Having sex for goods and/or services?

BlackSnake

Anaconda
Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Posts
9,196
Does that really make you a whore to have sex for goods and/or services? Goods would include money, and services is so that someone would do something for you or that you want them to do. When a woman's husband fail to do one thing or another that she want, she deny him sex, but when he does those simple little special things she allows him a romp in the sack, isn't that the same thing? Doesn't this type of act make some married women whores?

Is covering up that fact with defenses like she loves her husband make it not so?

Is it true that only virgins and sluts not whores?

What makes you not a whore?
 
A whore has sex only to get the payment. Love, lust, affection, in love, whatever - don't play a role in a whore's decision to have sex.
 
LadyJeanne said:
A whore has sex only to get the payment. Love, lust, affection, in love, whatever - don't play a role in a whore's decision to have sex.

I'd have to disagree with that simply based on the differences among women. Some modern day professionals do it because of the love for her pimp (her man). She knows that he is happy when she successfully completes a call and is ready to do another. If she please him, she is able to receive his affection. Sometimes the benefit is him spending some time with her instead of one of the other girls. The john doesn't matter, only the pimp in that situation. She brings the pimp the money and she get his affection.

Sometimes a whore will have sex to barder for a place to say, the car she drives, keeping her parol officer at bay.
 
BlackSnake said:
She brings the pimp the money and she get his affection.

Sometimes a whore will have sex to barder for a place to say, the car she drives, keeping her parol officer at bay.

I don't know about pimps and whores, but I think my basic premise is still correct - the only reason she's having sex with the johns is to get the money, the place to stay, etc. She would not be having sex with them unless there is a payment of some kind. Why she wants that payment is a different question.
 
LadyJeanne said:
I don't know about pimps and whores, but I think my basic premise is still correct - the only reason she's having sex with the johns is to get the money, the place to stay, etc. She would not be having sex with them unless there is a payment of some kind. Why she wants that payment is a different question.


You said it, the payment of some kind.

Her beautiful home. Her social standings. Whatever...some type of goods or services.
 
If you're going to be that picky about it, then just about everybody that has sex is a whore. Male or female.

Why? They all have a payoff. The pleasure found in the act itself is a personal payoff.
 
BlackSnake said:
You said it, the payment of some kind.

Her beautiful home. Her social standings. Whatever...some type of goods or services.

Hmm, I'm not making my point clear: Getting the payment is the only reason a whore has sex with someone. Someone who gets the home, etc., such as a wife/husband, might also have other reasons for having sex besides a payment. If getting the payment is not their sole purpose for having sex with someone, they are not a whore.
 
Man do I remember this conversation. I had it a long time ago and never reached a reasonable answer.

You have to ask yourself some basic questions first. Define a whore, how is a whore different from prostitute? (Or are they the same?) What is the type of payment that would define such? Why is this bad, and what is the difference?

To my way of thinking, and this is from the way I was raised, a prostitute is someone who has sex for money. They get paid for having sex. Is this bad? Not to my way of thinking but then again I am in the minority on this as in so many other things.

What is the payment received? Is it money? Is it a nice house? Is it a job? If it is any of these then many of us could be considered prostitutes because we have had sex with someone we either didn't know or didn't like for some gain.

The only time I can think of that a person can have sex without being called a whore or prostitute is if they have it for the sheer joy of having sex. (Then they are considered sick and a whore because they enjoy sex.)

Maybe it is time we as a society grew up and realized that we can have fun, we can have sex and enjoy it, and not be stigmatised for it.

Cat
 
SeaCat said:
The only time I can think of that a person can have sex without being called a whore or prostitute is if they have it for the sheer joy of having sex. (Then they are considered sick and a whore because they enjoy sex.)

Maybe it is time we as a society grew up and realized that we can have fun, we can have sex and enjoy it, and not be stigmatised for it.

Cat
i think i love you. :D

Actually, your whole post is what i was trying to say in mine and couldn't get into words.
 
entitled said:
i think i love you. :D

Actually, your whole post is what i was trying to say in mine and couldn't get into words.

One should always be afraid when I agree with them. It means that they are going against what society believes is right.

Cat

(You can love me all you want, but if you try to kiss me beware, I'll kiss you back.)
 
SeaCat said:
One should always be afraid when I agree with them. It means that they are going against what society believes is right.

Cat

(You can love me all you want, but if you try to kiss me beware, I'll kiss you back.)
Society is stuffy and full of crap anyway. People as a whole can kiss my ass.

:kiss:
 
entitled said:
Society is stuffy and full of crap anyway. People as a whole can kiss my ass.

:kiss:

I'm tempted to say come here and pucker up. :D

Cat
 
I am not a person to attempt to withhold sex.

First off because sex is like breathing to me, so that would be bad. I happen to like sex. It's not a power thing, it's not a thing other than the fact that if I'm with someone, I want to have sex with them. When I don't want to have sex with them anymore, I leave.

The first decision to withhold sex is called breaking up or divorce.
 
Recidiva said:
I am not a person to attempt to withhold sex.

First off because sex is like breathing to me, so that would be bad. I happen to like sex. It's not a power thing, it's not a thing other than the fact that if I'm with someone, I want to have sex with them. When I don't want to have sex with them anymore, I leave.

The first decision to withhold sex is called breaking up or divorce.


withholding can be erotic, just in itself!
 
entitled said:
Sometimes it can't be helped.

I do understand that other people are not like me.

I just don't function like this, though. The intimacy of physically being able to move in and out of someone else's space at will is like breathing, if I'm not free to do that, I'm gone. It's never happened to me. It would be like asking me not to eat or breathe. I just don't see it as an issue attached to ego, I see it as an issue attached to survival.
 
Recidiva said:
I do understand that other people are not like me.

I just don't function like this, though. The intimacy of physically being able to move in and out of someone else's space at will is like breathing, if I'm not free to do that, I'm gone. It's never happened to me. It would be like asking me not to eat or breathe. I just don't see it as an issue attached to ego, I see it as an issue attached to survival.
If i had my druthers, i would live like you described. There are things that get in the way of that at times, though, that i wouldn't give up without a fight.
 
Ted-E-Bare said:
Yeah, its called parenthood. Don't those little buggers ever sleep?
um... now?

i'm also the only adult in the house most of the time they sleep. The resident asshole technically counts as an adult, but is NOT getting within five feet of me without risking bodily harm.

Makes things difficult.
 
Okay, here's a question ...

If you nearing the end of a date, and you were attracted to the guy, say about 90% of what it would take for you to have sex that night, is there ever a material benefit that would by itself, be the necessary 10%?

Say, if you spent the night with him, you'd probably still be around his apartment tomorrow when he's mentioned your favorite singer is coming by to go over some contracts?

Or would you trade something close to sex, but not quite, for something material? Like a quick blow job in exchange for Chemestry notes that will let you ace the final and get a passing grade for the entire semester?
 
Ted-E-Bare said:
Okay, here's a question ...

If you nearing the end of a date, and you were attracted to the guy, say about 90% of what it would take for you to have sex that night, is there ever a material benefit that would by itself, be the necessary 10%?

Say, if you spent the night with him, you'd probably still be around his apartment tomorrow when he's mentioned your favorite singer is coming by to go over some contracts?

Or would you trade something close to sex, but not quite, for something material? Like a quick blow job in exchange for Chemestry notes that will let you ace the final and get a passing grade for the entire semester?

Sorry, I flunked that kind of math. He always had to figure me out first and I never knew the answer myself.
 
Back
Top