong with her that pulling a train wouldn't put right. Choo Choo
MG
 
You misspelled her name, MG. It's Cho Chang. WHOW, that girl is a GREAT quidditch-player!:)
 
this

the real reason this went down this way is defamtion of character unless the said party (the guy) could prove that katy did the things he claimed he would have had to post a disclaimer much like the one on the celeb section of the lit otherwise he is making money off of her name and "mediocre celebrity" without any basis of truth. that said free speech rocks
 
Free Speech

The American legal basis of freedom of speech is actually freedom of expression. Under UK law I have freedom of speech, but not the right to shout FIRE! in a crowded theatre (unless it is true).

Do Americans feel similarly constrained? If so the simple test of libel, where a good defence is "true as to fact and fair as to comment" should apply.

Of course in the EU under its new constitution the right of free speech will specifically be limited, in that it will become a Federal Offence to speak against the idea of "an ever-closer union of states", or anything which is an offical policy of the EU, or anything else that European Court judges hold to be a Bad Thing.
 
sounds like a rerun of 'Miss wyoming', where Penthouse was sued for running fiction in which a beauty pagent winner fellated a baton on stage. The real Miss Wyoming happened to be a baton twirler. Penthouse lost . go figger.
 
I think that fan fics are perfectly all right, as long as they are so unbelievable that even a moron can understand that they are false.

Like...

The horny young teenager turned down the Olsen-twins in order to "reform" Rosie O' Donnell.

Jennifer Aniston left Brad Pitt to marry a fat, rude, redneck.

Bush said something intelligent.

You get the picture...
 
Train, pulling a

PierceStreet said:
I was going to use that phrase in a story recently, but since I had only heard the phrase in the 70's and in the midwest, I wondered if readers would know what I was talking about.

Dear PS,
If they don't now, they soon will. Ma Jukes, of the DurtGurl Group, is preparing a definitive essay on the subject which will be posted soon.

There will be no doubt about the meaning after it's read.

Choo choo,
MG
 
Chain

Does it include one inch ball bearings wrapped in silk?

Og
 
Re: Train, pulling a

MathGirl said:
If they don't now, they soon will. ...
Even I, in the UK and in my dotage, have heard of it. Also "stirring the porridge".
 
Back
Top