Gallimaufry

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...0-billion-empire-with-stakes-in-28-funds.html



Healey Rules $400 Billion Empire With Stakes in 28 Funds
By Anthony Effinger and Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam
July 9, 2012


One of the things Sean Healey missed most when he left Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in 1995 was his business card. Flashing it was a surefire way to convince people of his credentials.

“People would say, ‘Oh, you must be a genius,’” Healey jokes.

Then he moved to Boston to work for a three-person startup with a bland name and a big idea. Affiliated Managers Group Inc. set out to buy stakes in equities money-management companies, including hedge funds, and share their investment fees. In return, the owners got cash for the companies they had built.

Healey’s AMG card didn’t have the same mojo as the one from Goldman, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its August issue. And Healey handed it out often because he was cold-calling money managers, trying to convince them to sell.

The demographics of the fund management business worked in his favor. Baby-boom-era managers who started their funds in the 1970s were ready to sell as they prepared for retirement. Still, the Goldman alum usually got the brushoff.

“They treated you like dirt,” Healey says.

A varsity wrestler when he was an undergrad at Harvard University, Healey kept fighting. AMG has since locked up chunks of mutual fund companies Yacktman Asset Management Co.; Tweedy, Browne Co.; Friess Associates LLC (manager of the Brandywine Fund); and Cliff Asness’s hedge fund AQR Capital Management LLC.

Healey has found a way to make money -- lots of it -- by choosing managers who in turn pick good stocks. And he favors equities, not bonds.

Stocks Rule
To profit in the current environment, “investors will have to take risk,” he says. “Over the long term, the best return for investors will be in equities.”

AMG’s 28 affiliated fund managers -- plus one wealth adviser -- controlled $392 billion as of March 31. The fees earned by the 27 fund firms in which AMG held stakes in 2011 totaled $1.7 billion, up 25 percent from $1.36 billion in 2010. AMG’s share was $553.4 million in 2011 and $489.2 million in 2010.

The firm’s stock has risen more than sixfold since the company’s initial public offering in November 1997. It’s up 12.5 percent this year as of yesterday.

AMG succeeds because it buys top-performing funds and doesn’t get in the way of independent-minded managers, Healey says. Asness, for one, is an outspoken libertarian who has a tattoo of Captain America’s shield on his left arm.

‘Secret Sauce’
“We have wild personalities in the money management business,” says Don Putnam, co-founder of Grail Partners LLC, a San Francisco-based firm that invests in money managers. “AMG has a secret sauce.”

The ingredients, says Healey: Identify skilled managers and put them in social situations -- dinner, golf -- to make sure the prospective partners will get along. He never buys 100 percent of a firm, since managers need to have skin in the game to stay motivated. Healey also requires sellers to sign a 10- year employment contract, just to be safe.

Then he leaves them alone.

AMG’s funds are attracting cash while others lose it. Investors have pulled $502 billion out of U.S. stock mutual funds since 2007, according to the Investment Company Institute in Washington. The money has gone to bond managers, who have vacuumed up $1 trillion, the institute says.

‘Deliberate Design’
AMG, by contrast, had positive flows for the eight quarters ended on March 31, taking in $40 billion. AMG owns just one bond manager.

“It’s deliberate design,” Healey says.

Bond funds charge low fees, so you need substantial assets to make them pay, he says. AMG couldn’t compete with Bill Gross’s Pacific Investment Management Co., which manages $1.77 trillion.

More important, Healey thinks the flight to safety in bonds is about to end. The stampede drove the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note to a record low 1.44 percent on June 1. Nobody can retire on that, he says, and losses will be huge when interest rates rise.

“Many of the investments that people, especially retail investors, are making now will end badly,” Healey says.

These days, AMG is looking mostly for hedge funds and emerging-markets managers because they’re harder to replicate with low-cost index funds, another threat to AMG’s business.

In March, Healey went further afield and agreed to buy Veritable LP, a firm that manages the financial affairs of 200 wealthy families.

Yacktman Purchase
Healey returned to plain-vanilla mutual funds in April when he agreed to buy most of Yacktman, based in Austin, Texas. The Yacktman Fund (YACKX) returned 7.3 percent last year, more than triple the 2.1 percent return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. For the past three years, the firm’s two funds have been among the best performers in Bloomberg Markets’ annual ranking of mutual funds.

Healey wrestled at 158 pounds (72 kilograms) at Harvard. He remains trim and compact, with graying hair cut short. He exudes a cheery confidence that either comes with having good luck --or brings it. In a 2009 fishing tournament, he pulled a 94-pound white marlin onto his 77-foot (23-meter) yacht, Orion, off Ocean City, Maryland. It was the biggest white marlin caught since 1980, and it won him prize money of $903,000. It was, in short, a million-dollar fish.

Updike Country
Healey and a majority of his 120 employees make their deals from a hilltop mansion in Prides Crossing, Massachusetts, near the North Shore haunt of the late novelist John Updike. AMG’s 90-acre (36-hectare) spread once belonged to William Loeb III, the late publisher of the conservative Union Leader newspaper in Manchester, New Hampshire. Healey kept the tennis court when he rebuilt the place.

Healey, the son of a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Marine Corps, shares some of the former owner’s politics. His wife, Kerry, was lieutenant governor of Massachusetts under Mitt Romney from 2003 to 2007. Now, she’s foreign policy coordinator on Romney’s campaign for president. Former AMG Chief Financial Officer Darrell Crate moonlighted as treasurer for Romney’s failed campaign in 2008. He left AMG in February 2011 to do the same job again, and to run private-equity firm Easterly Capital.

Healey is a reluctant New Englander. Born in San Rafael, California, north of San Francisco, he recently paid $17 million for a house in Florida’s Palm Beach, where he goes to get away from Massachusetts weather -- and Massachusetts politics.

During Kerry Healey’s term as lieutenant governor, news helicopters routinely hovered over their house, Healey says, and the Boston Globe once referred to AMG’s offices as the “state Republican Party headquarters.”

After closing one deal, Healey headed to the porch to smoke a cigar. A helicopter approached and hovered outside. A photo appeared on the front page of the Globe that Sunday.

‘Blood Sport’
“There is no other place like this,” Healey says, shaking his head. “Politics is a blood sport.”

He’d rather talk about money management. Even during rough patches like the current one, the industry is attractive because profit margins are so high. Baltimore-based T. Rowe Price Group Inc., for example, had net income of $773 million on revenue of $2.75 billion in 2011, giving it a profit margin of 28 percent.

Margins tend to stay high even in down periods. Most costs are compensation, and that falls along with revenue because managers are paid mostly for their results, says Grail Partners’ Putnam. And once retail investors put money into a mutual fund, they leave it there.

“You can’t kill these companies,” Putnam says.

Asset Drain
Many are injured now, though. Legg Mason Inc. (LM), home to stock picker Bill Miller, who beat the S&P 500 for a record 15 years through 2005, has been hemorrhaging assets. They fell to $627 billion in May from a peak of $1 trillion in 2007. Legg Mason shares have lost two-thirds of their value in that period.

Healey says the gloom makes for good angling. Few others are buying these days, he says. Banks, once serial fund acquirers, are selling assets to repair balance sheets. In 2010, AMG teamed up with managers at Artemis Investment Management Ltd. to buy the mutual fund company from Brussels-based Fortis Bank SA/NV, which was rescued by the Belgian government.

Shrewd purchases have helped Healey outdo his old employer. In 2007, Goldman started an AMG look-alike called the Petershill fund, run by Jonathan Sorrell, son of Martin Sorrell, CEO of WPP Plc, the world’s biggest advertising agency. Jonathan had the Goldman business card, and connections.

It wasn’t enough. The fund invested in Level Global Investors LP in April 2010. Level closed a year later after the FBI raided its offices looking for evidence of insider trading. Co-founder Anthony Chiasson pleaded not guilty to insider trading charges in February.

Shumway Exit
Goldman got another bad break when it took an 8 percent stake in hedge fund Shumway Capital Partners LLC in late 2009. A year later, in November 2010, founder Chris Shumway said he would no longer serve as chief investment officer. Investors yanked $3 billion from the fund.

Then Shumway returned all of his investors’ money, depriving Goldman of the fees it had expected to collect. The firm now manages money just for Shumway and his employees.

Goldman is trying to sell Petershill, according to two people familiar with the situation. Goldman spokeswoman Andrea Raphael declined to comment.

Healey had a Shumway-type problem early on. The founder of Systematic Financial Management LP left a year after AMG paid $20 million for a piece of the firm. Assets plummeted to $200 million from $1.4 billion. Healey’s solution was the 10-year employment contract.

Leave, and you forfeit your ownership.

AQR Signs
Asness and AQR co-founder David Kabiller signed their 10- year commitment in 2004.

“You show that to a lawyer, and they say, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me,’” Kabiller says. He and Asness agreed to the terms to diversify their personal investments.

“No matter how good an investor you are, you always have tough moments,” he says.

The demographics of fund management are going AMG’s way. Many managers are nearing retirement age, yet cashing out is difficult because few fund firms are publicly traded. That’s where Healey comes in.

Don Yacktman is 70 and has been running his namesake company since 1992. He co-manages the firm’s two funds with his son Stephen. They’ve beaten 99 percent of rivals during the past five years.

“I have seven children; one works here and six don’t,” Yacktman says. The sale to AMG will help him implement a succession plan for a company that has grown beyond its family roots, he says.

Go East
Healey took a winding path to money management. For three generations, the Healeys went to Stanford University or the University of California, Berkeley. He went east to Harvard, graduating in 1983 with a degree in history and literature. He then got a master’s degree in philosophy at University College Dublin and enrolled at Harvard Law School, intending to be a law professor.

He veered away from that idea while working at the Harvard Law Review alongside future Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan. He found the Review to be highly political.

“I could tell that these were the kinds of people who would be on a law faculty,” Healey says, and he wasn’t interested.

Goldman Recruits
During his second year, a friend went to a recruiting session for summer associates at Goldman Sachs. Healey decided to check it out.

He got the summer job and then returned full time after law school. Three and a half years later, he was promoted to work for J. Christopher Flowers, the buyout specialist, in the unit that did investment banking for financial firms.

In 1994, Healey got a call from Bill Nutt, former president of the Boston Company. Nutt had just started AMG with backing from TA Associates, a Boston-based buyout firm.

TA wanted AMG to mimic United Asset Management Corp., which, starting in 1980, made a business of acquiring money managers. At its peak, the Boston-based company had stakes in some 50 firms that managed $200 billion. Unlike AMG, UAM typically acquired 100 percent of its affiliates.

Nutt needed a detail-oriented deputy who could do deals, and he picked Healey.

Leaving Goldman was tough, Healey says. The firm was a partnership in those days, and Healey expected to become one. The hours were long, however, and he had two young children. So he decamped to Boston and went to work with Nutt and Nathaniel Dalton, a young lawyer whom TA had retained. Dalton is now AMG’s president and chief operating officer.

Tweedy Deal
Soon after, they did the deal that made the firm, Healey says. It was May 1997, and an old friend from Goldman, Don Truesdale, called. Tweedy Browne, a value investor founded in 1920 and boasting superior returns, was looking to do a deal.

Tweedy had $5 billion then, and its owners agreed to sell 70 percent of the firm for $300 million, Healey says, or about 10 times Tweedy’s earnings of $30 million. AMG had paid as little as eight times earnings on the four deals it had done before then, so Tweedy was expensive.

“To me, it was a no-brainer,” Healey says. Tweedy was a marquee name that would double profits at AMG.

Yet AMG had no money. Nutt and Healey borrowed from banks to get Tweedy, betting they could sell AMG shares to the public and repay the loans. They hired Goldman to manage the offering, and in November 1997 sold 7.5 million shares at $23.50 each, raising $176 million.

Friess, Whitman
Loaded with cash, AMG got busy buying big names. Foster Friess sold a majority stake in Friess Associates to AMG in 2001. Martin Whitman sold most of Third Avenue Management LLC to them in 2002. Whitman was 77 at the time and still owned most of the company.

“Every first, second or third question from investors was, ‘What are you going to do when Marty Whitman retires?’” Third Avenue’s current CEO, David Barse, recalls. Whitman sold to AMG because it promised the manager autonomy, Barse says. He also met with UAM in 2001, passing on a deal because UAM wanted 100 percent of the firm, taking away, in Healey’s view, the managers’ incentive to perform.

UAM had faltered in the late 1990s as investors pulled money from the firm for three straight years. In 2000, Old Mutual Plc, South Africa’s biggest insurer, bought it for $2.2 billion.

Healey says he’ll dodge UAM’s mistakes. After his 17 years in business, fund managers know who he is. His business card is worth something again.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...0-billion-empire-with-stakes-in-28-funds.html
 


More financial chicanery. Pretending current interest rates are "normal" doesn't make it so.



_________________


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...y-ease-competition-risk-chart-of-the-day.html



S&P 500 Pension Cuts May Ease Competition Risk

By David Wilson
July 27, 2012

Efforts by General Motors Co. and other companies to reduce pension obligations to employees may be essential...

...companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index had a record $354.7 billion deficit in pension funds at the end of last year, according to figures compiled by S&P. The shortfall widened by 45 percent from 2010.

The larger gap reflects lower returns on U.S. stocks... The S&P 500’s total return, including dividends, fell last year to 2.1 percent from 15 percent in 2010 and 26 percent in 2009.

“Many U.S. corporations have been attempting to address pension costs recently... This may be the key for the future health” of their business... many international competitors aren’t saddled with comparable expenses.

GM, the largest U.S. automaker, and Ford Motor Co., the second biggest, have offered buyouts of payments to a total of 140,000 salaried retirees. Their pension plans were underfunded by a combined $40.8 billion at the end of 2011.

To be sure, pension-calculation changes will ease the financial burden on these companies and others that have plans, the report said. President Barack Obama signed legislation this month that lets companies use an average interest rate for the past 25 years, rather than two years, in determining payments.




http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...y-ease-competition-risk-chart-of-the-day.html
 


It is precisely this sort of clown, this sort of political/patronage appointee and this sort of management by committee that ensures investment mediocrity (or worse) in state/county/municipal/union/endowment funds. While this appointee may be well-meaning and may even be bright, I promise this appointee is completely, utterly and absolutely clueless when it comes to investing.



The Board of Trustees of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System (MSRPS) today recognized Kenneth B. Haines—a veteran Prince George's County teacher with experience both in the classroom and at the bargaining table—as its newest member.

Haines, a foreign language instructor at Northwest High School in Hyattsville, also is president of the Prince George's County Educators' Association (PGCEA), the bargaining unit for the county's 9,000 teachers. He ran unopposed for one of the five elected positions on the 14-member board of the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System (MSRPS) after collecting nominations from 500 active or retired teacher members.

"I look forward to this opportunity to serve all those with a vested interest in the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System," said Haines. "It was an honor simply to be considered worthy by my colleagues."

On the pension system board, Haines will fill out the term of William D. Brown, which expires July 31, 2013. Brown served as a trustee for 14 years, until his retirement in July from Montgomery County Public Schools.

"Congratulations to Mr. Haines on his selection to the Board," said Brown. "His long time experience in working for the benefit of educators will serve him well in protecting the interest of all of our members. I have been honored to serve on the Board of Trustees. I thank my fellow Trustees and the SRA staff for the tremendous role they play in working in the interest of the system's members. Keep up the great work."

As a member of the PGCEA negotiating team, Haines has performed cost-analysis of salary and benefit proposals valued at up to $850 million for school system faculty. Before being named union president, Haines served a term as vice president and two as treasurer, where he chaired the committee charged with oversight and analysis of the budget process.



http://sra.maryland.gov/News/PR-Haines_Elected_to_Board.aspx
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...ay-for-erie-canal-fix-that-eluded-father.html



Cuomo Gets Truckers to Pay for Erie Canal Fix That Eluded Father
By Freeman Klopott and Martin Z. Braun
August 2, 2012

It takes David Sylvaria about two hours to pilot the Grande Mariner, a 184-foot cruise ship, almost 20 miles along New York’s Erie Canal.

“This is slow going no matter what,” Sylvaria said one afternoon last month as he steered the ship from Little Falls east to Canajoharie. “I wish we could gun it, believe me.”

The canal’s progress from a dying 19th century shipping lane to an economic-development engine has moved just as slowly. Since Governor Mario Cuomo’s administration in the early 1990s, the state has spent tens of millions of dollars to turn the canal, which opened the U.S. Midwest to the Atlantic Ocean, into a tourist destination to revive the upstate economy.

A still-unfinished pedestrian trail along the 363-mile waterway has taken more than 10 years to build, longer than the canal itself. Plans to redevelop a canal harbor in Syracuse languished for decades.

A consultant’s report in May found that Canal Corp., the New York Thruway Authority subsidiary that runs the waterway, has no “meaningful strategy” to make money from it. The state spends as much as $90 million a year, primarily from tolls, to operate the canal and takes in only $2 million in revenue, Chicago-based Navigant Consulting Inc. said.

As Thruway officials prepare to raise truck tolls 45 percent, critics including the American Trucking Associations and New York Farm Bureau say the canal is sapping funds that can be used to offset the increase.

‘Significant Reason’
“The Canal Corp. is a significant reason why we’re looking at a toll increase,” Brian Sampson, executive director of Unshackle Upstate, a Rochester-based business group, said in a telephone interview. “The canal is such a part of our history that we should never walk away from it, but let’s be honest about what it is: At this point, it’s a tourist attraction.”

Tom Madison, Thruway Authority executive director, said the agency is looking at public-private partnerships to get more revenue from the canal system. Including the Champlain, Cayuga- Seneca and Oswego canals, the network covers 524 miles (843 kilometers).

“Historically, we’ve disposed of Canal Corp. land here and there,” Madison said in a telephone interview. “We’re talking about rolling together parcels of property and really doing more proactive marketing of the property.”

Clinton’s Ditch
The brainchild of Governor De Witt Clinton, the Erie Canal, known as “Clinton’s Ditch,” opened in 1825, eight years after workers with shovels and pickaxes began building the waterway from Buffalo to Albany. It opened up the Midwest by allowing goods to move from New York City up the Hudson River to the Great Lakes. New York state issued bonds to pay for the $7 million construction, one of the first municipal debt sales.

In 1903 state voters approved spending $101 million for a new, deeper and wider canal, which is the waterway in use today. Commercial traffic reached its peak in 1951 and dwindled to 9,107 tons in 2010 and 6,150 tons last year, when Tropical Storm Irene hit. Thirty years ago, the canal handled 600,000 tons a year. The state constitution requires that it be kept navigable.

Democrat Andrew Cuomo, Mario’s son and the current governor, showered $237 million on canal towns while serving as U.S. secretary of Housing and Urban Development under President Bill Clinton. Then, as now, the goal was to help revive an upstate region where the poverty rate rose to 13 percent in 2008 from 11 percent in 2000, according to a 2011 report by Cornell University.

Rhine River
Economic activity from the canal amounts to about $380 million annually, said Brian Stratton, director of canals, citing a 2002 study by Eric Mower and Associates, a marketing and communications firm based in Syracuse.

Part of the state’s plan is to make the Erie Canal as appealing as Germany’s Rhine River, Stratton said. From 2000 to 2010, boating on the canal declined 23 percent to 99,343 vessels, according to the Thruway Authority.

“We’re really looking at the model established in Europe, where smaller but similar vessels cruise through the Rhine and other great areas,” he said. “We want to take that very successful model and bring it here to a very significant history corridor along the Erie.”

On board the Grande Mariner, retirees from Alabama, Massachusetts and Florida marveled as Sylvaria, the 35-year-old captain, maneuvered into Lock 17, near Little Falls. As the lock emptied, the ship descended more than 40 feet (12 meters).

It was the 12th day of a 16-day voyage that took passengers from Chicago, through the Great Lakes and connected with the Erie Canal near Buffalo, according to the website for Blount Small Ship Adventures, which operates the vessel. The trip, which cost $5,000 per person, ended in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, near the company’s headquarters.

Village Revival
Farther east along the canal system near Albany, the town and village of Waterford won a $1.5 million grant and a $3.6 million loan from HUD in 1997 to build a visitors center and improve a stretch of the Champlain Canal.

Fifteen years later, the village has seen the storefronts on Broad Street, its business district of about 20, go from being half-empty to about 85 percent occupied, said Russ Vandervoort, the village treasurer. Colleen Coloney, who has owned the Broad Street Café for 17 years, said the improvements bring in customers.

“We see new faces every week and people who come back and say, ‘Hi, do you remember us from last year?’” Coloney said.

Still, some parts of the canal’s redevelopment have struggled. In 2002, Governor George Pataki, a Republican, announced a five-year, $35 million plan to finish building the 348-mile Erie Canalway Trail for bikes and pedestrians. In July, Canal Corp. said it would complete a section of the asphalt trail near Lyons in western New York this year, which would leave about 25 percent of the trail still unfinished.

Syracuse Harbor
In Syracuse, after failing for decades to develop a former barge terminal, Canal Corp. last year transferred 34 acres surrounding the Inner Harbor to the city for free.

Within a year, Syracuse selected a local developer, COR Development Co., which plans to transform the area into a neighborhood with apartments, a hotel, shops, and a satellite campus for the Onondaga Community College. COR will pay $2.8 million, which will be used to clean polluted land. After the cleanup, the remainder of the funds will revert to Canal Corp.

Stratton said the Syracuse project is an example of how state officials can work with private industry and local governments to develop Canal Corp. property.

“The value is not in the sale of the land,” Stratton said. “It’s in the economic activity that’s generated after.”

Living Museum
Canal Corp. has received about $1 million from land sales in the last five years, according to R.W. Groneman, a spokesman.

The cost of maintaining a system that’s become a living museum -- the brass levers used to lift the locks are 100 years old -- has business groups pushing Cuomo to reconsider the canal’s position under control of the Thruway Authority.

Unshackle Upstate, the New York Farm Bureau and the American Trucking Associations were among more than a dozen groups that suggested such a change in a July 24 letter to Cuomo that cited the Navigant report.

It was Navigant that recommended a toll increase. If the increase doesn’t happen, the authority may face a downgrade on its A+ credit rating just as it’s planning to sell toll-backed bonds to build a new $5.2 billion Tappan Zee Bridge over the Hudson River, Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Services said in June. The 3.1-mile bridge 20 miles north of New York City carries 138,000 vehicles each day, 40 percent more than its design intended.

No Strategy
According to the report, the Thruway Authority has considered closing portions of the canal, selling land and developing public-private-partnerships for recreational development projects.

“However, to date, no meaningful strategy has been pursued,” the report said.

Bill Kupper, a retired television ad salesman who lives in Sarasota, Florida, was among the more than 60 passengers on the Grande Mariner. He wasn’t concerned about operating costs. He saw the canal as a piece of American history.

“It became like the pyramids or the Great Wall of China,” Kupper said. “That’s how it stood in the world.”



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...ay-for-erie-canal-fix-that-eluded-father.html
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-03/citizens-republic-said-to-seek-buyers.html


Citizens Republic Said to Seek Buyers
By Zachary R. Mider
Aug 3, 2012

Citizens Republic Bancorp Inc. (CRBC), the Michigan lender that has yet to repay a $300 million U.S. government bailout, is soliciting takeover bids from competitors, said three people with knowledge of the matter.

The bank hired JPMorgan Chase & Co. to find a buyer and has contacted suitors in recent weeks, according to the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the effort is private. The company, which had a market value of more than $700 million yesterday, has also explored other ways to pay back its 2008 bailout, including by issuing equity, they said.

Huntington Bancshares Inc., which also operates in Michigan, may be interested, said one of the people. Flint-based Citizens has lost more than $1 billion since 2007 on bad commercial and residential real-estate loans, forcing the lender to operate under a supervisory agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

The shares climbed 5.7 percent to $18.64 at 11:29 a.m. in New York after earlier advancing as much as 7.9 percent.

Kristine Brenner, director of investor relations at Citizens Republic, declined to comment. A spokeswoman at JPMorgan declined to comment. Maureen Brown, a spokeswoman at Huntington, said the company doesn’t comment on speculation or rumor.

The U.S. Treasury appointed two directors to the board last year after the bank stopped paying dividends on the bailout funds. Michigan’s economy fared worse than the country’s as a whole during the latest recession, and the jobless rate stood at 8.6 percent in June, compared with 8.2 percent nationally.

Citizens Republic had $1.04 billion of shareholders’ equity as of March 31, and $18.83 of book value per common share. It operates through its Citizens Bank subsidiary, founded in 1871.

Among the banks with the most deposits in Michigan are Huntington and Fifth Third Bancorp, both based in Ohio, and Pennsylvania’s PNC Financial Services Group Inc., according to data compiled by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-03/citizens-republic-said-to-seek-buyers.html


Flint
Citizens
Boenning
WallStreet
Brokers
InvestmentBanking
Analyst
 
New York Times
August 11, 2012


A Mutual Fund Master, Too Worried to Rest
By JEFF SOMMER
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/b...er-is-too-worried-to-rest.html?pagewanted=all


VANGUARD, the penny-pinching mutual fund company founded by John C. Bogle, has become a colossus. Its index funds — once derided for not even trying to beat the market — are now the industry standard.

And after at least six heart attacks and one heart transplant, Mr. Bogle has managed to witness this triumph. “It’s all a kind of a miracle,” he says in a booming baritone. “It’s really nice that I’m able to see this happen in my own lifetime.”

With this kind of medical history, any other man of 83 might simply enjoy his success. But not John Bogle. He is still on a mission, as outspoken as ever and nearly as vigorous — thanks, he says, to the heart of a younger man. He’s not done yet.

“It’s urgent that people wake up,” he says. Why? This is the worst time for investors that he has ever seen — and after more than 60 years in the business, that’s saying a lot.

Start with the economy, the ultimate source of long-term stock market returns. “The economy has clouds hovering over it,” Mr. Bogle says. “And the financial system has been damaged. The risk of a black-swan event — of something unlikely but apocalyptic — is small, but it’s real.”

Even so, he says, long-term investors must hold stocks, because risky as the market may be, it is still likely to produce better returns than the alternatives.

“Wise investors won’t try to outsmart the market,” he says. “They’ll buy index funds for the long term, and they’ll diversify.

“But diversify into what? They need alternatives, bonds, for the most part. What’s so frightening right now is that the alternatives to equities are so poor.”

In the financial crises of the last several years, he says, investors have flocked to seemingly safe government bonds, driving up prices and driving down yields. The Federal Reserve and other central banks have been pushing down interest rates, too.

But low yields today predict low returns later, he says, and “the outlook for bonds over the next decade is really terrible.”

Dark as this outlook may be, he says, people need to “stay the course” if they are to have hope of buying homes or putting children through college or retiring in comfort.

He is still preaching the gospel of long-term, low-cost investing. “My ideas are very simple,” he says: “In investing, you get what you don’t pay for. Costs matter. So intelligent investors will use low-cost index funds to build a diversified portfolio of stocks and bonds, and they will stay the course. And they won’t be foolish enough to think that they can consistently outsmart the market.”

Still, because the market and the economy are deeply troubled, it’s time for action on many fronts, he says: “We’ve really got no choice. We’ve got to fix this system. All of us, as individuals, need to do it.”

That’s the message of his latest and 11th book, “The Clash of the Cultures: Investment vs. Speculation” (Wiley & Sons, $29.95). It offers a scathing critique of the financial services industry and updated guidance for investors. “A culture of short-term speculation has run rampant,” he writes, “superseding the culture of long-term investment that was dominant earlier in the post-World War II era.”

Too much money is aimed at short-term speculation — the seeking of quick profit with little concern for the future. The financial system has been wounded by a flood of so-called innovations that merely promote hyper-rapid trading, market timing and shortsighted corporate maneuvering. Individual investors are being shortchanged, he writes.

Corporate money is flooding into political campaigns. The American retirement system faces a train wreck. America’s fundamental values are threatened. Mr. Bogle remains a dyed-in-the-wool capitalist but says the system has “gotten out of balance,” threatening our entire society. “You can always count on Americans to do the right thing — after they’ve tried everything else,” he says, quoting Winston Churchill. Now, he says, it’s time to try something else.

He advocates taxes to discourage short-term speculation. He wants limits on leverage, transparency for financial derivatives, stricter punishments for financial crimes and, perhaps most urgently, a unified fiduciary standard for all money managers: “A fiduciary standard means, basically, put the interests of the client first. No excuses. Period.”

Those clients — the ordinary people to whom he has always appealed — need to protect themselves from peril, he says: “In an ideal world, Adam Smith-like, individuals would recognize what they need to do in their own self-interest, and they will make changes happen and look after themselves.”

MR. BOGLE sometimes disagrees with current Vanguard management, but he remains proud of the company he created. Index funds are ever more popular, and Vanguard is gushing money, torrents of it. Thanks largely to its various index funds, Vanguard, which is based near Valley Forge, Pa., pulled in a net $87.7 billion in cash this year through June, excluding money market funds. That’s nearly 40 percent of the cash flow of the entire mutual fund industry.

Burton Malkiel, the Princeton economist and author of “A Random Walk Down Wall Street,” says: “Index funds are so popular now that it’s easy to forget how courageous and tenacious Jack Bogle was in starting them. They were called Bogle’s Folly because all they did was replicate the returns of the market. But, of course, that’s a great deal. In the academic world many people saw the wisdom of this — but Jack is the guy who actually made it happen.”

Mr. Bogle also tried to ensure that Vanguard funds would always be cheap to buy and hold. While Vanguard is his baby, he has never had an ownership stake in it aside from the shares he holds in its mutual funds. Vanguard fund shareholders own the place collectively because he planned it that way.

“Strategy follows structure,” he says, explaining that with no parent company or private owners to siphon profits, Vanguard can keep costs lower than anyone else. That was always his goal. “The only way anyone can really compete with us on costs is to adopt a mutual ownership structure,” he says. “I’ve been waiting all these years for someone to do it, but no one has.”

One reason is surely that there’s no profit in it. Despite Vanguard’s size and success, Mr. Bogle is no billionaire. For comparison, Forbes lists the personal wealth of Edward C. Johnson 3rd, the chairman of Fidelity, as $5.8 billion. By contrast, Mr. Bogle says his own wealth is in the “low double-digit millions.” Most of it is in Vanguard and Wellington mutual funds in which he invested via payroll deduction during his long career.

During his peak earning years at Vanguard, he regularly gave half his salary to charities, including two alma maters — the Blair Academy, a prep school in Blairstown, N.J., and Princeton University. He was a scholarship student at both, holding down part-time jobs to help pay his way. At Princeton, in a senior thesis, he sketched the rough outlines of the cost-cutting, shareholder-serving company that would become Vanguard.

Mr. Bogle continues to make donations to several causes. “My only regret about money is that I don’t have more to give away,” he says.

WHILE he has no operational role at Vanguard, he hasn’t entirely left it. He works on its campus, heading the Bogle Financial Markets Research Center, a small research institute that provides him with a bully pulpit, which he tries to use in the energetic mode of his hero, Theodore Roosevelt. “There aren’t many of us Roosevelt Republicans left,” he said.

He says government regulation of the financial industry is insufficient, and he endorses the Volcker Rule, named for his friend, Paul A. Volcker, the former Fed chairman, who says regulated banks shouldn’t be making risky bets with their own money.

Mr. Volcker, in turn, embraces Mr. Bogle’s critique of the financial services industry. At a public forum held in Manhattan last winter to celebrate Mr. Bogle’s legacy, Mr. Volcker said that the only unequivocally good financial innovation out of Wall Street in the last 25 years was the bank A.T.M. (If he went back 40 years, Mr. Volcker said, he would include Mr. Bogle’s invention of the index fund.) And Mr. Volcker said that a unified fiduciary standard “is an excellent solution.”

The research institute is financed by Vanguard but is independent, allowing Mr. Bogle to write books and make fiery speeches that sometimes differ from Vanguard policies.

At the moment, for example, he supports a crucial part of a Securities and Exchange Commission proposal to tighten rules on money market funds. “Investors shouldn’t be misled into believing these funds are as safe as a bank account,” he says. “They’re not.”

In 2008, one fund, Reserve Primary, “broke the buck,” falling below the $1-a-share asset value that money market funds have traditionally maintained. That set off a panic and the government intervened. To prevent future crises, Mary L. Schapiro, the S.E.C. chairwoman, would require funds to let their net asset values float — so that $1 invested in a fund might be worth 99 cents.

Vanguard sides with other big firms like Charles Schwab and Fidelity in trying to block the proposal, which is set for a vote on Aug. 29. Allowing shares to float would “require significant, and expensive, changes” and would put off investors, many of whom would shift assets from firms like Vanguard into banks, Vanguard said in a filing.

Mr. Bogle sides with Ms. Schapiro and differs with Vanguard on that point. “A lot of things that are disruptive have to be done anyway, and this is one of them,” he says. “Mary Schapiro has a lot of courage in trying to do it.”

MR. BOGLE moved to the institute after leaving the company’s board in 1999 amid a conflict with John J. Brennan, his handpicked successor and second in command. Mr. Brennan, who has said little about the issue in public and declined to comment for this article, has since been succeeded by F. William McNabb III.

Mr. Bogle’s health was precarious in the 1990s. By 1996, when he relinquished his role as C.E.O. to Mr. Brennan, he had already had at least six heart attacks and was mortally ill, according to two people then at Vanguard. “At that point Jack Bogle couldn’t walk slowly across a room without getting out of breath,” one of those officials said. “Jack’s heart was failing. Either he’d get a transplant or basically have to say goodbye to the world.”

The transplant in early 1996 was spectacularly successful. “Physically, Jack was born again,” the official said. “That was wonderful. But it made things very complicated at Vanguard.”

Mr. Bogle had hired Mr. Brennan in 1982, and they worked together amicably for more than a decade. “The two Jacks are very different types,” said one Vanguard veteran, speaking on condition of anonymity because the issue is still sensitive within the company. “Jack Brennan is Mr. Inside, an operations man who doesn’t particularly like talking to journalists, and Jack Bogle is Mr. Outside, the ultimate marketer.” For a long while, it seemed to be a good match.

But things changed after Mr. Bogle returned with a new heart and renewed vigor. Now with the title of “senior chairman,” Mr. Bogle found that he disagreed with some of Mr. Brennan’s decisions, and said so openly. He criticized Mr. Brennan’s interest in starting narrowly focused sector equity funds. Mr. Bogle also worried that Vanguard was beginning to emphasize the sale of funds through investment advisers, these people said. Direct sales to investors had been a principal low-cost innovation in the company’s early days.

In 1999, as tensions rose, Mr. Bogle was asked to leave the board at the mandatory age of 70. “I thought there would be an exception for the company’s founder,” he says. The dispute became public, and the board offered to let Mr. Bogle extend his term. But he moved to the new research institute, which has been his base ever since.

Several Vanguard insiders say that after this, Mr. Brennan habitually walked past his former boss, rather than say hello. Journalists witnessed such scenes. Today, Mr. Bogle says he is puzzled by Mr. Brennan’s behavior.

Soon, contrary to Mr. Bogle’s advice, Vanguard began selling exchange-traded funds, or E.T.F.’s — index funds that may be bought or sold throughout the trading day. For years, Mr. Bogle had opposed this move, saying E.T.F.’s enable frequent trading, which generally hurts individual investors. He compared the innovation to “giving an arsonist a match.”

Now Mr. Bogle says that some E.T.F.’s, like those that mimic core Vanguard index funds, are fine if used carefully by buy-and-hold investors or by institutional investors for specific purposes. But he warns that they are dangerous for investors because many E.T.F.’s track relatively obscure sections of the market and all of them encourage the propensity to trade rapidly — “to speculate, rather than invest.”

In a telephone interview, Mr. McNabb, Vanguard’s current chief executive and chairman, wouldn’t comment on the Brennan-Bogle relationship. He praised both men, saying, for example, that Mr. Brennan’s introduction of E.T.F.’s expanded Vanguard’s influence and, therefore, Mr. Bogle’s legacy.

“We revere Jack Bogle here,” Mr. McNabb said. “Everybody can quote his sayings. He laid out a vision for the company and set up an ownership structure unlike anything the industry had ever seen.”

Mr. McNabb added: “We live and breathe the fact that we’re client-owned, that we’re built for the long-term, and that we serve only one constituency, our clients, who are also our owners. That’s all Jack Bogle.”

For his part, Mr. Bogle says the company embodies his ideas. Current executives are making “hard decisions and doing a good job and doing it very sincerely.” But, he adds, “I think it’s good that I have an independent voice.”

ON the Vanguard campus, on a lawn near the cafeteria, stands a 7-foot-high bronze statue of Mr. Bogle.

He is sheepish about it. “I’m not sure we should’ve done it, but there it is,” he says. “It’s a good likeness, isn’t it?”

Indeed, it is. Thomas J. Warren, the sculptor who created it in 1996, said the Vanguard board commissioned the statue when Mr. Bogle was ill, and that he became stronger as work proceeded.

“Mr. Bogle was very humble about it,” Mr. Warren says. “I went out to his house to ‘live cast’ his face one day, and I was late. He was dressed for a board meeting, but he was very gracious and got down on the kitchen floor, and we made the mold.” Mr. Bogle asked him not to prettify his image. “Mr. Bogle has arthritis, but he told me to go ahead and show him the way he really is, so the fingers on the statue are gnarled.”

One day earlier this year in the company cafeteria — the “galley,” as it’s called at the nautically themed Vanguard — Mr. Bogle ordered a grilled cheese sandwich and chatted with an endless stream of young well-wishers. On the walls were murals embellished with quotations from his speeches:

“Like a rock.”

“Even one person can make a difference.”

“Press on regardless.”

“We lead.”

“Success must not be bought but earned.” And, of course, there is another, which may be his favorite. “Stay the course,” Mr. Bogle says.
 

I've got news for you; Emory ain't the only one— by far.

We've become a nation of liars and cheats.

U.S. News & World Report has sold a fuckload of magazines ever since it begat this ranking crap and the credulous public bought into it hook, line and sinker.


____________________

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-18/emory-says-it-inflated-students-entrance-exam-scores.html



Emory Says It Inflated Students’ Entrance Exam Scores
By John Hechinger
August 18, 2012

Emory University, an Atlanta school that received more than 17,000 freshman applications, said it intentionally reported inflated student entrance-exam scores and high school class ranks for more than a decade.

Unfairly burnishing its reputation, the college gave the information to the public and to services that rank schools based on the data, such as U.S. News & World Report, Emory said yesterday in a statement. The rankings are influential with students and parents making college choices.

“As an institution that challenges itself, in the words of our vision statement, to be ’ethically engaged,’ Emory has not been well served by representatives in this history of misreporting,” President James Wagner said in a statement. “I am deeply disappointed.”

Emory’s admission illustrates the pressure colleges face to boost their rankings as they compete for the attention of students and their tuition dollars. The university’s announcement follows the January disclosure by Claremont McKenna College, near Los Angeles, that a school official had misrepresented SAT statistics since 2005.

Emory said it had inflated its reported SAT scores by 40 points in both 2010 and 2009. The school incorrectly said the 25th percentile of its admitted students in 2010 had a combined reading and math SAT score of 1,310 out of 1,600 and the 75th percentile achieved 1500. In fact, the scores ranged from 1,270 to 1,460.

SAT, ACT
Emory also incorrectly stated that 87 percent of its students in 2010 were in the top 10 percent of their high school classes in terms of grades. The true figure was 75 percent. The university made similar misrepresentations the year before.

At one time, which the college didn’t specify, Emory said it may have excluded the scores of the bottom 10 percent of students reporting both SAT and ACT scores, the main college admissions exams, and grade-point averages. Evidence showed the practice wasn’t followed after 2004.

The university said the misreporting occurred since at least 2000 as the admissions office reported the scores of admitted students, rather than those who enrolled. In May of this year, John Latting, Emory’s new assistant vice provost overseeing admissions, discovered discrepancies and the school conducted an investigation using an outside law firm, the college said.

Deans Involved
Two former deans of admission and the leadership of Emory’s Office of Institutional Research were aware of the misreporting, according to the university statement.

“The employees responsible for this conduct are no longer employed at Emory,” the college said in the statement. Emory declined to name the employees.

New internal controls, including a staff dedicated to managing “a system of checks and balances for future reporting,” will be put in place, the university said in the statement.

Emory said it didn’t know whether it had received a higher U.S. News ranking than it deserved, or if its position would drop.

U.S. News said its preliminary calculations show that Emory’s ranking over the past two years -- No. 20 among national universities -- wouldn’t have changed, according to a statement on its website. The misrepresentations would probably have had “a small to negligible effect in the several years prior.”

“We deplore the long-standing misreporting which Emory made public,” Brian Kelly, U.S. News editor and chief content officer said in the statement yesterday. “We appreciate the university’s commitment to fixing its data process.”

Manipulated Results
The Emory news underscores the flaws of efforts to rank colleges based on exam scores, said Bob Schaeffer, a spokesman for FairTest, a Boston-based nonprofit group critical of standardized tests.

“Emory’s confession that school officials gave inaccurate information to U.S. News & World Report is further evidence that the higher education ranking game is a case of garbage-in- garbage-out,” Schaeffer said in an e-mail. “The reliance on self-reported data from colleges, which obviously want to burnish their profiles, guarantees that the results will be manipulated.”

Founded in 1836, Emory has long been a favored charity of those running Atlanta-based Coca-Cola Co. Alumni include Kenneth Cole, the fashion designer and Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-18/emory-says-it-inflated-students-entrance-exam-scores.html
 

Many in the middle class are doing quite well.

Here are suggestions:
1) Finish High School.
2) Go to college and get a degree in something useful (STEM).
3) Don't have kids until you are married and can afford them.
4) Don't overspend on a house (and certainly don't buy without 20% down).
5) Only purchase used cars until you can pay cash for a new car (which may be never)
6) Stay married.
7) Don't make emotional purchases on credit.
8) Save, save, save.

Too many people blame the government and everybody else for their current lot in life.

Success starts with making good decisions.

 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-05/in-stadium-building-spree-u-s-taxpayers-lose-4-billion.html



In Stadium Building Spree, U.S. Taxpayers Lose $4 Billion
By Aaron Kuriloff and Darrell Preston
September 5, 2012

New York Giants fans will cheer on their team against the Dallas Cowboys at tonight’s National Football League opener in New Jersey. At tax time, they’ll help pay for the opponents’ $1.2 billion home field in Texas.

That’s because the 80,000-seat Cowboys Stadium was built partly using tax-free borrowing by the City of Arlington. The resulting subsidy comes out of the pockets of every American taxpayer, including Giants fans. The money doesn’t go directly to the Cowboys’ billionaire owner Jerry Jones. Rather, it lowers the cost of financing, giving his team the highest revenue in the NFL and making it the league’s most-valuable franchise.

“It’s part of the corruption of the federal tax system,” said James Runzheimer, 67, an Arlington lawyer who led opponents of public borrowing for the structure known locally as “Jerry’s World.” “It’s use of government funds to subsidize activity that the private sector can finance on its own.”

Jones is one of dozens of wealthy owners whose big-league teams benefit from millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies. Michael Jordan’s Charlotte, North Carolina, Bobcats basketball team plays in a municipal bond-financed stadium, the Time Warner Cable Arena, where the Democratic Party is meeting this week. The Republicans last week used Florida’s Tampa Bay Times Forum, also financed with tax-exempt debt. It is the home of hockey’s Lightning, owned by hedge-fund manager Jeffrey Vinik. None of the owners who responded would comment.

$4 Billion
Tax exemptions on interest paid by muni bonds that were issued for sports structures cost the U.S. Treasury $146 million a year, based on data compiled by Bloomberg on 2,700 securities. Over the life of the $17 billion of exempt debt issued to build stadiums since 1986, the last of which matures in 2047, taxpayer subsidies to bondholders will total $4 billion, the data show.

Those estimates are based on what the Treasury could have collected on interest from the same amount of taxable bonds sold at the same time to investors in the 25 percent income-tax bracket, the rate many government agencies assume. In fact, more than half the owners of tax-exempt bonds pay top rates of at least 30 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office. So they save even more on their income taxes, a system that U.S. lawmakers of both parties and President Barack Obama have described as inefficient and unfair.

Widespread Practice
Including the Cowboys’ Jones, there are 21 NFL owners whose teams play in stadiums built or renovated in the past quarter- century using tax-free public borrowing. Such municipal debt helped build structures used by 64 major-league teams, including baseball, hockey and basketball. The new generation of publicly owned stadiums was designed to increase revenue from high-priced seating as well as concessions and retailing. The venues have helped double the value of sports franchises since 2000, according to W.R. Hambrecht & Co., a financial services firm.

That growth occurred even after Congress tried in 1986 to bar cities and states from building stadiums with tax breaks originally set up to help local governments cut their borrowing costs for building roads, sewers and schools. Lawmakers’ revisions instead unintentionally encouraged local officials to borrow even more for pro sports, according to Dennis Zimmerman, a retired Congressional Research Service economist who analyzed the act’s effects.

“You have the costs spread out, with small losses to hundreds of thousands -- maybe millions -- of people,” said Zimmerman, who lives in Falls Church, Virginia. In a 1996 government study, he put the annual cost to taxpayers of 21 publicly financed stadiums at $24.3 million.

Cowboys, Yankees
In the case of Cowboys Stadium, opened in 2009, the subsidy to bondholders will be $65.3 million over 29 years. The 40-year debt issued by the New York City Industrial Development Agency to help build the new Yankee Stadium for owners Hal and Hank Steinbrenner will cost taxpayers $321.5 million. Similarly, a football stadium for the Indianapolis Colts, owned by Jim Irsay, benefits from $209.3 million in tax exemptions, and one for the Arizona Cardinals, owned by Bill Bidwell, $125.9 million. None of the teams would comment.

Stadium finance has changed dramatically since the early 20th century, when baseball’s Chicago Cubs began playing in the privately financed Wrigley Field, writes Judith Grant Long, a professor at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. After World War II, prosperity spurred a wave of municipal stadium construction as cities considered them an economic boon.

Building Boom
The most recent building boom began in the 1980s, as teams sought more premium suites and other ways of amplifying revenue, she writes in an academic paper tracing the history of stadium finance from 1890 to 2005. Team owners covet income from luxury seating, naming rights, retail, parking and concessions because it is generally exempt from league requirements for pooling and sharing revenue from television broadcasts and ticket sales, according to Grant Long.

During the past decade, studies by Grant Long; Robert Baade of Lake Forest College near Chicago; Victor Matheson, an economist at College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts; and others have found that stadiums are poor municipal investments. Nonetheless, political leaders are still willing to offer taxpayer-funded aid to team owners -- including muni-bond financing -- to lure or avoid losing a franchise and the civic pride and event-related jobs that go with it.

‘Flyover’ Country
Without the NFL’s Vikings, Minnesota is in “flyover” country, said state Senator Geoff Michel, an Edina Republican, in an April discussion of financing a $975 million stadium. “This is one of the things that puts us on the map,” he said.

Because leagues control the supply of teams, the threat of relocation has proved powerful and credible. In March 1984, the Colts left Baltimore one snowy morning for Indianapolis and a new $95 million stadium built partly with public debt. Baltimore lured the Browns from Cleveland after the 1995 season with a $229 million muni-bond-financed structure. To land an expansion team in 1998, Cleveland provided a $315 million publicly financed building. The tax-exempt bonds for the new Baltimore and Cleveland venues cost federal taxpayers $69.3 million.

In Detroit, Tony Pivetta says he quit going to Tigers baseball games after the team moved into Comerica Park in 2000. The team’s billionaire owner, Mike Ilitch, tapped Detroit-area taxpayers for $115 million of the $361 million cost of building the stadium. Tax-exempt bonds totaling $86 million will cost U.S. taxpayers $36.5 million through 2027. Ron Colangelo, a spokesman, declined to comment.

‘Richest Guy’
“It’s another transfer from the working people to the rich,” said Pivetta, a 55-year-old pension manager in Royal Oak, Michigan. “I’m against any sort of property redistribution, particularly for the richest guy in town.” Ilitch, 83, made his fortune as founder of the Little Caesar’s chain of pizza stores and also owns hockey’s Detroit Red Wings.

In Texas, Cowboys owner Jones started shopping early last decade for a new stadium. The team’s lease was about to expire on Texas Stadium, built in 1971 in the Dallas suburb of Irving. The building had a distinctive partial roof with a hole in the middle “so God can watch his favorite team play,” the former Cowboys linebacker D.D. Lewis once said.

Jones, now 69, bought the Cowboys in 1988 for $140 million. The wealthy oilman from Arkansas hired his old University of Arkansas football teammate Jimmy Johnson as coach and turned the franchise into a Super Bowl winner by the mid-1990s. The Harris Poll found that the Cowboys were still the most-popular club in the NFL each of the past five years.

Mayoral Bid
After Jones failed to line up a new stadium deal with Irving, Dallas and other area cities, Robert Cluck pressed Arlington to bid, according to a history prepared by the city of 373,700 people. Cluck, then a member of the City Council, said he would run for mayor “if I have an opportunity to bring something big to Arlington.”

Located between Dallas and Fort Worth, the city was already a tourism and entertainment center, with the Texas Rangers baseball stadium and the Six Flags Over Texas amusement park.

Cluck won his race for mayor in 2003. The former obstetrician soon met with Jones, who said he wanted to build a $650 million stadium. The city agreed to contribute about half of that, Cluck said in an interview. Jones declined to be interviewed for this story.

“We offered them money to come here and build their stadium,” said Cluck, now 73. “We were just trying to help them out.” He knew after the first meeting that Arlington was “going to get the Cowboys,” according to the city history.

Tax Increases
Cluck had to get the council and voters to approve revenue bonds backed by city taxes. To repay the proposed borrowing, voters had to accept a 0.5 percent sales-tax increase, a 2 percent hotel levy and a 5 percent rental-car tax.

In the 2004 referendum campaign that ensued, the Cowboys ponied up $5.1 million spent by a group called “Vote Yes! A Win for Arlington.” An opposing organization called the “No Jones Tax Coalition” raised about $43,000, according to an Oct. 26, 2004, article in the Dallas Morning News on campaign finance reports. The spending mismatch made the fight hopeless, says opposition leader Runzheimer.

On Nov. 2, 2004, as former Texas Rangers owner George W. Bush was re-elected president, the Jones and Cluck families waited out the local results in a suite at the Arlington Sheraton Hotel. They celebrated when voters approved the bonds by 55 percent to 45 percent, according to city election records.

Legislation Backfired
The financing plan relied on the city’s ability to issue bonds paying interest that is exempt from federal income taxes. Almost 20 years earlier, U.S. lawmakers from both parties set out to block muni bonds for municipally financed stadiums as part of an attack on public borrowing for private businesses, according to former Senator Bob Packwood, the Oregon Republican who was chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

“We wanted to limit it,” Packwood said in an interview. “It was one of the most egregious uses of the part of the tax code that allowed for industrial development bonds. It was clearly not what the tax code had in mind when tax-exempt bonds were authorized.”

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 removed sports facilities from the types of projects that could qualify for the subsidy. It required such bonds to become taxable if more than 10 percent of the debt for a facility built mainly for nongovernment use was to be repaid with revenue from a private business. The lawmakers who thought this would call a halt to tax-exempt stadium financing were wrong, according to Zimmerman, the economist.

Taxpayers’ Pockets
The wording of the law encourages cities and states to offer more-favorable terms to pro teams wanting financial assistance while preventing the borrowers from using stadium revenue to pay off the bonds, he wrote. The measure functions as “an open-ended matching grant” for stadiums, he said. Cities and states borrowed more money backed by tax revenue, not less, to make sure that no more than 10 percent of a stadium’s debt payments came from a private business, Zimmerman said.

“They have to take it out of the pockets of their taxpayers,” Zimmerman said. “It forces a bigger subsidy, if you’re going to use tax-exempt debt.

In the case of Cowboys Stadium, Arlington has borrowed about $300 million by selling muni bonds since 2005. A 29-year portion maturing in 2034 yields 4 percent. Arlington owns the field, and the Cowboys pay $2 million a year under a lease that expires in 2038. Over 30 years, the rent comes to $60 million.

Jones covered the rest of the stadium’s cost, as the final price almost doubled from his initial plan. The building helped the Cowboys generate an NFL-best $119 million in operating income in the 2010 season, its second straight year at the top, according to Forbes magazine. It said the team tied with the New York Yankees as the nation’s most-valuable sports franchise.

Interest Payment
The voter-approved sales-tax increase and levies on hotel rooms and rental cars have to raise enough to repay the principal and cover an initially estimated $343 million of interest to bondholders, before some of the debt was refinanced, according to Bloomberg data. As structured, the deal ensures that revenue from the Cowboys amounts to well under the 10 percent limit. The city’s operating budget this year is $383.3 million, according to its website.

Because interest paid on the bonds is free of federal income tax, the buyers accepted lower interest rates -- at least 1 percentage point less than on taxable corporate debt sold at the time. In the case of Arlington’s 29-year tax-exempt bonds yielding 4 percent, the saving to the city at the time of the sale worked out to 20 percent, or $18.5 million over the life of the borrowing. Initial estimates show the lower yields resulting from the tax-free status would save Arlington about $85 million.

Wealthy Benefit
Not all of the subsidy goes to the city, based on a 2009 report from the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation. Researchers found that just 80 percent of the amount the Treasury gives up because of the exemption serves to reduce a municipality’s borrowing costs. The remaining 20 percent amounts to “a federal transfer to bondholders in the higher tax brackets,” according to the report.

That’s because people paying the top marginal rate get a disproportionate benefit from the exemption. Take the 29-year Arlington bonds. For an investor in the 25 percent tax bracket, the securities’ 4 percent yield would be equivalent to a taxable return of 5.33 percent. But for someone at the 35 percent level, the comparable figure would be 6.15 percent, meaning the wealthier investor is getting a 15 percent higher return.

That aspect of tax-exempt debt has drawn attacks from the Obama administration and Democratic lawmakers including Max Baucus of Montana, the Senate Finance Committee chairman. Peter Orszag, Obama’s former director of the Office of Management and Budget, says the tax break has problems with “both efficiency and fairness.” Obama has proposed limiting deductions of tax- exempt interest in the $3.7 trillion municipal bond market to narrow the budget deficit.

Untaxed Property
Arlington’s ownership of the stadium amounts to another subsidy for Jones. The Cowboys don’t have to pay property taxes on an asset appraised at $904.5 million. That saves Jones about $17 million a year at the current property-tax rate. Arlington’s levies on real estate, accounting for 37 percent of the city’s revenue, were expected to rise 2.3 percent to $74.5 million this fiscal year, the city said in a report.

Soon after voters backed the bond issue, Arlington acquired 73 acres (30 hectares) near the Rangers’ ballpark, Six Flags and the Tom Landry Freeway, connecting Dallas and Fort Worth and named for the Cowboys’ first coach. To make way for what the Cowboys call the “world’s largest domed structure,” Arlington demolished 162 properties, including 51 businesses, 927 apartments and 105 houses, according to the city.

Retractable Roof
The stadium can hold more than 100,000 spectators, including standing room. It has a retractable roof and massive glass doors on each end. A 600-ton, four-screen video structure hangs 90 feet (27 meters) above the middle of the playing field and stretches from one 20-yard line to the other. Tickets to tour the building, which also houses art exhibits, cost $17.50 to $27.50 for adults.

There are 15,000 club seats and 320 suites with polished marble floors and granite counters. The suites, arrayed over three levels, lease for $100,000 to $500,000 a season, according to a study by John Vrooman, a Vanderbilt University economist.

A double suite leased by T. Boone Pickens, the billionaire oilman and corporate raider from the 1980s, is part of a cluster known as the owner’s club, near Jones’s luxury box. Guests use a parking lot that costs $75 a game. They skip the general- admission entry lines and have access to a buffet featuring prime rib, ceviche, crab dip, baked chicken and dessert pastries. At halftime, caterers swap that fare for hot dogs with relish, fried chicken, chips and queso, pizza and cookies. The walls are lined with TV screens showing the game.

Revenue Surge
Surging revenue from the new stadium cemented the Cowboys and Jones in the NFL’s financial elite. In 2009, the franchise was worth $1.7 billion, according to Forbes magazine. By 2011, the venue helped boost the team’s value 12 percent to $1.85 billion, Forbes said, calling the building a “gold mine.”

The city has benefited from an increase in sales-tax receipts, Cluck said. The levy, generating a quarter of Arlington’s revenue, was expected to rise 5.4 percent from the previous year to $50.6 million in fiscal 2012, which ends Sept. 30, according to a city report. Tourism spending supported 10,500 local jobs in 2010, up 9.5 percent from 2008, bucking a 9.4 percent decline nationwide, the city said in a 2011 report.

Jones covered his share of the stadium’s cost with taxable debt or equity contributions, said Rich Dalrymple, a spokesman.

Other Events
The venue has also brought in events such as the National Basketball Association’s All-Star game, a Super Bowl football championship and high-profile college contests such as a planned Final Four basketball tournament, Dalrymple said. While direct revenue for stadium use goes to the team, the city gets any increase in tax revenue from spending by visiting fans.

The Cowboys’ opponents tonight chose another path. The Giants partnered with the New York Jets to build a privately financed $1.6 billion stadium in suburban New Jersey, with each team borrowing $650 million. While the Cowboys haven’t won a Super Bowl since 1996, the Giants have won two in four years.

As the NFL’s reigning champions, the Giants will begin their title defense when quarterback Eli Manning leads them onto the field tonight against Tony Romo and the Cowboys. The New York team beat the New England Patriots, this year’s title favorite, 21-17 in the 46th Super Bowl in Indianapolis.

Like the Cowboys’ facility, MetLife Stadium contains martini bars, field-level clubs with leather chairs and HD video screens. The Giants and Jets also landed a naming rights partner, securing a 25-year deal with MetLife Inc. worth as much as $20 million annually, according to the New York Times.

Packwood, the former Senate Finance chairman, calls MetLife Stadium “the most expensive stadium built without public money” and said the private financing shows “it can be done.”

“You come back to this thin line of, ‘What is a legitimate municipal government undertaking?’” Packwood said. While he draws the line at sports venues, he said too many voters and local politicians don’t. “If the owner can get away with the public putting up part of the money, he’s going to do it.”



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-05/in-stadium-building-spree-u-s-taxpayers-lose-4-billion.html
 
  • 25 minutes on the elliptical "Cross Trainer," Level 12, 3.65 miles, maximum pulse 151 (RPMs @ ~61 ) [ new P.B. 5/2/11 ]
    3.67 miles { 23 minutes at Level 12 with 2-minute cool-down at Level 2 } [ new P.B. 4/7/10 ]
__________________________________

It's a new year and time for a clean slate.
  • Wednesday 9/12/12..................Run 3.85 miles in 33:12......................................( upper body session, 9:43 for 2,000 meters, 160 pounds, elapsed time 0:50 )
  • Thursday 9/13/12.....................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 6-2, 6-1 )................the usual indoor start: everything clicking
  • Tuesday 9/18/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 4-6, 3-6, 1-6 )
  • Thursday 9/20/12.....................Three sets of doubles ( 6-0, 6-3, 6-2 )
  • Friday 9/21/12.........................Bicycle 58.4 miles in 5:54 (total) averaging 9.9 MPH (total time) 10.5 MPH (bike time)
  • Saturday 9/22/12.....................Three sets of doubles ( 6-1, 6-4, 6-1 ).................161 pounds
  • Sunday 9/23/12........................Bicycle two hours
  • Monday 9/24/12.......................Three sets of doubles ( 1-6, 4-6, 0-6 )
  • Tuesday 9/25/12......................Run 3.85 miles in 32:51, two sets of doubles ( 6-1, 2-6 )........6,266 steps or 3.55 miles
  • Wednesday 9/26/12..................Three sets of doubles ( 1-6, 6-4, 6-4 ).................159 pounds
  • Thursday 9/27/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 6-1, 6-1 )
  • Friday 9/28/12..........................Three sets of doubles ( 7-1, 4-4, 5-3 ).................=16/3=5
  • Saturday 9/29/12......................Run 3.78 miles
  • Sunday 9/30/12........................Two sets of singles ( 1-6, 1-6)............................Steve Chawalsky
  • Monday 10/1/12............................................................................................( upper body session, 9:42 for 2,000 meters, 161 pounds, elapsed time 0:46 )
  • Tuesday 10/2/12.......................Two sets of doubles ( 10-8, 3-4 )
  • Thursday 10/4/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 6-1, 6-4 )
  • Friday 10/5/12..........................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 8-0, 6-2 ).................159 pounds =19/3=6
  • Sunday 10/7/12........................Two sets of "stationary" doubles ( 2-6, 6-3 )
  • Monday 10/8/12........................Walk 3.78 miles................................................( upper body session, 9:48 for 2,000 meters, 161 pounds, elapsed time 0:37 )
  • Tuesday 10/9/12.......................Three sets of doubles
  • Thursday 10/11/12.....................Three sets of doubles ( 2-6, 7-5, 4-4 )
  • Friday 10/12/12.........................Three sets of doubles ( 4-4, 6-2, 5-3 )................= 15/3=5
  • Saturday 10/13/12.....................Run 3.21 miles on the treadmill............................34:23, 160 pounds
  • Monday 10/15/12...........................................................................................( upper body session, 9:41 for 2,000 meters, 161 pounds )
  • Wednesday 10/17/12..................Bicycle 34.6 miles (JB)
  • Thursday 10/18/12.....................Four sets of doubles ( 6-1, 6-0, 6-2, 2-6 )
  • Friday 10/19/12.........................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 7-1, 7-1 )................=19/3=6
  • Saturday 10/20/12.....................Three sets of doubles ( 6-1, 7-9, 1-2 )................161 pounds
  • Monday 10/22/12.......................Run 3.85 miles in 32:57.....................................( upper body session, 9:53 for 2,000 meters, 162 pounds, elapsed time 0:50 )
  • Tuesday 10/23/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 6-1, 4-6, 7-6 )
  • Wednesday 10/24/12..................Bicycle 46.4 miles in 4:30..................................160 pounds
  • Thursday 10/25/12.....................Three sets of doubles ( 4-6, 6-1, 3-4 )
  • Friday 10/26/12.........................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 7-1, 6-2 )................=19/3=6
  • Saturday 10/27/12.....................Run 3.78 miles.................................................162 pounds (plus island time)
  • Monday 10/29/12.......................Walk 2.32 miles through hurricane
  • Tuesday 10/30/12......................1 minute@ Level 12, 24 minutes@ Level 5.............3.11 miles ( full session— 9:39 for 2,000 meters, 161 pounds, elapsed time 1:20 )
  • Thursday 11/1/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 7-5, 6-3, 4-4 )
  • Tuesday 11/6/12.......................Barefoot run from Coral Beach to Elbow Beach and return
  • Sunday 11/11/12.......................Run 2.50 miles on the treadmill at Coral Beach Club...25:00
  • Tuesday 11/13/12......................Two sets of doubles ( 5-7, 5-5 ).........................162 pounds
  • Thursday 11/15/12.....................Two sets of doubles ( 4-6, 6-4, win tiebreaker )
  • Friday 11/16/12.........................Three sets of doubles ( 7-1, 5-3, 7-1 )................=19/3=6
  • Sunday 11/18/12.......................Run 3.22 miles on the treadmill.............................34:26, 160 pounds
  • Monday 11/19/12.......................Walk 3.78 miles
  • Tuesday 11/20/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 3-6, 6-3, 6-2 ).................160 pounds
  • Wednesday 11/21/12..................Run 1.88 miles on the treadmill............................19:00 (full session)
  • Friday 11/23/12.........................Three sets of doubles ( 7-1, 5-3, 5-3 ).................=17/3=6
    ..............................................Run 3.78 miles in ~38 minutes..............................161 pounds
  • Tuesday 11/27/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 6-4, 6-0, 6-1 )
  • Wednesday 11/28/12..................Two sets of singles ( 4-6, 4-6 )
  • Thursday 11/29/12.....................Three sets of doubles ( 4-6, 4-6, 2-6 )
  • Friday 11/30/12.........................Three sets of doubles ( 8-0, 6-2, 3-5 ).................=16/3=6
  • Monday 12/3/12.........................Singles tennis, run 3.78 miles in ~38 minutes..........161 pounds
  • Tuesday 12/4/12........................Three sets of doubles ( 6-3, 6-1, 6-0 )
  • Thursday 12/6/12.......................Two sets of doubles ( 6-3, 6-2 )
  • Friday 12/7/12...........................Three sets of doubles ( 7-1, 6-2, 4-4 ).................=17/3=6
  • Sunday 12/9/12..........................Run 2.12 miles on the treadmill.............................21:50, (full session, 9:31 for 2,000 meters, 164 pounds, elapsed time 1:30 )
  • Monday 12/10/12........................Singles tennis
  • Tuesday 12/11/12.......................Two sets of singles ( 6-2, 6-4, 1-1 ).....................Nice to beat her
    ...............................................Three sets of doubles ( 6-4, 4-6, 2-1 )
  • Thursday 12/13/12......................Two and a ½ sets of doubles ( 6-3, 2-6, 3-2 )
  • Friday 12/14/12..........................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 )..................=18/3=6...65 points to 51, a lead of 14— it's now almost mathematically impossible for me not to win
  • Monday 12/17/12........................Two and a ½ sets of doubles ( 6-3, 6-4, 2-2 )........162 pounds
  • Tuesday 12/18/12.......................One set of doubles ( 8-6, 2-0 ).............................substitute
  • Wednesday 12/19/12...................Run 1.0 miles on the treadmill...............................10:20, (full session, 9:21 for 2,000 meters, 162 pounds, elapsed time 1:10 )
  • Friday 12/21/12..........................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 )..................=18/3=6
  • Saturday 12/22/12......................Two sets of doubles ( 6-1, 8-6 )
  • Wednesday 12/26/12...................Three sets of doubles ( 6-4, 6-1, 6-1 )..................in the bubble with the Congressman
  • Thursday 12/27/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 4-6, 7-5, 3-3 )..................163 pounds
  • Friday 12/28/12..........................Three sets of doubles ( 8-0, 4-4, 1-7 )..................=13/3=4
  • Saturday 12/29/12......................Three sets of doubles ( 6-0, 6.2, 6-1 )
  • Sunday 12/30/12.........................Run 3.16 miles on the treadmill..............................34:46, (full session, 9:21 for 2,000 meters, 162 pounds, elapsed time 1:20 )
  • Tuesday 1/1/13...........................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 )
  • Wednesday 1/2/13.......................Singles tennis
  • Thursday 1/3/13..........................Four sets of doubles ( 1-6, 1-6, 6-1, 5-1 )
  • Friday 1/4/13..............................Three sets of doubles ( 7-1, 4-4, 2-6 )..................=13/3=4
  • Saturday 1/5/13..........................Walk 3.78 miles
  • Sunday 1/6/13............................Walk 3.78 miles
  • Monday 1/7/13............................Two+ sets of singles ( 3-6, 6-2, 1-3 )....................163 pounds
  • Tuesday 1/8/13...........................Three sets of doubles ( 1-6, 6-2, 3-3 )
  • Wednesday 1/9/13.......................Singles tennis
  • Friday 1/11/13.............................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 4-4, 3-5 )..................=12/3=4 Winner of 1st half
  • Tuesday 1/15/13..........................Five sets of doubles ( 6-4, 6-1, 6-2, 6-0, 6-0 )
  • Wednesday 1/16/13......................Singles tennis
  • Thursday 1/17/13.........................One set of doubles ( 8-6 ), one set of singles ( 7-0 )
  • Friday 1/18/13.............................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 7-1, 5-3 )..................=17/3=6
  • Monday 1/21/13...........................2:00@ Level 12, 23:00@ Level 6...........................3.31 miles ( full session— 9:59 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 148, 166 pounds, elapsed time 1:20 )
  • Tuesday 1/22/13..........................Three sets of doubles ( 2-6, 6-3, 3-2 )
  • Wednesday 1/23/13......................Singles tennis
  • Thursday 1/24/13.........................Three + sets of doubles ( 2-6, 6-3, 1-6, 2-4 )
  • Friday 1/25/13.............................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 8-0, 5-3 )...................=18/3=6
  • Tuesday 1/29/13..........................Three sets of doubles ( 5-7, 2-6, 2-1 )
  • Thursday 1/31/13.........................Three sets of doubles ( 4-6, 6-4, 1-1 )
  • Friday 2/1/13...............................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 5-3, 4-4 )...................=14/3=5
  • Monday 2/4/13.............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-1, 6-3, 6-0 )
  • Tuesday 2/5/13............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 5-7, 2-0 )
  • Thursday 2/7/13...........................25 minutes @ Level 10.........................................3.39 miles ( full session— 9:40 for 2,000 meters, 167 pounds, elapsed time 1:15 )
  • Friday 2/8/13................................Three sets of doubles ( 4-4, 6-2, 5-3 )..................=15/3=5
  • Monday 2/11/13............................25 minutes @ Level 12........................................3.38 miles ( full session— 9:45 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 151, 168 pounds, elapsed time 1:25 )
  • Tuesday 2/12/13...........................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 6-1, 6-4 )
  • Thursday 2/14/13..........................Three sets of doubles ( 6-3, 3-6, 3-6 7-1 T )
    PLANTAR FASCIITIS (mysteriously) COMMENCES
  • Friday 2/15/13...............................Three sets of doubles ( 7-1, 8-0, 7-1 )..................=22/3=7
  • Sunday 2/17/13.............................Three sets of singles ( 1-6, 2-6, 4-3 )
  • Tuesday 2/19/13............................Three sets of doubles ( 8-6, 6-1, 1-4 )
  • Friday 2/22/13...............................Three sets of doubles ( 7-1, 6-2, 5-3 )..................=18/3=6
  • Sunday 2/24/13.............................25 minutes @ Level 12........................................3.34 miles ( full session— 9:34 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 153, 167 pounds, elapsed time 1:20 )
  • Thursday 2/28/13...........................Three sets of doubles ( 1-6, 5-7, 4-2 )
  • Friday 3/1/13.................................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 7-1, 7-1 ).................=20/3=7
  • Monday 3/4/13...............................11 minutes @ Level 12, 14 minutes @ Level 8.........3.30 miles ( full session— 9:47 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 146, 168 pounds, elapsed time 1:15 )
  • Tuesday 3/5/13..............................Three sets of doubles ( 1-6, 5-7, 4-2 )
  • Wednesday 3/6/13..........................22 minutes @ Level 12, 3 minutes @ Level 8..........3.41 miles ( full session— 9:26 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 147, 168 pounds, elapsed time 1:15 )
  • Thursday 3/7/13.............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-3, 6-3, 6-3 )
  • Friday 3/8/13.................................Three sets of doubles ( 2-6, 7-1, 2-6 ).................=11/3=4
  • Saturday 3/9/13.............................Run 1.39 miles, walk 1.39 miles............................first outdoor run of the year, 64°, long sleeves
  • Sunday 3/10/13.............................Walk 5.78 miles.................................................first shorts, 60°
  • Monday 3/11/13.............................1 minute @ Level 12, 24 minutes @ Level 8............3.37 miles ( elliptical only— maximum pulse 147, 169 pounds )
  • Tuesday 3/12/13............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-0, 6-4, 4-2 )
  • Friday 3/15/13...............................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 4-4, 5-3 ).................=14/3=5, signs that rest was helpful with plantar and elbow
  • Sunday 3/17/13.............................25 minutes @ Level 12........................................3.36 miles ( full session— 9:39 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 153, 169 pounds, elapsed time 1:15 )
  • Thursday 3/21/13...........................Two sets of doubles ( 6-4, 6-4 )
  • Friday 3/22/13...............................Three sets of doubles ( 1-7, 6-2, 7-1 ).................=14/3=5
  • Tuesday 3/26/13............................Three sets of doubles ( 7-5, 6-2, 5-0 )
  • Thursday 3/28/13...........................Two sets of doubles ( 7-5, 6-0 )
  • Friday 3/29/13...............................Three sets of doubles (5-3, 6-2, 5-3 )..................=16/3=5
  • Saturday 3/30/13...........................25 minutes @ Level 12.......................................3.27 miles ( full session— 9:41 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 150, 170 pounds, elapsed time 1:20 )
  • Tuesday 4/2/13.............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-1, 5-7, 6-2 )
  • Thursday 4/4/13............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-1, 6-3, 6-0 )
  • Friday 4/5/13.................................Three sets of doubles ( 6-2, 7-1, 5-3 ).................=18/3=6
  • Sunday 4/7/13...............................Bicycle wreck, emergency room, stitches
  • Monday 4/8/13..............................Walk 3.78 miles, 25 minutes @ Level 12..................3.37 miles ( full session— 9:59 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 157, 168 pounds, elapsed time 1:25 )
  • Tuesday 4/9/13.............................Run 1.92 miles, walk 1.92 miles..............................167 pounds (first run out there, somebody's maintaining the thing)
  • Thursday 4/11/13...........................Two sets of doubles ( 6-4, 6-4 )
  • Friday 4/12/13...............................Three sets of doubles (6-2, 2-6, 6-2 )..................=14/3=5
  • Tuesday 4/16/13............................Two sets of doubles ( 4-6, 4-6 )
  • Wednesday 4/17/13........................25 minutes @ Level 12.......................................3.50 miles (abbreviated session— maximum pulse 153, 169 pounds, elapsed time 0:28 )
  • Thursday 4/18/13...........................Two sets of doubles ( 3-6, 4-6 )
  • Friday 4/19/13...............................Three sets of doubles ( 3-5, 6-2, 4-4 ).................=13/4=4
  • Tuesday 4/23/13............................Three sets of doubles
  • Friday 4/26/13...............................Three sets of doubles ( 5-3, 7-1, 4-4 ).................=16/3=5
  • Tuesday 4/30/13............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-4, 6-0, 4-6 )
  • Wednesday 5/1/13..........................25 minutes @ Level 8 (Schwinn)...........................2.3 miles (full session— 10:04 for 2,000 meters, 170 pounds, elapsed time 1:00 ) Last Schwinn 3/16/11— 2.5 miles
  • Thursday 5/2/13............................Three sets of doubles ( 5-7, 7-5, 1-1 )
  • Friday 5/3/13.................................Three sets of doubles ( 4-4, 4-4, 8-0 ).................=16/3=5 and Winner of 2nd half
  • Tuesday 5/7/13..............................25 minutes @ Level 8 (Schwinn)...........................2.4 miles ( abbreviated session— 170 pounds, maximum pulse 142, elapsed time 0:30 )
  • Wednesday 5/8/13..........................25 minutes @ Level 8 (Schwinn)...........................2.3 miles ( abbreviated session— 169 pounds, maximum pulse 142, elapsed time 0:30 )
  • Thursday 5/9/13.............................Three sets of doubles ( 6-4, 6-4, 0-6 )
  • Sunday 5/12/13..............................Walk 4.78 miles
  • Monday 5/13/13..............................25 minutes @ Level 8 (Schwinn)...........................2.3 miles (abbreviated session— 169 pounds, maximum pulse 144, elapsed time 0:32 )
  • Tuesday 5/14/13.............................25 minutes @ Level 4 (Schwinn)...........................2.7 miles (abbreviated session— 168 pounds, maximum pulse 142, elapsed time 0:33 )
  • Wednesday 5/15/13.........................25 minutes @ Level 12........................................3.30 miles ( full session— 9:47 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse ???, 169 pounds, elapsed time 1:10 )
  • Thursday 5/16/13............................25 minutes @ Level 1 (Schwinn)...........................3.7 miles (abbreviated session— 169 pounds, maximum pulse 146, elapsed time 0:33 )
  • Friday 5/17/13................................Walk 4.582 miles through the forest and o'er the ridges
  • Monday 5/20/13..............................25 minutes @ Level 8 (Schwinn)............................2.3 miles (abbreviated session— 170 pounds, maximum pulse 143, elapsed time 0:33 )
  • Tuesday 5/21/13.............................Bicycle 29.6 miles in 4½ hours...............................Bentley-Hanover Jct., leisurely- début of NCRR "York" #17, 168 pounds
  • Wednesday 5/22/13.........................Walk 4.7 miles through the forest and o'er the ridges (2:45)
  • Thursday 5/23/13............................25 minutes @ Level 12.........................................3.33 miles ( full session— 9:54 for 2,000 meters, maximum pulse 148, 167 pounds, elapsed time 1:10 )
  • Tuesday 5/28/13.............................25 minutes @ Level 8 (Schwinn)............................2.3 miles (abbreviated session— 169 pounds, maximum pulse 144, elapsed time 0:33) followed by ½ hour swim— FIRST SWIM of the year
  • Wednesday 5/29/13.........................Bicycle 30.6 miles...............................................Monk-Railroad, followed by ½ hour swim, 165½ pounds
  • Thursday 5/30/13............................25 minutes @ Level 12.........................................3.19 miles (abbreviated session— 166½ pounds, maximum pulse 150, elapsed time 0:32) followed by ½ hour swim. Dead legs.
  • Saturday 6/1/13..............................Bicycle 6.2 miles.................................................Goof off
  • Thursday 6/6/13..............................Bicycle 39 miles..................................................Whitehall-Hanover Jct
  • Friday 6/14/13.................................Bicycle 60.2 miles.............................................Whitehall-York
  • Wednesday 6/19/13..........................Bicycle 42.6 miles...............................................Bentley-Brillhart
  • Friday 6/21/12.................................Walk 3 miles, run 1 mile, ½ hour swim
  • Saturday 6/22/13.............................Walk 3 miles, run 1 mile, ½ hour swim.....................Can't figure out which hurts more, running or walking
  • Monday 6/24/13...............................Run 2½ miles, walk 1½ miles.................................It's "do-able" but something is clearly not right.
  • Tuesday 6/25/13..............................Bicycle 39.1 miles...............................................Bentley-Howard
  • Thursday 6/27/13.............................Run 2 miles, walk 2 miles......................................damn thing hurts more when I stop than when I run
  • Sunday 6/30/13................................Bicycle 6 miles
  • Monday 7/1/13.................................Run 3½ miles through the mud and the puddles
    PLANTAR FASCIITIS (mysteriously) ENDS
  • Tuesday 7/2/13................................Bicycle 20.1 miles across the dikes, through the marsh and the forest and over the dunes
  • Thursday 7/4/13...............................Bicycle 12 miles down the highway and through the mud
  • Friday 7/5/13...................................Run 7 miles (plus walk an additional mile) 1:29, bicycle 7 miles
  • Monday 7/8/13.................................Run 3.85 miles in 37:44, brief swim
  • Tuesday 7/9/13................................Walk 3.78 miles in the dark
  • Wednesday 7/10/13...........................Run 3.85 miles, ½ hour swim
  • Friday 7/12/13..................................Walk 3.78 miles, ½ hour swim
  • Sunday 7/14/13................................1½ hours of singles tennis
  • Tuesday 7/16/13...............................Singles tennis, 4-6, 0-5...................................... sprint stamina is awful
  • Thursday 7/18/13..............................Bicycle 41 miles (100°)
  • Friday 7/19/13..................................Run 2.85 miles, walk 1.0 mile (100°)
  • Sunday 7/21/13................................Singles tennis 7-6 (7-5)
  • Tuesday 7/30/13...............................Bicycle 60.2 miles.............................................Whitehall-York
  • Friday 8/2/13....................................Singles tennis
  • Monday 8/5/13..................................Lesson
  • Wednesday 8/7/13.............................Run 3.78 miles, ½ hour swim, 170 pounds
  • Saturday 8/10/13...............................Doubles tennis ( 6-4, 6-2, 2-4)
  • Sunday 8/11/13.................................Bicycle 2 hours, ½ hour swim
  • Monday 8/12/13................................Singles tennis ( 4-6, 0-6) I'm better than she is
  • Tuesday 8/13/13................................Singles tennis ( 0-6, 6-1, 6-3 ) R.V.- Hot Damn! A bit of redemption for yesterday's abomination
  • Wednesday 8/14/13............................Doubles tennis ( 6-0, 6-2, 6-1 ) at the kennels
  • Thursday 8/15/13...............................Singles tennis (1-6, 4-2) R.C.
  • Friday 8/16/13....................................Bicycle 21 miles JG
  • Saturday 8/17/13................................Run 3.85 miles in 34:08
  • Monday 8/19/13.................................Singles tennis ( 6-0, 6-1, 6-0 )
  • Tuesday 8/20/13................................Bicycle 60.2 miles
  • Thursday 8/22/13...............................Three sets of singles (6-2, 4-6, 1-6 ) R.V.
  • Sunday 8/25/13.................................Two sets of singles ( 4-6, 6-1 ) R.C.
  • Monday 8/26/13.................................Three sets of singles ( 6-0, 6-0, 6-0 )
  • Tuesday 8/27/13................................Run 3.85 miles, ½ hour swim
  • Wednesday 8/28/13............................Two sets of doubles ( 4-6, 2-6, 3-4 )
  • Thursday 8/29/13...............................Bicycle 19 miles
  • Saturday 8/31/13...............................Run 3.85 miles in 34:40, brief swim
  • Sunday 9/1/13...................................Two sets of singles ( 7-5, 6-3 ) Good- R.C.
  • Monday 9/2/13...................................10 mile bicycle ride - 18 Charles Lane
  • Tuesday 9/3/13..................................Three sets of doubles ( 6-3, 6-2, 6-2 ) Jim, Jeff, Ray
  • Thursday 9/5/13.................................Run 3.85 miles
  • Friday 9/6/13.....................................Bicycle 39 miles in 4 hours
  • Sunday 9/8/13...................................Two sets of singles ( 4-6, 6-2 ) goofing- R.C.




  • 25 minutes on the elliptical "Cross Trainer," Level 12, 3.65 miles, maximum pulse 151 (RPMs @ ~61 ) [ new P.B. 5/2/11 ]
    3.67 miles { 23 minutes at Level 12 with 2-minute cool-down at Level 2 } [ new P.B. 4/7/10 ]
  • 15 reps lifting 110 pounds on the lat bar
  • 15 reps of knee curls lifting 70 pounds
  • 15 reps bench pressing 90 pounds
  • 15 reps lifting 90 pounds on the lat bar
  • 15 reps of knee curls lifting 70 pounds
  • 15 reps bench pressing 90 pounds
  • 15 overhand arm curls of 40 pounds
  • 15 underhand arm curls of 40 pounds
  • 25 reps of 110 pounds of overhead shoulder presses
  • 1 minute of outstretched arms holding 5 pounds in each hand outstretched horizontally
  • 75 crunches holding 10 pounds on chest
  • 2,000 meters of rowing in 9 minutes, 30 seconds
  • 5 minutes on the elliptical "Cross Trainer," alternating forward and reverse motion, Level 2, 0.60 miles
Total elapsed time: 58 minutes


__________________________
It is amazing; when I was a kid I could do sit-ups all day long. I'd rip off 100 without even stopping to think about it; other people were impressed— I was merely surprised that they were impressed. Today..., it's a little bit of a struggle to do 75 crunches with 10 pounds sitting on my chest. When on the elliptical, I inevitably end up reflecting on the fact that no matter how fast I go I'm still going to end up spending a fixed amount of time in hell— that contrasts with running where I always console myself with the thought that the faster I run, the sooner it's over. At least the rowing machine enables that incentive.




2011-2 http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=38607474&postcount=259
2010-1 http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=35435518&postcount=106
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=32848727&highlight=elliptical#post32848727
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=28145289&postcount=51





N32° 16' 07.34" W064° 47' 00.73"



 
Last edited:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/18/radnor-capital-idUSL1E8KI7J520120918



Radnor Capital Management returns, joins Dynasty
Tuesday, September 18, 2012


Sept 18 (Reuters) - Radnor Capital Management, the Pennsylvania investment management company sold to U.S. Trust more than a decade ago, has resurfaced on the wealth management scene as an independent investment advisory firm.

Doug Pyle and Pierce Archer, who worked together at the original Radnor Capital Management for more than 10 years, are hoping to use the brand once again on their new firm, which is owned and financed by its employees.

"We both felt the time was right for us to resign from the places where we were and put Radnor Capital back together again," Pyle said on Tuesday.

"The two of us in combination really complemented each other," said Pyle, who has worked primarily on the institutional side. Archer has focused on the family wealth and high-net-worth client segment.

Pyle started the new Radnor Capital in May after leaving Columbia Management Group, the Boston-based investment firm purchased by Ameriprise Financial Inc from Bank of America Corp two years ago. Archer joined after leaving Pennsylvania Trust Co earlier this month.

The team decided to join Dynasty Financial Partners, which caters to independent advisers who lack the backing of a big firm.

Dynasty, founded by former Citigroup Inc executive Shirl Penney in December 2010, offers technological and administrative support for those newly independent teams. The company targets the top 3 percent of advisers, or those with $300 million or more in assets under management.

The new Radnor Capital Management will provide investment advice to families, trusts and high-net-worth clients, as well as charitable organizations, foundations and other institutional portfolios.

The original Radnor Capital Management was established in 1989 and sold a decade later to U.S. Trust, which was eventually acquired by Charles Schwab Corp. Schwab then sold it to Bank of America, which in turn sold its institutional advisory arm, Columbia Management, to Ameriprise.

"We felt the original firm name had a good, established reputation," Pyle said. "To go with a name that had some recognition made more sense than trying to create something new as an identity."

Joining Pyle and Archer are fellow Radnor alumni Andrea Funk as chief operating officer; Elisabeth Schwan, securities analyst; and Pat Barlow, account administrator.



http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/18/radnor-capital-idUSL1E8KI7J520120918
 
http://www.npr.org/2012/09/26/161796984/tourists-banned-from-indias-tiger-reserves



Tourists Banned From India's Tiger Reserves
by Julie McCarthy
NPR
September 26, 2012


Can tigers and tourists coexist? The debate is rumbling through India, where the Supreme Court has temporarily banned tourism in core areas of the country's 41 tiger reserves. The unexpected and controversial ruling is aimed at protecting the last of India's 1,700 tigers.

Up until the late 1960s, big game hunters trod the forests of Rajasthan's Ranthambore National Park, part of a sprawling tiger reserve southwest of Delhi. Today, spotting one of India's big cats — a tiger or the more elusive leopard — inside the park is forbidden.

But next to the outer wall one night, with the headlights of our van trained on the brick boundary, a beautiful male leopard appeared straight ahead of us under the moonlight. Undistributed by the noise of trucks, he moved his huge head in our direction, but he wasn't about to jump anywhere.

"He's perfectly comfortable sitting here while we have a vehicle sitting about 40 yards away from him," said guide Balendu Singh, "and he's perfectly at ease. Plus, it's a good perch for him to sit and observe a stray dog or something walking by."

"Dinner?" I asked.

"Dinner, that's right," Singh said.

This forest once teemed with the leopard's cousin, the tiger. But this former hunting ground of the Maharajas has just 52 of the big cats today.

Less Tiger Habitat, More Humans
The forests of Ranthambore are dotted with the remnants of India's past glories. A mile inside, and still open to visitors, looms the thousand-year-old Ranthambhore Fort.

Scavenging monkeys and families feeding them crowd the fort's ramparts and tombs. Below, broad valleys of deciduous forests and expanses of water make up the tiger reserve.

Touring the fort, field biologist Dharmendra Khandal says 20 percent of the land inhabited by Indian tigers has been lost in the past six years to increasing demands for land by an ever-growing population, mostly tied to the agriculture and mining industries.

Ajay Dubey, the Supreme Court petitioner behind the ban on tourists entering core areas of tiger reserves, says he has been working on "environmental issues and good governance" for the past 12 years.

The 37-year-old activist from Bhopal, who waged successful campaigns against India's powerful mining interests, is now rattling the cage of tiger tourism and some of the more prominent conservationists.

Dubey says "mindless tourism" has adversely affected the big cat, and that human activity should be restricted to "buffer" areas of tiger habitats to stop the decline of the tigers.

"Eighteen-hundred tigers in 1972, right? Now we are having only 1,700 tigers — only 1,700 tigers. We have to be more careful and sincere for the conservation of the tiger," Dubey says.

Livelihoods Dependent On Tourism
Some wildlife experts agree that tourists damage the natural habitat. Others say they act as watchdogs against poachers and lax forestry officials.

Singh, our guide at the park boundary and a local hotelier and wildlife enthusiast, is opposed to the tourism ban. He says entry into Ranthambhore is already strictly regulated, with a total of 520 guests allowed in for a limited time.

"We have three hours in the morning and three hours in the afternoon — a total of six hours in a day," he says.

Moreover, Singh says, a permanent ban would be disastrous for the local economy.

The court's decision on whether to extend its ban will affect thousands of Indians — including drivers, cooks, guides and luggage bearers at train stations. Their livelihoods depend on tourism, which Singh says only raises the local standard of living.

"Better education, better life, better health care — so the entire area is elevated and becomes better," Singh says. "You get more awareness; awareness and education lead to better conservation. And nobody can deny that."

Many conservationists agree that poachers are a bigger danger to tigers than tourists. Like the ivory of elephants, the bones and body parts of tigers are poached for enormous sums. But the regulations governing tourism are the controversy at the moment.

India's Wildlife Protection Act states that core areas of tiger reserves are "inviolate." The Supreme Court is expected to shed light on what that means when it hears arguments on the tourism ban Thursday.



http://www.npr.org/2012/09/26/161796984/tourists-banned-from-indias-tiger-reserves
 


The exemption given to natural resource-related MLPs was a colossal mistake. The legitimization of natural resource MLPs by Congress led to horrible abuse. The thimblerigging corporate finance deal-meisters went berserk and have been able to raise billions of dollars by promising chimerical distribution yields to gullible patsies aided and abetted by hordes of none-to-swift stock jobbers (i.e., brokers).

This is NOT a level playing field and, if there were any justice in the world, the natural resource MLP exemption would be repealed.



_____________________

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-15/congress-denies-1-5-billion-with-favor-to-pipelines.html




Congress Denies $1.5 Billion With Favor to Pipelines
By Zachary R. Mider
January 15, 2013

For more than 60 years, the Tennessee Gas Pipeline has linked natural-gas wells in Texas to customers in the north. Until last year, it paid federal corporate income taxes on its earnings, setting aside $107 million in 2011 alone.

Then in August, Houston-based Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP bought the pipeline. Because of a little-known subsidy that annually costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, Tennessee Gas’s bill dropped to zero and stayed there.

Kinder Morgan is one of the biggest of about 90 tax-free publicly traded partnerships that have taken over the U.S. pipeline business and are expanding into the rest of the oil and gas industry, partly by gobbling up dozens of tax-paying companies. The break for these “master limited partnerships” will cost taxpayers about $1.5 billion from October 2010 through September 2015, Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation estimated last January.

The product of an exception to a 1987 tax law, publicly traded oil and gas partnerships generated a record $16.7 billion in pretax profit in 2011, up from $7.2 billion in 2007. Their market value has swelled more than 12-fold in the past decade to about $340 billion. Founders such as Kinder Morgan’s Richard Kinder are now billionaires. Thirteen MLPs went public in 2012 in an otherwise lackluster year for stock debuts.

Ending Breaks
Congress broadened the break in 2008, adding $12 million a year to the cost borne by taxpayers. It may consider legislation this year to make more companies eligible, even as President Obama and congressional Republicans call for a corporate tax overhaul that includes eliminating some breaks. Canada ended a similar break in 2011, saving an estimated $500 million a year.

“The people who say they want deficit reduction, how do they justify expanding it” with subsidies, said Representative Keith Ellison, the Minnesota Democrat who sponsored an unsuccessful bill last year to end oil and gas tax breaks, including the one for MLPs. “These industries are some of the most profitable in the country.”

Kinder Morgan emphasizes that lawmakers set up the tax exemption. “Congress made a conscious decision to encourage investment in energy infrastructure through the MLP structure,” Larry Pierce, a spokesman for the company, said in a statement.

“The overall tax break is not huge,” said Park Shaper, president of Kinder Morgan Inc., which controls the Kinder Morgan partnerships.

IRS Encouragement
The Internal Revenue Service, which referees which kinds of businesses can form MLPs, is encouraging their spread. Among a record number of rulings on the matter last year, the IRS said in October that companies that convert natural-gas liquids into ethylene, an ingredient in plastics and antifreeze, could form MLPs. Dow Chemical Co. was among stocks that rallied on the news as investors speculated the companies might spin off plants into tax-free vehicles.

U.S. corporations face two levels of taxation -- they pay corporate income tax at a top federal rate of 35 percent, and their shareholders pay again in personal income tax on dividends and capital gains.

MLPs legally avoid taxes by removing one of the layers. Though they have thousands of investors and are traded on exchanges, including the New York Stock Exchange, they are associations of individual partners. Each of those partners counts a share of the company’s profits as ordinary personal income.

The tax that partners pay on that income offsets to some extent the government’s loss of revenue from corporate taxes.

However, MLP investors often can defer those personal taxes through a complicated process by which they are allowed to recognize depreciation on the company’s assets.

‘Tax Shield’
As a result of this “tax shield,” as the benefit is known, about 20 percent of payouts to partners of a typical MLP are taxed immediately. The remainder is deferred, according to a Wells Fargo & Co. research note.

Because MLP’s regularly pay out all of their available cash to investors, they are especially popular in the current low- interest rate environment. Yields on 10-year Treasuries fell to less than 2 percent last year, compared with yields on the Alerian MLP Index of about 6 percent.

That has led a variety of companies connected to the energy industry to switch to the MLP structure. New MLPs that went public in the past two years include CVR Partners LP, which uses refinery byproducts to make fertilizer, and Hi-Crush Partners LP, which digs up the sand used in the hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells.

Investor Risk
The proliferation of unconventional MLPs benefiting from the tax break may pose risks for investors who assume they can depend on stable cash payouts like those from pipelines, said Christopher Eades, who manages $4.2 billion in MLP securities at ClearBridge Advisors LLC in New York.

“People have gotten lulled into thinking that all MLPs are low-risk, high-yielding securities,” said Eades, who said he avoided most of last year’s “non-traditional” offerings. “While that’s generally true, you can’t make that statement for every MLP out there.”

In the months after Oxford Resources Partners LP, which operates coal mines in Appalachia, went public in July 2010, the price of its securities increased as much as 58 percent to $28.34. It has lost more than half of its value since last October, when it slashed its cash payout as a result of low coal demand, and now trades at about $5.

Tax Avoidance
In 1981, an oil producer subsidiary of Apache Corp. became the first publicly traded partnership. At the time, all partnerships, whether closely held or public, did not pay corporate income tax.

By the mid-1980s, such companies as Burger King and the Boston Celtics were creating listed partnerships, leading to concerns that U.S. tax receipts would erode. Congress acted in 1987 to bring them back on the tax rolls -- except for a few industries, notably oil and gas.

Lawmakers calculated that exempting energy companies, which accounted for most of the tax-free partnerships, would make the ban more likely to win support, said John Buckley, who as a Democratic congressional aide helped draft the law.

“You try to mitigate the political opposition by not touching the people who are currently using it,” he said. In addition, the Reagan administration maintained that building more pipelines would help the nation’s energy security.

Becoming Popular
The authors of the exception didn’t envision how popular the tax break would become. “It is an example of a decision that was made for one reason that has proved to be far more consequential than people thought,” said Buckley, now a tax professor at Georgetown University Law Center. “I don’t think anybody expected the dis-incorporations of pipeline assets that have occurred.”

As a result of the exception, more energy corporations that were subject to U.S. taxes shifted assets to publicly traded, tax-free partnerships. Lawmakers broadened the break in 2008, benefiting Kinder Morgan and other MLPs.

Amid lobbying from the trade association representing MLPs, lawmakers inserted a section into an energy bill that allows the partnerships to transport and store biofuels such as ethanol. By 2010, Kinder Morgan estimated it was handling 25 percent to 30 percent of the U.S. market for renewable fuels.

Lobbying Expenses
As the size of the MLPs has grown, so too has their clout in Washington. Taken together, the trade association and managers of the largest partnerships have tripled lobbying expenses since 2007, to about $7 million in 2011, according to disclosure forms compiled by Bloomberg. Williams Cos., the Tulsa, Oklahoma-based pipeline operator, alone spent $3.8 million.

The latest push in Congress seeks to expand the break further. Senator Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, proposes to extend the benefit to clean energy companies such as wind and solar producers, an industry that has relied on Democrats for support. Coons said the renewable energy industry should have the same advantages of fossil-fuel producers.

The measure will probably win support from pro-oil Republicans because it would help protect the original MLP tax break in a corporate overhaul, Coons said at an event in Washington last month, according to an account of his remarks in The Hill newspaper.

“This is a way that everybody can win,” The Hill quoted Coons as saying. Republicans who have signed on include Representative Ted Poe of Texas and Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

“We’re all for it,” said Shaper, the Kinder Morgan president. “It is an effective means to encourage investment.”

Obama Proposals
The Obama administration has gestured to both sides. In a framework for corporate tax reform issued last year, it proposed lowering the top corporate rate to 28 percent and covering the cost in part by eliminating breaks such as MLPs. In December, Energy Secretary Steven Chu endorsed the Coons proposal.

The MLP break is “a perfect example of how we end up in the mess we’re in,” said Edward Kleinbard, a law professor at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and a former chief of staff for the Joint Committee on Taxation. “Those who don’t have the subsidy ask for it, rather than asking for its repeal. Subsidies like this expand and expand.”

Dozens of corporate tax expenditures cost the government as much as $151 billion in 2012, according to the Tax Policy Center.

Third Biggest
The MLP tax break helped create the third-largest energy company in North America in just 20 years. The market value including net debt of the Kinder Morgan partnerships, combined with parent Kinder Morgan Inc., is smaller than only Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp.

Richard Kinder left Enron Corp. in 1996 after he was passed over for the chief executive officer’s job. He lost out to a college classmate, Kenneth Lay.

Shortly after he departed, Kinder and Bill Morgan bought the general partner of a publicly traded pipeline partnership for $40 million from Enron, which was shifting focus from operating pipelines to trading gas and power.

Kinder later described the acquisition as a collection of “sleepy, old pipelines.” At the time, there were about 19 publicly traded energy MLPs together worth about $9 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Most were stable, slow- growing businesses akin to toll roads, charging fees to energy companies for hauling hydrocarbons across the country.

Buying Spree
Kinder embarked on a 15-year buying spree, using his tax advantage to outbid competitors for pipeline assets. That allowed him to regularly increase the amount of cash his partnership paid out to members, earning him a premium market value and returning an annualized 19 percent over the subsequent decade. Kinder Morgan and its related companies have 75,000 miles of pipelines, enough to circle the globe three times.

Since Kinder took over in 1997, the main partnership he oversees, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, has made more than $12 billion before taxes. The partnership set aside about 3 percent for taxes, such as payments in other countries and payments to state governments. The federal corporate income tax rate is 35 percent.

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., acquired by Kinder Morgan Energy in August, said in regulatory filings that it set aside a total of 36 percent for federal and state taxes in the three full years before its sale. Pierce, the spokesman for Kinder Morgan, said the company is now part of the partnership, which doesn’t pay U.S. corporate income taxes.

$3.4 Billion
He added that Kinder Morgan Inc., the general partner that controls the company’s partnerships, pays federal corporate income taxes amounting to $3.4 billion since 1997.

That growth has rewarded Kinder and the other founders of MLPs, creating some of the newest fortunes in Texas. He’s now the richest man in Houston, with a fortune Bloomberg estimates at $10 billion. The previous holder of the title, Dan Duncan, ran the second-biggest MLP, Enterprise Products Partners LP, before he died in 2010. Forbes estimated his net worth at about $9 billion.




http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-15/congress-denies-1-5-billion-with-favor-to-pipelines.html
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/opinion/brooks-suffering-fools-gladly.html


January 3, 2013
Suffering Fools Gladly
By DAVID BROOKS


Recently I was reading a magazine profile of a brilliant statistician. The article mentioned, in passing, that this guy doesn’t suffer fools gladly.

I come across that phrase a lot. I’ve read that Al Gore and former Representative Barney Frank don’t suffer fools gladly. Neither, apparently, did Steve Jobs, George Harrison, Pauline Kael or even Henry David Thoreau.

The phrase originally came from William Tyndale’s 1534 translation of the Bible. In it, Paul was ripping into the decadent citizens of Corinth for turning away from his own authoritative teaching and falling for a bunch of second-rate false apostles. “For ye suffers fool gladly,” Paul says with withering sarcasm, “seeing ye yourselves are wise.”

Today, the phrase is often used as an ambiguous compliment. It suggests that a person is so smart he has trouble tolerating people who are far below his own high standards. It is used to describe a person who is so passionately committed to a vital cause that he doesn’t have time for social niceties toward those idiots who stand in its way. It is used to suggest a level of social courage; a person who has the guts to tell idiots what he really thinks.

Sure, it would be better if such people were nicer to those around them, the phrase implies, but this is a forgivable sin in one so talented. The actor Ed Harris’s “penetrating gaze signals that this is a serious, somber man on a singular quest,” a writer observed in The Toronto Sun. “He doesn’t suffer fools gladly, if at all.”

This sounds fine in the abstract, but when you actually witness somebody in the act of not suffering fools gladly, it looks rotten. Once I watched a senior member of the House of Representatives rip into a young reporter after she nervously asked him an ill-informed question.

She was foolish about that particular piece of legislation, but, in the moment, he looked the bigger fool. He was making a snap judgment about a person with no real information about her actual qualities. He was exposing a yawning gap between his own high opinion of himself and his actual conduct in the world. He was making the mistake, which metaphysical fools tend to make, that there is no connection between your inner moral quality and the level of courtesy you present to others.

Smart people who’ve thought about this usually understand that the habits we put in practice end up shaping the people we are within. “Manners are of more importance than laws,” Edmund Burke wrote. “Manners are what vex or soothe, corrupt or purify, exalt or debase, barbarize or refine us, by a constant, steady, uniform, insensible operation, like that of the air we breathe in.”

In his extremely French book, “A Small Treatise on the Great Virtues,” the contemporary philosopher André Comte-Sponville argues that “politeness is the first virtue, and the origin perhaps of all the others.” Politeness is a discipline that compels respectful behavior. Morality, he writes “is like a politeness of the soul, an etiquette of the inner life, a code of duties, a ceremonial of the essential.” (I told you it was very French.)

Jane Austen is the novelist most famous for advocating this point of view. In her novel “Emma,” the lead character is rude to a foolish and verbose old woman named Miss Bates. Emma’s friend George Knightley rebukes her.

If Miss Bates were rich or smart or your equal, maybe this rudeness would have been tolerable, Mr. Knightley tells her, but “she is poor; she has sunk from the comforts she was born to; and, if she live to old age, must probably sink more. Her situation should secure your compassion. It was badly done, indeed!”

I don’t give myself high marks on suffering fools. I’m not rude to those I consider foolish, but I strenuously and lamentably evade them. But I do see people who handle fools well. Many members of the clergy do, as do many great teachers. In my experience, Midwesterners are more likely to treat fools well. Natural politicians do so, too. Joe Biden is effective because he loves humanity in all its shapes and sizes.

G. K. Chesterton had the best advice on suffering fools gladly. He put emphasis on the gladly. When you’re with fools, laugh with them and at them simultaneously: “An obvious instance is that of ordinary and happy marriage. A man and a woman cannot live together without having against each other a kind of everlasting joke. Each has discovered that the other is a fool, but a great fool. This largeness, this grossness and gorgeousness of folly is the thing which we all find about those with whom we are in intimate contact; and it is the one enduring basis of affection, and even of respect.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/opinion/brooks-suffering-fools-gladly.html


ht tp://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/opinion/brooks-suffering-fools-gladly.html





Suffering those who say "suffer fools gladly"
by Robert Fulford
The National Post, April 23, 2002
http://www.robertfulford.com/SufferFools.html


When George Harrison died, Paul McCartney said, "He was a great guy, full of love for humanity, but he didn't suffer fools gladly." When Northrop Frye died, Margaret Atwood wrote: "He didn't suffer fools gladly ..." When Stephen Harper became head of the Canadian Alliance, a professor in Edmonton told a reporter, "He doesn't suffer fools gladly." Emily Carr, in her wretched years as a landlady, was "never one to suffer fools gladly," according to a publication of the museum in Victoria. The Associated Press once reported that Hedy Lamarr was much smarter than the world knew -- and, by the way, didn't suffer fools gladly.

What were all those people trying to express, and why were they all using the same words? There's something puzzling going on here, because that term makes no sense if you think about it. To say that someone doesn't suffer fools gladly implies that there are others who do. Can this be the case? Are there individuals (never mentioned in newspapers, incidentally) who eagerly cultivate the acquaintanceship of fools and enjoy their company? Surely theirs can be no more than a minority taste. The absence of it hardly merits comment. So when writers and others use that phrase, they don't mean it literally. They are trying to make a point without stating it.

Suffer-fools-gladly, a malleable euphemism, carries a rich load of ambiguity. Everyone who uses it means something different, and readers take from it whatever they choose. If it's said often enough about the same person, we may guess it's an oblique attack. It suggests that the subject is brusque to the point of rudeness, uncaring about the feelings of others, given to rages when crossed. Often it's an attempt to avoid risking offence while describing someone totally disagreeable.

McCartney probably meant Harrison got angry when people disappointed him. Atwood had noticed that Frye could be devastating when confronted by pretentious ignorance, though the honest ignorance of young students aroused his compassion. And my guess is the reference to Stephen Harper meant he can't stand stupid journalists and won't hide his dislike. But these are mostly my own speculative readings.

There's apparently no limit to the individual humans who merit this versatile little formulation. The Rocky Mountain News of Denver has noted that James Garner doesn't suffer fools gladly. How about Robert B. Parker, the mystery writer? He doesn't do it either.

Nor does Ed Harris, the actor. Last year, the Toronto Sun broke the news that Harris's "penetrating gaze signals that this is a serious, sombre man on a singular quest ... he does not suffer fools gladly, if at all." Someone went around and checked out James Woods and discovered he didn't do it either. The same could be said of the late Frank Zappa, and was.

Astrologers (at least some of them) say Aquarians are particularly unwilling to suffer fools gladly. That's because Aquarians are sensitive and intelligent, a thought that as an Aquarian I'd find flattering if only I believed the motions of the planets meant something.

Suffer-fools-gladly also works as thinly disguised self-praise. When Stephanie Zacharek wrote in Slate magazine that the late Pauline Kael didn't suffer fools gladly, she let us know that she, Stephanie, was close enough to Pauline to be able to depict her intimately ("her voice, coquettish and musical and airy as meringue, somehow softened even her sharpest zingers"). This neatly made the point that Stephanie herself was no fool (unless, of course, Pauline made an exception in her case).

Writers of obituaries have always been drawn to the vagueness of suffer-fools-gladly. Obits, of course, frequently appear in code. "Confirmed bachelor," for instance, means homosexual, and "lived life to the full" often means a drunk. I recently came across an English writer who, translating obituary language, explained that "didn't suffer fools gladly" means "cantankerous old git."

Intellectuals have used this cliché to portray other intellectuals for longer than anyone can remember. It was often said about Henry David Thoreau, except by those who thought that his incessant blithering about living with nature made him look like a bit of a fool himself. In 1916, Bernard Shaw applied it to Henry Sweet, one of the phoneticians who inspired the character of Henry Higgins in Pygmalion and My Fair Lady. Sweet's great ability should have won him official recognition and helped him to popularize his subject, Shaw said, but he disliked academic dignitaries and (though not ill-natured) "was about as conciliatory to conventional mortals as Ibsen or Samuel Butler." He "would not suffer fools gladly," Shaw added. And a couple of months ago, in the Partisan Review, someone wrote about the character that Philip Roth based on Bernard Malamud in The Ghost Writer: "He does not suffer fools gladly, nor is he easily impressed by other writers ..."

Referring to an earlier column, a few readers have suggested that I refrain from blaming all the sexual ills of Christianity on St. Paul. Fair enough, but in the case of "suffer fools gladly," Paul must accept complete responsibility. It's his phrase. It occurs in one of his renowned letters, II Corinthians 11:19 -- "For ye suffer fools gladly, seeing ye yourselves are wise."

He was writing to people who needed straightening out, the Corinthians. In those days, Corinth was such a fleshpot that "Corinth" became a synonym for coitus. Paul didn't consider Corinthians wise at all, and was putting them in their place with sarcasm. Or so one gathers. This means that modern writers misuse him if (as sometimes happens) they make his phrase describe someone of stern intelligence who has the good sense to avoid the foolish. Paul wrote in mockery.

Which leaves a question: Who, in the history of the world, ever did suffer fools gladly? Well, Shakespeare did, obviously. Since he gave them so many roles, he must have liked having them around. Others, less great, may enjoy fools as part of the human comedy, perhaps bearing in mind that all of us are fools sometimes, some of us fools often. In fact, I live in hope of reading someday an obituary that says: "He was wise and talented, greatly accomplished, and much admired, above all for his ability to suffer fools gladly."



http://www.robertfulford.com/SufferFools.html


ht tp://www.robertfulford.com/SufferFools.html
 
Last edited:

Interesting


Potential Impact of Saudi Arabian Oil Exports on Global Supply/Demand Balances 2013 to 2020

In our continuing debate about the outlook for energy securities, we all agree that the price of crude oil (and natural gas) will be the largest and least-predictive variable. Those favoring a conservative view cite the near certainty of rising North American liquids production, and declining demand for petroleum products throughout much of the industrialized world, as evidence that supply may exceed demand, leading to lower oil prices. While we know this can occur, I offer a different viewpoint based on two less-discussed topics; the likelihood of declining oil exports from Saudi Arabia and that country’s need to maintain high prices to fund its daunting social spending.

One thing most of us can agree upon is that Saudi Aramco (the Saudi Arabian National Oil Company) has been, and will continue to be, the #1 swing producer, raising or lowering output to meet global demand. Having spent over forty years studying geology and politics of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), I remain surprised at how little this is understood by many oil analysts and the degree to which they may be missing evidence of that country’s rapidly maturing export capability.

Let’s begin with a few accepted facts:

• Saudi Aramco production peaked in 2009 at nearly 12 Million barrels per day (bpd).
• Production is now closer to 9.6 Million bpd as an accommodation for weak global demand and rising non-OPEC output from the United States and Canada.
• The Kingdom also produces about 2.0 Million bpd of natural gas liquids used, primarily, as feedstock for its huge petrochemical industry.
• Claimed “proven reserves” remain at 265 billion barrels, the same figure for about the past thirty years.
• As KSA has averaged 7 Million bpd over this time frame, they would have produced 77Billion of these 265 Billion barrels.
• Domestic oil consumption has been rising rapidly. From 1.6 Million bpd in 2000, it is now closer to 3.0 Million bpd and rising at an accelerating rate.
• Natural decline rates in its existing fields remain a hotly debated topic. The Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources claims it is about 3%/year. My years of research, including interviews with dozens of drilling engineers and foreign service companies, suggests the number is larger – possibly closer to 7%/year.​

Given these apparent “facts”, what does all this mean for the global oil industry? It raises several vital questions, each of which will have meaningful impact on future supply/demand balances;
• Has Saudi Aramco really replaced the estimated 77 Billion barrels produced since 1983? While aware of several important new discoveries (Safaniya, Khurais, Shaybah and Manifa), only two of these are Arab Light crude while the other two are much lower grade, high sulfur Arab Heavy which is less attractive to Eastern Hemisphere refiners. Likewise these fields were developed at high cost in order to replace the Kingdom’s ultra-low cost, 70 Billion barrel Ghawar field that produces 5 million of their 9.6 million bpd.
• Domestic consumption is the largest “wild card” for projecting KSA export potential. As noted earlier, this figure has nearly doubled to 3.0 Million bpd in the past decade. Up to one-third of this is used as fuel for their electric utilities where demand growth is soaring to support new industrial plants and water desalination. Given internal demand rising much faster than production, Aramco’s CEO, Khalid al-Falih, warns that domestic consumption may double again by 2020 unless replaced either by natural gas or unwelcomed economizing. The implication of this statement is significant. Assuming, as I believe one should, that Saudi Arabia remains at 9.5 Million bpd by 2020, but raises consumption to 6 Million bpd, that leaves 3.5 Million for export versus a current 6.5 Million bpd. This reduction of 3.0 Million bpd would be a very convenient “accommodation” for the United States and Canada where production may rise by a comparable amount.
• The obvious best alternative for Saudis would be to expand natural gas production for use as industrial fuel and electricity generation. The country is actively exploring for such reserves with a clear shift away from oil to Natural Gas targets, employing global service giants like Schlumberger, Halliburton and Baker Hughes. While meeting with some success, it must offset declines in production of “associated gas” (that produced with crude oil) which represents nearly 60% of their 3.6 Trillion Cubic Feet of annual output. As a country with the fifth largest gas reserves in the world (behind Russia, Iran, Qatar and United States), we can foresee rising dry gas production but potentially significant loss of associated gas. One might ask the logical question; “why not import gas from Qatar, its next door neighbor?” Here is where geopolitics comes forward. You only need to spend time in these two countries to measure their enmity for each other, including Wahhabi Sunni versus Shiite bitterness, to understand why economic logic can be overwhelmed by personal/religious rivalries. It appears that politics surpasses logic, leading Saudi Aramco to spend billions annually to become a major natural gas producer despite having the world’s largest natural gas deposit (Qatar’s North field) right next door where gas is converted to Liquid Natural Gas rather than being piped to the giant oilfields and petrochemical plants of its next door neighbor.​

The “bottom line” of this discussion, quite simply, is that energy investors should increasingly focus on Saudi Arabia’s likely declining crude oil exports in coming years, both due to their rising internal consumption and need to make room for rising North American output. The other reason why this will happen is the country’s huge “social contract” with its population that is about 90% Sunni and 10% Shiite. That latter 10% represent key workers in their large Eastern Province oilfields. Were they to become restive, as they have in the past, the Kingdom’s stability would be threatened as has happened with the Arab Spring throughout North Africa, Syria and another neighbor – Bahrain. While subject to some debate over definitions, it is my belief that Saudi needs about $110/barrel for its Arab Light crude just to meet budgetary commitments that include huge subsidies for all citizens. This is one other reason that, despite its occasional accommodative comments about supporting “fair prices” for oil, to support struggling world economies, they will make every effort to keep global prices well above $100/barrel. That implies domestic (West Texas Intermediate) should remain above $90/barrel in coming years, assuming no economic collapse or military conflicts.

The above scenario makes our outlook for oil exploration and services reasonably positive in the next few years.
 
Last edited:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...y-republicans-as-pejorative-entitlements.html




Entitlement Programs: Social Security and Medicare
By David J. Lynch
April 15, 2013

President Barack Obama says Social Security and Medicare fulfill “the guarantee of a secure retirement,” providing Americans benefits they have earned through a working lifetime of contributions.

Republican House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan looks at a broad array of so-called entitlement programs and sees a corrosive effect. “More and more able-bodied people are becoming dependent upon the government,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” in January. Left unchecked, Republicans say, Obama’s “entitlement society” will bankrupt the nation.

Republicans have been working to convert the once-neutral entitlement label into a negative, potentially making it easier for Congress to shave social spending. That move was underscored last year when presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who chose Ryan as his running mate, castigated 47 percent of Americans “who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it” in a private talk to campaign donors.

“‘Entitlement’ used to be a fairly positive thing,” said historian Edward Berkowitz, an expert on social-welfare policy at George Washington University in Washington. “Now, the term is being changed. Entitlement is this form of social spending that’s getting out of control.”

Under Obama, voters received their first new entitlement in almost half a century with the expansion of health insurance to tens of millions of the uninsured. Now, with the president’s new budget containing proposals to lower spending on Social Security and Medicare, Americans are about to discover the limits of their entitlement to government help.

New Formula
In a bid for a deal with Republicans to cut the deficit, Obama last week proposed changing the formula for calculating cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security recipients, which could mean benefits 10 years from now about 3 percent lower than previously projected. Medicare spending will be trimmed by reducing payments to doctors, hospitals and drugmakers while requiring more affluent patients to pay more.

Spending on Social Security and what the White House describes as “means-tested entitlements” -- including Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps and jobless benefits -- rose 40 percent over the decade ending in 2012, according to White House budget documents. That was more than twice the inflation- adjusted increase in the size of the economy over that period.

Still, any cutbacks are risky, with public support for the largest entitlement programs unwavering. Eighty-seven percent of respondents to a Pew Research Center poll favored increasing Social Security spending or keeping it the same compared with 10 percent who backed cuts. Respondents rejected Medicare cuts by 82 percent to 15 percent, according to the Feb. 13-18 survey.

Good Deal
Yet while Democrats portray the most costly entitlements as benefits that voters have paid for, typical wage-earners retiring in 2010 will receive at least $3 for every $1 they contributed to the Medicare health-insurance program, according to an Urban Institute study. Some will do even better: A married couple with one worker earning the average wage will reap more than six times their Medicare contributions.

From the start of both programs, Americans were conditioned to regard Social Security and Medicare as special. “The checks will come to you as a right,” explained a 1936 government pamphlet that introduced the program.

President Franklin Roosevelt, who proposed Social Security, later said he had established a dedicated funding source to protect the program from future political attacks.

“We put those payroll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and unemployment benefits,” Roosevelt said. “With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.”

Entitled Elderly
President Lyndon Johnson created a similar mechanism to support Medicare. And in signing legislation creating the health-insurance program for the elderly in 1965, he said of the 65-and-older population, “they are entitled” to medical care.

In 1972, Congress indexed Social Security benefits to increase automatically each year to match rising inflation. As the consumer price index grew at an average annual rate of 7.9 percent over the next five years, indexation cemented Americans’ view that they had a right to their monthly checks unlike other government services.

The 1974 law that created the modern budgetary process mentioned lawmakers’ “entitlement authority” to make payments to those “who meet the requirements established by such law” - - possibly the first official use of the phrase.

‘Not Welfare’
Andrew Biggs, a former principal deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration, says the term reflects the “automatic” nature of such spending unlike so-called discretionary programs whose outlays Congress adjusts each year.

“These are not welfare payments,” he says. “They’re benefits you get for paying the taxes you pay. It shouldn’t actually be taken as pejorative.”

In 1981, “entitlements” came into wider use, according to “Debt and Taxes,” a book by John Makin and Norman Ornstein. On June 24 of that year, President Ronald Reagan said the “automatic spending programs, what we called entitlements” were mushrooming in cost “and our elected representatives don’t have any control over them.”

Speaking at the annual convention of the Jaycees in San Antonio, the new president decried what he labeled “budgetary time bombs set to explode in the years ahead.”

Still, for years, “entitlement” remained a non- controversial term, merely reflecting legal eligibility for specified government benefits.

‘Social Insurance’
“Many of us who are of a certain age grew up with it, so we’re used to it,” says Jared Bernstein, 57, a former top economic adviser to Vice President Joe Biden. “But I prefer ‘social insurance,’ which I think is more accurate.”

Though “entitlement” is widely used by Democrats as well as Republicans, economist Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research says the term’s meaning has been altered by “people who want to see cuts in the programs.”

To most voters, the dedicated payroll tax that funds the two major social insurance systems is what distinguishes them from programs supported by general tax revenue.

Social Security is financed by a 12.4 percent payroll tax, evenly divided between employee and employer. In 2010, the last year before a temporary reduction in the tax was enacted to spur the economy, Social Security drew 93 percent of its annual funding from payroll and other dedicated taxes.

Almost Exhausted
Social Security’s disability trust fund is expected to be exhausted in 2016, though in the past Congress used funds from the program’s retirement account to cover shortfalls. Social Security will have sufficient income to pay full retirement benefits through 2033, according to its trustees.

Americans paid $195.6 billion in Medicare taxes in 2011, according to the most recent government data. That program, which spent $549 billion that year, is projected to run short of money in 2024.

Early Social Security beneficiaries got the best return on their contributions. A two-income couple with both individuals earning an average wage of $44,600 who reached age 65 in 1960 received more than seven times as much in lifetime benefits as they paid in payroll taxes, according to C. Eugene Steuerle and Caleb Quakenbush of the Urban Institute.

The retirement program has become less generous as the payroll tax has increased from the original 2 percent rate and the retirement age has been gradually raised. The same couple turning 65 in 2010 would be expected to roughly break even on their lifetime Social Security contributions.

Moral Issue
Medicare is becoming a better deal as health-care costs rise. That average couple retiring in 2010 can anticipate receiving $387,000 in lifetime benefits in return for just $122,000 in taxes.

“You’re entitled to get what you paid in,” says Biggs, now at the American Enterprise Institute. “Are you entitled to three times what you paid? Legally, yes, you are. But morally, of course you’re not. If people want benefits, they need to pay for them.”

For the average-wage couple reaching age 65 in 2030, the Medicare payback will approach four times their lifetime contributions. They can expect $664,000 in lifetime benefits compared with $180,000 in contributions.

The disparity between contributions and benefits means Medicare is becoming increasingly dependent upon general government revenue.

Claiming Victory
In 2011, payroll taxes and premiums covered 48.1 percent of Medicare’s total spending while the Treasury paid 41 percent of the bills.

In 2001, the share of Medicare costs covered by general government revenue was 30 percent. The addition of a new prescription drug benefit in 2003 without additional financing, along with continued aging and rising medical-care costs, is draining government coffers.

Berkowitz, the historian, says both sides in the debate over reducing government spending will use language allowing them to ultimately claim victory.

The administration’s “sensible” embrace of changing Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustments -- or “chained CPI” -- masks a policy shift that will reduce benefits.

“It’s so technical that nobody gets it,” he says. “So we can argue in the end that we cut spending and preserved the programs.”




http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...y-republicans-as-pejorative-entitlements.html
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...r-files-for-bankruptcy-after-selling-art.html



How Halsey Minor Blew Tech Fortune on Way to Bankruptcy
By Dawn McCarty and Ari Levy
May 31, 2013

How do you sell the technology company you founded for $1.8 billion and five years later, file for personal bankruptcy? For Halsey Minor, it may have been a fascination for houses, hotels, horses and art.

Minor, 47, who sold CNET Networks Inc. to CBS Corp. in 2008, says he owes as much as $100 million and only has, at most, $50 million to pay his debts thanks to bad bets on real estate and other ventures that took him out of what he calls his technology comfort zone.

He’s made sure that he won’t be the only one who’s uncomfortable. There’s no money for his unsecured creditors, he said in his bankruptcy petition, which seeks to hand over all his eligible assets to a court official who will sell them to the highest bidder and wipe Minor’s finances clean for whatever he decides to do next.

“Choosing Chapter 7 is clearing the slate,” said Bob Rattet, a bankruptcy lawyer in White Plains, New York. “He isn’t required like Middle America to pay his debts, because they’re mostly business-related.”

The bankruptcy petition, filed May 24 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Los Angeles, listed assets of as much as $50 million and debt of as much as $100 million. In Chapter 7, an impartial trustee is appointed to administer the case and sell assets such as automobiles.

Minor Ventures invested in early-stage technology startups including GrandCentral Communications Inc., which Google Inc. bought in 2007 for about $65 million and renamed Google Voice.

Blue-Eyed Nurse
Since then, Minor has been selling his art collection to pay debts. In 2010, he sold a painting of a blue-eyed nurse by Richard Prince and an aluminum couch by Marc Newson to help raise $21.1 million for his creditors. Proceeds from the sales went toward a $21.6 million judgment obtained in October 2009 by ML Private Finance, a Bank of America Corp. affiliate, on a delinquent loan.

In April 2010, Sotheby’s Inc. won a $6.6 million judgment against him in connection with three artworks he bought at auction and later refused to pay for.

Minor didn’t respond to an e-mail seeking comment on the Los Angeles filing. His lawyer, David Shemano of Peitzman Weg LLP in Los Angeles, didn’t respond to an e-mail. Minor netted $200 million from his sale of CNET, according to a press report.

‘Financial Risk’
“I love being an entrepreneur even though it involves financial risk,” Minor, a native of Charlottesville, Virginia, said in an e-mailed statement cited by his hometown’s Daily Progress newspaper. “But if you win some you are going to lose some too.”

“A case might have been made that I should never have strayed from technology,” Minor said in the e-mail, according to the Daily Progress. “However, I like doing things outside my comfort zone, and I believe that willingness in part accounts for my tech successes.”

After years of technology investing, Minor embraced real estate. In February 2008, Minor bought the Carter’s Grove Plantation from Virginia’s Colonial Williamsburg Foundation for $15.3 million. The 400-plus acre estate, with a mile of frontage on the James River, was at one time a museum. Its 12-bedroom Georgian mansion was built for Carter Burwell, a scion of one of the richest families in colonial Virginia, in the 1750s. Architect magazine said Minor planned to raise racehorses on the property.

Carter’s Grove
Carter’s Grove filed for bankruptcy protection in San Francisco in 2011, according to Minor’s petition. The case later was transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia. Minor put Minor Family Hotels LLC into bankruptcy in 2010 and the case is pending in the Western District of Virginia, according to court papers.

Creditors listed in the Los Angeles filing include Sotheby’s, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Ship Art International and AVN Air LLC, as well as several law firms.

Minor also listed Claiborne Farm, Lanes End Stallions, KESMARC Kentucky and Braeburn Training Center among his creditors. Amounts owed to each creditor weren’t disclosed.

“No funds will be available for distribution to unsecured creditors,” according to the petition.

Minor had at least one brush with bankruptcy early on. It was the early 1990s, and he was trying to get CNET off the ground, Businessweek reported then. He had maxed out his credit cards, expenses were piling up “and he was $40,000 in the hole,” according to the magazine.

Second Investment
Microsoft Corp. co-founder Paul Allen invested $2.5 million in August 1994 and made a second investment of the same amount later, giving the company a chance, Fortune reported in 2008.

Minor had a falling out with fellow backers of 12 Entrepreneuring Inc., a business incubator he started in 2000 with Internet veteran Eric Greenberg, amid allegations of lavish spending as startup investing began falling out of favor.

The incubator had raised more than $130 million from investors including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, angel investor Ron Conway and venture firm Benchmark Capital, which had made a fortune from an early investment in EBay Inc. Directors included Marc Andreessen, the co-founder of Netscape Communications Corp., and EBay founder Pierre Omidyar.

“This was the dream team,” Conway told Businessweek in a November 2001 article. Conway led a revolt to recoup the investor group’s money, raising questions over $45 million in office-lease commitments and $13 million on furnishings and technology equipment, Businessweek reported. Halsey eventually returned 40 percent of the capital, Fortune reported in 2008.

Conway declined to comment.

Under 40
12 Entrepreneuring invested in at least three companies -- Propel Software Corp., iBuilding Inc. and NotifyMe Networks -- before closing in 2001. That year, Fortune ranked Minor as the 34th wealthiest American under the age of 40, with a net worth of $180.2 million.

Minor was also an early investor in Salesforce.com Inc., a pioneer in online-business software founded in 1999. He also served on Salesforce’s board. In 2003, Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff joined the board of GrandCentral Communications Inc., an Internet company Minor founded after CNET.

Benioff didn’t immediately have a comment.

Minor is a graduate of the University of Virginia with a degree in anthropology. He grew up in Charlottesville and attended Woodberry Forest School, a private, all-male boarding school in Woodberry Forest, Virginia.

Shelby Bonnie, who co-founded CNET with Minor, declined to comment.

Beverly Hills
The home listed on Minor’s filing is in the 90210 zip code made famous by the television series. It’s a two-story white brick house in the “flats” of Beverly Hills, in a neighborhood of single-family homes just off of Wilshire Boulevard, near the Beverly Hilton hotel. While these aren’t the larger, more ostentatious homes in the “hills” of Beverly Hills, they can still fetch high valuations. One residence nearby sold for $3.2 million in November.

A woman came to the door of the house, but didn’t open it to a reporter. There were three SUVs in the driveway -- a black Mercedes Benz, a black Range Rover and a black GMC Yukon. Gardeners were mowing the lawn, and there was a bike parked in the driveway.

The woman shook her head “no” when asked if Minor was home and then walked away from the door.



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...r-files-for-bankruptcy-after-selling-art.html
 
Back
Top