Glen Beck's Non Event in Washington, D.C.

amicus

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
14,812
Wanna have some fun? Go Web browsing and try to find out how many people attended the Beck Rally and the Sharpton Rally in DC 8/28/10.

Oh! You didn't know there was a Rally?

Makes my point.

Amicus
 
I knew there was a Beck rally.

Still haven't figured out what the heck it was about. Something "honor" something something "god" something.
 
As you know, Beck is a former radio personality now turned TV bloviator. I think he's borderline insane.
 
It seems there were over a million people there. This is a significant demonstration of the size of the Tea Party and their motivation.
 
It seems there were over a million people there. This is a significant demonstration of the size of the Tea Party and their motivation.
Over 100,000 people-- not nearly a million.

A hundred thousand white people, talking about civil rights. The right to be fat because of the cheap food they eat courtesy of the the corporations that pirate their lives.

Yes, ami, we all knew all about beck's plans. We chose not to talk about them here. We come here to talk about writing. And Sex. And sex writing.

Talking politics on this little forum is for wusses. Take it to Huffington or craigslist. http://craigslist.org/forums/? where, at this moment, there are 2224 people visiting the politics usa forum, and 15486 visiting the world politics forum.
 
Last edited:
Over 100,000 people-- not nearly a million.

A hundred thousand white people, talking about civil rights. The right to be fat because of the cheap food they eat courtesy of the the corporations that pirate their lives.

Yes, ami, we all knew all about beck's plans. We chose not to talk about them here. We come here to talk about writing. And Sex. And sex writing.

Talking politics on this little forum is for wusses. Take it to Huffington or craigslist. http://craigslist.org/forums/? where, at this moment, there are 2224 people visiting the politics usa forum, and 15486 visiting the world politics forum.

Actually, Stella you are wrong. It is more like 87,000. lol

I just couldn't resist posting the Republican claims because this whole event offended me. Some movement.
 
Actually, Stella you are wrong. It is more like 87,000. lol

I just couldn't resist posting the Republican claims because this whole event offended me. Some movement.
Ack! the Baltimore Sun was off by three thousand! That's crappy head-counting. You think they got lazy? ;)
 
Ack! the Baltimore Sun was off by three thousand! That's crappy head-counting. You think they got lazy? ;)

Maybe. Plus they all look alike to me. lol Sorry, bad joke.

That is of course not an exact number, but is a scientific estimate based on aerial photography. I just don't understand how you can extrapolate that to several hundred thousand or even worse a million.
 
Whatever the real number of people, the photos show that a hell of a lot of people were there. When one man can draw a crowd like that, what he has to say is worthy of respect, not the mockery of fools.

Disagree all you want, but come up with a cogent counter-argument, instead of trotting out the familiar old, one-size-fits-all insults, accompanied by girlish giggling.

Anyone who can create--such as a writer--has a godlike power, and should be above such childishness.
 
Whatever the real number of people, the photos show that a hell of a lot of people were there. When one man can draw a crowd like that, what he has to say is worthy of respect, not the mockery of fools.

Disagree all you want, but come up with a cogent counter-argument, instead of trotting out the familiar old, one-size-fits-all insults, accompanied by girlish giggling.

Anyone who can create--such as a writer--has a godlike power, and should be above such childishness.
Mockery is the best he's going to get around here, or haven't you noticed? :D

Girlish giggling is fun, easy, and rejuvenating. Kind of like sex. I don't mind giggling like a girl once in a while. Girls are cool!
 
Actually, Stella you are wrong. It is more like 87,000. lol

I just couldn't resist posting the Republican claims because this whole event offended me. Some movement.

The turnout was remarkably small considering the time, place, promotion, planning, hype, etc.

One TV person, a producer, I think, said that drawing a crowd on the Washington Mall on a beautiful Saturday in August was nothing...D.C. is full of tourist out and about. He said that once he drew a crowd of about 20,000 there, just setting up equipment for a shoot. There was no event of any kind planned, happening, announced or promoted.

Eddie the Accounter
 
Told you it would be fun chasing the estimated attendance figures, but you miss the point entirely.

An estimated 500,000 people attended what turned out to be a religous 'revival' meeting, to 'restore' American values to its' Judeao Christian foundations...in other words, the 'Fundies' were out in great number from all over America.

And you didn't even notice.

Is it November yet?

:)

Amicus
 
Of course she was way too young for him! She didn't care that he had a job, a family, a wife, a position in the community, not to mention a membership in the GOP. She wanted him, craved his touch, dreamed about his lips, pined for the salty taste of his cock. God, she loved cock! No, love wasn't even close to the intensity of the feelings she had for a thick, nasty cock. Right now it was his thick, tasty cock that she was fantasizing about.
What a twist of fate! She'd gone along with her best friend, who actually did get hit on by this guy during a campaign event, to give her some moral support during the event. She'd gone along but didn't suspect that he'd make eye contact with her right after he noticed that she was checking out his package! (what a bulge in his groin! - enough to make Mona bite her lower lip) Her GF, Shiela, tried to talk to the guy but he sort of blew her off and then gave Mona the 'eye'.
Now she couldn't wait, or rest, until she'd sucked, fucked, and bagged this one.....
 
Told you it would be fun chasing the estimated attendance figures, but you miss the point entirely.

An estimated 500,000 people attended what turned out to be a religous 'revival' meeting, to 'restore' American values to its' Judeao Christian foundations...in other words, the 'Fundies' were out in great number from all over America.

And you didn't even notice.

Is it November yet?

:)

Amicus

So is it 'billions and billions' as FAUX NOOOS would have us believe? or a mere 90K as most responsible estimates tally?
November? Be careful what you wish for, it may be too rich for your blood: Here's a News Flash: Sister Sarah will put your fat butt out in the street first.......I'll bet not one of your '23' grandkids would take you in - especially not the ones you molested...........................but that's gonna be another story for you, right?
That '23' number is a mix of children some women you were fucking (probably for $$$) and those luckless broads who thought you had some potential, right?
No way you're on speaking terms with the mothers of 23 grandchildren................not if they love and value those young minds and booties....................
 
I have no idea how many people were there, except the number is probably in between two estimates. One group, with an agenda, said 87,000. Another group, with a different agenda, said half a million. I suspect the actual figure is in between those extremes.

Estimating through photos can be fixed if you know what your principal wants. For instance, if the "sample area" is the reflecting pool, you can look at it and say "There's nobody there. That must mean therer was nobody at the rally. I realize they would never do something so absurd, but they could use a "Sample Area" that happened to be at the outskirts of the crowd and was less densely packed than the middle of the crowd. :(
 
I have no idea how many people were there, except the number is probably in between two estimates. One group, with an agenda, said 87,000. Another group, with a different agenda, said half a million. I suspect the actual figure is in between those extremes.

Estimating through photos can be fixed if you know what your principal wants. For instance, if the "sample area" is the reflecting pool, you can look at it and say "There's nobody there. That must mean therer was nobody at the rally. I realize they would never do something so absurd, but they could use a "Sample Area" that happened to be at the outskirts of the crowd and was less densely packed than the middle of the crowd. :(

So you're saying? Nonsense.........In your case Box, you need to keep your stuff to yourself and let people only guess that you're an idiot..........when you rant or try to 'speculate' you remove all doubt.......geez, yore dum!!! But it's a gift and you should use it...........
 
I have no idea how many people were there, except the number is probably in between two estimates. One group, with an agenda, said 87,000. Another group, with a different agenda, said half a million. I suspect the actual figure is in between those extremes.

Estimating through photos can be fixed if you know what your principal wants. For instance, if the "sample area" is the reflecting pool, you can look at it and say "There's nobody there. That must mean therer was nobody at the rally. I realize they would never do something so absurd, but they could use a "Sample Area" that happened to be at the outskirts of the crowd and was less densely packed than the middle of the crowd. :(
Show us your tits, Box! :kiss:
 
Back
Top