Guileful and Marximus and my involvement.

Calamity Jane said:
AND, if Laurel, as the owner of this board DID choose to share information with a moderator, or her friend, that's her choice.
(and no, I don't think she did)

It may be her choice, but as owner she has a rather obvious incentive to not be doing that, lest people bail in droves (which is I think what Byron was getting at).
 
Calamity Jane said:
Careful, your vendetta is showing.

What vendetta is that?

I don't have any vendetta with honeylick.

You might want to check yours with me though.
 
Bent said:
I completely disagree with you. What you're saying is comparable to accusing the President of something, and he has to answer to you because you are a Democrat, but Kerry doesn't have to because you support him.
No, it isn't comparable to that at all. Your analogy is inapplicable.

Anyway, if Laurel doesn't prove her innocence, what's your plan of action?
 
In general, I have no problem with alts. Alts can be used for many reasons. What bothers me, and someone please correct me if I'm wrong, is that these alts were used to gather information/spread gossip about the 'real' posters 'friends'. Am I correct here?

If so, that just is very sad. And pathetic. If someone would do that on a porn board , then, I'd hate to be these folks friends in real life. Damn, Bob.

What exactly is Heavy's involvement?

Is Heavy Hanns? I seem to remember Hanns giving MWG hell quite abit, how does that make Bob feel about Heavy?

As far as MWG. Moo.
 
Cherry said:
What vendetta is that?

I don't have any vendetta with honeylick.

You might want to check yours with me though.

Yeah ok.

It's no secret I think you're an idiot, but I wouldn't exactly call that a vendetta.
 
Byron In Exile said:
No, it isn't comparable to that at all. Your analogy is inapplicable.

Anyway, if Laurel doesn't prove her innocence, what's your plan of action?

It's inapplicable because you say it is? No, Byron, I feel the way I do, because I do respect people's right to privacy. My plan of action Byron? Why would there even need to be a plan of action if she is innocent?
 
freakygurl said:
I believe that information was posted (by Morcheeba) on the board months ago. I don't remember if a troll or someone else brought it up or not.


I didn't read it months ago, freaky

Morcheeba has made that claim four time since last night. Something about sending honeylick a postcard where she referred to having OCB ... and then later having a troll repeat it back to her. She swears that honeylick is the only person she ever told.

I think it's somewhere in this thread ... and then again in the BB one
 
Bent said:
I completely disagree with you. What you're saying is comparable to accusing the President of something, and he has to answer to you because you are a Democrat, but Kerry doesn't have to because you support him.


You know, I can't speak for Laurel, I can only say what I would do in her shoes.

Back when Laurel was a GB regular (the good old days)she responded to shit like this on the rare occasions it popped up.

Then a few people decided it would be fun to accuse her of malicious, behind the scenes bullshit on a daily basis until she was doing pretty much nothing but defending herself against bullshit lies.

So no, I don't think Laurel should post about this. It would only encourage more idiots to cry out "Laurel did it!!!" whenever they needed to stir some shit people would actually be interested in.

If you want to know the truth and you won't believe people when they say "Laurel pm'd me and said she wasn't involved" then pm her yourself! KS and Desiqn are hardly her "supporters" or "friends" and yet she responded to them I'm sure she'll respond to you.

You know this and yet you haven't done it. Why?
 
Oie vie.

Allright......so are all the players the same as they were last night? Or do I need a new playbill.

Is there anything I need to see in the 30 pages since last night in these several threads?

Help a brotha out.
 
Cherry said:
Originally posted by freakygurl
Until Laurel and/or Draah comes forward and says that yes, they did give Bob that info.. then I'm leaning towards the idea that that information was made up.




And, what about honeylick?

Didn't Morcheeba say that information she gave honeylick on a postcard ended up in one of the alt flame threads?

Maybe she should be asked what part she played in the scenario?

It happened like this:

1) I sent Honeylick 4 postcards. On one I'd written: "Damn me and my OCD w/ numbers!" as a jokingly way of commenting on the 4th pcard.

2) Out of the blue I stumbled upon a thread w/ her saying:

honeylick said:
talked to another lit member today... she noted the GB has been pretty piss-poor in the area of witty and sharp discussion.. and even the flaming is hardly causing a burn

so, i've been skimming thru all these so-called flame wars and thread arguments, looking for a shred of a caustic verbal exchange or the resurgance of a classic schoolyard bully, and am coming up short.

what happened to the raging cunts of the board? you know, the 'real-deal holyfield' of drama queens?

have they eschewed the spotlight in favor of playing it safe? has the peer pressure of being associated as a 'clique' or having a gang-mentality label thrust upon them, been too much for their cunty attitudes to bear?

has the streamilined, strong, vibrant, cunty personality, been replaced with a sloppy, fatty, jelly-roll of a jiggly apprehensive scaredy cat?

has classic *bratcat* been replaced by a sub-par, sharting morcheeba?

say it isn't so.

*** paid for by the bring back the drama in 2004 campaign. ***

Morcheeba said:
I like the way you think about me 2 Friday nights in a row, sugar mama. Last night with this obvious insult and the previous Friday you gave me a link to a thread to showcase *bratcat's ways* - hehe, obsess much?

honeylick said:
dude, you have obsessive all locked down. i'm just tryin' to live in your world, big playa.

Morcheeba said:
I have 'obsessive' all locked down? How's that?

honeylick said:
hey, take your pill and get back on topic here.

*bratcat* or bobble-tits. you choose.

Then a couple days later MWG and HeavyStick attacked me with OCD-related comments. Then Marximus made that Spotlight thread about me with OCD questions.

Since then, not even Cheyenne or HeavyStick was able to find anything remotely close to my discussing OCD or any other mental disorder here in Literotica. All came from a postcard sent to Honeylump.

HoneyLump claims to have never posted such info. But I've been online for more than several years and know EXACTLY what I shell out to others. That's why she went into hiding for several weeks afterward. She wants "obsessive" - I'll give her just that.
 
Desiqn said:
<snip>Anyways, Freya, I really have always liked you, I'm sorry you feel hurt by my actions, and you're absolutely right, whether I was given the info or not, I still chose to use it, and post it. I did so willingly. I could have just not posted. I enjoyed the drama it created, and it kept other people soaked with drama juice as well, whether anyone wants to believe it or not, the GB is all about the drama.

I don't want any sort of special treatment. I am not looking to be praised while Bob is not, I am willing to share equal blame with Troll4U and Bob, I never once said I wasn't. You can all vent on me all you like. I think I kind of like the torment. After all, I am a sicko. :D

Thanks.

It doesn't fix it, but it helps.

Sucks that I have to be mad at two of my top twenty posters now though. Assholes.
 
Desiqn said:
Huhhhhh ... strange way to feel.

Look, we all could use an understanding ear to listen now and then. I don't particularly care for, nor understand, your behavior. But, I hate the thought of you being so self-destructive without anyone to help you.

Your response to me shook me. To hear your acceptance of being disliked as if all that you can be makes me feel sad for you.

If you find yourself in despair, pm me. I will listen and try to help.
 
8ball said:
In general, I have no problem with alts. Alts can be used for many reasons. What bothers me, and someone please correct me if I'm wrong, is that these alts were used to gather information/spread gossip about the 'real' posters 'friends'. Am I correct here?

If so, that just is very sad. And pathetic. If someone would do that on a porn board , then, I'd hate to be these folks friends in real life. Damn, Bob.

What exactly is Heavy's involvement?

Is Heavy Hanns? I seem to remember Hanns giving MWG hell quite abit, how does that make Bob feel about Heavy?

As far as MWG. Moo.

8ball!!! DUDE!! how ya been? I hear war eagles in the winds for you guys this tomorrow :D wonder if your two QB's can pull this off??
 
Bent said:
It's inapplicable because you say it is?
No, it's inapplicable because it's a faulty analogy.
No, Byron, I feel the way I do, because I do respect people's right to privacy.
Uh... okay...
My plan of action Byron? Why would there even need to be a plan of action if she is innocent?
Well, obviously there wouldn't.

But you aren't going to get any proof of that.

So what are you going to do about it?

Take your toys and go home?

Start a thread about it?

Hold your breath?

What?
 
sunstruck said:

KS and Desiqn are hardly her "supporters" or "friends" and yet she responded to them I'm sure she'll respond to you.

She pm'd me. I've never pm'd her accept in response.

And I agree. She wont ever say word one about this because of the past tudes and accusations. Its probably for the best too. She's pretty stuck between a rock and a hard place though but she's keeping tabs.

I dont believe she abused anyones trust here, but I have told her she needs to rearrange her moderator list.
 
sunstruck said:
You know this and yet you haven't done it. Why?


Because in the past when I have PMd Laurel it has gone unanswered...and I'm not the only one that deserves to know the final yes or no on this. I just seem to be the only one that gives a shit enough to say something about it.

There are people here who are in the military, that work for the government, that are facing divorce or having their kids taken away...and to be here under the impression that this place is a safe haven to be yourself (and they try their damndest to maintain their anonimoty or however you spell it, only for that to be false *shakes head*...yeah, they deserve an answer.
 
Byron In Exile said:
No, it's inapplicable because it's a faulty analogy.
Uh... okay...
Well, obviously there wouldn't.

But you aren't going to get any proof of that.

So what are you going to do about it?

Take your toys and go home?

Start a thread about it?

Hold your breath?

What?

Oh what is all that childishness about Byron? Because I am asking for an answer to something that is a serious issue. You people are bitching about Bobby, Desiqn and MWG giving out info, and if Laurel and draaah did the same thing, why shouldn't they be asked to answer. Again...this shows the hypocrisy which is Lit.
 
huskie said:
8ball!!! DUDE!! how ya been? I hear war eagles in the winds for you guys this tomorrow :D wonder if your two QB's can pull this off??

It should be a rather kick ass game. I just hope we can slow down those two backs. The general feelings towards this team are the highest they've been in some time. I just hope they don't get cocky and blow it, as our teams have in the past.

And actually, there are several excellent games this weekend. Good thing I already mowed the lawn, cuz, my ass is not leaving the couch all day Saturday. I just hope that Momma gets her rest, as she's going to get a workout bringing me my beer.
 
Morcheeba said:
It happened like this:

<snip>

Thank you for explaining. I was trying to see where this had been addressed before today.

I remember you questioning Honey about it.. but I wasn't sure when or where.
 
Bent said:
Because in the past when I have PMd Laurel it has gone unanswered...and I'm not the only one that deserves to know the final yes or no on this. I just seem to be the only one that gives a shit enough to say something about it.

There are people here who are in the military, that work for the government, that are facing divorce or having their kids taken away...and to be here under the impression that this place is a safe haven to be yourself (and they try their damndest to maintain their anonimoty or however you spell it, only for that to be false *shakes head*...yeah, they deserve an answer.
What difference does it make if you PM her?

She could just be lying to you anyway.

And even if you do believe her, why should anyone believe you?

Every user who deserves an answer should PM Laurel.
 
8ball said:
In general, I have no problem with alts. Alts can be used for many reasons. What bothers me, and someone please correct me if I'm wrong, is that these alts were used to gather information/spread gossip about the 'real' posters 'friends'. Am I correct here?

If so, that just is very sad. And pathetic. If someone would do that on a porn board , then, I'd hate to be these folks friends in real life. Damn, Bob.

What exactly is Heavy's involvement?

Is Heavy Hanns? I seem to remember Hanns giving MWG hell quite abit, how does that make Bob feel about Heavy?

As far as MWG. Moo.

Y'know even though "they" trolled me, I never could bring myself to actually care so I'm not upset from that angle.

But all the people who took up for "them", who considered themselves to be friends of the people involved - some even being trolled or feeding information to other trolls; yeah, that's who I feel sorry for.

By the same token, I'm just amazed that anyone is amazed that Bob et al would do this. I mean, c'mon people, did you ever actually read his posts?

Heavy is denying any involvment.
Desiqn said that Bob claimed to only write the spotlight threads as marximus and heavy made the other posts under that nick. Bob admitted to making the spotlight threads only, and didn't say who else had control of that alt.

Oh, and *snort!*
 
Just leave it be Bent, they are pretty much right in their responses. Never question or expect answers from those who are the authority figures because more often than not they are busy balancing on their pedestals.
 
Back
Top