Guileful and Marximus and my involvement.

Cheyenne said:
:D

The smart ass sitting next to me hasn't laughed that hard at this board in a LONG time.

And his Jedi mind skills are stronger than yours so you'd be surprised what those IM logs might REALLY say when you post them.

So you and P1 are really MWG and Bob?

;-)
 
Cheyenne said:
:D

The smart ass sitting next to me hasn't laughed that hard at this board in a LONG time.

And his Jedi mind skills are stronger than yours so you'd be surprised what those IM logs might REALLY say when you post them.

The parts where I say I'm a dirty slut are true.
 
Question:
How can anyone involved in this whole marximus deal deny responsibility or guilt? The personal attacks were all over these boards. Heavy, keep trying to convince us of your innocence, but it's not going to fly. You may be able to claim you provided no personal information that was used. You can claim you never saw any of the marximus pm's, but how in the hell can you deny what was in black and white all over this board? You easily could have ended your association with all of this by changing the password...by telling your 'friends', that their behavior was not something you found acceptable. You chose to do none of these and in turn you chose to allow the attacks to continue.

Why do some here say guilt by association? Forget the car anaologies and the bank robberies. When one witnesses something they find irreprehensible they distance themselves. When ones choice is not to distance one's self, then one at that time is accepting of said behavoirs, and is guilty...yes, of association.
 
Cheyenne said:
Well of COURSE the moderators have super powers! Haven't you ever heard of Jedi mind control? You only THINK you remember changing your control panel settings. That's because they MAKE you think that you did, they put their thoughts directly into your brain.

*bump* for Freaky.

And yes, I am. :devil:
 
I know.. I'd read it. That is why I made the comment I did. :cool:

And I'm still wondering abou the audio section of Lit. Where is it?
 
TellerOfStories said:
Question:
How can anyone involved in this whole marximus deal deny responsibility or guilt? The personal attacks were all over these boards. Heavy, keep trying to convince us of your innocence, but it's not going to fly. You may be able to claim you provided no personal information that was used. You can claim you never saw any of the marximus pm's, but how in the hell can you deny what was in black and white all over this board? You easily could have ended your association with all of this by changing the password...by telling your 'friends', that their behavior was not something you found acceptable. You chose to do none of these and in turn you chose to allow the attacks to continue.

Why do some here say guilt by association? Forget the car anaologies and the bank robberies. When one witnesses something they find irreprehensible they distance themselves. When ones choice is not to distance one's self, then one at that time is accepting of said behavoirs, and is guilty...yes, of association.

You're an idiot.

All that shit has been covered.

Would you like one or two scoops of "fuck off" with your cup of shut the fuck up?
 
HeavyStick said:
You're an idiot.

All that shit has been covered.

Would you like one or two scoops of "fuck off" with your cup of shut the fuck up?


Can I just get your cock... to go please. :D
 
Byron In Exile said:
But you'd publicly beg for the chat logs.

Lance has you nailed.

:D Nice try.

My name was in them based on the search for my name that I always do first thing on the board. Pardon me for being curious to know what lies might be being spread about me THIS time.
(Except the comment desiqn made about me defending Dark Angel as being brilliant was true. I did defend him here and I do think he is brilliant. I can live with that.)
 
Good gawd, its taken me 2 days to catch up.

Darn it, I gotta start getting online during the weekends again.

Ya'll stop posting when I am not around, k?
 
TellerOfStories said:
Why do some here say guilt by association? Forget the car anaologies and the bank robberies. When one witnesses something they find irreprehensible they distance themselves. When ones choice is not to distance one's self, then one at that time is accepting of said behavoirs, and is guilty...yes, of association.

Dude - vocabulary check.

Irreprehensible ~ (a.) Not reprehensible; blameless; innocent.

Just sayin.

And, you might want to try paragraph breaks and stuff. If you want anyone to actually read the stories you're tellin.
 
lovetoread said:
Good gawd, its taken me 2 days to catch up.

Darn it, I gotta start getting online during the weekends again.

Ya'll stop posting when I am not around, k?

Just ignore her, she's tied up indefinetly for the next bunch of weekends.
 
I'm not really here on page 61.
I'm actually back on page 50.

I'm slowly working my way through this when I have the patience.
 
Cheyenne said:
:D Nice try.

My name was in them based on the search for my name that I always do first thing on the board. Pardon me for being curious to know what lies might be being spread about me THIS time.
I did not know that.

Glad you cleared it up; you're excused.
 
Cherry said:
Even in this thread, you resorted to harrassing Morcheeba for her physical impairment/addicition.


Cherry! Calm down, girl!

I don't have a physical impairment (unless you chalk up clumsiness to being an impairment) and I'm not much of an addict for anything these days. What're you talking about?
 
Oh cool... I just bumped this stale bitch of a thread and started page 62 just to discuss my supposed physical impairments and addictions.

Me/ My Brain/ My Fingers = GENIUS!!!
 
Back
Top