Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
I'm trying to picture this in a way that is very non-gay.
Still trying.
Still trying.
...
Dude simulpost, you scare me.
Are you also salivating over that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm trying to picture this in a way that is very non-gay.
Still trying.
Still trying.
...
It's really hard for me to see this kind of thing as not the least tiny little bit gay. Manly warrior butchmeister classical gay. Homoerotic anyway. I don't see jacking off in view of one another as totally straight either.
It's really hard for me to see this kind of thing as not the least tiny little bit gay. Manly warrior butchmeister classical gay. Homoerotic anyway. I don't see jacking off in view of one another as totally straight either.
Dude simulpost, you scare me.
Are you also salivating over that?

I don't really know what to call my fascination with male sexuality. It certainly isn't straight
Scratches noggin
I don't really know what to call my fascination with male sexuality. It certainly isn't straight, but I don't find men sexually attractive.
Scratches noggin
Tell us more. I've got time.
Everyone's doing it. Even JM said he'd do Jon Stewart.
Well maybe I am some kind of repressed or in-denial homo, because I'm far more interested in male sexuality, orgasm and response than female. It's just that I'm into using women as the intermediary.
Or woman-substitutes, for instance my idea to start the world's first Realdoll bordello.
I guess there's just no good word for people attracted to the mating drama. Seems like a minority sexuality, but one that I'd think would be more common than it is, that's hot stuff.
Seems kinda widespread if you ask me. Whither cumshots? Mainstay of straight porn.
True.
Honesty about it and self-awareness, aha, there's the rub.
Yet remove the sperm-shot from the porn and watch the so called straight boys complain!
I actually far prefer the rare internal cumshot. If anyone came out with a line of porn called "Internal Completions", I'd be a customer.Prolly not the only ones though.
Internal cumming (why is it come verb but not coming? ) is about as exciting as golf.
I actually far prefer the rare internal cumshot. If anyone came out with a line of porn called "Internal Completions", I'd be a customer.
I guess you can't really call it a come-shot, but in some amateur porn, you can see the man obviously coming hard inside.
I need to see it. Maimonides was my main man, after all.
I had this old Ed Powers dirty debutante tape. Most of it was meh, but there were "bloopers" at the end. In one of them, he's fucking away with this pudgy little Filipina wannabe-starlet and she starts to respond ina very hot genuine way. Ed loses it inside her!
Twenty times hotter than anything else on the tape.
OK, that I buy. Genuine reactions of any kind are win.
I actually far prefer the rare internal cumshot. If anyone came out with a line of porn called "Internal Completions", I'd be a customer.
I guess you can't really call it a come-shot, but in some amateur porn, you can see the man obviously coming hard inside.
I actually far prefer the rare internal cumshot. If anyone came out with a line of porn called "Internal Completions", I'd be a customer.
You have to admit, something that's fun to do and dull to watch.
It's really hard for me to see this kind of thing as not the least tiny little bit gay. Manly warrior butchmeister classical gay. Homoerotic anyway. I don't see jacking off in view of one another as totally straight either.
Me too. For me, as far as cum goes, in is always better than out.
The (two) gangbangs I was involved in weren't with guys who never get any, or who are pathetic and desperate, or with guys for whom a gangbang scenario is their only opportunity to treat a woman violently or like an object, they were with respected dominants in my local community and guys with dominant tendencies who obviously don't have much trouble getting laid.
In my experiences, the gangbang just seemed like an opportunity for a little bit of camaraderie amongst dom-types. There was no condescension or immaturity, but true encouragement and suggestions and fellow-dom-ship. It really seemed like besides being a means to an end, I was an opportunity for some real fellowship. It was almost sweet, when I wasn't feeling too much like a humiliated sex toy to notice, anyway.
The guys doing the fucking in the simulated gang rape for which I served as security monitor were selected for size and aggressiveness. The whole point was for them to be intimidating.Ehh, I wouldn't really say it was like that. More like... Like when a bunch of rope-tops get together over some piece of rigging and talk about it, offer suggestions, give advice, work on it together, and bond (in a very macho way, of course). Only instead of rope and a piece of rigging, they were talking over, giving suggestions and advice about me. Instead of working on a piece of rigging together, they were fucking me together, and bonding over it (in a very non-gay, domly way).
I'd disagree. Almost inevitably, whenever a topic pops up about men being pegged by their girlfriends people make the distinction between being fucked by guys and being fucked by girls and how the latter isn't homoerotic because it's done with a women and so on so forth repeat ad infinatum et nauseum; in the context of a gangbang, it seems like the point of attraction is the girl at the middle of it. It's probably not entirely unhomoerotic (and that was an awfully-structured sentence) but I don't see it as that.
Aye. Takes the top spot just ahead of baseball, because there are slightly more exciting occasions in baseball (home runs, stealing home plate) than in golf.
I'd disagree. Almost inevitably, whenever a topic pops up about men being pegged by their girlfriends people make the distinction between being fucked by guys and being fucked by girls and how the latter isn't homoerotic because it's done with a women and so on so forth repeat ad infinatum et nauseum; in the context of a gangbang, it seems like the point of attraction is the girl at the middle of it. It's probably not entirely unhomoerotic (and that was an awfully-structured sentence) but I don't see it as that.
On a similar topic, does anybody else prefer when porn blowjobs don't end with the guy just jerking off on the chick's face? I can't fathom the reasoning behind it for the life of me