Help with NonConsent Stories

[ChasingAnna]

Write for yourself. No one else is paying you.

This site is nitpicky about a lot. Some is good, (grammar, punctuation) some is bad. Write what you like, and if you don't feel the requirements for here improve the story, take it elsewhere.

 

[eroticstoryspinner]

Admittedly I'm a little aggravated, physically writing is challenging for me due to a disability. I tried twice to submit a nonconsent story, the first time I was rejected for punctuations, then today I receive this message.

Brutal and violent sex. While we do accept submissions with graphic violence, we don't accept "snuff" - i.e. death & extreme torture with the aim of sexual titillation. We generally do not accept submissions of nonconsensual sex in which the "victim" gets absolutely no sort of thrill or enjoyment from the acts, or is seriously and /or permanently physically harmed/abused.

I should say, I didn't write snuff. Admittedly my story is aggressive, and I took out a few sentences where the main character mentions that he wrote a story about having sex with his future victim on a guillotine during the French Revolution and resubmitted it, hoping this was the objection

I guess my question is on the we don't accept stories where the victim doesn't enjoy the act. I can point to a dozen stories where this simply isn't true. I don't mind that literotica has policies, but where are they located (this comment didn't seem to be on the submission guidelines). And they don't seem to be consistently enforced.

I'm working on another nonconsent story where sons turn their mother into their sexual pet. It gets very brutal at parts, she does cum, but takes the first opportunty to escape when given the chance. I guess I'm wondering where the line is, it seems very unclear.

Any thoughts or help would be appreciated,

Thanks,

Sam

I tried to PM you a smippit I had to edit out to get my first story past laurel but it would not go through. I an currently writing in a universe where penal slavery is a thing so it is kind of the essence of non cons. FWIW from reading the opinions of long time LIT writers, I think if you can justify why it is within the guidelines fits in the story she will let it go

 

[ThisNameIsntTakenYet]

I don't expect (hope) Laurel to let things go, just because they fit in the story. First of all, the story content has to meet the rules of the website.

Yeah, I think that should be phrased "if you can explain why she was wrong in her assumption of where the story was going (and this is justified), she might let it through without a revision." This only works if she made a mistake, which is all to possible with the amount of submissions she has to plow through on a daily basis. If not, well... you'll just have to change the story or find a different place to post it.