I Want to Stroke a Cock Not an Ego

lavender said:
I understand fully that there is a need for a smidgeon of ego stroking in every relationship. But, it seems that ego stroking becomes so important to the happiness of many people and many relationships.

It always pleases me to know that I am with someone who is confident enough in themselves, not just outwardly confident, but truly comfortable in their own skin to the point where it's not necessary for me to constantly be building them up.

Besides, I'd rather spend that time having good sex.

Cock stroking I provide - in abundance.

Ego stroking - I'm honest. Ego stroking shouldn't take effort at ALL.


Can I assume then that you have never asked that question that chills almost every mane to the bone :

"Does this dress make my ass look fat?"



Mike
 
Cock stroking is also ego stroking. Kill two birds with one stroke
 
The wang is the home of the ego.

(The word cock just rubs me the wrong way {and I don't mean in the good way}...yet, I can't think of one that works any better, so wang it is for today.)
 
Dont you know a man's cock and ego are hardwired to each other?

strokinghd.jpg
 
Re: Re: I Want to Stroke a Cock Not an Ego

Desert Amazon said:
I think it's one of the rarer qualities. It is nice to have someone who's confident and self-assured.

Yes, and thats a turn on in and of itself...and it all feeds on itself.

That is so damn sexy.

I would think that the way one responds is stroking enough...no? Good Lord, I make no bones about it.
 
Re: Dont you know a man's cock and ego are hardwired to each other?

Lancecastor said:

Hot Damn! Can you please insert him into my phone call thread? A girl can dream.;)
 
lavender said:
Ego stroking shouldn't take effort at ALL.

Whereas, cock stroking should?

Seems to me if you know how to do both equally well, there's hardly any effort involved. :)
 
Re: Re: Re: I Want to Stroke a Cock Not an Ego

intrigued said:
Yes, and thats a turn on in and of itself...and it all feeds on itself.

That is so damn sexy.

I would think that the way one responds is stroking enough...no? Good Lord, I make no bones about it.

Intrigued, I would love to have you stroke my fat cock<wink>
 
lavender said:
we have issues.

You always have issues, Lav. Some people are like that. Issues issues issues.

In terms of a life-long partnership, if I could choose only one? I'd choose a partner who strokes my ego and go without my cock being stroked.

A partner who lifts me up when I'm low, who gets me to do things I don't want to do with sweet talk instead of "honesty" about my "attitude", for example, is a far better future than getting a hot tongue in bed and a cold shoulder the rest of the time.

Flies, sugar, vinegar, catching more....ring a bell?

Desert Amazon and Intrigued's responses, for example, show balance and harmony in terms of understanding that a relationship is about give and take; compromise, not issues.

I think you'd do well to consider their point of view for inclusion in your arsenal.

Balance.

Lance
 
Last edited:
lavender said:
I understand fully that there is a need for a smidgeon of ego stroking in every relationship. But, it seems that ego stroking becomes so important to the happiness of many people and many relationships.

It always pleases me to know that I am with someone who is confident enough in themselves, not just outwardly confident, but truly comfortable in their own skin to the point where it's not necessary for me to constantly be building them up.

Besides, I'd rather spend that time having good sex.

Cock stroking I provide - in abundance.

Ego stroking - I'm honest. Ego stroking shouldn't take effort at ALL.

Having great sex strokes one's ego, or so I remember!
 
Back
Top