Getting Along

All true... But we are working on minimizing that.

See, this is where knowing your history comes in. Try only comes here to post political rhetoric. He used to be here all the time and is one of the reasons for the political sub forum. His whole rant was because all his crap is not over there and not in here. Over there, he gets his head handed to him on a regular basis.
 
For the record, untrained pit bulls are the nice ones. You have to train hostility into a pit bull to make it aggressive. Come meet mine.

https://youtu.be/GJ6HvjJisMA

(Naoko's right. It's almost impossible to resist bringing up Global Warming at this point. Damn and blast, why is being good always so hard?)

Its in the sixties in RI past mid December, it may hit sixty Christmas day here. Hard to not think warming these days
 
See, this is where knowing your history comes in. Try only comes here to post political rhetoric. He used to be here all the time and is one of the reasons for the political sub forum. His whole rant was because all his crap is not over there and not in here. Over there, he gets his head handed to him on a regular basis.

When I don't know something. I ask. Then I may or may not change my mind. I will always listen to other POVs.

I occasionally post in politics... Its basically pointless though. There are only about 10 regular posters and none of them listen.
 
When I don't know something. I ask. Then I may or may not change my mind. I will always listen to other POVs.

I occasionally post in politics... Its basically pointless though. There are only about 10 regular posters and none of them listen.

Try is one of those that has political threads going back 4 or 5 years. They disappear and then he makes the rounds and resurrects them from the basement. I think he only has two left over here, the other dozen or so were moved. A few years ago this place looked like the political forum.
 
Try is one of those that has political threads going back 4 or 5 years. They disappear and then he makes the rounds and resurrects them from the basement. I think he only has two left over here, the other dozen or so were moved. A few years ago this place looked like the political forum.

And Stella used to yell about it, then start them:D
 
Thing is if Freddie didn't keep changing names I think they would have more stories than SamuelX who is well over two thousand and be the most prolific here also way higher on the all time fav list, but then again they usually keep changing names when they burn bridges under it.
 
Thing is if Freddie didn't keep changing names I think they would have more stories than SamuelX who is well over two thousand and be the most prolific here also way higher on the all time fav list, but then again they usually keep changing names when they burn bridges under it.

I don't think that's true--The stories become retreads from name to name (which also helps account for the big Survivor numbers). And Freddie isn't the only one posting under more than one account name.

Besides, the "Susan" numbers only can include "Susan" stories. If you want to talk Freddie numbers, they are much larger--but then you have to admit the umbrella existence of Freddie, and wouldn't that be inconvenient for someone wanting to believe "Susan's " barf?
 
More stories usually means lower quality.

Not always...but there's a trend.

No it doesn't. There's no causative relationship between those. And your inference is both insulting and ignorant even if it sounds like some sort of truism coming off the tongue. Everyone doesn't have equal time to write, equal experience in writing, equal ability to formulate stories, or equal ability to write rapidly. In other words, one doesn't really have anything to do with the other.
 
No it doesn't. There's no causative relationship between those. And your inference is both insulting and ignorant even if it sounds like some sort of truism coming off the tongue. Everyone doesn't have equal time to write, equal experience in writing, equal ability to formulate stories, or equal ability to write rapidly. In other words, one doesn't really have anything to do with the other.

There's another thing we disagree on.

:)
 
There's another thing we disagree on.

:)

With your ability to figure things out here, I'm not worried about that.

Speaking of pontificating before researching, have you bothered to try to back up your claim that "Susan" is the most prolific Lit. author posting to AH yet? :rolleyes:

Would you like some independent reader to compare/contrast the quality of the stories of some of the more prolific writers here (including Freddie's--he's a good writer) and yours?
 
Last edited:
With your ability to figure things out here, I'm not worried about that.

Let me suggest that we were starting to make some progress towards normalizing relations - at least LC doesn't seem to be trying to take a stick to my ass at the moment, and contentious people are starting to talk about why and who. Let's not start slipping backwards.

Being a contributing forum member shouldn't require vast skill at sussing out whatever conspiracies, lies and cruelties once happened - since the goal is to adopt a forum where personal attacks are deleted by the mod before things get out of control, and conspiracies, presumably, won't flourish when people aren't all over each other.

Nathan's advocating we start with a clean slate. A couple of people seem to be saying that's unacceptable in the cases of Scouries and SJP because they are exceptionally heinous, but is there objection to the idea otherwise?

I suppose I'm asking if we can agree to a No Personal Attack policy and other bits from Angrim's list, and amnesty for previous sins of the folk here, if SJP and Scouries are excluded from the amnesty.

I'm not saying that a desirable goal. Rules with exceptions for certain individuals will just convince people that the rules have been abandoned in general. But if we can get some sort of agreement in place for everyone else, hammering out the special cases ought to be possible.

Let me put it this way. One charge is that SJP attempted to drive someone off Literotica and was pretty vile about it. (I'm repeating a rumor. I know nothing about this). Well, last week, it looked to me like LC was trying to drive me off literotica. (My interpretation, factual or not) But I think LC and I can agree to coexist in a forum where personal attacks are forbidden.

Now maybe SJP was a million times worse than LC could ever be (LC, that's NOT a challenge...) and hir crimes were way more vile than anything I can imagine. Maybe I've never seen the like of someone like hir torturing someone and there was some compelling reason Ignore couldn't save hir victim. Maybe all that's true. But these days, SJP seems to be confined to screaming in large fonts that s/he's female, and no one seems to be threatened by hir for the simple reason that hir stuff isn't read (or people just lash out, but I don't see how that helps). As a threat s/he's neutralised. Why not let hir be the mod's problem now? We got us a mod, let's use it.

(Sorry mod, but you know you're just a large hammer in function, in a room full of nails.)
 
More stories usually means lower quality.

Not always...but there's a trend.

Not all the time depends on the writer and the topic.

The only time the quantity thing bothers me is if I see a chapter series and every chapter is only 1 page, at that point it looks like nothing more than stat padding by stretching a 14k story into 6 parts.

But like everything else everyone has their ways, most of my stuff is long and many could be broken into two sometimes three parts, but I don't care how many stories I have or how long they are.

My first year here I worried a little about length and tired to keep everything two pages, then got tired of caring. For instance I was looking at my two part BDSM story from 2010 which is 13k and thinking if I wrote that today it would be one four page story.
 
Let me suggest that we were starting to make some progress towards normalizing relations - at least LC doesn't seem to be trying to take a stick to my ass at the moment, and contentious people are starting to talk about why and who. Let's not start slipping backwards.

Being a contributing forum member shouldn't require vast skill at sussing out whatever conspiracies, lies and cruelties once happened - since the goal is to adopt a forum where personal attacks are deleted by the mod before things get out of control, and conspiracies, presumably, won't flourish when people aren't all over each other.

Nathan's advocating we start with a clean slate. A couple of people seem to be saying that's unacceptable in the cases of Scouries and SJP because they are exceptionally heinous, but is there objection to the idea otherwise?

I suppose I'm asking if we can agree to a No Personal Attack policy and other bits from Angrim's list, and amnesty for previous sins of the folk here, if SJP and Scouries are excluded from the amnesty.

I'm not saying that a desirable goal. Rules with exceptions for certain individuals will just convince people that the rules have been abandoned in general. But if we can get some sort of agreement in place for everyone else, hammering out the special cases ought to be possible.

Let me put it this way. One charge is that SJP attempted to drive someone off Literotica and was pretty vile about it. (I'm repeating a rumor. I know nothing about this). Well, last week, it looked to me like LC was trying to drive me off literotica. (My interpretation, factual or not) But I think LC and I can agree to coexist in a forum where personal attacks are forbidden.

Now maybe SJP was a million times worse than LC could ever be (LC, that's NOT a challenge...) and hir crimes were way more vile than anything I can imagine. Maybe I've never seen the like of someone like hir torturing someone and there was some compelling reason Ignore couldn't save hir victim. Maybe all that's true. But these days, SJP seems to be confined to screaming in large fonts that s/he's female, and no one seems to be threatened by hir for the simple reason that hir stuff isn't read (or people just lash out, but I don't see how that helps). As a threat s/he's neutralised. Why not let hir be the mod's problem now? We got us a mod, let's use it.

(Sorry mod, but you know you're just a large hammer in function, in a room full of nails.)

I mind my own business. I don't bother anyone. Yet, I'm constantly under attack by TxRad, Sr71plt, Lovecraft, and now you.

What they claim I did, I didn't do. Right up there with PrincessErin and Starkers, SelenaKitten and DanielleKittner were two of the worst personalities on the site and are on the same par as TxRad, Sr71plt, and Lovecraft. SelenaKitten, Miss Drama Queen, left on her own accord after she claimed that she was pregnant and her pretend baby died.

Seriously, what grieving mother comes on the forum board to make such posts?

As far as I'm concerned, Scouries was the best person on this site. He was the most entertaining and I miss her.

I've added you to my ignore list.

"Fuck all of you! Bye."
 
Last edited:
I mind my own business. I don't bother anyone. Yet, I'm constantly under attack by TxRad, Sr71plt, Lovecraft, and now you.

What they claim I did, I didn't do. Right up there with PrincessErin and Starkers, SelenaKitten and DanielleKittner were two of the worst personalities on the site and are on the same par as TxRad, Sr71plt, and Lovecraft. SelenaKitten, Miss Drama Queen, left on her own accord after she claimed that she was pregnant and her pretend baby died.

Seriously, what grieving mother comes on the forum board to make such posts?

As far as I'm concerned, Scouries was the best person on this site. He was the most entertaining and I miss her.

I've added you to my ignore list.

"Fuck all of you! Bye."

So her miscarriage was pretend, but your being sexually abused isn't? See the problem here? No, you don't and thanks for bringing up Danielle Kitten because none of us did.
 
Let me suggest that we were starting to make some progress towards normalizing relations - at least LC doesn't seem to be trying to take a stick to my ass at the moment, and contentious people are starting to talk about why and who. Let's not start slipping backwards.

Being a contributing forum member shouldn't require vast skill at sussing out whatever conspiracies, lies and cruelties once happened - since the goal is to adopt a forum where personal attacks are deleted by the mod before things get out of control, and conspiracies, presumably, won't flourish when people aren't all over each other.

Nathan's advocating we start with a clean slate. A couple of people seem to be saying that's unacceptable in the cases of Scouries and SJP because they are exceptionally heinous, but is there objection to the idea otherwise?

I suppose I'm asking if we can agree to a No Personal Attack policy and other bits from Angrim's list, and amnesty for previous sins of the folk here, if SJP and Scouries are excluded from the amnesty.

I'm not saying that a desirable goal. Rules with exceptions for certain individuals will just convince people that the rules have been abandoned in general. But if we can get some sort of agreement in place for everyone else, hammering out the special cases ought to be possible.

Let me put it this way. One charge is that SJP attempted to drive someone off Literotica and was pretty vile about it. (I'm repeating a rumor. I know nothing about this). Well, last week, it looked to me like LC was trying to drive me off literotica. (My interpretation, factual or not) But I think LC and I can agree to coexist in a forum where personal attacks are forbidden.

Now maybe SJP was a million times worse than LC could ever be (LC, that's NOT a challenge...) and hir crimes were way more vile than anything I can imagine. Maybe I've never seen the like of someone like hir torturing someone and there was some compelling reason Ignore couldn't save hir victim. Maybe all that's true. But these days, SJP seems to be confined to screaming in large fonts that s/he's female, and no one seems to be threatened by hir for the simple reason that hir stuff isn't read (or people just lash out, but I don't see how that helps). As a threat s/he's neutralised. Why not let hir be the mod's problem now? We got us a mod, let's use it.

(Sorry mod, but you know you're just a large hammer in function, in a room full of nails.)

I don't try to drive anyone off, I will bust balls, but I can be ignored or have my balls busted back. I think I mentioned I was fine with you leaving when you said you were going to, but that was your announcement, not me saying hey, how about you leave.

There are levels of here. You and I are on opposite sides of the coin on here on the two most controversial kinks on lit. You think I'm a pedo-or support it-and I think you're a misogynist who gets off on abuse(in fantasy at least) so those are the lines, but they are straight forward and doesn't mean we couldn't reply to each others posts civilly on other topics. We're also both muck stirrers, but I'm more in your face and you're more subtle, whatever, doesn't matter.

SJP is far worse in my eyes than you-or anyone else currently in the AH-could ever be and that's not a challenge to you either. IN fact in my time here the only person in the AH ro any forum other than the GB that could be as loathsome is scouries who partnered up with Freddie on the Kitt and as they just confessed to Danielle Kitten being driven off. The two of them were the toxic twins, right now one's been MIA for awhile and that alone has stopped some of the crap here. Don't think you've been around when he's in full gear.
 
Not all the time depends on the writer and the topic.

The only time the quantity thing bothers me is if I see a chapter series and every chapter is only 1 page, at that point it looks like nothing more than stat padding by stretching a 14k story into 6 parts.

But like everything else everyone has their ways, most of my stuff is long and many could be broken into two sometimes three parts, but I don't care how many stories I have or how long they are.

My first year here I worried a little about length and tired to keep everything two pages, then got tired of caring. For instance I was looking at my two part BDSM story from 2010 which is 13k and thinking if I wrote that today it would be one four page story.

As I said... 'Trend'.

This isn't an absolute, but many do write too much, and repeat themselves too much. Especially some of those who are selling their output... But it's just a trend.

It can be bucked.
 
You think I'm a pedo-or support it

The retraction and apology was offered for that in this thread. Did you miss it?

-and I think you're a misogynist who gets off on abuse(in fantasy at least).

Let's end this accusation. Go read my Why I Hate My Roommate. Then come back and explain how someone who hates women could have written it, It won't be your cup of tea, because it portrays a submissive woman in a positive way, and the transformation of another woman into a submissive mindset. I know you only groove to strong women kicking male tail. But if you think someone can write that story without insight into women, sympathy for the problems they face in submission and life in general, and genuine affection for the female gender, I'd love to know how. Yes, there's a scene in which one of the males goes overboard with a belt on someone's ass. It's also made abundantly clear that the male was badly out of line (the males are young, and deliberately written as unwise about some things for that reason) and the scene is there to point out that submissives face risks and dangers pursuing their desires. There may be people who got off to that scene - people who don't understand either D/s or BDSM - but I was entirely grim faced while writing it.

Then read Angelwatch. You'll like it better. The women are strong (not in a kick ass way, but emotionally, though the main character does murder some rapists) and the story is my tribute to rape survivors and people who oppose rape.

SJP is far worse in my eyes than you-or anyone else currently in the AH-could ever be and that's not a challenge to you either. IN fact in my time here the only person in the AH ro any forum other than the GB that could be as loathsome is scouries who partnered up with Freddie on the Kitt and as they just confessed to Danielle Kitten being driven off. The two of them were the toxic twins, right now one's been MIA for awhile and that alone has stopped some of the crap here. Don't think you've been around when he's in full gear.

No idea. He's on Ignore. So is SJP. I have no idea what they say at this point because I've decided neither is relevant to my time here. They lost relevance to me, and if they are as bad as you say, they should lose relevance to everyone. That leaves them talking into an unplugged microphone, and sooner or later that means they will quit the stage. Cut the power to them and walk away.

Since we're on the topic, I'd still like an answer to this question:

What can anyone do here that is not solved by Ignore? We have a mod now. Personal attack will be deleted. What that solved, nothing else matters if you Ignore it.

I asked it when Naoko suggested AH wasn't safe for women. I asked why Ignore didn't solve the problem and I don't think I ever got a satisfactory reply.

I'll ask the same about the two people who got driven off. How do you drive someone away when Ignore is an option? What's the game plan and how can you possibly make it work?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The retraction and apology was offered for that in this thread. Did you miss it?



Let's end this accusation. Go read my Why I Hate My Roommate. Then come back and explain how someone who hates women could have written it, It won't be your cup of tea, because it portrays a submissive woman in a positive way, and the transformation of another woman into a submissive mindset. I know you only groove to strong women kicking male tail. But if you think someone can write that story without insight into women, sympathy for the problems they face in submission and life in general, and genuine affection for the female gender, I'd love to know how. Yes, there's a scene in which one of the males goes overboard with a belt on someone's ass. It's also made abundantly clear that the male was badly out of line (the males are young, and deliberately written as unwise about some things for that reason) and the scene is there to point out that submissives face risks and dangers pursuing their desires. There may be people who got off to that scene - people who don't understand either D/s or BDSM - but I was entirely grim faced while writing it.

Then read Angelwatch. You'll like it better. The women are strong (not in a kick ass way, but emotionally, though the main character does murder some rapists) and the story is my tribute to rape survivors and people who oppose rape.



No idea. He's on Ignore. So is SJP. I have no idea what they say at this point because I've decided neither is relevant to my time here. They lost relevance to me, and if they are as bad as you say, they should lose relevance to everyone. That leaves them talking into an unplugged microphone, and sooner or later that means they will quit the stage. Cut the power to them and walk away.

Since we're on the topic, I'd still like an answer to this question:

What can anyone do here that is not solved by Ignore? We have a mod now. Personal attack will be deleted. What that solved, nothing else matters if you Ignore it.

I asked it when Naoko suggested AH wasn't safe for women. I asked why Ignore didn't solve the problem and I don't think I ever got a satisfactory reply.

I'll ask the same about the two people who got driven off. How do you drive someone away when Ignore is an option? What's the game plan and how can you possibly make it work

I did miss it, I have not read every word all have posted here and sometimes get put off by very long posts, so if you offered a retraction on that accusation, consider it retracted or as Fish would say from the Ally McBeal show(yeah, I just confessed to watching that) "Bygones"

I've never read your writing because you have a tint of non con-the fetish-to a lot of your tastes and posts so I figure why put my foot on a mine? That's the great thing about categories, easy to avoid what you don't like.

If you tell me the story has none of that-or has shows it in a bad light, I'll check the story out soon.

You come across a certain way, which to many may not be bad, but some of it is an angle I am strongly against in the real world so I can admit to reading more into your posts than might be there.

So if I have read more into it or let my admitted hatred of what I perceive as 'real men' get to me, then I too will step back from that and take it from this point on so you can consider that statement my retraction for you to consider. If you ever doubt that malice-and not saying toward you, but real life non con rape and abusers-check my Halloween entry Abigail out, I tend to write out my hate from time to time in story form.

So as far as I'm concerned I'll just toss the hatchet in the dirt, up to you if you want to consider it buried.
 
So as far as I'm concerned I'll just toss the hatchet in the dirt, up to you if you want to consider it buried.

Done.

Angelwatch contains noncon, but it's a woman killing rapists, murder being the ultimate noncon. She eventually comes to learn that it's the wrong approach and finds a better one. If you're able to handle violence against rapists you'll get through it ok and the ending, given your opinion of me, will probably surprise you. Warning: some themes are drawn from religious ideas, which I know is an issue for you, but it's not intrusive.

Why I Hate My Roommate has the one scene of a girl being pushed to her knees and a belt being taken to her ass in anger. It avoids being noncon only because I make it clear she could have gotten up and left; it avoids being erotic because I very clearly wrote it not to be. It's there to point our that D/s only works if the D has the self control of a saint, and this particular D screws it up in that scene. The story will bother you - it's not how you want females to be - but I've been told by females who have been there that the story works extremely well.

Avoid my other stuff - kidnappings and forced orgasms and sexploitation galore. They virtually all end up as love stories - I don't write simple characters - but you won't get far enough into them to care.
 
Done.

Angelwatch contains noncon, but it's a woman killing rapists, murder being the ultimate noncon. She eventually comes to learn that it's the wrong approach and finds a better one. If you're able to handle violence against rapists you'll get through it ok and the ending, given your opinion of me, will probably surprise you. Warning: some themes are drawn from religious ideas, which I know is an issue for you, but it's not intrusive.

Why I Hate My Roommate has the one scene of a girl being pushed to her knees and a belt being taken to her ass in anger. It avoids being noncon only because I make it clear she could have gotten up and left; it avoids being erotic because I very clearly wrote it not to be. It's there to point our that D/s only works if the D has the self control of a saint, and this particular D screws it up in that scene. The story will bother you - it's not how you want females to be - but I've been told by females who have been there that the story works extremely well.

Avoid my other stuff - kidnappings and forced orgasms and sexploitation galore. They virtually all end up as love stories - I don't write simple characters - but you won't get far enough into them to care.

Yeah why I hate my room mate would set me off-and I know that is because of my hang ups due to things in my past nothing to do with you-but regardless of reasons I avoid things that send me to work the bag for fifteen minutes before I self destruct. Intriguing point though on showing a D gone bad.

Its iffy with me on whether her having a choice takes the brakes off non con. Technically I think you're right, but if she is not leaving out of fear then I'm not sure, but your story, your concepts, your spin.

Having said that I have written scenes that allude to rape-not for titillation but to set up the story and define the character-and it makes me shudder when I do it, but since it comes from the dark corners of my mind I handle it a little better, I also have the advantage of already knowing what the animals get.

Now Angelwatch? I'll give it a go because to me there cannot be enough violence leveled at rapists.

You see "I spit on your grave?" ultimate in female revenge movies and I paid tribute to it in Abigail. Maybe we'll have a friendly bet on who dealt the most 'payback':D
 
Back
Top