Former Top Baltimore Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby...

[Rightguide]

Former Top Baltimore Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby Who Previously Threatened to Prosecute Federal Agents Sent by Trump to Stop BLM Riots, Found GUILTY in Mortagage Fraud​

By Anthony Scott Feb. 7, 2024 11:40 am

Former top Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby was found guilty on Tuesday on one count of mortgage fraud.

Mosby, who previously served two terms as the State’s Attorney for Baltimore, was found guilty of mortgage fraud after testifying that she made false statements on loan applications in order to buy two vacation homes in Florida.

In November, Mosby was found guilty of two federal counts of perjury after falsely claiming she had financial hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to access funds from the city’s retirement fund.

Mosby has yet to be sentenced in either case.

More here: My my, two racist trump hating prosecutors exposed as criminals in their own right. Amazing.

 

[ll74]

And?

The conflation and contortion here is fun.

 

[DeluxAuto]

My my, two racist trump hating prosecutors exposed as criminals in their own right. Amazing.

A million trump hating prosecutors being exposed as criminals doesn't make trump less of a criminal, dumbass.

 

[ll74]

Actually, now that I really read the full headline, the author is a genius for intersecting like four of the major trigger points for MAGA dipshits into one headline.

Independent woman
Black Lives. Matter
Trump hating
Baltimore (big city)

It's like maga freaks were driving down the highway and they immediately had to take a left turn to this piece of shit article because they had no control over their brain.

 

[dmallord]

It sounds like Marilyn encountered a legal justice system Trump faced - and still faces. One that found her guilty of Trump-like issues involving inflating his net worth to obtain more favorable loan terms. Isn't that indicative of an evenhanded justice system working the way we expect? No one seemed to be screaming it was a political witch hunt on her part anyway.

Trump - guilty - but denying it. Marilyn - guilty - but denying it. Sounds like Donald still doesn't get it—thumbs up for justice.

Rightguide has found evidence that justice prevails and isn't colored by political vindictiveness.

 

[Rotadom]

Former Top Baltimore Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby Who Previously Threatened to Prosecute Federal Agents Sent by Trump to Stop BLM Riots, Found GUILTY in Mortagage Fraud​

By Anthony Scott Feb. 7, 2024 11:40 am

Former top Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby was found guilty on Tuesday on one count of mortgage fraud.

Mosby, who previously served two terms as the State’s Attorney for Baltimore, was found guilty of mortgage fraud after testifying that she made false statements on loan applications in order to buy two vacation homes in Florida.

In November, Mosby was found guilty of two federal counts of perjury after falsely claiming she had financial hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to access funds from the city’s retirement fund.

Mosby has yet to be sentenced in either case.

More here: My my, two racist trump hating prosecutors exposed as criminals in their own right. Amazing.

Oh, so you lied when you said that Dems don't get investigated/prosecuted. Just add this to your previous piles of bullshit.

 

[goldytheGoldfish]

Meh. Is this the news now? It's history and forgotten at that. The only relevant statistic about Baltimore I know is the murder rate, which is quite high. Kind of like DC.

 

[Rotadom]

Meh. Is this the news now? It's history and forgotten at that. The only relevant statistic about Baltimore I know is the murder rate, which is quite high. Kind of like DC.

Proclaiming your disinterest and ignorance on the topic is certainly a reason to post about it.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Meh. Is this the news now? It's history and forgotten at that. The only relevant statistic about Baltimore I know is the murder rate, which is quite high. Kind of like DC.

Baltimore's rate is pretty high, #2 in the US behind St,Louis which is #1. Washington is #19, not even in the top ten. I'd not call that close when comparing the two.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Baltimore Sees Significant Year-Over-Year Violent Crime Reduction in January

The first month of 2024 showed a continuing downward trend in homicides and non-fatal shootings citywide after 2023’s historic drop.

 

[icanhelp1]

It sounds like Marilyn encountered a legal justice system Trump faced - and still faces. One that found her guilty of Trump-like issues involving inflating his net worth to obtain more favorable loan terms. Isn't that indicative of an evenhanded justice system working the way we expect? No one seemed to be screaming it was a political witch hunt on her part anyway.

Trump - guilty - but denying it. Marilyn - guilty - but denying it. Sounds like Donald still doesn't get it—thumbs up for justice.

Rightguide has found evidence that justice prevails and isn't colored by political vindictiveness.

Two entirely different scenarios, it appears she falsified documents claiming financial hardship to use covid funds.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/...-baltimore-city-states-attorney-marilyn-mosby

 

[icanhelp1]

Two entirely different scenarios, it appears she falsified documents claiming financial hardship to use covid funds.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/...-baltimore-city-states-attorney-marilyn-mosby

Do black women have a problem with authority and power?

 

[dmallord]

Two entirely different scenarios, it appears she falsified documents claiming financial hardship to use covid funds.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/...-baltimore-city-states-attorney-marilyn-mosby

A Republican and a Democrat committed fraud, and the equal justice system prevailed. That's the point - that they were different types of cases was not relevant to my observation.

 

[icanhelp1]

A Republican and a Democrat committed fraud, and the equal justice system prevailed. That's the point - that they were different types of cases was not relevant to my observation.

Trump didn’t commit fraud and Trump isn’t an officer of the court.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

Trump didn’t commit fraud and Trump isn’t an officer of the court.

Donald Trump has already been found guilty of fraud.

 

[icanhelp1]

Donald Trump has already been found guilty of fraud.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...is_this_what_we_want_from_a_legal_system.html

Engoron’s unconstitutional overreach explained; If your concerns are for fair and equal application of the law over hatred for Trump then this explanation is common sense.

Identifying an individual then find a criminal statute to apply is ass backward lawfare. This is a perfect case for abuse of power. Both Letitia James and judge Engoron should be reprimanded by the higher court and possibly barred from practicing law.

“JONATHAN TURLEY: Well, this court really proved Oscar Wilde's rule that, "The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it." Because the court has done everything short of ordering that Trump be thrown into a wood chipper. He's imposed almost the maximum amount that James requested. He's barring him from doing business in the city where he's an iconic business figure, barring him from getting loans.

The last part is particularly ironic because the banks not only said that they were not victims and did not complain about the alleged fraud, but they said that they wanted to do more business with Trump. They described him as a "whale" client. So this is all being done essentially in their name as victims, even though no one lost any money.

None of us could find a case like this. Yet, the first one, you have this fortune that is being demanded by the court to be turned over. I think there are real problems here. I think that this is going to have the same impact on some appellate judges. There have to be some limits, including Constitutional limits on the size of penalties, this is confiscatory and in my view, just excessive.

You know, I think there's a major appeal obviously that will come. I was hoping the court would defy its critics and show a more moderate response. To show that yes, there were assets that were undervalued and overvalued, but to impose a more reasonable fine.

Many of us believed that there were cases of valuation problems. But those are ubiquitous in this field of real estate. This is extremely common for businesses to undervalue property, to try to lower tax costs, and to overvalue in securing loans. Often you look at the victims themselves to see if those practices produced the type of injury that warrants this rare action. And the victims are in court saying we're not victims. We didn't really take these numbers on their face.”

 

[Chobham]

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...is_this_what_we_want_from_a_legal_system.html

Engoron’s unconstitutional overreach explained; If your concerns are for fair and equal application of the law over hatred for Trump then this explanation is common sense.

“JONATHAN TURLEY: Well, this court really proved Oscar Wilde's rule that, "The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it." Because the court has done everything short of ordering that Trump be thrown into a wood chipper. He's imposed almost the maximum amount that James requested. He's barring him from doing business in the city where he's an iconic business figure, barring him from getting loans.

The last part is particularly ironic because the banks not only said that they were not victims and did not complain about the alleged fraud, but they said that they wanted to do more business with Trump. They described him as a "whale" client. So this is all being done essentially in their name as victims, even though no one lost any money.

None of us could find a case like this. Yet, the first one, you have this fortune that is being demanded by the court to be turned over. I think there are real problems here. I think that this is going to have the same impact on some appellate judges. There have to be some limits, including Constitutional limits on the size of penalties, this is confiscatory and in my view, just excessive.

You know, I think there's a major appeal obviously that will come. I was hoping the court would defy its critics and show a more moderate response. To show that yes, there were assets that were undervalued and overvalued, but to impose a more reasonable fine.

Many of us believed that there were cases of valuation problems. But those are ubiquitous in this field of real estate. This is extremely common for businesses to undervalue property, to try to lower tax costs, and to overvalue in securing loans. Often you look at the victims themselves to see if those practices produced the type of injury that warrants this rare action. And the victims are in court saying we're not victims. We didn't really take these numbers on their face.”

There are constitutional limits but Trump has to get to appeal (cough up the cash) to get those restrictions imposed on the trial(?) judge.

 

[Bn2f]

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...is_this_what_we_want_from_a_legal_system.html

Engoron’s unconstitutional overreach explained; If your concerns are for fair and equal application of the law over hatred for Trump then this explanation is common sense.

“JONATHAN TURLEY: Well, this court really proved Oscar Wilde's rule that, "The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it." Because the court has done everything short of ordering that Trump be thrown into a wood chipper. He's imposed almost the maximum amount that James requested. He's barring him from doing business in the city where he's an iconic business figure, barring him from getting loans.

The last part is particularly ironic because the banks not only said that they were not victims and did not complain about the alleged fraud, but they said that they wanted to do more business with Trump. They described him as a "whale" client. So this is all being done essentially in their name as victims, even though no one lost any money.

None of us could find a case like this. Yet, the first one, you have this fortune that is being demanded by the court to be turned over. I think there are real problems here. I think that this is going to have the same impact on some appellate judges. There have to be some limits, including Constitutional limits on the size of penalties, this is confiscatory and in my view, just excessive.

You know, I think there's a major appeal obviously that will come. I was hoping the court would defy its critics and show a more moderate response. To show that yes, there were assets that were undervalued and overvalued, but to impose a more reasonable fine.

Many of us believed that there were cases of valuation problems. But those are ubiquitous in this field of real estate. This is extremely common for businesses to undervalue property, to try to lower tax costs, and to overvalue in securing loans. Often you look at the victims themselves to see if those practices produced the type of injury that warrants this rare action. And the victims are in court saying we're not victims. We didn't really take these numbers on their face.”

You and Jonathan Turley can continue crying for the long overdue comeuppance of trump’s white privilege - the courts, the trials, the judgments will continue.

Also, you both should educate yourselves on what Oscar Wilde was imprisoned for before you talk about victimless crimes.

 

[icanhelp1]

You and Jonathan Turley can continue crying for the long overdue comeuppance of trump’s white privilege - the courts, the trials, the judgments will continue.

Also, you both should educate yourselves on what Oscar Wilde was imprisoned for before you talk about victimless crimes.

Perhaps you can identify a victim in this sham fraud case.

 

[Bn2f]

Perhaps you can identify a victim in this sham fraud case.

Yes. If you took your head out of the ass that is the $786 million paying perpetrator of lies that is Fox News. You would know that Leticia James clearly stated that she, as the attorney general of New York, is representing the citizens, and the interest of the state of New York. That’s your victim(s).

 

[Bn2f]

Perhaps you can identify a victim in this sham fraud case.

I answered your question now Lemme ask you…. what exactly was George Flyod detained for? Do you know?

 

[Bn2f]

Perhaps you can identify a victim in this sham fraud case.

Awwww, you left and didn’t answer the question I asked. . How is it that you can listen to Turley and come here to make the claim that financial crimes (this one) are victimless, but you’re astute enough to know where I’m leading you in questioning to ditch this thread in shame?

My friend, with all due respect, defending the white privilege of trump will continually make you the dummy.

 

[icanhelp1]

Yes. If you took your head out of the ass that is the $786 million paying perpetrator of lies that is Fox News. You would know that Leticia James clearly stated that she, as the attorney general of New York, is representing the citizens, and the interest of the state of New York. That’s your victim(s).

James is on a self serving ego trip. Campaigning on vengeance towards Trump she exhibits the appearance of impropriety as well as impropriety and reeks of arrogance and hypocrisy setting a new precedent which will eventually lead to a exodus of tax paying businesses and cause great harm to New York’s business climate. There are no victims.

 

[icanhelp1]

I answered your question now Lemme ask you…. what exactly was George Flyod detained for? Do you know?

Non sequitur.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Do black women have a problem with authority and power?

Non sequitur.

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.