Global warming and a country ran by Crude Junkies

~hellbaby~

It's not a demon thing
Joined
Nov 20, 2004
Posts
5,510


excerpts from Global Warming Fast Facts
By Brian Handwerk for National Geographic News

There is little doubt that the planet is warming. Over the last century the average temperature has climbed about 1 degree Fahrenheit (0.6 of a degree Celsius) around the world.
There is more warming at higher latitudes. The multinational Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) report recently concluded that in Alaska, western Canada, and eastern Russia, average temperatures have increased as much as 4 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit (3 to 4 degrees Celsius) in the past 50 years. The rise is nearly twice the global average. In Barrow, Alaska (the U.S.'s northernmost city) average temperatures are up over 4 degrees Fahrenheit (2.5 to 3 degrees Celsius) in 30 years
There is more warming at higher latitudes. The multinational Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) report recently concluded that in Alaska, western Canada, and eastern Russia, average temperatures have increased as much as 4 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit (3 to 4 degrees Celsius) in the past 50 years. The rise is nearly twice the global average. In Barrow, Alaska (the U.S.'s northernmost city) average temperatures are up over 4 degrees Fahrenheit (2.5 to 3 degrees Celsius) in 30 years.
Data from the distant past show rapid climate change is possible.Over the last million years the Earth has fluctuated between colder and warmer periods. The shifts have occurred in roughly 100,000-year intervals thought to be regulated by sunlight. Earth's sunlight quota depends upon its orbit and celestial orientation
Arctic ice is at risk. Rising temperatures have a dramatic impact on Arctic ice, which serves as a kind of "air conditioner" at the top of the world. Since 1978 Arctic sea ice area has shrunk by some 9 percent per decade, and thinned as well.
The Arctic impacts affect people and animals. In the Arctic the impacts of a warming climate are being felt already. Coastal Indigenous communities report shorter periods of sea ice, which fails to temper ocean storms and their destructive coastal erosion. Increased snow and ice melt have caused higher rivers while thawing permafrost has wreaked havoc with roads and other infrastructure. Some communities have had to move from historic coastline locations.
Glaciers are shrinking. Vast quantities of fresh water are tied up in the world's many melting glaciers. When Montana's Glacier National Park was created in 1910 it held some 150 glaciers. Now fewer than 30, greatly shrunken glaciers, remain. Tropical glaciers are in even more trouble. The legendary snows of Tanzania's Mount Kilimanjaro 19,340-foot (5,895-meter) peak have melted by some 80 percent since 1912 and could be gone by 2020.
Sea levels have risen and fallen many times over the Earth's long geological history. Average global sea level has risen by 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 cm) over the past century according to the IPCC.
Warming could alter the ocean conveyor belt. The ocean's circulation system, known as the ocean conveyor belt, moderates global temperatures by moving tropical heat around the planet. Global warming could alter the balance of this system, via an influx of freshwater from melting ice caps for example, creating unforeseen and possibly fast-paced change.
Extreme weather could become common. Climate models suggest that globalwarming could cause more frequent extreme weather conditions. Intense hurricanes and storm surges could threaten coastal communities, while heat waves, fires and drought could also become more common.
Human activities have contributed to global warming. Since the 1860s, increased industrialization and shrinking forests have helped raise the atmosphere's CO2 level by almost 100 parts per million -- and Northern Hemisphere temperatures have followed suit. Increases in temperatures and greenhouse gasses have been even sharper since the 1950s.
Global warming affects plants, birds and amphibians also. Studies show that many European plants now flower a week earlier than they did in the 1950s and also lose their leaves 5 days later.
Warming could cause plant and animal extinction. By 2050, rising temperatures exacerbated by human-induced belches of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases could send more than a million of Earth's land-dwelling plants and animals down the road to extinction, according to a recent study.
Coral reefs are also affected. Coral reefs worldwide are "bleaching," losing key algae and resident organisms, as water temperatures rise above 85 degrees Fahrenheit (29.5 degrees Celsius) through periods of calm, sunny weather. Scientists worry that rapid climate change could inhibit the ability of many species to adapt within complex and interdependent ecosystems.
Positive effects are possible. The effects of a warming globe may not be entirely negative. Heating costs could decline for those in colder climates, while vast marginal agricultural areas in northern latitudes might become more viable. Arctic shipping and resource extraction operations could also benefit—summer sea ice breakup in Hudson Bay already occurs two to three weeks earlier than it did half a century ago.
But many species could be hit hard—including humans. The most vulnerable are peoples living in the far North, those perched along the world's coasts, and millions dependent on subsistence agriculture subject to the vagaries of a changing climate
 
Bush makes all American's out to be Crude Junkies when he says thing like
"Here in America, we have become too dependent--too dependent--on the increasingly limited supply of foreign oil for our own energy needs".
The ex-alcoholic's addictive tendencies have him grasping for Oil at all costs. The rest of the planet scowls at the US as consortiums of global scientists present undeniable proof modern day lifestyles cause climate changes. Astonshingly though, George Bush fires the scientists, changes the wording in the reports and holds the door for Christie Whitman, the head of the EPA. Whitman joins the scores of other officials who have left the Bush administration on matters of principal and ethics.

**

Hey Asia, Stop Using AMERICA'S Gas
Still Refusing to Even Consider Cutting Back,
George Bush Blames Asia For High US Gas Prices US may help India conserve energy

T V Parasuram | June 17, 2005 12:06 IST

Observing that much of the current and projected rise in oil prices is due to increasing consumption in Asia, US President George W Bush has stressed on the need to help India and China conserve energy in order to reduce the global demand for petroleum. "Much of the current and projected rise in gasoline prices is due to rising oil consumption in Asia. These are emerging economies that are consuming more natural resources, one of which is oil. As Asian economies grow, their demand for oil is growing much faster than the global supply is growing. And that drives up prices", he said while addressing the 16th annual Energy Efficiency Forum in Washington.

"It is in our interest to help countries like India and China become more efficient users of hydrocarbons. That will help take the pressure off global supply. It will take the pressure off gasoline prices here", Bush said.

The US President said he would ask world leaders at the G-8 meeting next month to join America in helping developing countries find practical ways to use cleaner and more efficient energy technologies.

"When we lower the global demand for oil, Americans will be better off at the gas pump and future generations will breathe cleaner air too", he said.

"Here in America, we have become too dependent--too dependent--on the increasingly limited supply of foreign oil for our own energy needs".

**


"Americans consume about one-quarter of the world's oil production, and on a per capita basis consume about double the amount Europeans use, according to government statistics. Despite these facts, Bush avoided confronting the American public with a lecture about the need to conserve energy in the face of depleting fossil fuel reserves."

**

USA Today quoted environmental lobbyist David Hamilton, who wonders if the current shortage of refinery capacity was an intentional decision of the oil industry in the 1990s to reduce supplies and thereby increase profits.

BP – up 165%
Chevron-Texaco - up 294%
Conoco-Phillips - up 44%
ExxonMobil - up 125%


**


"On Sunday the Washington Post reported on the influence that has been wielded in this Administration by the people who raised large amounts of money for President Bush’s campaign.

One of the four people who organized the entire fundraising apparatus was Donald Evans, a Texas oil man.

The article also noted the influence of Enron CEO Ken Lay, who served on the Energy Department transition team and recommended two of the appointees to the five-member Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

When it comes to a national energy policy, this Administration has taken care of the Enrons and the big oil companies ... while middle class families get gouged at the gas pump."




Some of the changes include deleting a summary that stated: 'Climate change has global consequences for human health and the environment.' Sections on the ecological effects of global warming and its impact on human health were removed. So were several sentences calling for further research on climate change.

Symons left the EPA in April 2001 and now works for the National Wildlife Federation as head of its climate change programme. The Bush administration's attitude was clear from the beginning, he said, and a lot of people were working to ensure that the President did nothing to address global warming.


**

The email discusses possible tactics for playing down the report and getting rid of EPA officials, including its then head, Christine Whitman. 'It seems to me that the folks at the EPA are the obvious fall guys and we would only hope that the fall guy (or gal) should be as high up as possible,' Ebell wrote in the email. 'Perhaps tomorrow we will call for Whitman to be fired,' he added.



**



"When Bush first came to power he withdrew the US - the world's biggest source of greenhouse gases - from the Kyoto treaty, which requires nations to limit their emissions. "
"Both Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney are former oil executives; National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice was a director of the oil firm Chevron, and Commerce Secretary Donald Evans once headed an oil and gas exploration company. "
'It all fits together,' said Kert Davies of Greenpeace. 'It shows that there is an effort to undermine good science. It all just smells like the oil industry. They are doing everything to allow the US to remain the world's biggest polluter.'


**



Some of the changes include deleting a summary that stated: 'Climate change has global consequences for human health and the environment.' Sections on the ecological effects of global warming and its impact on human health were removed. So were several sentences calling for further research on climate change.
Symons left the EPA in April 2001 and now works for the National Wildlife Federation as head of its climate change programme. The Bush administration's attitude was clear from the beginning, he said, and a lot of people were working to ensure that the President did nothing to address global warming.


The email discusses possible tactics for playing down the report and getting rid of EPA officials, including its then head, Christine Whitman. 'It seems to me that the folks at the EPA are the obvious fall guys and we would only hope that the fall guy (or gal) should be as high up as possible,' Ebell wrote in the email. 'Perhaps tomorrow we will call for Whitman to be fired,' he added.





2005-06-02 10:45:58


**


 
This whole Global warning thinggets me mad ,its scientists keeping them selves in a job.

Its like food every now and then they tell you that coffee is bad then a few weeks later it is good.
 
retd said:
This whole Global warning thinggets me mad ,its scientists keeping them selves in a job.

Its like food every now and then they tell you that coffee is bad then a few weeks later it is good.
Its an administration in oil who would rather ruin the world and make millions than preserve it
 
Alternative energy is not new news. It has to do with the investment involved.

Natural factors contribute to warming trends as well as man made ones.
 
limodrivinslut said:
Alternative energy is not new news. It has to do with the investment involved.

Natural factors contribute to warming trends as well as man made ones.

Especially when the natural factors are a result of man. I just don't believe there is no effort to push for conservation and alternate fuel.
I saw three hours of cspan where they did nothing but say 'yea we should do something' while the experts where saying 'YOU NEED TO CONSERVE'
Congross wanted no part of it, they discussed alternative fuel and incentives to use alternative fuel but would not go near conservation, except to say maybe if gas was six dollars a gallon folks wouldn't drive so much. It was unreal.
 
You shoulda seen us screamin' about this stuff back in the eighties... and the ninties.
 
limodrivinslut said:
You shoulda seen us screamin' about this stuff back in the eighties... and the ninties.
Don't forget the 70's. Carter was in office and you could only get gas on certain days depending on your license plate numbers.
 
My dad bought a Honda Civic then. Those first ones that were short. Big man... pretty cramped. Good mileage though.
 
~hellbaby~ said:
Especially when the natural factors are a result of man. I just don't believe there is no effort to push for conservation and alternate fuel.
I saw three hours of cspan where they did nothing but say 'yea we should do something' while the experts where saying 'YOU NEED TO CONSERVE'
Congross wanted no part of it, they discussed alternative fuel and incentives to use alternative fuel but would not go near conservation, except to say maybe if gas was six dollars a gallon folks wouldn't drive so much. It was unreal.[/SIZE]

But if gas was $6 a gallon, people wouldn't drive as much.
 
San Francisco

July 20 (BCN) -- The board of directors of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District took a historic vote today, adopting a rule designed to reduce flaring at the Bay Area's five refineries.

The rule, the first of its kind in the nation, decreases refinery flaring, which is the combustion of excess gases at refineries to prevent them from venting directly into the atmosphere.

At a morning board meeting in San Francisco, dozens of environmentalists, doctors and East Bay residents urged the board to support the rule, which was designed by district staff to reduce air pollution and "provide better protection of public health and help the region attain and maintain ambient air quality standards," according to the district.

http://www.refineryreform.org/News_BAAQMD_media.html
 
limodrivinslut said:
Alternative energy is not new news. It has to do with the investment involved.

Natural factors contribute to warming trends as well as man made ones.
So is it worth the investment to save the planet, or say WTF? Then in 100 or 200 years everyone is huddled together in the mountain ranges and the oceans moving in. Of course the white house has been moved to sit on top of Denali which is about the only place the air and water are clean. But at least we saved some money. I think it has quite a bit to do with the investment big money has in oil more than what it would cost to impliment. The profits they make are absolutley absurd.. up over 200 % on an ongoing basis. there is no lack of funding, only lack of ethics and an overflowing amount of greed.
 
We chose to go industrial and become dependant on others for our survival. It will be an interesting world when supplies can not be delivered.
 
limodrivinslut said:
We chose to go industrial and become dependant on others for our survival. It will be an interesting world when supplies can not be delivered.
I keep imagining they will drill so much the continents will start to collapse and slowly sink into the earth's molten core. And may all the iol-men be the first to go.
 
The gas association should be looking for alternative choices for energy but money guides their decisions more than saving our resources. The Policy and Planning V.P. of the American Gas Association was showing slides of how they drill for natural gas and while showing the slide of a drilling site commented that there is "lot more energy coming out of that than a couple of windmills"."these are the real
"Evildoers"
 
When you can give me the explanation for global warming on Mars, then I will pay attention to your dumbass "ex-spurts..."
 
Of, course, when I was in High School, we were on the verge of an ice-age and the same experts were submitting ideas like covering Antarctica in black soot to absorb more of the sun’s heat.

Now that the sun is in a different part of its cycle, we’re worried that Antarctica is too warm!

I don’t hear the penguins bitching…
 
"It's the sun stupid."

*Wasted words for a wasted mind.*

Ishmael
 
St-st-st-stuck on st-st-st-stupid...

Why let a perfectly good theory die in the face of fact?

"Who you gonna believe bitch, me or your lying eyes?" Richard Pryor
 
Back
Top