I Think The Democrat In Congress Should Go For It!

[FGB]

I Think The Democrats In Congress Should Go For It!

Trump has pretty much told them to go fuck themselves.

Well They DO seem to be good at it!

With their Hen House ways and the Constitution along with SCOTUS and the people watching what could go wrong?

They ALL know Trump is doing things impeachment worthy right?

I say GO FOR IT they might make it ...they don't know!

(Did I hear a "Hey Y'all watch this!" from the Democrats?)

 

[SpeareChucker]

They don't have the balls to impeach...



Serious, even their men have undergone figurative castration.

 

[Boxlicker101]

They don't have the balls to impeach...



Serious, even their men have undergone figurative castration.

Some of the loonier ones, such as Mad Max, might have the balls, but they don't have the votes, and they know it. An attempted impeachment would fail, and do nothing but piss off the electorate over the foolish waste of time and effort.

 

[SpeareChucker]

But focusing on endless investigations and a-cumin-ated fried chicken are not

a "foolish waste of time and effort."






To kill an infidel is not murder; it is the path to God!

 

[FGB]

"Nancy Pelosi fears Trump won't leave White House if he loses 2020 election by small margin"

I don't think that is going to be a problem!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nancy-pelosi-fears-trump-wont-103700287.html

 

[cowslinger64]

But focusing on endless investigations and a-cumin-ated fried chicken are not

a "foolish waste of time and effort."






To kill an infidel is not murder; it is the path to God!

Yeah, because the gop never did anything remotely like that.


Ten investigations were conducted into the 2012 Benghazi attack, six of these by Republican-controlled House committees. Problems were identified with security measures at the Benghazi facilities, due to poor decisions made by employees of the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, and specifically its director Eric Boswell, who resigned under pressure in December 2012.[1] Despite numerous allegations against Obama administration officials of scandal, cover-up and lying regarding the Benghazi attack and its aftermath,

 

[bellisarius]

I'm just enjoying watching Pelosi trying to drag them back from the edge without starting an open rebellion.

 

[Boxlicker101]

"Nancy Pelosi fears Trump won't leave White House if he loses 2020 election by small margin"

I don't think that is going to be a problem!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nancy-pelosi-fears-trump-wont-103700287.html

If she means The GOP will insist on recounts in very close elections, she's probably right. You can say the same thing for the Dems. In those states where Trump wins by very small margins, the Dems will call for recounts.

That's assuming, of course, that a change in the results in the states in question would affect the overall election results.

 

[HisArpy]

Yeah, because the gop never did anything remotely like that.


Ten investigations were conducted into the 2012 Benghazi attack, six of these by Republican-controlled House committees. Problems were identified with security measures at the Benghazi facilities, due to poor decisions made by employees of the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, and specifically its director Eric Boswell, who resigned under pressure in December 2012.[1] Despite numerous allegations against Obama administration officials of scandal, cover-up and lying regarding the Benghazi attack and its aftermath,

And yet, for some reason, the Speaker of the House at the time never said that Obama wasn't going to go quietly. Or at least, I don't remember Boehner saying it.

 

[someoneyouknow]

You do realize impeachment is the process, not the end result.

Even if the Senate doesn't agree, the con artist would still be impeached.

 

[FGB]

You do realize impeachment is the process, not the end result.

Even if the Senate doesn't agree, the con artist would still be impeached.

And THAT started before he was even elected!

 

[Aglaopheme]

And yet, for some reason, the Speaker of the House at the time never said that Obama wasn't going to go quietly. Or at least, I don't remember Boehner saying it.

But Trump’s own people are saying it now.

 

[SpeareChucker]

You do realize impeachment is the process, not the end result.

Even if the Senate doesn't agree, the con artist would still be impeached.

What the fuck is this supposed to mean?

It has nothing to do with the process the Democrats will only talk about...

 

[SpeareChucker]

But Trump’s own people are saying it now.

WTF???

Is this just another day at Delphi?

 

[HisArpy]

You do realize impeachment is the process, not the end result.

Even if the Senate doesn't agree, the con artist would still be impeached.

So, knowing in advance that absolutely nothing will change, you advocate going through the process anyway?

Why?

Just to convince that half of the public which hates Trump to keep on hating him? From there the next question I have to ask is; since when did The House of Representatives get reduced to a place where unpopular political figures get vilified and publicly ridiculed instead of a place to conduct the Nation's business?

 

[HisArpy]

WTF???

Is this just another day at Delphi?

Well, you know, when the truth isn't in your favor, make up fake facts and use them often.

 

[cowslinger64]

And yet, for some reason, the Speaker of the House at the time never said that Obama wasn't going to go quietly. Or at least, I don't remember Boehner saying it.

You could have not answered and it would have meant the same.

 

[cowslinger64]

Well, you know, when the truth isn't in your favor, make up fake facts and use them often.

With his 10,000 lies, President Trump is the most dishonest politician ever

https://www.courier-journal.com/sto...like-no-other-democrat-republican/3649677002/

 

[Adre]

So, knowing in advance that absolutely nothing will change, you advocate going through the process anyway?

Why?

Just to convince that half of the public which hates Trump to keep on hating him? From there the next question I have to ask is; since when did The House of Representatives get reduced to a place where unpopular political figures get vilified and publicly ridiculed instead of a place to conduct the Nation's business?

So the House should never impeach unless the outcome is guaranteed? Following that logic no one should ever be indicted. That wouldn’t be good for your profession.

 

[cowslinger64]

So, knowing in advance that absolutely nothing will change, you advocate going through the process anyway?

Why?

Just to convince that half of the public which hates Trump to keep on hating him? From there the next question I have to ask is; since when did The House of Representatives get reduced to a place where unpopular political figures get vilified and publicly ridiculed instead of a place to conduct the Nation's business?

It's got little to do with HATE... grow up.

It certainly started by then, anyways.

http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/23/the-party-of-no-new-details-on-the-gop-plot-to-obstruct-obama/

the Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whip Eric Cantor (in December 2008) and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (in early January 2009) in which they laid out their daring (though cynical and political) no-honeymoon strategy of all-out resistance to a popular President-elect during an economic emergency. “If he was for it,” former Ohio Senator George Voinovich explained, “we had to be against it.”

 

[SpeareChucker]

They are refusing to pass immigration reform, quibbling over how many crimes it takes to disqualify an applicant as well as spending to stop our crumbling infrastructure. One would think that they want to run on the issue instead of solving it.

And it's not so much that Trump isn't willing to spend and spend yuuuuuge!

Dems said we want infrastructure spending and he said, "Let's start at $2T!"

That's a lot of fucking light rail! 10, maybe 20 miles of it!!!

 

[FGB]

And yet, for some reason, the Speaker of the House at the time never said that Obama wasn't going to go quietly. Or at least, I don't remember Boehner saying it.

Ha!

Obama is STILL mouthing off!

 

[heathergives]

https://pics.onsizzle.com/liberal-democrats-hang-themselves-by-their-own-petard-22990079.png

 

[pointless]

And THAT started before he was even elected!

that's because he's a corrupt gangster. this really should be obvious to you.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Well, you know, when the truth isn't in your favor, make up fake facts and use them often.

No, he's trying to change the subject.
He knows his team is balking on "doing the right thing*"
So, there has to be a way to blame the other team; i.e., YOU KNOW THEY WON'T CONVICT HIM!!!



Inquisitions should be made of sterner stuff.
He longs for the days of the rack and the fire...







* at least in his mind