Geoengineering?

Repetition does not imply truth.

It would seem that you have managed to convince you and no one else, otherwise why do you feel that you have to constantly repeat your false claim?
So the repeating of your credit card alert when pumping gas wasn’t true? Say it ain’t so!!!
 
Proofreading can be your friend.
Does proofreading also include ensuring your anecdotal scenarios actually are possible before you double down and stand by them?

Or is that more just editing? I guess you didn’t have any grammatical or spelling errors it was just your content was not anywhere close to reality.

But then again, that does sound just like you. Can only write what you “know”.

Bing, credit card alert!
 
Does proofreading also include ensuring your anecdotal scenarios actually are possible before you double down and stand by them?

Or is that more just editing? I guess you didn’t have any grammatical or spelling errors it was just your content was not anywhere close to reality.

But then again, that does sound just like you. Can only write what you “know”.

Bing, credit card alert!

The spaghetti method of political commentary seems to suit your failing attempts to sound knowledgeable.
 
Many things do and they can be when geoengineering on a world scale.
 
Many things do and they can be when geoengineering on a world scale.

And unintended geoengineering???

Like say from anthropogenic climate change due to the burning of fossil fuels??? Livestock???

I personally think scientists better start getting very creative with ideas for reversing the geoengineering we humans have already done; or the next major human sponsored geoengineering event will be an intentional nuclear winter..

*nods*
 
No, "consequences"....As I originally typed it, tongue in cheek....

So what is more alarming;: “Unintended consequences” from potential intentional geoengineering counter measures to “unintended geoengineering”; or unaddressed “unintended consequences” of “unintended geoengineering”.

Decisions, decisions……
 
Back
Top