Have Lit's administrators gone MAGA?

[BabyBoomer50s]

They/them are fleeing the Politics Board in droves and migrating to BlueSky where it’s safe.

 

[RoryN]

They/them are fleeing the Politics Board in droves

Proof?

(None, because it's a lie.)

 

[coati]

Glamorizing violence against shitty people violating decent society is NORMAL.

^^^BoBoChad still has hurt fee-fees from getting banned from Lit multiple times for advocating violence against migrants, protesters, and Muslims. The above statement promoting social strife and violence is his adolescent way of getting back at the world for being banned so many times.

Chad, originally naming himself on Lit "BotanyBoy" years ago, described himself as a well-educated military vet of Korean descent who aspires to be like the cool white guys who were in the military during the same time of his service. His mother and father split up during his formative years, and he got sent off with the dad for the primary custody arrangement. This appears to be a major reason why he is stuck in perpetual adolescence. BoBoChad once described himself on Lit as a borderline sociopath. His behavior to this day supports that description.

He disappeared from Lit for a long time following his fourth banning but then crawled back out from under his rock when his cult leader Trump was elected to second term.

This is what Rory is talking about with regard to Lit emboldening violent MAGAts just because we happen to have a racist President-elect who reinforces violent tendencies among his MAGA followers. Literotica is simply following the lead of Musk on X, Zuckerberg on Meta, and Bezos at the Washington Post in kissing Trump's ass, similar to what Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and so many others did with Hitler during the Nazi rise to power in Germany. They all should be ashamed of themselves for promoting violence and scapegoating in society.

 

[ll74]

They/them are fleeing the Politics Board in droves and migrating to BlueSky where it’s safe.

Who has fled the board?

All I've seen are previously banned users complaining about censorship. They aren't fleeing either

 

[Rotadom]

Proof?

(None, because it's a lie.)

Who has fled the board?

All I've seen are previously banned users complaining about censorship. They aren't fleeing either

He was being facetious but him being a liar who is wrong quite often makes it hard to tell when he's joking.

Plus, he's always drunk.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Is that why you always talk shit past everyone like a total BITCH??

It is the way of the Mean Girl Squad.......typical fatherless behavior.

That makes zero sense.

I always tell you what a spaz and cuck you are.

Am I not allowed to agree with someone who also sees you as an imbecile?

 

[Typo Fu Master]

That said, we do have rules. Literotica requires that all forum users must be at least 18 years of age, they must show respect for each other, follow our Community Guidelines, and our specific Forum Rules (see below). Those violating forum rules or community guidelines may be temporarily or permanently banned.

This gets broken on a daily basis. And has been broken on a daily basis since I've been a member. Or does flinging verbal poo not count?

 

[Typo Fu Master]

what is bluesky?

A simple Google search could answer that, but here ya go: Bluesky.

 

[UltraChad]

Learn to use punctuation, dipshit.

I know how to use punctuation dipshit.

Poor Bot feels punished.

Ahhh the edit to make the ascription fit....the desperation is PATHETIC.

 

[UltraChad]

^^^BoBoChad still has hurt fee-fees from getting banned from Lit multiple times for advocating violence against migrants, protesters, and Muslims.

Bat shit lunatics still making shit up to justify their censorship of people who don't share their hatred of the USA and the things it stands for like free speech.

Why do you and the leftoids hate free speech so much??? OH yea it's because your ideas SUCK!!!! and censorship is the only way you can "win". Fucking losers.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Multiple examples of my point in this thread alone.

I'll admit, I'm probably guilty too. I like to be snarky on occasion. I originally came to this site for the porn. I stayed for the free-er speech. I fully understand that I'm not free to say anything I want. But less censorship is more freedom.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Learn to use punctuation, dipshit.

I know how to use punctuation dipshit.

https://media1.tenor.com/m/62M48U-INwsAAAAd/fmj-full.gif

Fucking perfect.

 

[UltraChad]

Fucking perfect.

I'm glad you understand who you're talking to.

 

[DeluxAuto]

I'm glad you understand who you're talking to.

A half-Korean loser who got dumped by a fat goth girl who only used you for babysitting.

 

[PaxNurgle]

There is a huge difference between conservatives and sociopaths.

And most of us are well aware that the latter try and pass themselves off as the former.

If I kept on saying stuff like, "Let's go lynch all white Anglo-Saxon Males, burn down all religious establishments, and put a hit on all buisness owners- doxx them, burn down their buisnesses and lynch them, so we can establish a true Worker's Paradise*" then most reasonable people would expect me to get banned. Justifiably so. This is hate speech- plain and simple, and is promoting violence, injustice and tyranny.

(*I am NOT ADVOCATING FOR SUCH THINGS! This is an example.)

But if I do post garbage like this, and they censor me, then what if I complained "These right-wing lit admins are censoring good liberals!" Would I have a valid case? NO! I'd deserve that ban. Same way that BotanyBoyChad, LessOhmo, etc deserve a permanant ban that is long overdue- and by permanant, this means, they don't get to get around the ban by simply creating new accounts. Kick them off, and make it stick.

By NOT banning the violent, hateful, sociopathic speech of UltraChad, LessOhmo, and all the various Hisarpy/Icanhelp/etc accounts (all the same guy) then if anything, Literotica is showing an inherant RIGHT WING, not left wing, bias.

I will add, there are plenty of reasonable conservatives, even right wingers, on here. Lance Castro, for example, is one of them- I don't agree with a lot of his stuff but he is at least somewhat intelligent and not some knee jerk sociopath. Same with Laura Lovecraft; Even Babyboomer50 is sometimes fair and reasonable, meaning, I can at least have an intelligent and adult conversation with him even though we disagree.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

There is a huge difference between conservatives and sociopaths.

And most of us are well aware that the latter try and pass themselves off as the former.

If I kept on saying stuff like, "Let's go lynch all white Anglo-Saxon Males, burn down all religious establishments, and put a hit on all buisness owners- doxx them, burn down their buisnesses and lynch them, so we can establish a true Worker's Paradise*" then most reasonable people would expect me to get banned. Justifiably so. This is hate speech- plain and simple, and is promoting violence, injustice and tyranny.

(*I am NOT ADVOCATING FOR SUCH THINGS! This is an example.)

But if I do post garbage like this, and they censor me, then what if I complained "These right-wing lit admins are censoring good liberals!" Would I have a valid case? NO! I'd deserve that ban. Same way that BotanyBoyChad, LessOhmo, etc deserve a permanant ban that is long overdue- and by permanant, this means, they don't get to get around the ban by simply creating new accounts. Kick them off, and make it stick.

By NOT banning the violent, hateful, sociopathic speech of UltraChad, LessOhmo, and all the various Hisarpy/Icanhelp/etc accounts (all the same guy) then if anything, Literotica is showing an inherant RIGHT WING, not left wing, bias.

I will add, there are plenty of reasonable conservatives, even right wingers, on here. Lance Castro, for example, is one of them- I don't agree with a lot of his stuff but he is at least somewhat intelligent and not some knee jerk sociopath. Same with Laura Lovecraft; Even Babyboomer50 is sometimes fair and reasonable, meaning, I can at least have an intelligent and adult conversation with him even though we disagree.

Is it ok for someone to wish for someone's house to burn down? What if that person largely supported your ideology?

 

[UltraChad]

A half-Korean loser who got dumped by a fat goth girl who only used you for babysitting.

LOL then you go and post some insane shit like that.

 

[UltraChad]

There is a huge difference between conservatives and sociopaths.

And most of us are well aware that the latter try and pass themselves off as the former.

If I kept on saying stuff like, "Let's go lynch all white Anglo-Saxon Males, burn down all religious establishments, and put a hit on all buisness owners- doxx them, burn down their buisnesses and lynch them, so we can establish a true Worker's Paradise*" then most reasonable people would expect me to get banned.

Not at all. That's just a little common sense MOSTLY peaceful protest!!

HATE speech and misinformation is exclusively for NOT progressives. Progressives preach progress and can never be wrong.

See how that works

 

[PaxNurgle]

Is it ok for someone to wish for someone's house to burn down? What if that person largely supported your ideology?

Wishing for it and advocating people actually deliberately go and set fires to people's houses are two different things.

The fires are a true tragedy that have affected thousands of people. Yet, I have read a fuck ton of really insensitive posts here who express utterly NO sympathy or sorrow for those affected by the fires, but instead want to make long, angry posts blaming democrats, people of color, GLBT people, or liberals for the spread of the fires. Which is sickening. I would argue that these people DESERVE to have their homes burned down because these people, like the garbage they post, are disgusting. It would indeed serve them right.

But that is not the same thing as urging people to take action to burn down other people's homes. There is a distinction.

 

[DeluxAuto]

LOL then you go and post some insane shit like that.

It's cute that you pretend that we don't know exactly who you are.

 

[UltraChad]

It's cute that you pretend that we don't know exactly who you are.

It's cute that you pretend that you do.

 

[RobDownSouth]

They/them are fleeing the Politics Board in droves and migrating to BlueSky where it’s safe.

Pfft. BlueSky is the libertarian future. You control your own algorithm over there, unlike Musk's Twitter (the algorithm serves up a steaming pile of fascist propaganda each day) and Zuckerberg's Threads (which is 100% clickbait).

Another differentiation is you can banhammer the trolls from your feed ruthlessly.

 

[UltraChad]

Pfft. BlueSky is the libertarian future.

LMFAO!!!

 

[RobDownSouth]

Happy Korean-American Day to those who celebrate this today.

This might just be the last one ever celebrated, seeing as the recent passed Laken Riley bill obliterates the distinction between "legal" and "illegal" immigrants and "refugees" on a state-by-state basis, and when coupled with the elderly felon's campaign promise to remove the concept of "birthright citizenship" has the distinct potential of making certain Litsters' continued residence in the USA a tad... problematic.

Troubled times ahead for "anchor babies".

I'm a 1st gen American, both my parents came here LEGALLY, one as a war refugee.

 

[UltraChad]

Happy Korean-American Day to those who celebrate this today.

This might just be the last one ever celebrated, seeing as the recent passed Laken Riley bill obliterates the distinction between "legal" and "illegal" immigrants and "refugees" on a state-by-state basis, and when coupled with the elderly felon's campaign promise to remove the concept of "birthright citizenship" has the distinct potential of making certain Litsters' continued residence in the USA a tad... problematic.

Troubled times ahead for "anchor babies".

So you don't know what the Laken Riley Bill does and you don't understand what a legal citizen is.

Got it. Another fuckin' retarded (D)umb fuck...probably a faggot too.