Hillary and WW3.

underguy1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Posts
2,857
At the third presidential debate, Hillary Clinton reasserted her commitment that if elected president, she would implement a no-fly-zone, intimating that the objective was to “save lives”.

---------------------------------------------------------------


In a Senate Arms Services Committee hearing, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dunford said, responding to questions from Republican Senator Roger Whicker (Mississippi)

“Right now, Senator, for us to control all of the airspace in Syria it would require us to go to war, against Syria and Russia,… That’s a pretty fundamental decision that certainly I’m not going to make.”
 
I think you're going to be very disappointed at how little "the sky is falling" is actually going to happen. You obviously crave being pants-on-fire crazy miserable.
 
I think you're going to be very disappointed at how little "the sky is falling" is actually going to happen. You obviously crave being pants-on-fire crazy miserable.

Are you saying that she was lying about this crazy "no fly zone" scheme?
 
Washington’s New Lock-Step March Of Folly. “Escalation in Syria, Take-down of Iran, Showdown with Nuclear-armed Russia”…

By Robert Parry


From the Parry piece......


Greg Jaffe wrote for the neocon-dominated Washington Post on Friday,

“In the rarefied world of the Washington foreign policy establishment, President Obama’s departure from the White House — and the possible return of a more conventional and hawkish Hillary Clinton — is being met with quiet relief.

“The Republicans and Democrats who make up the foreign policy elite are laying the groundwork for a more assertive American foreign policy, via a flurry of reports shaped by officials who are likely to play senior roles in a potential Clinton White House.

“It is not unusual for Washington’s establishment to launch major studies in the final months of an administration to correct the perceived mistakes of a president or influence his successor. But the bipartisan nature of the recent recommendations, coming at a time when the country has never been more polarized, reflects a remarkable consensus among the foreign policy elite.

“This consensus is driven by a broad-based backlash against a president who has repeatedly stressed the dangers of overreach and the need for restraint, especially in the Middle East. … Taken together, the studies and reports call for more-aggressive American action to constrain Iran, rein in the chaos in the Middle East and check Russia in Europe.”
 
Washington’s New Lock-Step March Of Folly. “Escalation in Syria, Take-down of Iran, Showdown with Nuclear-armed Russia”…

By Robert Parry


From the Parry piece......


Greg Jaffe wrote for the neocon-dominated Washington Post on Friday,

“In the rarefied world of the Washington foreign policy establishment, President Obama’s departure from the White House — and the possible return of a more conventional and hawkish Hillary Clinton — is being met with quiet relief.

“The Republicans and Democrats who make up the foreign policy elite are laying the groundwork for a more assertive American foreign policy, via a flurry of reports shaped by officials who are likely to play senior roles in a potential Clinton White House.- Taken together, the studies and reports call for more-aggressive American action to constrain Iran, rein in the chaos in the Middle East and check Russia in Europe.”

The Dark Lords gather to celebrate their victory! You can bet the American Enterprise Institute is leading the charge. The Neo-Cons and the Neo-Libs seem to have achieved a merger based upon a desire to CONTROL! People in countries that are not even theirs! The Prince of Darkness arises in the Capitol to again reck his havoc. It's 2002 all over again!
 
Back
Top