incest/pediphile

old_saltNpepper said:
Sick.. sick.. GO SOMEWHERE ELSE YOU SICK FUCK!

Some people jump to conclusions WAY to quickly. He said "fictional" - did you not read that?

If you're so sexually repressed then what the hell are you doing on Lit? :) Funny guy!
 
Fantasies_only said:
This was a discussion of "Non Consent VS Rape".

Although I don't believe there is a difference in real life, at least on Lit, non consent is consensual in mid penetration.


Thankyou for clearing that up for me. :D
 
Fantasies_only said:
I think the fact we have gotten away with it without deletion proves otherwise.
They mean child sexuallity (no matter how subtle) can't be submitted in stories (story page, chat, PMs, or SRPs) or gone into graphic detail in discussion or debate.

The fact this is a story ideas forum should be a clue that you should either write it on another site (something I don't recommend) or up the age to 18.
You will find many hot mom with 18 year old son stories here.

This includes an SRP that I will start in a few weeks.
You can have either part if you want.
If you're up to it, you can play both mother and son (will include lesbianism).

How the hell are ya? Still into kiddie porn?
 
ghanes14 said:
Incest yes, pedo....weird... teens, ok....kids....seek help?


It's all about the age of consent. Adults may partake in illegal things, but they are of consenting age.

Yes, seek help.
 
hmm, I'm really not too sure about the idea myself, I hate the idea actually, but look at the netherlands example. They have a registry where paedos can sign up to, giving them access to a meeting group, like AA, only they talk about, well, yknow. This list is passed to the local police every month so they can monitor all of them. This is supposedly a large list, yet the occurences of paedophelia in the country is extremely low.

I aint saying its ok, far from it, it is disgusting and peole who commit such an act deserve to be carstrated an locked up for life, but i think the group thing is a god idea. They can help each other not commit that awful act and the police can monitor them
 
I promised myself I would not post in this again, but well dang it Daes you just had to mention a group of pedophiles and well.

Daes the group thing, made me think of NAMBLA from South Park, you know the episode where Cartman looks for mature friends and ends up being a poster child for a group of pedophiles. Which is exactly what would happen if pedophiles were stuck into a group together and attended meetings, they would get together and do each others kids. :mad:

Oh and since a few people don't seem to correlate the two, kids and pedophilia are the same thing halfway, a pedophile is an adult who has sex with kids. Necrophilia is weird, well for me it's sickening but personal preference, that is sex with the dead.
 
cloudy said:
nope, not "on this site." Here, all participants must be 18 or older.
I think what trendy meant is along the lines of what I've been saying.
People should have the right to write about ALL aspects of sexuality on this site.
The mere fact that Lit supports free speech but censors its members is doubly bad since Laural and Manu are talking out both sides of their mouths.

Maybe they should join the FCC in the cleaning up indecency fight. :mad:
 
Fantasies_only said:
People should have the right to write about ALL aspects of sexuality on this site.
The mere fact that Lit supports free speech but censors its members is doubly bad since Laural and Manu are talking out both sides of their mouths.

Maybe they should join the FCC in the cleaning up indecency fight. :mad:
You're fighting a losing battle on this one. As I mentioned earlier, the hard part is knowing where to draw the line. But, obviously, the line is drawn at age 18. You might think it's an arbitrary line, but in a civilized society, we need arbitrary lines in order to keep society from degenerating into anarchy. If you're not happy with where the line is drawn, perhaps you should consider becoming a *Morman*. Or moving to another country where the line is drawn more to your liking.
I don't think accusing LIT of censorship is very productive, since they bend over backward to allow as much freedom of speech as they can without getting shut down. Your beef should not be with LIT, it should be with the US government. And, to clarify my earlier post, your beef is not my beef. I'm prefectly happy with where the line is drawn.

*(Not a regular Mormon, but one of those cults, where they marry early in life.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fantasies_only said:
I think what trendy meant is along the lines of what I've been saying.
People should have the right to write about ALL aspects of sexuality on this site.
The mere fact that Lit supports free speech but censors its members is doubly bad since Laural and Manu are talking out both sides of their mouths.

Maybe they should join the FCC in the cleaning up indecency fight. :mad:

How has this site censored you? They are merely trying to stay within the law.

People seem to bandy the word right around fairly loosely.

Free speech doesn't mean you can say anything, anytime you wish. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater. You can't slander and libel someone. You can't lie while under oath. Threatening to kill the President could land you in jail.

As I said before, there are responsibilities that come along with rights.

On this site, you really have no rights. It's not your right to be here, it's a privilege granted by the operators of the site. You agreed to their terms and conditions when you signed up.
 
Last edited:
drksideofthemoon said:
How has this site censored you? They are merely trying to stay within the law.

People seem to bandy the word right around fairly loosely.

Free speech doesn't mean you can say anything, anytime you wish. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater. You can slander and libel someone. You can't lie while under oath. Threatening to kill the President could land you in jail.

As I said before, there are responsibilities that come along with rights.

On this site, you really have no rights. It's not your right to be here, it's a privilege granted by the operators of the site. You agreed to their terms and conditions when you signed up.

DEAR GOD I LOVE YOU! :rose:
 
drksideofthemoon said:
... They are merely trying to stay within the law. ...
Actually they are not. They are trying to stay within what one bigoted group would like the law to be, to avoid harassment.

If it were the actual law of the USA, then all copies of Lolita would be banned and possessing one would be an offence, let alone republishing it as a CD as Random House Audio Assets did in 2005. Sex with children is illegal, and hence possessing pictures of sex with children is illegal, but words are not.

I realise that murder, and driving at 80 mph are also illegal, but possessing pictures of either of those acts is not illegal. Then, the lawmakers, and hence the laws themselves, were never very logical.
 
Last edited:
drksideofthemoon said:
How has this site censored you? They are merely trying to stay within the law.

People seem to bandy the word right around fairly loosely.

Free speech doesn't mean you can say anything, anytime you wish. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater. You can't slander and libel someone. You can't lie while under oath. Threatening to kill the President could land you in jail.

As I said before, there are responsibilities that come along with rights.

On this site, you really have no rights. It's not your right to be here, it's a privilege granted by the operators of the site. You agreed to their terms and conditions when you signed up.
Please look at the PROTECT Act (signed 2003 - amended for sex offenses).

Images one would think are of minors in sexual situations is against the law, however images of minors that don't seem real (such as on Family Guy, when Peter went to bed mistaking Chris for Lois) isn't.
It also states minors in sexually explicit themes in text form is free speech, protected by the constitution, therefore there is no reason Literotica can't include pedophilia, bestiality, and violent rape by humans.

The comment about the FCC was about how they were given the authority to break that constitutional right on network TV and radio, and soon on cable TV and the Internet.
 
Last edited:
Wait Just One Sec...

The poster said, "PEDIPHILE".

Perhaps you folks are getting all bent out of shape for nothing.
Looks to me like poster has a thing for feet.

/a little toe jam never hurt anyone
 
Fantasies_only said:
Please look at the PROTECT Act (signed 2003 - amended for sex offenses).

Images one would think are of minors in sexual situations is against the law, however images of minors that don't seem real (such as on Family Guy, when Peter went to bed mistaking Chris for Lois) isn't.
It also states minors in sexually explicit themes in text form is free speech, protected by the constitution, therefore there is no reason Literotica can't include pedophilia, bestiality, and violent rape by humans.

The comment about the FCC was about how they were given the authority to break that constitutional right on network TV and radio, and soon on cable TV and the Internet.

give it up already. Dear lord, you're tiresome.

This site is owned by Laurel and Manu. They can decide exactly what can and cannot be posted here, get it?
 
I think paedophelia is sick end of story, that should be it really.It is illegal, twisted and destroys peoples lives.

But I think the same of incest as well, apart from it destroys lives, since incest has, i assume, both willing partners. Is it that same reason there is a section of stories for incest on literotica?

Either way, both are disturbing and sick
 
emap said:
I promised myself I would not post in this again, but well dang it Daes you just had to mention a group of pedophiles and well.

Daes the group thing, made me think of NAMBLA from South Park, you know the episode where Cartman looks for mature friends and ends up being a poster child for a group of pedophiles. Which is exactly what would happen if pedophiles were stuck into a group together and attended meetings, they would get together and do each others kids. :mad:

Oh and since a few people don't seem to correlate the two, kids and pedophilia are the same thing halfway, a pedophile is an adult who has sex with kids. Necrophilia is weird, well for me it's sickening but personal preference, that is sex with the dead.

In response to this, the group was set up as a means of monitoring the group members, which the gov there approves of.Not for them to have their sick ways
 
Yes yes I know they are all watched and supervised. Which is a total lie, they maybe have a guy drop by to peak in once a month, they have the names and they leave it at that.

Even if the building is bugged there are guards at every corner in said building, those perverts will figure out a way to talk about their passion and find ways of making it happen.

There is one thing your forgetting, these are people, people will do whatever they can to make themselves happy at the expense of anyone and anything that gets in their way.
 
juicemaster said:
i am looking for stories of pediphil incest, fictional of couse
I assume you want to read these stories without writing them.
If you look on the homepage and story FAQ, you'll find that stuff can't be submitted here.
I suggest you read everything about this site before you post.
dragonrazor said:
why hasn't this been locked yet?
I just gave him his answer, so now it can be.

Everyone, he has his answer now so keep your comments to yourselves.
 
BedtimeStories77 said:
Talk about being full of yourself. :rolleyes:

ya think?

He's the only one that's allowed to talk about kiddie porn here. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top