Impeachment Thread

[icanhelp1]

Oh, I know. Look, this is a porn site. I split my time between pushing papers and covering miles. It gets boring and when I need a break I pop in here and there and amuse myself for a bit. Once in while one of the knuckleheads does manage to get under my skin but usually, I'm just enjoying myself talking or bitching about politics or perusing the porn stories elsewhere on the site. I even tried to read Keith's and Y's stories a while back but fell asleep.

If I was taking this place seriously, I'd be posting on a site that had some relevance to mainstream voters. That's part of what makes their russian bot claims so absurd. Why would the BOTHER botting this site? The only people that actually read these politics forums are the dozen or so people that post here.

CHUCKLE!

 

[YDB95]

The framers established the impeachment process as a mechanism to remove a corrupt individual, outside the judiciary ( political ),

Actually, judges can also be impeached.

It was purely partisan and the Dems knew it was partisan, which demonstrates the Dem party was reckless and unworthy to lead.

Trying to extort a foreign leader for dirt on his opponent? That's partisan all right, but it ain't the Dems who did it.

 

[KeithD]

Is ICan't like thirteen years old?

 

[gunthernehmen]

Oh my goodness, ICan't has gotten so triggered he's turned blue.

Have you cashed the check from Russians? Make sure it doesn't bounce.

You Trumpettes are disgusting pieces of shit.

Like the stupid Trumpettes here want anyone to think the two impeachments compare in any way.

all to cover up crimes. His crimes. And he's still doing it.

The Government Accountability Office fingered Trump's Ukraine corruption as criminal.

He's been called on his corruption and criminality and he's impeached and shown as dirty scum for ever and ever in history. And there isn't a damn thing that board Trumpettes can do about that.

Is ICan't like thirteen years old?

Three pages of whining, crying and accusations without a single fact, never mind citing a source for anything, but you're accusing Ican of acting like a child?

ROFL

 

[icanhelp1]

Actually, judges can also be impeached.

WOW! We finally agree on something!

Trying to extort a foreign leader for dirt on his opponent? That's partisan all right, but it ain't the Dems who did it.

More goalpost moving, take it up with Gunther!

 

[icanhelp1]

Three pages of whining, crying and accusations without a single fact, never mind citing a source for anything, but you're accusing Ican of acting like a child?

ROFL

He suffers from hypoxia. You're right, no substance. He keeps bringing up the ICA, the feds don't have a case! His primary source of communications is adhom and insults and he accuses me acting like a child. He suffers from stage 5 TDS and then
hides behind IGGY. I guess SKYPILOT and YB share the same rock.

I don't ever recall an indictment being initiated by a finger.

 

[freakyguy41]

Wrong. Neither article of impeachment cites a criminal statute.

Rather than listening to you parrot trumpette and talk radio talking points like a ventriloquist dummy... the Constitution does not require the specific identification of a criminal statute...

"Impeachment proceedings are for those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.” Alexander Hamilton 1788

Abuse of Power was one of the articles of impeachable pushed forward against Nixon which forced his resignation.

"Abuse of power or abuse of authority, is the language used to define "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties." Public officials are fired and sometimes imprisoned for malfeasance... so you let us know when you want to change that for everyone.

Lastly... please enlighten us as to in what court on the planet does the accused have the authority to determine that lawfully issued subpoenas are erred and therefore the accused does not have to abide by them?

In short... la douche bag trump is a criminal but the kool aid swilling, talk radio points parroting trumpettes want to dance around thinking they sound righteous and intelligent... the trumpettes are the real hoax in this entire presidency.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Rather than listening to you parrot trumpette and talk radio talking points like a ventriloquist dummy... the Constitution does not require the specific identification of a criminal statute...

They cannot understand that "impeachment" is not a criminal process. So no "statutory or common law" crime needs to occur.

"Impeachment proceedings are for those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust.” Alexander Hamilton 1788

Abuse of Power was one of the articles of impeachable pushed forward against Nixon which forced his resignation.

"Abuse of power or abuse of authority, is the language used to define "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct", is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties." Public officials are fired and sometimes imprisoned for malfeasance... so you let us know when you want to change that for everyone.

Lastly... please enlighten us as to in what court on the planet does the accused have the authority to determine that lawfully issued subpoenas are erred and therefore the accused does not have to abide by them?

In short... la douche bag trump is a criminal but the kool aid swilling, talk radio points parroting trumpettes want to dance around thinking they sound righteous and intelligent... the trumpettes are the real hoax in this entire presidency.

I like the above, but it will not convince the "cult"....

Chuckles

 

[Leather_Lesbian]

PURE RETALIATION: Former House national security official slams Trump for firing inspector general

On Friday evening, President Donald Trump stunned observers by announcing he would be dismissing Michael Atkinson, the intelligence community inspector general who first relayed the whistleblower complaint about Trump’s phone call with the president of Ukraine.

Daniel Goldman, a national security advisor for the House Intelligence Committee, slammed the decision on Saturday, calling it “pure retaliation” and noting that his only offense was following the law when the president did not.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/04/pu...pector-general/?utm_source=push_notifications