How's this new turn in foriegn policy working out?

[Ishmael]

We are going to be treated to a foreign policy litmus test here in the coming week. Islamic leaders from across the spectrum are calling on the UN to criminalize "Contempt of Islam."

In any realistic world the reaction on the part of all non-Muslim nations should be a diplomatic, "Fuck off idiot" response. However in light of the recent riots the Islamists are in a pretty good position to drive this one through. It will depend on how effective their latest round of mob violence extortion has been.

I will be keenly watching the current administrations position on this particular issue.

Ishmael

 

[mercury14]

We are going to be treated to a foreign policy litmus test here in the coming week. Islamic leaders from across the spectrum are calling on the UN to criminalize "Contempt of Islam."

In any realistic world the reaction on the part of all non-Muslim nations should be a diplomatic, "Fuck off idiot" response. However in light of the recent riots the Islamists are in a pretty good position to drive this one through. It will depend on how effective their latest round of mob violence extortion has been.

I will be keenly watching the current administrations position on this particular issue.

Ishmael

You're just fearmongering though. This has no chance of making it through the UN, not even a tiny one. But conservatives will be playing it up tremendously, won't they?

 

[Ishmael]

You're just fearmongering though. This has no chance of making it through the UN, not even a tiny one. But conservatives will be playing it up tremendously, won't they?

And you're one of the lowest forms of moronic life to be gracing this board.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

We are going to be treated to a foreign policy litmus test here in the coming week. Islamic leaders from across the spectrum are calling on the UN to criminalize "Contempt of Islam."

In any realistic world the reaction on the part of all non-Muslim nations should be a diplomatic, "Fuck off idiot" response. However in light of the recent riots the Islamists are in a pretty good position to drive this one through. It will depend on how effective their latest round of mob violence extortion has been.

I will be keenly watching the current administrations position on this particular issue.

Ishmael

With any luck, they'll take care of those ten floors for us...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

And you're one of the lowest forms of moronic life to be gracing this board.

Ishmael

"Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak up."
Martin Niemöller

 

[mercury14]

And you're one of the lowest forms of moronic life to be gracing this board.

Ishmael

Hey bro, let's put a $20 bet on this. You can paypal me when you lose. Deal?

Also your prediction about Sharia Law overriding our Constitutional rights in court? I'll put $50 on that not happening. Deal?

 

[Ishmael]

"Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak up."
Martin Niemöller

He can't even think that big.

Ishmael

 

[mercury14]

He can't even think that big.

Ishmael

You don't even have to pay me when you lose if you don't want to. I'll just run you up a tab, okay?

 

[busybody..]

We are going to be treated to a foreign policy litmus test here in the coming week. Islamic leaders from across the spectrum are calling on the UN to criminalize "Contempt of Islam."

In any realistic world the reaction on the part of all non-Muslim nations should be a diplomatic, "Fuck off idiot" response. However in light of the recent riots the Islamists are in a pretty good position to drive this one through. It will depend on how effective their latest round of mob violence extortion has been.

I will be keenly watching the current administrations position on this particular issue.

Ishmael

The advance text shows

He will disavow the US from the vid..........(silence on PISS CHRIST)

But have the obligatory

BUT.......it is no cause for violence..................


Wrong approach........

Btw..........Morsi is giving conditions to the US for them being nice

 

[Ishmael]

You don't even have to pay me when you lose if you don't want to. I'll just run you up a tab, okay?

Look moron, this is what I posted.

We are going to be treated to a foreign policy litmus test here in the coming week. Islamic leaders from across the spectrum are calling on the UN to criminalize "Contempt of Islam."

In any realistic world the reaction on the part of all non-Muslim nations should be a diplomatic, "Fuck off idiot" response. However in light of the recent riots the Islamists are in a pretty good position to drive this one through. It will depend on how effective their latest round of mob violence extortion has been.

I will be keenly watching the current administrations position on this particular issue.

Ishmael

And this is how you replied.

You're just fearmongering though. This has no chance of making it through the UN, not even a tiny one. But conservatives will be playing it up tremendously, won't they?

So moron, just what thought process did you use to extract "fear mongering" from my post? Be specific about how you made that leap.

And from there you go babbling, like a fucking idiot, about the odds of it passing when that wasn't even the core of what I said to begin with. I'm pretty sure it won't pass, if for no other reason than an Asian/South American coalition blocking it. The issue, like the basic core of this thread, is how THIS administration will handle the issue in the forum of the UN. And I fully expect you to go off trying to make pretend bets, and pretending to win said bets, when in reality no one is betting.

Your inability to grasp the core of most discussions and then to jump from the irrelevant to the inane is simply breathtaking.

Ishmael

 

[mercury14]

In any realistic world the reaction on the part of all non-Muslim nations should be a diplomatic, "Fuck off idiot" response. However in light of the recent riots the Islamists are in a pretty good position to drive this one through.

Tell me what you mean by Islamists being in a good position to drive this through. That sounds like you believe they're in a good spot to passing it. If I took this wrong then Mea Culpa but I'd love to hear you clarify it.

Let's revise the bet. The Obama administration will oppose it. Ten dollars. I'll even give you the right to back out when you read the proposal if it's not what you were thinking.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

He can't even think that big.

Ishmael

The enemy of my enemy is my ally...


As long as the Democrats hold most of the government, he's a big government guy.

Why do I have a sneaking suspicion that all of that will change should Romney win...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

A source familiar with Stevens' thinking told CNN earlier this week that, in the months leading up to his death, the late ambassador worried about what he called the security threats in Benghazi and a rise in Islamic extremism.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/22/world/africa/libya-ambassador-journal/index.html

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Today’s journalists do not resemble jurors. The interviews proceed in a now-familiar pattern. We go through the events of last week’s atrocity in Libya, where U.S. ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were murdered in Benghazi. Again and again, Obama-administration officials insisted that the killings were the result of spontaneous rioting over an obscure movie casting Islam’s prophet in an unflattering light — a movie from months ago, a movie virtually no one knew about, much less saw, a production so cockamamie that calling it a “movie” fails the straight-face test.
As the administration well knew, this was a coordinated jihadist attack led by al-Qaeda-affiliated forces, clearly well-trained and equipped with sophisticated weapons. One of the participants was a former Gitmo prisoner, detained there for years because it was patent that, given the chance, he’d go back to the jihad. There appears to have been forewarning about likely trouble on the 9/11 anniversary.

Did anyone really need in-depth intelligence to recognize these dangers? Part of the reason the United States struck up an alliance with Qaddafi’s despicable regime was his intelligence cooperation: Per capita, Libya sent more jihadists to Iraq to fight against American troops than any other country. The only difference between then and now is that, with Obama having toppled Qaddafi in a war the U.S. launched without provocation and on the side of al-Qaeda, the rabidly anti-American Islamists of Benghazi now have access to high-powered weaponry previously unavailable to them. A movie? Before the president ever got to his unseemly Vegas fundraiser, with the nation still mourning its dead, it was pluperfectly obvious that we’d been subjected to a terrorist strike that had nothing to do with a moronic movie.

Yet our U.N. ambassador, Susan Rice, repeated the farcical Obama-admnistration line with a straight face. It was insulting, and even reporters for whom Obama can do no wrong could not take it seriously. In some of my interviews there has been nervous laughter — not over the situation, which is so deadly serious, but over the administration’s line, which has been ludicrous.

But then we get to the Blind Sheikh. I prosecuted Omar Abdel Rahman back in my former trial-lawyer life. He is less than 20 years into his life sentence for terrorism convictions. During his time in prison, he nevertheless managed to issue the fatwa Osama bin Laden credited as the required sharia green-light for the 9/11 attacks. So I have been asked often this week about reports that he may be transferred to his native Egypt. There, as Spring Fever demonstrates, the populace is overwhelmingly adherent to the supremacist Islam that dominates the Middle East. There, his war against America makes him a hero, and he would be welcomed, triumphantly, as such.

Could that possibly happen? “You bet it could,” I’ve told my interlocutors, “it could and it will.” Watch for the frightening weeks between Election Day and Inauguration Day, when, no matter who wins the election, Barack Obama will retain all the awesome power of the presidency without any of the accountability of an impending election.

“But wait,” I’m admonished. “They’ve denied it. The Justice Department has denied it. So has the State Department, and at least one member of the National Security Council. How much clearer can they be?”

I don’t know. How much clearer could they have been about Libya?

Andy McCarthy, NRO

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Andy continues:

The president has already released the terrorists responsible for murdering our five soldiers in Karbala. In his last go-round at Justice, Eric Holder orchestrated pardons for convicted FALN terrorists — pardons signed off on by President Clinton, who went on to release two convicted Weather Underground terrorists on his way out the Oval Office door.

There is nothing new here. Reports that the State Department was discussing a transfer of the Blind Sheikh back to Egypt surfaced months ago, in the context of a potential swap for democracy activists the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces was then detaining. The administration then issued a visa to Hani Nour Eldin, a member of the Islamic Group — the Blind Sheikh’s terrorist organization, to which it is a felony to provide material assistance. The purpose was to invite Eldin to, yes, the White House, for consultations with top American national-security officials on prospective relations between the United States and the new, Islamist Egypt. As the administration had to know he would do, he pressed his top agenda item: The United States must return the Blind Sheikh as a “gift to the revolution.”

Eldin obviously felt very comfortable making the demand. We do not know exactly what he was told or what message he took back to Egypt. We do know that shortly afterward, as soon as the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi was announced as winner of the July presidential election, Morsi publicly vowed to pressure the United States to transfer the Blind Sheikh back home.

Did the Obama administration express outrage? Did the president tell Morsi, “Not in a million years”? No, he dispatched Secretary of State Clinton to Cairo for a friendly face-to-face meeting with Morsi — right after she paid a visit to the ruling generals, squeezing them to surrender power to the popularly elected Brotherhood regime. Then the Obama administration got about the business of planning both more billions in aid for Egypt and a red-carpet welcome for Morsi at the White House — the kind of meeting our actual ally, Israel, asked for but can’t seem to get as our busy commander-in-chief bounces from David Letterman to Jay-Z.

But don’t worry: Obama would never send the Blind Sheikh back to Egypt after the election, when the wrath of voters is no longer a concern for him. After all, administration officials have sworn otherwise, and we know we can take that to the bank, right?

 

[mercury14]

The enemy of my enemy is my ally...


As long as the Democrats hold most of the government, he's a big government guy.

Why do I have a sneaking suspicion that all of that will change should Romney win...

Because you like to ascribe thoughts to other people.

 

[Busybody]

No Joke: Obama To Condemn Mohammed Film During His U.N. Speech…




Good grief.

Via USA Today:


President Obama will address “the recent unrest in the Muslim world” in his speech Tuesday to the United Nations General Assembly, the White House is saying.

That includes denouncing both the protests at American diplomatic posts in the Middle East — including the death of the U.S. ambassador to Libya — and the anti-Islam film that is inspiring some of the protests.

“As he has in recent days, the President will make it clear that we reject the views in this video, while also underscoring that violence is never acceptable,” said National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor in a memo on Obama’s upcoming U.N. speech.

That message has been echoed by leaders in Libya, Egypt, Yemen and other nations, the memo stated.

 

[Busybody]

Your inability to grasp the core of most discussions and then to jump from the irrelevant to the inane is simply breathtaking.

Ishmael

Im sure you know

He can grasp the core of discussions.....He just realizes how wrong he and his elk are, and cant defend it, so he does what good LIBZ do

BULLSHIT...DISTRACT...DISTORT....LIE.....ATTACK etc

 

[Busybody]

A New Egypt, Dr. Mohamed Elmasry, with an eyewitness DVD


"Egyptians have inspired us, and they've done so by putting the lie to the idea that justice is best gained through violence ... We must educate our children to become like young Egyptian people." - President Barak Obama, speaking about the January 25th Egyptian Revolution.

 

[Squibbs]

Modern day witch hunts are fun.

Look at all the morons with their pitch forks.

 

[eyer]

Modern day witch hunts are fun.

Look at all the morons with their pitch forks.

Morons with their pitch forks...

...or parade trailer with his shovel?

I ask you, Mr. squids...

...which is the sh!ttier pursuit?

 

[Busybody]

Modern day witch hunts are fun.

Look at all the morons with their pitch forks.

Obama stands between the LIB PITCHFORKERS and us regular peeps

 

[Busybody]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1r2C4yeRz0E/UFYTsKL7J5I/AAAAAAAAGp4/bQXzd7y29KQ/s640/America%2527s-Chicken.jpg

 

[Busybody]

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-B5BBQE3QvQE/UFYTDQFoBxI/AAAAAAAAGpI/ZyQ8kGuBI6k/s640/Electric.jpg

 

[kbate]

Because you like to ascribe thoughts to other people.

ahahahahahahahaahahaha

ahahahahaha
ahahaha

ahaha


Pot/Kettle
Tomato/Tomäto

Now tell me that I'm defending AJ and collect another Hypocrisy point.