Cherry
~spankable~
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2000
- Posts
- 5,972
Quoting Laurel here, as this was a strongly felt belief expressed:
All the lip service to Freedom and America that I hear today, while we've been holding dozens of people who happen to be Arab without any kind of case against them - students, families, people totally without any "terrorist" background, with no evidence of wrongdoing - without releasing their names, for nearly a year. But that's okay, because they have brown skin and don't come from here so the Constitution doesn't apply.
If a horrific crime killing 3,000 people was committed by 20 blonde-haired, blue-eyed, light-skinned women with a southern accent ... would you think that the police should interogate dark-haired, brown-eyed, dark-skinned men with a northern accent? Orrrrrrrrr, perhaps investigate the commonalities of the suspects who committed the crime?
The point being, of course, the atrocity of September 11, 2001 is being investigated based on the recognized profile of both their middle-eastern nationality, as well as their religious zeal and expressed hatred for the United States. It would be ridiculous to do otherwise.
Of the suspects detained, there was a valid reason for detainment (immigration violations) in each and every case. I doubt we are privy to the reasons to suspect the ones held longer, as that would jeapordize the judicial process.
Secondly, the constitutional rights, you suggest are being trampled on, are guaranteed to Americans ... foreigners who come into our country illegally, or stay illegally, with the specific intention of destroying our nation and killing innocent Americans, are NOT entitled to our constitutional rights.
Our country is still very much in danger from terrorist attacks. Proof that the current system is necessary and working follows in two of today's articles.
All the lip service to Freedom and America that I hear today, while we've been holding dozens of people who happen to be Arab without any kind of case against them - students, families, people totally without any "terrorist" background, with no evidence of wrongdoing - without releasing their names, for nearly a year. But that's okay, because they have brown skin and don't come from here so the Constitution doesn't apply.
If a horrific crime killing 3,000 people was committed by 20 blonde-haired, blue-eyed, light-skinned women with a southern accent ... would you think that the police should interogate dark-haired, brown-eyed, dark-skinned men with a northern accent? Orrrrrrrrr, perhaps investigate the commonalities of the suspects who committed the crime?
The point being, of course, the atrocity of September 11, 2001 is being investigated based on the recognized profile of both their middle-eastern nationality, as well as their religious zeal and expressed hatred for the United States. It would be ridiculous to do otherwise.
Of the suspects detained, there was a valid reason for detainment (immigration violations) in each and every case. I doubt we are privy to the reasons to suspect the ones held longer, as that would jeapordize the judicial process.
Secondly, the constitutional rights, you suggest are being trampled on, are guaranteed to Americans ... foreigners who come into our country illegally, or stay illegally, with the specific intention of destroying our nation and killing innocent Americans, are NOT entitled to our constitutional rights.
Our country is still very much in danger from terrorist attacks. Proof that the current system is necessary and working follows in two of today's articles.
Last edited: