If you're wondering why innocent Western women are seized in Iraq

[amicus]

Pure]Again, since you include Iraq [in the US 9-11 response], please answer:

Were any 9-11 folks from Iraq? funded by Iraq?

Was al qaida in Iraq at the time of 9-11?

Have any major terrorist acts (outside Iraq)--e.g. WTC, 1993-- of the last ten years emanated from Iraq?

Is the Iraq adventure making US soil safer?

[/I]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I had to smile as I read your really lame attempt to recoup some of your composure by asking me to teach you how to add and subtract again.

Your comments and questions are almost as silly and in the same vein as those from Senators Kennedy and Kerry, and John Dean and Nancy Pelosi and other strident voices of the left.

I am sure, had a coalition of Allied Forces, invaded Germany in 1938 to pre empt world war two, you would have raised the same objections, just change the names and places.

And had that same coalition of Allied Forces, as the Soviets were occupying Berlin, followed Churchill and Patton's advice, to begin a campaign against to Soviets, you would have done the same.

This is a war, Pure et al, a global conflict that long ago transcended 9/11 and all the previous and consequent terrorist attacks.

In the news tonight, throughout Europe, the dispostion of immigrant Muslims is being questioned, in Denmark there are riots, as there were in Paris not long ago.

There will be a 'dirty bomb' attack, by Muslims on a major city, somewhere in the world; there will be a biological attack by Muslims on another major city, somewhere in the world.

There will be a major disruption of of Port City and the energy grid of a major city, somewhere in the world.

As those events transpire, and they will, then perhaps you and others like you will begin to get just the faintest clue of events that are now transpiring which your blinders do not let you see.

I purposely did not recite the well known debate over WMD's or Iraqi involvement in 9/11, as that is a two year old discussion and all sides have been covered.

You will not admit that the regime of Saddam Hussein was friendly to and supportive of terrorists, that is your prerogative; ignore facts as you will.

That Saddam ordered the invasion of Kuwait, ordered the firing of Scud missiles into Israel and Saudi Arabia and ignored UN ultimatums, time and time again, all facts that you ignore.

Nearly 200 of the 800 aircraft in Husseins AirForce flew away to Iran and other terrorist friendly nations at the outset of war, the rest were destroyed by coalition air strikes.

Other than pilots, what did they maybe contain? Comic books and thermos bottles of tea?

You have a fairly facile mind, like Shereads and several others, but it is so blinded by your anti american ideology that you have no vision and it warps your every post and I find that sad.


amicus...

 

[Pure]

in short, iraq has had nothing much to do with 9-11,
with terrorism elsewhere up to 9-11
and even up to the present (re events outside iraq).

am:I am sure, had a coalition of Allied Forces, invaded Germany in 1938 to pre empt world war two, you would have raised the same objections, just change the names and places.

Did saddam have plans for world conquest? If so, why did the US aid him, up through the 1980s? Did he plan to take over Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran? which regional nations did he have his eye on?

am There will be a 'dirty bomb' attack, by Muslims on a major city, somewhere in the world; there will be a biological attack by Muslims on another major city, somewhere in the world.

There will be a major disruption of of Port City and the energy grid of a major city, somewhere in the world

P: I agree there, since Bush has done little that would prevent it.

But in any case, there is no reason to think the folks who will do this are Iraqis or funded by Iraq

(I think I know what you will say: Well they *might* have come from Iraq, if the US weren't running Iraq).

Leaving aside a landgrab in Kuwait, what terrorist acts outside Iraq, was Iraq responsible for?

---
In fact the case is stronger than I've presented.

By US going into Iraq, al qaeda was *brought there*, and given a bunch of eager recruits (iraqi's pissed with the US). And al qaeda has a wonderful propaganda and recruiting tool: simply keep showing pics of burned up Iraq women and babies.

Your blind Bush loyalty is even past 'loyal Republicanism,' you simply 'don't get it' re global terrorism. When there's a 'dirty bomb' in your back yard, and your National Guard is nowhere near, but 'sowing democracy' in Iraq, maybe you'll get it.