WriterDom Good to the last drop Joined Jun 25, 2000 Posts 20,077 Apr 18, 2002 #1 I think not. We wouldn't have the world's smartest woman running for president in 2004.
Azwed Invading Poland Joined Apr 9, 2000 Posts 11,575 Apr 18, 2002 #2 and you accused me of biased poll answers.
p_p_man The 'Euro' European Joined Feb 18, 2001 Posts 24,253 Apr 18, 2002 #3 Where "Other"? Couldn't do any worse... ppman
B BustyTheClown Literotica Guru Joined Jan 15, 2002 Posts 921 Apr 18, 2002 #4 I'd have picked "other" or "don't know," too. It's hard to say where we'd be with Gore. We might be in the same boat, but I agree with p_p_man, at least we couldn't be any worse.
I'd have picked "other" or "don't know," too. It's hard to say where we'd be with Gore. We might be in the same boat, but I agree with p_p_man, at least we couldn't be any worse.
clit_licker30 Nibblin' On Sponge Cake Joined Feb 7, 2002 Posts 5,324 Apr 18, 2002 #5 With Gore we would have had Bin Laden visiting the UN and Congress so we could get his insight on why he hates the US.
With Gore we would have had Bin Laden visiting the UN and Congress so we could get his insight on why he hates the US.
WriterDom Good to the last drop Joined Jun 25, 2000 Posts 20,077 Apr 18, 2002 #6 We wouldn't have to explain to 23 posters why the tax rebate wasn't an advance on their 2002 rebate. and that liberal Tony Blair wouldn't be a dog on Gore's chain.
We wouldn't have to explain to 23 posters why the tax rebate wasn't an advance on their 2002 rebate. and that liberal Tony Blair wouldn't be a dog on Gore's chain.