Eumenides
I Am Little Spoon
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2002
- Posts
- 24,371
There are many intelligent posters on lit. I am sure that many of them have even taken communications &/or debate classes, and have learned the rules to an effective debate or discussion. So why is it that these intelligent posters let the less skilled communicators drag them down to the level of name calling and insult hurling?
I can't say that I've been totally immune to it, but I try to refrain as much as possible. I absolutely hate to hurt people's feelings, and that gets me into enough trouble as it is. Can someone explain to me why this happens? Is it that the debate becomes more about who can hurl the more creative insult? Is it a shameless need to hurt someone? Or do people really believe they can win arguments this way?
I usually don't post leading threads like this, as I hate confrontation. But after reading some "discussion" threads today, I am saddened by the amount of name-calling that people use in serious discussions. To me it trivializes the issue. Argue the topic, not the person who holds the opposing viewpoint.
I can't say that I've been totally immune to it, but I try to refrain as much as possible. I absolutely hate to hurt people's feelings, and that gets me into enough trouble as it is. Can someone explain to me why this happens? Is it that the debate becomes more about who can hurl the more creative insult? Is it a shameless need to hurt someone? Or do people really believe they can win arguments this way?
I usually don't post leading threads like this, as I hate confrontation. But after reading some "discussion" threads today, I am saddened by the amount of name-calling that people use in serious discussions. To me it trivializes the issue. Argue the topic, not the person who holds the opposing viewpoint.