WhiteRose
Com-passionate flower
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2002
- Posts
- 1,269
No really, this IS about fried chicken.
Just got back from the grocery store (one of my least favorite tasks), and was thinking about meat and how healthy it really is or isn't. This isn't about eating meat vs. not eating meat, I just have a question about the quality of cooked meat that I'm hoping someone can answer.
I know there are plenty of healthy ways to cook chicken, and I know you can still buy range-fed chicken (at higher costs usually), but for the sake of a one on one comparison, I want to compare the average fried chicken eaten 100 years ago (skin on, deep fried) to the average fried chicken eaten today (skin on, deep fried).
100 years ago, the chicken was raised in the barnyard, ran around, was mostly muscle, and had little fat. However it was fried in lard. Today chickens are penned up in little cages where they can barely move and force-fed all kinds of stuff to make them bigger and juicier, and they also have a ton of fat in them, though generally they're fried in "better" oils. So which one is actually better for you?
And my second question is simply, if you do "fry" chicken (this can include oven-fried), what's your favorite recipe? I've never actually fried chicken myself, but I'm always looking for new recipes.
Thanks!
Just got back from the grocery store (one of my least favorite tasks), and was thinking about meat and how healthy it really is or isn't. This isn't about eating meat vs. not eating meat, I just have a question about the quality of cooked meat that I'm hoping someone can answer.
I know there are plenty of healthy ways to cook chicken, and I know you can still buy range-fed chicken (at higher costs usually), but for the sake of a one on one comparison, I want to compare the average fried chicken eaten 100 years ago (skin on, deep fried) to the average fried chicken eaten today (skin on, deep fried).
100 years ago, the chicken was raised in the barnyard, ran around, was mostly muscle, and had little fat. However it was fried in lard. Today chickens are penned up in little cages where they can barely move and force-fed all kinds of stuff to make them bigger and juicier, and they also have a ton of fat in them, though generally they're fried in "better" oils. So which one is actually better for you?
And my second question is simply, if you do "fry" chicken (this can include oven-fried), what's your favorite recipe? I've never actually fried chicken myself, but I'm always looking for new recipes.
Thanks!