lavender
Cautiously Optimistic
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2001
- Posts
- 25,108
You would assume a man with the following credentials would be unpopular in America:
And these aren't even including the mission in Iraq. We now know there are no WMDs, the intelligence was faulty, and there was pressure on the intelligence community to provide this faulty intelligence so they could convince Americans that it was the thing to do. But even if it wasn't for WMDs, it was because of links to Al Qaeda, but if you look at it closely you will realize that as a secularist Hussein and Bin Laden hated each other. There were no ties between bin Laden and Iraq at least none that posed any imminent threat to the United States.
Source for ties to bin Laden:
Wednesday, January 7, 2004 by the Madison Capital Times (Wisconsin)
But, wait a minute, even if we didn't go in because of an imminent threat to national security and even if there are no WMDs and even though there were no ties to terrorism, then we were there to "free" and "liberate" the Iraqi people.
Well that theory is a bit iffy considering our version of free speech in Iraq - let's analyze how we are dealing with media structures there. It's rather oppressive. In fact it seems downright authoritarian and more like a communist regime than one that truly promotes freedom and democracy.
Check out what we are now calling "Information Dominance."
Source: Published on Thursday, January 8, 2004 by the Guardian/UK
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0108-09.htm
But, even if you say that the media needs a little bit less freedom right now because we want our troops to be safe, let's analyze what we are doing regarding liberty in other areas.
A few weeks ago, 60 Minutes did a wonderful little piece. They interviewed a Shia exile who had been in the United States. After the fall of the regime he went back to Karbollah (sp?) which is considered a Shia stronghold. In this city, the town had elected a town council and had tried to create their own democracy because that is what they felt "democracy" meant. They thought Americans would be proud of them. And even though Paul Bremer said that none of the Ba'athists of any rank would hold power in the new regime, the police chief in Karbollah is now, yup, you got it, a high ranking police chief under Saddam.
The United States and the Ba'athist police chief disbanded the democratically elected town council. And the Ba'athist chief even had many of the elected town council members arrested.
But of course they must have been arrested for good cause, right? Sure. When the 60 Minutes reporters went to the camp where some of the former town council members were alleged to be, the head of the camp met with 60 Minutes reporters. She informed them that there was no way this town councilman had been there for about 6 weeks without charges being brought because the policy was to definitely bring charges within 24 hours. If you couldn't bring charges within this time you released the men. Additionally, the director of the camp said there was no way that family members hadn't been able to visit because they were allowed within 72 hours (or something) of charges being filed.
So the 60 Minutes reporters went in to see the records about this man that was supposedly captured and jailed. And guess what, he had been there for the entire time, no charges had been filed, and no family visits were arranged.
And the director of the camp asked 60 Minutes to turn off the camera.
Shocker.
More to come.
- Net loss of 3 million jobs, including 2.7 million in industrial sectors
Source:
http://www.jsonline.com/bym/news/aug03/165529.asp
- Fiscal policies are the "worst in over 200 years" and would mean a 10-year deficit of over $6 trillion
- statement by Nobel Prize-winning economist George Akerlofof the University of California at Los Angeles
Source: same as above
- Cutting key sections of the Clean Water and Clean Air Acts; Crippling the Superfund program, Opening millions of acres of wilderness -- including some of the nation's most environmentally sensitive public lands -- to logging, mining and oil and gas drilling
Source:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...node=&contentId=A45700-2003Sep8¬Found=true
And these aren't even including the mission in Iraq. We now know there are no WMDs, the intelligence was faulty, and there was pressure on the intelligence community to provide this faulty intelligence so they could convince Americans that it was the thing to do. But even if it wasn't for WMDs, it was because of links to Al Qaeda, but if you look at it closely you will realize that as a secularist Hussein and Bin Laden hated each other. There were no ties between bin Laden and Iraq at least none that posed any imminent threat to the United States.
Source for ties to bin Laden:
Wednesday, January 7, 2004 by the Madison Capital Times (Wisconsin)
But, wait a minute, even if we didn't go in because of an imminent threat to national security and even if there are no WMDs and even though there were no ties to terrorism, then we were there to "free" and "liberate" the Iraqi people.
Well that theory is a bit iffy considering our version of free speech in Iraq - let's analyze how we are dealing with media structures there. It's rather oppressive. In fact it seems downright authoritarian and more like a communist regime than one that truly promotes freedom and democracy.
Check out what we are now calling "Information Dominance."
Source: Published on Thursday, January 8, 2004 by the Guardian/UK
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0108-09.htm
But, even if you say that the media needs a little bit less freedom right now because we want our troops to be safe, let's analyze what we are doing regarding liberty in other areas.
A few weeks ago, 60 Minutes did a wonderful little piece. They interviewed a Shia exile who had been in the United States. After the fall of the regime he went back to Karbollah (sp?) which is considered a Shia stronghold. In this city, the town had elected a town council and had tried to create their own democracy because that is what they felt "democracy" meant. They thought Americans would be proud of them. And even though Paul Bremer said that none of the Ba'athists of any rank would hold power in the new regime, the police chief in Karbollah is now, yup, you got it, a high ranking police chief under Saddam.
The United States and the Ba'athist police chief disbanded the democratically elected town council. And the Ba'athist chief even had many of the elected town council members arrested.
But of course they must have been arrested for good cause, right? Sure. When the 60 Minutes reporters went to the camp where some of the former town council members were alleged to be, the head of the camp met with 60 Minutes reporters. She informed them that there was no way this town councilman had been there for about 6 weeks without charges being brought because the policy was to definitely bring charges within 24 hours. If you couldn't bring charges within this time you released the men. Additionally, the director of the camp said there was no way that family members hadn't been able to visit because they were allowed within 72 hours (or something) of charges being filed.
So the 60 Minutes reporters went in to see the records about this man that was supposedly captured and jailed. And guess what, he had been there for the entire time, no charges had been filed, and no family visits were arranged.
And the director of the camp asked 60 Minutes to turn off the camera.
Shocker.
More to come.