Hillary's Interview

[Colonel Hogan]

That couldn't be it, because she lost to Trump, who I'm sure you will agree is a far worse human being and was a far worse nominee.

Most voters in the electoral states that most counted obviously did NOT agree. What is there about that you don't get?

 

[KingOrfeo]

Most voters in the electoral states that most counted obviously did NOT agree. What is there about that you don't get?

If they did not agree that Trump is a worse human being than Hillary, then they are wrong, as I have no doubt you will agree.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

I imagine Trump is as flawed and bo better than Hillary, but she lost. But Trump qill screw liberals, and that's what matters to me.

 

[Phelia]

Boy... I watched that train wreck. She just doesn't get it. The reason she lost was not because of Russia, or because of the FBI torpedoing her, or because Trump was better. She lost because she's an awful human being and was a terrible nominee.

Looks to me like you don't get it.

i'd say it's a combination of all but trump being a possible better candidate, but, yeah, if she wasn't such a shit she'd have been elected easy. the democratic party as a whole really needs to pay attention to the mistakes they made essentially anointing as the nominee and ignoring all other possibilities because it was beyond foolish. they didn't even really try to hide it, for fuck's sake.

and yeah, i voted for her, but in an incredibly unenthusiastic fashion. hell, i voted for kerry with more hope and enthusiasm and kerry had about as much charisma as a rotten banana.

Much better take. Thank you.

 

[Phelia]

Meanwhile, no threads on another impending healthcare failure, Trump's increasingly unhinged interviews, Comey's post-election nausea. We'll probably have what, five more threads about how horrible Hillary is today? AJ's sure she's teeing up for another run, lol.

But you're right. There was nothing unique about Hillary's campaign and no factors working against her - she lost because she's a dumb bitch, period.

Also, she was probably on her period.

If they did not agree that Trump is a worse human being than Hillary, then they are wrong, as I have no doubt you will agree.

Please. Compare how many times he's railed on Hillary vs how many times he's criticized Trump post-election. He's just happy to have dodged an imaginary bullet for reasons he can't really articulate.

Col can answer for himself, of course, but all you have to do is listen to these guys to see what they're about.

 

[thør]

Cool...so now we can vote?

Anyone can vote in Chicago.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

If they did not agree that Trump is a worse human being than Hillary, then they are wrong, as I have no doubt you will agree.

Here's your heaping dose of doubt.

Trump is an egotistical, misogynistic buffoon. Hillary is a cynically duplicitous tyrannical shrew. As a Presidential figurehead, she would have presented the better public facade. However, his are the "better" policies for this country at the moment -- if he can get most of them implemented.

I chose not to split that hair back in November. Can't think of a compelling reason to do so now. It is what it is, and it is as close to a dead-ass draw between two ludicrous ass-wipes as we've ever been forced to choose.

I see that clearly. The question is why don't you and yours?

 

[rocket_surgery]

That couldn't be it, because she lost to Trump, who I'm sure you will agree is a far worse human being and was a far worse nominee.

If he was a worse nominee she'd be president.

She was an awful candidate and is clearly a horrible human being. The reason she points to others as the reason for her loss is because she is incapable of understanding what people think of her. She's in a bubble and it doesn't look like she's gonna come out any time soon.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Comey's detailed answer to Feinstein as to why he notified Congress (NOT THE GENERAL PUBLIC) he was reopening the investigation on Clinton that he had previously said was closed. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZa6NVsaC5E)

Perhaps Hillary should watch this and pay the fuck attention.

Perhaps others here as well.

Also, a good answer on how the FBI uses information from FISA warrants when that surveillance impacts American citizens.

 

[Phelia]

Comey's detailed answer to Feinstein as to why he notified Congress (NOT THE GENERAL PUBLIC) he was reopening the investigation on Clinton that he had previously said was closed. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZa6NVsaC5E)

Perhaps Hillary should watch this and pay the fuck attention.

Perhaps others here as well.

Also, a good answer on how the FBI uses information from FISA warrants when that surveillance impacts American citizens.

It would be fucking amazing if you would, actually.

If the first time James Comey heard about this was October 27, doesn't it become pretty problematic that Rudy Giuliani was so gleeful about it on October 26? He admits knowing about it, by the way.

So either the Trump campaign knew more about what was going on inside his own department than Comey did, or he's lying. Probably not something to gloat about either way.

But again, this was a totally fair, normal election that Hillary lost exclusively through her stupid awfulness.

It is almost cute that you still think Donald Trump can get anything done. Other than embroil us in international conflict with a largely unstaffed state department, I mean. Sorry, am I "splitting hairs"?

 

[HisArpy]

It would be fucking amazing if you would, actually.

If the first time James Comey heard about this was October 27, doesn't it become pretty problematic that Rudy Giuliani was so gleeful about it on October 26? He admits knowing about it, by the way.

So either the Trump campaign knew more about what was going on inside his own department than Comey did, or he's lying. Probably not something to gloat about either way.

But again, this was a totally fair, normal election that Hillary lost exclusively through her stupid awfulness.

It is almost cute that you still think Donald Trump can get anything done. Other than embroil us in international conflict with a largely unstaffed state department, I mean. Sorry, am I "splitting hairs"?

I like how you conflate your source/cite as something other than what it is so that you can continue to live in a dream world.

However, if it's true that COMEY is lying, how does that apply to Trump's campaign? Comey wasn't a part of the campaign. In fact, Comey was investigating Trump's campaign. You think there was some sort of collusion between the guy who was investigating the Trump campaign and the campaign? And that the collusion resulted in the guy who was also investigating THE OTHER CAMPAIGN lying about stuff he was investigating? And THAT'S the reason she lost the election?

My god, you need a few more layers of tinfoil if you believe that conspiracy theory.

As for the last, I don't know if he'll get anything done. I know he'll try. I know that lots of people who "think" like you do will try to prevent it - no matter what "it" is (or even if it's a good thing) out of sheer spitefulness.

 

[Conager]

It would be fucking amazing if you would, actually.

If the first time James Comey heard about this was October 27, doesn't it become pretty problematic that Rudy Giuliani was so gleeful about it on October 26? He admits knowing about it, by the way.

So either the Trump campaign knew more about what was going on inside his own department than Comey did, or he's lying. Probably not something to gloat about either way.

But again, this was a totally fair, normal election that Hillary lost exclusively through her stupid awfulness.

It is almost cute that you still think Donald Trump can get anything done. Other than embroil us in international conflict with a largely unstaffed state department, I mean. Sorry, am I "splitting hairs"?

Are you unaware that the NYPD has investigators? Who do you think was looking into Hillary's girlfriend's husband's unlawful predilctions? I can easily see how that gets to a former NYC mayor before the Director, FBI.

If Hilary had not illegally sent Huma classified material onto the sex-offenders laptop, or if Huma had fully complied with previous subpoenas it all could have been swept under the rug with Comey's first statement which benefited Clinton.

 

[water505]

That couldn't be it, because she lost to Trump, who I'm sure you will agree is a far worse human being and was a far worse nominee.

"Who I'm sure you will agree...

What a snotty, self-aggrandizing shmuck.

 

[water505]

If they did not agree that Trump is a worse human being than Hillary, then they are wrong, as I have no doubt you will agree.

WTF is up with that shit? You're so fucking smart you know exactly what people are thinking?

You're making a fool of yourself...as I'm sure everyone will agree.

 

[sircumvent]

Boy... I watched that train wreck. She just doesn't get it. The reason she lost was not because of Russia, or because of the FBI torpedoing her, or because Trump was better. She lost because she's an awful human being and was a terrible nominee.

Clicks LIKE button...

 

[Conager]

WTF is up with that shit? You're so fucking smart you know exactly what people are thinking?

You're making a fool of yourself...as I'm sure everyone will agree.

He took a class on persusive techniques and is mangling them while he practices.

 

[Sean]

Boy... I watched that train wreck. She just doesn't get it. The reason she lost was not because of Russia, or because of the FBI torpedoing her, or because Trump was better. She lost because she's an awful human being and was a terrible nominee.

Nate Silver begs to differ.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...-cost-clinton-the-election/?ex_cid=538twitter

 

[Disgustipated]

"Who I'm sure you will agree...

What a snotty, self-aggrandizing shmuck.

Most Americans think 45 is a turd. Not really that hard to understand, miles.

 

[Porkwarrior]

https://prowhiteparty.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/weekend-at-hillarys.jpg

 

[Phelia]

I like how you conflate your source/cite as something other than what it is so that you can continue to live in a dream world.

However, if it's true that COMEY is lying, how does that apply to Trump's campaign? Comey wasn't a part of the campaign. In fact, Comey was investigating Trump's campaign. You think there was some sort of collusion between the guy who was investigating the Trump campaign and the campaign? And that the collusion resulted in the guy who was also investigating THE OTHER CAMPAIGN lying about stuff he was investigating? And THAT'S the reason she lost the election?

My god, you need a few more layers of tinfoil if you believe that conspiracy theory.

As for the last, I don't know if he'll get anything done. I know he'll try. I know that lots of people who "think" like you do will try to prevent it - no matter what "it" is (or even if it's a good thing) out of sheer spitefulness.

Did you get a little hard as you were pulling all of that out of your ass?

It wasn't speak vs. conceal. Conceal what? There was nothing there. It was speak vs. wait until we know what the fuck we're looking at - he didn't even wait for the search warrant. It becomes "conceal" when the people you're listening to give you bad information and share intelligence with one of the presidential campaigns before both the head of the FBI and congress.

And Trump is and will continue failing because of his own incompetence and selfishness. Democrats have signalled again and again that if Trump wants to protect the popular parts of healthcare, spend on useful infrastructure and job creation and actually help the middle class, they will support him. What has he done? Failed at forcing through cruel legislation, signed a bunch of failed and meaningless executive orders, embarrassed us internationally, taken us nearly to the brink of armed conflict, attempted to change tax laws to benefit himself and his family, whom he's entrusted with critical government responsibilities despite a complete lack of experience.

You deny it, of course, because you exist in lies now. They are the foundation of your reality.

Are you unaware that the NYPD has investigators? Who do you think was looking into Hillary's girlfriend's husband's unlawful predilctions? I can easily see how that gets to a former NYC mayor before the Director, FBI.

If Hilary had not illegally sent Huma classified material onto the sex-offenders laptop, or if Huma had fully complied with previous subpoenas it all could have been swept under the rug with Comey's first statement which benefited Clinton.

It was a federal investigation you incredible numbskull.

If I didn't immediately forget about every pointless thing you say as soon as you've said it, I'd get a kick out of bringing this post up next time you start whining about leaks.

 

[SyKoKo]

^^^^deranged Cunt

 

[Colonel Hogan]

It would be fucking amazing if you would, actually.

If the first time James Comey heard about this was October 27, doesn't it become pretty problematic that Rudy i was so gleeful about it on October 26? He admits knowing about it, by the way.

So either the Trump campaign knew more about what was going on inside his own department than Comey did, or he's lying. Probably not something to gloat about either way.

But again, this was a totally fair, normal election that Hillary lost exclusively through her stupid awfulness.

It is almost cute that you still think Donald Trump can get anything done. Other than embroil us in international conflict with a largely unstaffed state department, I mean. Sorry, am I "splitting hairs"?

I like how you conflate your source/cite as something other than what it is so that you can continue to live in a dream world.

However, if it's true that COMEY is lying, how does that apply to Trump's campaign? Comey wasn't a part of the campaign. In fact, Comey was investigating Trump's campaign. You think there was some sort of collusion between the guy who was investigating the Trump campaign and the campaign? And that the collusion resulted in the guy who was also investigating THE OTHER CAMPAIGN lying about stuff he was investigating? And THAT'S the reason she lost the election?

My god, you need a few more layers of tinfoil if you believe that conspiracy theory.

As for the last, I don't know if he'll get anything done. I know he'll try. I know that lots of people who "think" like you do will try to prevent it - no matter what "it" is (or even if it's a good thing) out of sheer spitefulness.

Exactly as Arpy said you disingenuous snowflake.

Nothing in your citations indicate that the surprise Giuliani had "up his sleeve" was a reference to prior knowledge of the FBI re-opening the Clinton investigation. Specifically, your second citation of Jaffy's tweet references an interview on November 4, 2016 on Fox and Friends with Steve Doocy and Brian Kilmeade in which Giuliani is SPECIFICALLY ASKED by Kilmeade what he knew with regard to the "then latest" reopening of the FBI investigation into Clinton. Giuliani"s SPECIFIC DENIAL of prior knowledge of that re-opening begins at the 4:21 mark of that interview:

"I am real careful not to talk to any on-duty, active FBI agents. I don't want to put them in a compromising position. But I sure have a lot of friends who are retired FBI agents; close personal friends. This has been going on since July. The reaction of the retired FBI agents that I know is almost uniformly that Comey made the wrong decision; that she should have been prosecuted back in July and from that point on I have been hearing from the retired agents that the Justice Department was obstructing the investigation of the Clinton Foundation."

It is abundantly clear from that interview that Giuliani's anticipation of an "FBI bombshell" was directly due to internal FBI strife percolating since July of 2016 and NOT based on his having "inside knowledge" of Comey lying to Congress OR even the possibility of a NEW investigation actually taking place.

If that isn't good enough for you, LATER THAT SAME FUCKING DAY, Wolf Blitzer interviewed Giuliani on CNN and referenced the mayor's comments on Fox and Friends. Here is THAT interview and THAT denial.

Need MORE? SAME FUCKING DAY, SAME DENIAL, IN THE SAME GODDAMN SUITCOAT AND BOW TIE TO CHRIS MATTHEWS AT MSNBC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-Pt9jEf6eA&t=206s

To both Blitzer and Matthews, Giuliani makes it perfectly clear his prior reference to upcoming "surprises" was with regard to specific campaign advertising initiatives by the Trump campaign and not knowledge of the FBI investigation. Additionally, as this October 29th article in THE HILL reports (http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/303430-trump-makes-last-minute-push-in-michigan), the last minute push into Michigan was FIRST reported by the Detroit News on Friday the 28th and had been planned prior to Comey's letter to Congress -- another little surprise Giuliani almost certainly knew when he bragged to Martha MacCallum on October 26.

But here's another one just for you because, you know, I "feel ya," Phelia. It's Comey's actual letter to Congress on the 28th. https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/oct-28-fbi-letter-to-congressional-leaders-on-clinton-email-investigation/2113/

Here's the dramatic, "explosive" language in that letter:

"I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant. and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony."

Now I ask you, does that sound like the fait accompli that is destined to get Hillary Clinton's ass thrown in jail and about which you would boast of on national TV?

And, oh by the way, how is it that everyone forgets that Comey himself pointedly CLEARED Clinton of criminal wrong doing yet a second time on Sunday November 6? But to hear HRC tell it, nobody heard THAT!! Jesus, on the very eve of the election she gets the BEST POSSIBLE NEWS a candidate under suspicion could possibly get, and all she wants to dwell on is want happened nine days earlier.

In any event, if you want to play "journalist," sweetpea, this is how it works. You get ALL the AVAILABLE ACTUAL WORDS people said, including the full context in which they said them, and present THAT as your story.

Or you just bullshit as you did in your last response to me.

You little twit.

 

[Conager]

Did you get a little hard as you were pulling all of that out of your ass?

It wasn't speak vs. conceal. Conceal what? There was nothing there. It was speak vs. wait until we know what the fuck we're looking at - he didn't even wait for the search warrant. It becomes "conceal" when the people you're listening to give you bad information and share intelligence with one of the presidential campaigns before both the head of the FBI and congress.

And Trump is and will continue failing because of his own incompetence and selfishness. Democrats have signalled again and again that if Trump wants to protect the popular parts of healthcare, spend on useful infrastructure and job creation and actually help the middle class, they will support him. What has he done? Failed at forcing through cruel legislation, signed a bunch of failed and meaningless executive orders, embarrassed us internationally, taken us nearly to the brink of armed conflict, attempted to change tax laws to benefit himself and his family, whom he's entrusted with critical government responsibilities despite a complete lack of experience.

You deny it, of course, because you exist in lies now. They are the foundation of your reality.



It was a federal investigation you incredible numbskull.

If I didn't immediately forget about every pointless thing you say as soon as you've said it, I'd get a kick out of bringing this post up next time you start whining about leaks.

I'm a numbskull??

Do you not follow current events?

It was a CLOSED federal investigation (that camp Clinton said wasn't an investigation) that was REOPENED (while camp Clinton claimed it was not reopened and was never an investigation) when NYPD investigaters ended up with Weiner's laptop because HE was under investigation. When they found CLASSIFIED material sent to Humma from Hilary, they notified the FBI who were put in an awkward position because they had been assured that hill and hum had disclosed and surrendered all of the devices they had used.

 

[Phelia]

Exactly as Arpy said you disingenuous snowflake.

Nothing in your citations indicate that the surprise Giuliani had "up his sleeve" was a reference to prior knowledge of the FBI re-opening the Clinton investigation. Specifically, your second citation of Jaffy's tweet references an interview on November 4, 2016 on Fox and Friends with Steve Doocy and Brian Kilmeade in which Giuliani is SPECIFICALLY ASKED by Kilmeade what he knew with regard to the "then latest" reopening of the FBI investigation into Clinton. Giuliani"s SPECIFIC DENIAL of prior knowledge of that re-opening begins at the 4:21 mark of that interview:



It is abundantly clear from that interview that Giuliani's anticipation of an "FBI bombshell" was directly due to internal FBI strife percolating since July of 2016 and NOT based on his having "inside knowledge" of Comey lying to Congress OR even the possibility of a NEW investigation actually taking place.

If that isn't good enough for you, LATER THAT SAME FUCKING DAY, Wolf Blitzer interviewed Giuliani on CNN and referenced the mayor's comments on Fox and Friends. Here is THAT interview and THAT denial.

Need MORE? SAME FUCKING DAY, SAME DENIAL, IN THE SAME GODDAMN SUITCOAT AND BOW TIE TO CHRIS MATTHEWS AT MSNBC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-Pt9jEf6eA&t=206s

To both Blitzer and Matthews, Giuliani makes it perfectly clear his prior reference to upcoming "surprises" was with regard to specific campaign advertising initiatives by the Trump campaign and not knowledge of the FBI investigation. Additionally, as this October 29th article in THE HILL reports (http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/303430-trump-makes-last-minute-push-in-michigan), the last minute push into Michigan was FIRST reported by the Detroit News on Friday the 28th and had been planned prior to Comey's letter to Congress -- another little surprise Giuliani almost certainly knew when he bragged to Martha MacCallum on October 26.

But here's another one just for you because, you know, I "feel ya," Phelia. It's Comey's actual letter to Congress on the 28th. https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/oct-28-fbi-letter-to-congressional-leaders-on-clinton-email-investigation/2113/

Here's the dramatic, "explosive" language in that letter:


Now I ask you, does that sound like the fait accompli that is destined to get Hillary Clinton's ass thrown in jail and about which you would boast of on national TV?

And, oh by the way, how is it that everyone forgets that Comey himself pointedly CLEARED Clinton of criminal wrong doing yet a second time on Sunday November 6? But to hear HRC tell it, nobody heard THAT!! Jesus, on the very eve of the election she gets the BEST POSSIBLE NEWS a candidate under suspicion could possibly get, and all she wants to dwell on is want happened nine days earlier.

In any event, if you want to play "journalist," sweetpea, this is how it works. You get ALL the AVAILABLE ACTUAL WORDS people said, including the full context in which they said them, and present THAT as your story.

Or you just bullshit as you did in your last response to me.

You little twit.

Lol. Always promising when you start an interview with:

"Nope. I've spoken to no current FBI agents."

After being reminded he claimed the opposite on a radio show and trying to explain he was "mistaken":

"I have not, I have not spoken to a on-duty FBI agent, about anything, I guess for the last ten months, I dunno."

And I'm confused - is "it" supposed to refer to the advertising campaign, the push in Michigan, or the general ideological divide within the FBI?

"Did I hear about it? You're darn right I heard about it."

Halp!

But very great journalisming. You repeated an entire spin tour! You have sure shown me.

I'm a numbskull??

Do you not follow current events?

It was a CLOSED federal investigation (that camp Clinton said wasn't an investigation) that was REOPENED (while camp Clinton claimed it was not reopened and was never an investigation) when NYPD investigaters ended up with Weiner's laptop because HE was under investigation. When they found CLASSIFIED material sent to Humma from Hilary, they notified the FBI who were put in an awkward position because they had been assured that hill and hum had disclosed and surrendered all of the devices they had used.

The Weiner investigation was federal. NYPD would have had nothing to do with it. You're embarrassing yourself. Go watch an adult breastfeeding video and take a nap.

 

[Disgustipated]

http://i.imgur.com/uDpJ74y.png
http://i.imgur.com/cy97dlS.png