If the Democrats want to win seats next election...

[Hypoxia]

There are already laws against slaughters... if those laws don't work, you think more laws will?

Sounds like you're a real wil-e coyote.

Acme gun banning, at your service. Guaranteed to solve the problem!

Democrats are their own worst enemy.

[/me taps /you forehead] [hollow sound] Hello, anybody home? Do you ever read what I write? Like that banning firearms in USA is impossible? Do you love stepping in old dogshit? Ewww...

USA ain't gonna ban guns. Much too late for that. Production, distribution, possession are beyond control. But public carrying CAN be controlled. Wank your Walther weenie at home. But don't take it to the streets.

USA and Guatemala are the only nations on Earth with firearms possession written into their constitutions, and Guatemala limits rights to "personal use" which I suppose precluded holdups and murder sprees. Many actual shithole nations ban firearms but the laws are totally ignored. Should we expect USA laws to be ignored? How well did that work during Prohibition? How deep a shithole nation should America be?

 

[bellisarius]

[/me taps /you forehead] [hollow sound] Hello, anybody home? Do you ever read what I write? Like that banning firearms in USA is impossible? Do you love stepping in old dogshit? Ewww...

USA ain't gonna ban guns. Much too late for that. Production, distribution, possession are beyond control. But public carrying CAN be controlled. Wank your Walther weenie at home. But don't take it to the streets.

USA and Guatemala are the only nations on Earth with firearms possession written into their constitutions, and Guatemala limits rights to "personal use" which I suppose precluded holdups and murder sprees. Many actual shithole nations ban firearms but the laws are totally ignored. Should we expect USA laws to be ignored? How well did that work during Prohibition? How deep a shithole nation should America be?

Pray tell us how that law works?

 

[richard_daily]

[/me taps /you forehead] [hollow sound] Hello, anybody home? Do you ever read what I write? Like that banning firearms in USA is impossible? Do you love stepping in old dogshit? Ewww...

USA ain't gonna ban guns. Much too late for that. Production, distribution, possession are beyond control. But public carrying CAN be controlled. Wank your Walther weenie at home. But don't take it to the streets.

Unless you're going to overthrow the supreme court, no it can't.

Do you believe that we should overthrow the supreme court? If so, I don't think you should be allowed to own firearms.

 

[Hypoxia]

Unless you're going to overthrow the supreme court, no it can't.

Do you believe that we should overthrow the supreme court? If so, I don't think you should be allowed to own firearms.

SCOTUS has reversed opinions before. SCOTUS can reverse opinions in the future. Tell me things don't change. Tell me that in 2015 you expected 2018 to look like this. Now tell me what SCOTUS will decide next year. Go ahead, tell me. I'm all fucking ears.

 

[richard_daily]

SCOTUS has reversed opinions before. SCOTUS can reverse opinions in the future. Tell me things don't change. Tell me that in 2015 you expected 2018 to look like this. Now tell me what SCOTUS will decide next year. Go ahead, tell me. I'm all fucking ears.

To look like what?

Citizen's United? Civil unrest in Syria? The Democratic party committing suicide?

All of these things have a cause and effect.

 

[Hypoxia]

To look like what?

Citizen's United? Civil unrest in Syria? The Democratic party committing suicide?

All of these things have a cause and effect.

How many state and special elections have Gups won since Tromp took office? And, more to the point, what is the prospect of change so fucking immense you can't imagine it now? I'll predict a SCOTUS testing shifting political winds and issuing a ruling on the scale of BROWN or ROE. Your turn.

 

[RobDownSouth]

To look like what?

Citizen's United? Civil unrest in Syria? The Democratic party committing suicide?

All of these things have a cause and effect.

You continue to cling to that particular piece of fiction, despite ample evidence to the contrary. Have you always been a fan of "alternate facts"?

 

[richard_daily]

You continue to cling to that particular piece of fiction, despite ample evidence to the contrary. Have you always been a fan of "alternate facts"?

Clinton's loss to Donald J Trump.

Do you need any worse examples?

Actually, the worst example is Hilary Clinton's rigging of the Democratic primary, but that's a different story, and a different issue.

 

[richard_daily]

I guess the Democrats are willing to give up Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and a couple of other key battleground states to make a point for the anti-gun part of their base.

Seems like a shame to me, to help the republicans with their anti-woman, anti-immigrant agenda...

 

[BotanyBoy]

OH shit.....looks like Daily is now over here with the rest of us *not Republicans* .

See what happens when you get out of step with the (D)???

Say some radical shit like you support free speech and you'll be called a libertoonian Nazi supporter next.

 

[Adre]

I guess the Democrats are willing to give up Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and a couple of other key battleground states to make a point for the anti-gun part of their base.

Seems like a shame to me, to help the republicans with their anti-woman, anti-immigrant agenda...

70% of Americans now say they favor tighter gun control. Guess we’ll find out.

 

[BotanyBoy]

70% of Americans now say they favor tighter gun control. Guess we’ll find out.

You get that from the same people who said Trump had a 1,000,000,000,000,000% chance of never winning the election??

 

[richard_daily]

70% of Americans now say they favor tighter gun control. Guess we’ll find out.

Says who?

 

[Adre]

You get that from the same people who said Trump had a 1,000,000,000,000,000% chance of never winning the election??

As I said, guess we’ll find out. Women and kids are mighty pissed off. About a lot of things.

 

[richard_daily]

As I said, guess we’ll find out. Women and kids are mighty pissed off. About a lot of things.

Kids also want less homework, and not to get grounded.

Will this be integrated into the democratic platform for 2020?

 

[Adre]

Says who?

CNN poll of 1,016 respondents. Highest percentage since 1994.

 

[richard_daily]

CNN poll of 1,016 respondents. Highest percentage since 1994.

Ah, so whichever way the wind blows.

I've never put much stock into surveys with small sample sizes. 1,016... great. What about the other 300+ million folks?

 

[Adre]

Ah, so whichever way the wind blows.

I've never put much stock into surveys with small sample sizes. 1,016... great. What about the other 300+ million folks?

As I said, I guess we’ll find out.

 

[BotanyBoy]

As I said, guess we’ll find out. Women and kids are mighty pissed off. About a lot of things.

Kids don't get a say so in the matter and even if you're just talking about young adults they still don't vote so fuck them they don't matter.

Women on the other hand do...so shit could swing back the other way but I have a feeling even if that is the case the (D)'s are going to have to do better than a rifle accessories ban if they want to keep it for very long.

CNN poll of 1,016 respondents. Highest percentage since 1994.

Oh yea CNN....because their "facts" are worth a shit

 

[Adre]

Oh yea CNN....because their "facts" are worth a shit

So you like Fox facts better?

 

[BotanyBoy]

So you like Fox facts better?

Because if not chugging CNN Kool-Aid then must be a FOX fan!!!
https://static2.fjcdn.com/comments/Haha+_ff69f6ba63775046eb70dbaa3cf54f55.png







No.

They are all pushing narratives/agendas to get viewership and thus get paid.

I take all their "news" reporting with a grain of salt and assume their "facts"/statistics/polls are skewed bullshit there to push their product....which is almost always outrage and as much "us vs. them" partisanship as possible.

 

[RobDownSouth]

So you like Fox facts better?

All "Not Republicans" watch Fox and trash CNN.

 

[BotanyBoy]

All "Not Republicans" watch Fox and trash CNN.

Oh look...DishonestDownSouth is pushing lies again.

Shocking.

 

[Adre]

Explain to the class how purposely skewing a poll or publishing an outright false poll would increase viewership and lead to higher profits. Rationally if possible, not with your usual maniacal bullshit if you please.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Explain to the class how purposely skewing a poll or publishing an outright false poll would increase viewership and lead to higher profits. Rationally if possible, not with your usual maniacal bullshit if you please.

Not being lock step with whatever (D) commands of it's most loyal followers doesn't = maniacal bullshit.


Putting out bullshit polls and statistics can be used in a lot of ways.

Promoting ideas, pushing a narrative to support their party and please their viewers, or to demonize the other party and manufacture outrage further polarizing shit.

People get sucked into that and watch their brand of news rather loyally....loyal viewership is something that is very valuable that every MSM channel sells to all sorts of buyers.