Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who doesn't hate the BNP?
But it looks like the Sun will go to seven days, absorb the NotW staff, and in a few weeks all will be the same.
Is it possible to block Rup from the BSkyB deal at this point?
But he did not just control our media. He dominated British public life. Politicians – including prime ministers – treated him with deference and fear. Time and again the Murdoch press – using techniques of which we have only just become aware – destroyed political careers. Murdoch also claims to determine the results of general elections.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-World-phone-hacking-scandal-hits-No.-10.htmlTo begin with, Cameron was wary of Murdoch. His first meetings with the tycoon went badly. After one meeting, a senior News International figure complained to me: “We told David exactly what to say and how to say it in order to please Rupert. But Cameron wouldn’t play ball. I can’t understand it.”
Cameron had made the deliberate decision to gain power without Murdoch’s assistance. Urged on by his senior aide – and probably his closest political friend, Steve Hilton – the future prime minister kept his distance.
But this strategy led to disaster in the polls. David Cameron was mocked and ridiculed in the Labour supporting Murdoch press, and by the summer of 2007 matters reached a crisis. There was talk that Gordon Brown, newly elected as Labour leader and Prime Minister, would call a snap election that autumn which he was widely expected to win handsomely.
It was at this point that George Osborne, then shadow chancellor and also Cameron’s closest strategic advisor, entered the fray. The immensely ambitious Osborne – who was already cultivating his own links with News International – made the case that Cameron should hire Andy Coulson
the editors place enormous pressure upon their journos to get the stories first, and bigger and better headlines are demanded to draw the buyers. to think that the editors have no inside knowledge of where these stories came from - the methods used to get them - is naive. brookes phoned gordon brown to let him know they'd aquired information - private medical information - about his son's medical condition and that they intended to run with it. this personal information was not come by legally.When it comes right down to it
the News of the world and
Murdoch are hardly to blame.
The blame clearly lies
with the actions of the sleazy
reporters involved.
The fact that the notw is a sleazy
rag and attracts the wrong element is irrelevant
Murdoch will easily come clean
on this.To assume otherwise
is being an idiot,
Latest I heard on de radio was that The Sun and a third Murdoch rag (The Sunday something) might be involved in these shennannigans too. Any brit or someone with google-fu who can verify that?
That's what it was, thanks.The Sunday Times - everything Murdoch touches starts to stink sooner or later.
So, how long do you think that Murdoch can keep up the appearances of his nose being clean in the states?
Anyone think for a second that fox isn't up to the same crap?
I can’t imagine that a sophisticated example of journalism like the NY Post could ever practice such unsavory behavior.