Former White House Staffer Anthony Scaramucci giving his reasons for endorsing Harris.

SevMax2

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
6,264

This is a man who worked closely with Trump...and doesn't back him for another term in the White House. It's very...fascinating.
 

This is a man who worked closely with Trump...and doesn't back him for another term in the White House. It's very...fascinating.
I think you’ve been doing better lately of making yourself out to be the new moderate/independent. 👍 (Sad face for RandyRebecca, though I’m sure her Jill Stein lovin ass will pop up again soon).

Lemme just say that, for me, when it comes to this upcoming election that I still find you and others who try to normalize republicans, current conservative policy, and trump as the flip side to democrats pretty frustrating. Yeah, let’s go with ‘frustrating’ over me saying expletives.

So… like this here post of yours. I’m glad you posted and more of these please but it’s not ‘fascinating’ at all that Scaramucci holds this position. He’s long let it be known his regrets on shilling for the orange asshole. Did you not hear any of the republicans speaking at the DNC? Hear of the over 40 administration officials condemning trump? Liz and Dick Cheney? The recently posted 700 or so security analysts warning of the dangers of another trump presidency? You feed in to the belief of mine that anyone still waffling on trump is really, deep breath and no cursing, out of touch on key things.

Here’s the good news! I actually believe that you’re heading in the right direction and will make the correct and democracy defending choice. Yay you! Until then I guess you and I will have to put up with being ‘fascinated’ with each other’s opinions.
 
Last edited:
Disgruntled former employee. Not surprising in what he now says.
 
The guy who hires
Disgruntled former employee. Not surprising in what he now says.
The guy who only hires the best people 🙄 sure does seem to have alotta disgruntled former employees.
 
The guy who hires

The guy who only hires the best people 🙄 sure does seem to have alotta disgruntled former employees.

This isn't surprising considering how large Trump's empire is.

Especially when compared to someone who has never employed anyone and therefore cannot have ANY employees, disgruntled or not.
 
This isn't surprising considering how large Trump's empire is.

Especially when compared to someone who has never employed anyone and therefore cannot have ANY employees, disgruntled or not.

Haha! That boot tastes good doesn’t it?
Don’t forget the sides where the dog poop has gathered. At no point does it occur to you to question the employer. Haha!

Yeah, your honor, my client is innocent. The 3 gunshot wounds to the head indicate to me that this is a suicide. 🙄
 
It should be important to note that someone with the inside track on Trump who exposes him is a bit more impressive if he doesn't completely buy into the kind of usual political disposition of most Trump detractors, that is, pro-war, pro-elite, neoconservative or neoliberal leaning, that kind of person. The Cheneys in particular aren't the kind of ringing endorsement anyone would want as a selling point to swing voters or anyone else. They were very much guilty of the kind of warmongering foreign policy and surveillance state apparatus that one tends to view with suspicion (and that traditionally included a lot of progressive/populist Democrats, of course). Someone like me, who went from a Ron Paul Republican in 2012 to a reluctant Democrat in 2016 because I didn't consider Trump to be fit for the Commander-in-Chief role and I actually worried about his potential for autocracy, and then a Bernie/Tulsi/Mike Gravel type of Democrat by 2019/2020 out of disgust for the DNC establishment, well, endorsements from people who still hold with Raytheon, the national security experts who got Iraq horribly wrong (the usual ones, anyway), and the top brass who were exposed in the Afghanistan Papers aren't the most persuasive ones. My anti-war stance hasn't fundamentally changed since about 2004 (and some version of it existed even during Kosovo/Somalia). The same with my anti Drug War stance, come to think of it. Hell, I voted Libertarian in 2008, bolting the GOP rather than backing McCain, largely because of Palin and because of McCain's excessive hawkishness.
 
Last edited:
Disgruntled former employee. Not surprising in what he now says.
You keep dismissing all these endorsements by current Republicans, military, former employees, and basically anyone else who endorses the future POTUS.

Why?
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...r&cvid=ede0bcf999184708b5fe9d7447ca5861&ei=18

This is from Reuters, one of the mainstream media sources that I find a bit more trustworthy than others. This election is still one helluva nail-biter. It really could come down to a couple thousand votes in a single state like Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, Georgia, or North Carolina. She could win the popular vote quite handily and still have to worry about the outcome in a state so close that an automatic recount is triggered. He's likely to be underestimated in the Electoral College and overestimated in the popular vote, to be perfectly frank.
 
Back
Top