Hussein Black Obama screams about gun control after every incident

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
the media and LIBZ bash teh REPOZ (what it has to do with REPOZ, I dunno), teh NRA, teh WHITE people

but

THEY WERE QUIET AS A CHURCH MOUSE AFTER FT HOOD:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
If it makes you feel any better, on this issue, like so many others, the man is basically all talk. There were several mass shootings during the first two years of his terms in office--you know, when he had supermajorities in both houses of Congress and plenty of opportunities for the Democratic majority in the Senate to rewrite the rules of the chamber to allow for a simple majority vote.. If he actually wanted to do something about this problem, he could have done it then. (It's similar to how he only ever actually publically supports liberal economic policy when it's completely impossible to pass in Congress.)

He doesn't. It's all talk to gin up the morons who don't pay attention to support him as he does the things he actually wants to do, i.e. hand banks control over the global economy for good, start endless wars, and be the guy who actually drives a stake through the heart of what's left of the New Deal and Great Society.

Also, there was outcry for gun control--and not enough talk about PTSD--after Ft. Hood. In fact, Ft. Hood should have been a turning point in the gun control debate since it puts the lie to the "one good man in a crowd" line from the fucking NRA. If people on a fucking MILITARY BASE can't protect themselves from a mass shooting, then, really, the argument that looser gun laws are the actual answer to the problem is revealed utterly as a fucking moronic suggestion divorced completely from reality.
 
And Billary, well underway now with her completely deceitful presidential campaign, having the perfect opportunity to actually put forth any credible options which would aid her election effort with reasonable people, spews that what America needs now is "common-sense" gun reforms...

...without, of course, having the actual sense to offer up even one single reform herself which would've made any difference at all in Charleston Wednesday night last.

Fact is, and Billary knows it as well as anyone (which is why she will not mention it in the least because she also knows it will definitely lose her "liberal" votes she so desperately needs)...

...the only action that can make any difference at all - which I've pontificated so many times for so long - is to amend the 2nd to repeal the natural right of all to keep and bear arms, so that government is then legally allowed to infringe on that natural right, completely opposite of the specifically intended purpose of the Second Amendment in the first place.

No less an anti-American move, by the way...

...than repealing the First Amendment so government may legally then abridge free speech.

Billary understands that pimping either anti-America agenda overtly (even though she literally drools at the very fantasy of doing so), will not only lose her significant American Idol votes...

...but if any significant move does begin to repeal the Second Amendment to specifically give government the right to infringe more on Americans' natural right to keep and bear arms, almost immediately after that move is recognized, civil war will again erupt in this nation.

Billary, the egotistically deceitful manipulator and chronic liar she is, no matter how much her cold, collective heart naturally longs for such an anti-American move, will not put how she truly feels on the presidential candidate table...

...and risk in the least, her only remaining wannabe chance in the spotlight of absolute power she statistly craves so much.

ELECT
BILLARY
2016


So she can return all that she stole...
...the last time she left the People's House.



Clinton calls for 'common-sense' gun control after Charleston terrorist attack
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politi...gun-control-after-Charleston-terrorist-attack
 
Last edited:
One of my personal maxims is to take with a grain of salt and/or a shot of penicillin anything said by someone who calls the President "Hussein Black Obama."
 
One of my personal maxims is to take with a grain of salt and/or a shot of penicillin anything said by someone who calls the President "Hussein Black Obama."

Same "maxim" might also exactly apply...

...to anything said by someone who obviously has a need to show her tits to strangers.

Perfect thing between you two is...

...the wannabe piece of shit busybody naturally is, you can say anything about him as long as you do show him your tits.
 
One of my personal maxims is to take with a grain of salt and/or a shot of penicillin anything said by someone who calls the President "Hussein Black Obama."

hopefully your CUNT works, cause you "mind" doesnt
 
Same "maxim" might also exactly apply...

...to anything said by someone who obviously has a need to show her tits to strangers.

Perfect thing between you two is...

...the wannabe piece of shit busybody naturally is, you can say anything about him as long as you do show him your tits.

piece of shit?

:rolleyes:
 
One of my personal maxims is to take with a grain of salt and/or a shot of penicillin anything said by someone who calls the President "Hussein Black Obama."

were it not for his color

No one would have heard of him

were it not for an allegation CuntClinton has a cunt, no one would hear of her
 
piece of shit?

:rolleyes:

Yep, same as your piece of shit buddy vetteman:

Whining and moaning so wailfully about what is wrong...

...yet continuing just as you always have to financially support it anyway, just so you can hold on to the most creature comforts and security for you and your family you possibly can.

Follow the money
...

...and at least one trail from the lost republic leads directly to wannabes like you.
 
Same "maxim" might also exactly apply...

...to anything said by someone who obviously has a need to show her tits to strangers.

Perfect thing between you two is...

...the wannabe piece of shit busybody naturally is, you can say anything about him as long as you do show him your tits.

lmao…
 
Same "maxim" might also exactly apply...

...to anything said by someone who obviously has a need to show her tits to strangers.

Perfect thing between you two is...

...the wannabe piece of shit busybody naturally is, you can say anything about him as long as you do show him your tits.

And Pussy pics;)
 
In fact, Ft. Hood should have been a turning point in the gun control debate since it puts the lie to the "one good man in a crowd" line from the fucking NRA. If people on a fucking MILITARY BASE can't protect themselves from a mass shooting, then, really, the argument that looser gun laws are the actual answer to the problem is revealed utterly as a fucking moronic suggestion divorced completely from reality.

You know exactly NOTHING about military base policy. Unless it is a part of their normal duty (I.E. MPs, Base police, LE. Security, or whatever the branch calls it) base personnel for the most part are not allowed to be armed while on base property.

Fort Hood's firearms policy:

The Army places strict restrictions on personal firearms carried onto Fort Hood and other bases. Military weapons are used only for training or by base security. Personal weapons bought on base are required to be secured at all times and must be registered with the provost marshal

Basically, this means that ANYONE coming onto a military installation, except for local/state/federal law enforcement, has to in effect "check their arms at the door".
 
You know exactly NOTHING about military base policy. Unless it is a part of their normal duty (I.E. MPs, Base police, LE. Security, or whatever the branch calls it) base personnel for the most part are not allowed to be armed while on base property.

Fort Hood's firearms policy:



Basically, this means that ANYONE coming onto a military installation, except for local/state/federal law enforcement, has to in effect "check their arms at the door".

I don't see how that refutes his point. If an armed military base with MPs at the gate cannot prevent a shooter from possessing and using an unauthorized firearm, why would any other place in America be safe?
 
I don't see how that refutes his point.

The point is until the MPs showed up, there was no one in or around that building that could have countered a mad man with a gun. Several soldiers tried with tables and chairs and such, two were killed outright. As far as the civilians, none of them were specific targets. But that is really unimportant as none of them were allowed to be armed either. Would it have made any difference if someone else was armed? We'll never know as the entire base is essentially a "gun free zone".


If an armed military base with MPs at the gate cannot prevent a shooter from possessing and using an unauthorized firearm, why would any other place in America be safe?

Except for the Security and MPs, the base is not armed. Do you understand that? ALL of the weapons with exception of those issued to the duty personnel for the duration of their shift, are kept in the base armoury. This includes those that are privately owned. If you live in base housing or the barracks and you have personal weapons they MUST be checked in with the Base Provost Marshal and stored in the armoury located there.

If you have a DOD sticker and authorization to be on the base you already know these rules and you don't bring personal weapons on base.

Visitors go through a different procedure and are generally checked for unauthorized items before they are given a pass.

Those with DOD stickers are generally not checked unless there is a heightened security alert going on. Even then, unless security is such that ALL entrants on the base are stopped and checked, some buck private or other lower rank enlisted man is NOT going to jack up a Major unless he has good reason to do so.

That all being said, no, you are not going to stop a determined individual from violating a law or possessing and using an unauthorized firearm. The best you can hope for is the ability to react to it in the shortest amount of time. So either that means you go about personally armed, stay out of places where this sort of thing might happen, hope that the cops or someone else suitably armed shows up before something bad happens or hope that somehow you manage to escape the situation.
 
It being a gun-free zone was the problem. Unlike schools, theaters, bars and restaurants that are also gun-free zones this particular gun-free zone had security. Armed security at, I am quite sure, every entrance to the base.

Which makes gun-free zones with no security at all even worse. Courthouses and Federal buildings are gun-free zones with metal detectors and armed guards.
 
Back
Top