CaryJanJunior
Sexfight enthusiast
- Joined
- May 11, 2023
- Posts
- 11
My story takes place in an area of my setting where injury and death are impossible. Swords leave thin pink lines that are erogenous but do not hurt nor bleed, punches to the face just leave someone cowed, hurting no more than a slap across the face, drowning is impossible and the person just becomes unconscious and eventually rescued by mermaids or a ship passing by or washing up on an island.
I have taken advantage of the cartoonishness inherent to the violence to play out all kinds of things, like sword fights as foreplay where the blades actually hit, punching tits, using daggers as improvised dildos or even shooting a flintlock pistol into the pussy of an opponent in a sexfight.
The story was turned away for the following reason:
"Literotica is dedicated to healthy fantasy exploration in fiction. While we do accept submissions with graphic violence, we don't accept "snuff" or "vore" - i.e. death & extreme torture with the aim of titillation and gratification, sexual or otherwise. We generally do not accept submissions of nonconsensual sex in which the "victim" gets absolutely no sort of thrill or enjoyment from the acts, or is seriously and /or permanently physically harmed/abused/maimed/killed and the death is eroticized."
The acts mentioned above (dagger as dildo etc.) were in the context of mutually agreed upon sexfights.
I put the following author's note at the beginning of the story:
"Also, there are many things I could not tag due to a limit of tags that could be off-putting. These are:
Inhumanity - the creatures they face in this chapter are mostly human beautiful women, but they have some notable inhuman features. The main one to worry about is a prehensile, tentacle-like tongue, which is used for a kiss and cunnilingus.
Violence & weapon play - the part of the setting the story takes place in explicitly prevents pain and injuries, and characters will abuse this to use guns and swords and knives to fight, culminating in two scenes - one which ends with a knife stuck into someone's vagina, and one with a gun being fired into it. Neither cause injury, and while some characters marvel at blows not hurting like they should, this narration is absent in these two specific scenes. In addition, one of the fights devolves into a brawl, and another into a vicious catfight.
Humiliation - a lot of characters use humiliation as a psychological weapon against their opponent. This is especially prevalent in the last fight.
There are other, less prevalent things as well, such as spitting into someone's mouth, choking, and so on.
Reader discretion is very much advised. I do not expect at least the next chapter to delve into such subjects again, but the series as a whole will return to some of if not most of them at some point."
I have sent the story to a volunteer editor a week ago, but since that was a day after my usual posting time and I have a biweekly posting schedule, I am considering noting this author's note and the fact none of the acts described actually leave injury or cause excessive pain or take place without consent.
Would this put me at risk of a ban or something for repeatedly sending stories that are in violation of the submission rules, or is more likely that the reviewer just skimmed it and missed the author's note or the in-universe explanations?
I have taken advantage of the cartoonishness inherent to the violence to play out all kinds of things, like sword fights as foreplay where the blades actually hit, punching tits, using daggers as improvised dildos or even shooting a flintlock pistol into the pussy of an opponent in a sexfight.
The story was turned away for the following reason:
"Literotica is dedicated to healthy fantasy exploration in fiction. While we do accept submissions with graphic violence, we don't accept "snuff" or "vore" - i.e. death & extreme torture with the aim of titillation and gratification, sexual or otherwise. We generally do not accept submissions of nonconsensual sex in which the "victim" gets absolutely no sort of thrill or enjoyment from the acts, or is seriously and /or permanently physically harmed/abused/maimed/killed and the death is eroticized."
The acts mentioned above (dagger as dildo etc.) were in the context of mutually agreed upon sexfights.
I put the following author's note at the beginning of the story:
"Also, there are many things I could not tag due to a limit of tags that could be off-putting. These are:
Inhumanity - the creatures they face in this chapter are mostly human beautiful women, but they have some notable inhuman features. The main one to worry about is a prehensile, tentacle-like tongue, which is used for a kiss and cunnilingus.
Violence & weapon play - the part of the setting the story takes place in explicitly prevents pain and injuries, and characters will abuse this to use guns and swords and knives to fight, culminating in two scenes - one which ends with a knife stuck into someone's vagina, and one with a gun being fired into it. Neither cause injury, and while some characters marvel at blows not hurting like they should, this narration is absent in these two specific scenes. In addition, one of the fights devolves into a brawl, and another into a vicious catfight.
Humiliation - a lot of characters use humiliation as a psychological weapon against their opponent. This is especially prevalent in the last fight.
There are other, less prevalent things as well, such as spitting into someone's mouth, choking, and so on.
Reader discretion is very much advised. I do not expect at least the next chapter to delve into such subjects again, but the series as a whole will return to some of if not most of them at some point."
I have sent the story to a volunteer editor a week ago, but since that was a day after my usual posting time and I have a biweekly posting schedule, I am considering noting this author's note and the fact none of the acts described actually leave injury or cause excessive pain or take place without consent.
Would this put me at risk of a ban or something for repeatedly sending stories that are in violation of the submission rules, or is more likely that the reviewer just skimmed it and missed the author's note or the in-universe explanations?