How's this new turn in foriegn policy working out?

[VaticanAssassin]

For a fake Internet Dr. You would think he would at least try not to make idiotic posts.

 

[Busybody]

If you dont believe Obama is planning on introducing Sharia Law to the US


Watch this


THEY DONT EVEN DENY IT

http://moonbattery.com/?p=18032

 

[Ishmael]

For a fake Internet Dr. You would think he would at least try not to make idiotic posts.

The sad part is that he's not trying to do so.

Ishmael

 

[mercury14]

ahahahahahahahaahahaha

ahahahahaha
ahahaha

ahaha


Pot/Kettle
Tomato/Tomäto

Now tell me that I'm defending AJ and collect another Hypocrisy point.

Yet the last time you replied to my posts you ascribed multiple thoughts to me that were untrue. And yes, jumping into a conversation I was having with AJ and immediately ascribing thoughts to me (in bullet point form) in order to criticize my questioning of his notion that kids are being "turned gay"... means you were defending him. Own it.

 

[Busybody]

^^^LOSER TURDBALL...............SCHMUCK


Thin skinned MOTHERFUCKER

 

[kbate]

Yet the last time you replied to my posts you ascribed multiple thoughts to me that were untrue. And yes, jumping into a conversation I was having with AJ and immediately ascribing thoughts to me (in bullet point form) in order to criticize my questioning of his notion that kids are being "turned gay"... means you were defending him. Own it.

Keep on telling me what my post meant based on your warped idea that, "anything unfavourable to you means support for your enemy."

I guess the 800000 Lit posters who didn't come in and cheer you on in your inane and ridiculous interpretation of "pop culture" into a political indictment of liberalism are also defending AJ?

Attacking you is defending him? Grow up.

 

[mercury14]

Keep on telling me what my post meant based on your warped idea that, "anything unfavourable to you means support for your enemy."

I guess the 800000 Lit posters who didn't come in and cheer you on in your inane and ridiculous interpretation of "pop culture" into a political indictment of liberalism are also defending AJ?

Attacking you is defending him? Grow up.

Ascription. You're tellin' me what my ideas are now lol.

You didn't bring up something unfavorable to me (nor did AJ), you specifically criticized my post directed to AJ by ascribing me two positions I wasn't taking. You can't even say what your reason was for inserting yourself into that discussion. You didn't want to comment on the subject, only attempt to criticize my post in ways that were not only invalid, they were inapplicable. You're really coming undone here.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

He cannot. He is a Democrat. His self-esteem is wrapped up in the cult of personality of Obama. As Obama goes, so goes he. He is terrified that Republicans will force him into the competitive private sector. That is, if we can believe a word of what he says about his life; he has been caught in several lies.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Ascription. You're tellin' me what my ideas are now lol.

You didn't bring up something unfavorable to me (nor did AJ), you specifically criticized my post directed to AJ by ascribing me two positions I wasn't taking. You can't even say what your reason was for inserting yourself into that discussion. You didn't want to comment on the subject, only attempt to criticize my post in ways that were not only invalid, they were inapplicable. You're really coming undone here.

You mean her response vaguely resembled that which you do?

Perish the thought Diogenes caught in the light of the lamp.

 

[mercury14]

He cannot. He is a Democrat. His self-esteem is wrapped up in the cult of personality of Obama. As Obama goes, so goes he. He is terrified that Republicans will force him into the competitive private sector. That is, if we can believe a word of what he says about his life; he has been caught in several lies.

Hey kbate there are about five examples of ascription and mind reading in this post. Are you going to put on your police hat and call him on it or do you only believe in rules for those who differ from you politically?

Then after kbate inserted herself into the previously-mentioned discussion with irrational blather, you used it as cover to avoid having to defend your belief what was it? That pop culture is changing the sexual orientation of children? Still lacking any coherent thoughts to back up that whopper, eh?

 

[kbate]

Ascription. You're tellin' me what my ideas are now lol.

You didn't bring up something unfavorable to me (nor did AJ), you specifically criticized my post directed to AJ by ascribing me two positions I wasn't taking. You can't even say what your reason was for inserting yourself into that discussion. You didn't want to comment on the subject, only attempt to criticize my post in ways that were not only invalid, they were inapplicable. You're really coming undone here.

I said:

AJ: I (indicates AJ and nothing else)
AJ: Think (indicates remainder of post is a lie)

This is not exactly favourable to AJ, a little snark aimed at him.

I then said:

(this has been a Mercury14 analysis) A little snark aimed at you because you turned "pop culture" into "Liberal Pop Culture" and then argued based on that.

And from this, you derive that I am somehow defending him from your Just and Right assault on his (both correct and incorrect) position that modern culture accepts and even endorses gay experimentation.

Yes, that is obviously a deep right wing philosophy I am endorsing and a hardcore defense of his statement.

but I'm undone. Right. . .

Doc, heal thyself.

 

[mercury14]

You mean her response vaguely resembled that which you do?

Perish the thought Diogenes caught in the light of the lamp.

Do you recall her post? I asked you to submit evidence for your claim. Kbate jumped in and accused me of generalizing your belief to others without any sort of reason to assume I was. And what was #2? Oh yes, that I'm confusing what you think for what you believe or vice-versa. Regardless, both her bullet points were irrelevant because I was simply asking you why you thought something.

 

[mercury14]

I said:

AJ: I (indicates AJ and nothing else)
AJ: Think (indicates remainder of post is a lie)

This is not exactly favourable to AJ, a little snark aimed at him.

I then said:

(this has been a Mercury14 analysis) A little snark aimed at you because you turned "pop culture" into "Liberal Pop Culture" and then argued based on that.

And from this, you derive that I am somehow defending him from your Just and Right assault on his (both correct and incorrect) position that modern culture accepts and even endorses gay experimentation.

Yes, that is obviously a deep right wing philosophy I am endorsing and a hardcore defense of his statement.

but I'm undone. Right. . .

Doc, heal thyself.

When AJ says "pop culture" in this context he refers to liberal cultural influences. I really don't think he's implying that conservative "family values" pop culture influences are leading to homosexuality, do you?

I don't think you were defending his point at all by the way. I think you were shielding him from criticism by suggesting that he shouldn't have to back up his assertion. You were defending him from criticism by suggesting that I was accusing him of lying.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Dude, quit building windmills...



You are quickly reducing yourself to a punch line.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You yell about ascription against you, but all you do is ascribe positions, demand people defend them, and then carry that cross for weeks upon end chasing them around demanding that they say your original ascription was correct.

As soon as the reasonable people like kbate start putting you on ignore, then I will too...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

He's the "punchline" in my sig.

Don't you love his tactic of my source is the only source that counts?

The set of positions and myths that all Republicans hold true too?

How Libertarians are just Republicans too ashamed to fess up?

How he never engages in conversation, just attack?

And yet, he's supposed to be some sort of

Medical Health Professional?

 

[mercury14]

He cannot. He is a Democrat. His self-esteem is wrapped up in the cult of personality of Obama.

Ascription.

As Obama goes, so goes he.

Ascription.

He is terrified that Republicans will force him into the competitive private sector.

Ascription.

Rules for thee but not for me!

Not ascription.

 

[kbate]

When AJ says "pop culture" in this context he refers to liberal cultural influences. I really don't think he's implying that conservative "family values" pop culture influences are leading to homosexuality, do you?

I don't think you were defending his point at all by the way. I think you were shielding him from criticism by suggesting that he shouldn't have to back up his assertion. You were defending him from criticism by suggesting that I was accusing him of lying.

No, he meant "pop culture": hip-hop, youtube, ringtones, sexting, texting, bare midriff, hip-huggers, boy shorts, men wearing trousers belted around their thighs, wiki-homework and the lot. It is a new and more permissive age and homosexual experimentation is socially acceptable, or moreso than ever before.

Kids don't think of "family values" or "Liberal or Conservative" - they think of "Will this make me popular or cool?"

Here: Try this one out:

*You: (indicates you and none other, except Rob the parasitic remora)
*Think: Indicates that something inane and probably wrong - but solely your own opinion is about to be posted.

(this has been a Gump analysis)

I did not defend him in any way, as I made no statement about the content of his post until much much later.

You on the other hand, decided what I thought, what it meant and how best to turn that into "kbate has gone over to the right wing".

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No, he meant "pop culture": hip-hop, youtube, ringtones, sexting, texting, bare midriff, hip-huggers, boy shorts, men wearing trousers belted around their thighs, wiki-homework and the lot. It is a new and more permissive age and homosexual experimentation is socially acceptable, or moreso than ever before.

Kids don't think of "family values" or "Liberal or Conservative" - they think of "Will this make me popular or cool?"

Here: Try this one out:

*You: (indicates you and none other, except Rob the parasitic lemora)
*Think: Indicates that something inane and probably wrong - but solely your own opinion is about to be posted.

(this has been a Gump analysis)

I did not defend him in any way, as I made no statement about the content of his post until much much later.

You on the other hand, decided what I thought, what it meant and how best to turn that into "kbate has gone over to the right wing".

Well said.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Ascription.



Ascription.



Ascription.



Not ascription.

Gee, you always recognize it when it is about you. Good for you, at least you know what it is. Now fucking edit yourself before you spout off...

 

[mercury14]

No, he meant "pop culture": hip-hop, youtube, ringtones, sexting, texting, bare midriff, hip-huggers, boy shorts, men wearing trousers belted around their thighs, wiki-homework and the lot. It is a new and more permissive age and homosexual experimentation is socially acceptable, or moreso than ever before.

Kids don't think of "family values" or "Liberal or Conservative" - they think of "Will this make me popular or cool?"

Here: Try this one out:

*You: (indicates you and none other, except Rob the parasitic remora)
*Think: Indicates that something inane and probably wrong - but solely your own opinion is about to be posted.

(this has been a Gump analysis)

I did not defend him in any way, as I made no statement about the content of his post until much much later.

You on the other hand, decided what I thought, what it meant and how best to turn that into "kbate has gone over to the right wing".

K - Upon re-reading this I misinterpreted one of those lines when you originally posted it and owe you an apology for running with it. My bad.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Didn't stop you from a week-long windmill tilt...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The worst part is, by later in the week you'll be bringing up the same topic with the same charge as if you had never admitted that you had ascribed by misreading...