I have him/her on ignore, because (s)he seems to think that (s)he is the only one allowed to have any opinions on the SI threads..cloudy said:ya think?
He's the only one that's allowed to talk about kiddie porn here.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have him/her on ignore, because (s)he seems to think that (s)he is the only one allowed to have any opinions on the SI threads..cloudy said:ya think?
He's the only one that's allowed to talk about kiddie porn here.![]()
Who implied that?snooper said:I have him/her on ignore, because (s)he seems to think that (s)he is the only one allowed to have any opinions on the SI threads..
Fantasies_only said:Who implied that?
In fact, I've been keeping out of this forum lately.
Where would you get that idea?
BTW, I'm a guy.
None of you guys were saying anything at all that really answered his question.cloudy said:How quickly you forget.
Does "Everyone, he has his answer now so keep your comments to yourselves," even look vaguely familiar to you?
Fantasies_only said:None of you guys were saying anything at all that really answered his question.
You all were ragging on him and attacking him for a simple question, not even implying that this is what he fantasized about.
At least I answered him without being a rude idiot or making sarcastic crude remarks.
old_saltNpepper said:Sick.. sick.. GO SOMEWHERE ELSE YOU SICK FUCK!
_Anna_ said:What he said.
reignophelia said:Pedophilia is not allowed to be discussed at Lit. Period. I don't think he deserves any slack anyway. I warned him that he wouldn't survive here. If he has an issue, he needs to go to a psychiatrist and should not be reading stories that will excite and incite him.
NR did not mean this in a mean spirited way as the below poster did.Nameless_Rose said:I agree with you to Ophelia, that pedophilia doesn't belong on Lit, and that he should search elsewhere and possibly seek counseling if he ever feels unhealthy desires towards children. I still think though, that if stories help mediate urges, than they should be read. The two charming comments before mine just pissed me off and I had to say something.
While I definitely don't condone their actions, pedophiles are still people, people who need help, not monsters. And you two with the rude comments: I really don't think calling him a "sick fuck" is doing anything.
Well, I could go on, but for the most part, you are correct this was a discussion, although a one sided discussion with only Nameless Rose on the side of the first poster who I don't believe is a pedophile.reignophelia said:Well, I agree with you otherwise I may have called him a "sick fuck".
Ok, no I wouldn't, it's just not my style. I do hope he gets help. There is not any absolute solid evidence that the stories mediate as opposed to exaggerate said urges. I think we should just agree that we really do agree and urge this person to get the help he needs.
You know, before a child is harmed, and he ends up in jail because of it...
Or something far worse...
Fantasies_only said:Well, I could go on, but for the most part, you are correct this was a discussion, although a one sided discussion with only Nameless Rose on the side of the first poster who I don't believe is a pedophile.
Because there's nothing in it that is particularly threatening. Discussions about what is allowable or not on Lit is at least tangentially germane to the subject of "story ideas," unlike at least half the conversations that occur around here.dragonrazor said:why hasn't this been locked yet?
i see how many things are banned here like pedo, necro, beastiarity and the like. I don't like those genres too much, but if they are banned I think it's neccessary to ban many other things...)))) Like Incest, rape, interracial (it's no good to mix races))))), nc, mind-control - it's too sordid to enjoy. All those genres are fetishes and snuff will be OK, too. I think it's necessary to have every desire fullfilled!!!!!!!
)Same old argument, does reading about it make you want to do it?
Being a guy who has a very active sexual life here in Russia, I can assure you that much people start their sexual experience at about 15-17.
About some stories I have written there is some thing that makes me laugh. It's dialogue:
"What's this?"
"It's pussy."
"And what's this?"
"Penis."
And so on. I can't believe that somebody doesn't know how to look privates and what they are for.
Many years ago I went to an arcade and saw a boy there, playing Mortal Kombat. He could hardly reach joystics and see what was on the screen, but all I heard was "Hey you son-of-a-bitch! Are u gonna do some fuckin' trick?" or something like that
Wow,
Lots of different discussion going on here.
I have a question for the good folks here.
I started sexual experimentation at a very early age. I had some frisky neighbor kids who started me out with the usual "show me yours" games and then moved onto more experimentation.
Now here's the thing. We were all kids. We all found it was very exciting and fun to be naughty. We were naturally curious about our differences even though we didn't have a clue why we were different. We learned it was fun to play with ourselves and very exciting to let someone else play with us as well as play with them. We were innocent but couldn't resist running back into the woods to be naughty. This type of play progressed as we got older and continued well into our early teens.
So given this as a background and remembering we were all kids at the time is it wrong to find these memories very exciting? We were brothers playing with sisters and cousins. Boy with boys and girls with girls as well as mixed company.
These early memories can be very exciting still today. As such it is also fun to hear about others who have enjoyed this same type of play.
Is this wrong to relive childhood fun?
Would like to hear others take on this.
i am looking for stories of pediphil incest, fictional of couse
i am looking for stories of pediphil incest, fictional of couse
Jeesus, people, cut him some slack. I don't condone pedophilia, but he isn't saying he wants to go molesting kids. I personally think that reading stories about it is a much more healthy outlet than doing anything physical. If reading stories satisfies socially unacceptable desires and/or stops people from doing things in real life, than they should read them and other people should keep hateful comments to themselves. I feel compelled to point out that the most popular stories on this site involve incest for the most part, and I have no problem with that fantasy, but if you asked for an incest story on a regular story site, you might get people calling you a sick fuck too.
And how did you draw this conclusion? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but there is no evidence to support or dispute your statement.
The warning under "18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement" concerns ONLY "visual depictions of persons engaged in actual or simulated sexual conduct" and that law does not include written, as opposed to pictorial, depictions. If it did include written words, then you would not be able to buy a copy of Nabokov's Lolita.Logically, because the warning on all porn major porn sites are that that sole purpose.
In real English, the Queen's English, as invented and © by the English nation, it is spelled PÆDOPHILIA.It's spelled pedofilia first of all, ...
Actually they are not. They are trying to stay within what one bigoted group would like the law to be, to avoid harassment.
If it were the actual law of the USA, then all copies of Lolita would be banned and possessing one would be an offence, let alone republishing it as a CD as Random House Audio Assets did in 2005. Sex with children is illegal, and hence possessing pictures of sex with children is illegal, but words are not.
I realise that murder, and driving at 80 mph are also illegal, but possessing pictures of either of those acts is not illegal. Then, the lawmakers, and hence the laws themselves, were never very logical.