JackLuis
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 21,881
To be fair, despite all the criticism, Foreign Policy's "Sex Issue" got a few things right. For an all-too rare moment, it put gender - er, sex - er, sexuality* - on the foreign policy agenda.
However The reaction included this cover:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZmOAsv_AIvI/T5Yv9oUI9GI/AAAAAAAAIuM/FfZ50AXme2U/s640/FPCoverSex.jpg
So the Mag takes on women's issues and ends up reinforcing the same gender biases that they are whining about. They couldn't separate the gender issues from sexual issues. I think they should stick to Foreign Policy and get that wrong, because they've got little clue about gender issues.
The article is very good and I can recommend it as one that may enlighten AH'ers to why you can't win even if you're on the same side.
However The reaction included this cover:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZmOAsv_AIvI/T5Yv9oUI9GI/AAAAAAAAIuM/FfZ50AXme2U/s640/FPCoverSex.jpg
So the Mag takes on women's issues and ends up reinforcing the same gender biases that they are whining about. They couldn't separate the gender issues from sexual issues. I think they should stick to Foreign Policy and get that wrong, because they've got little clue about gender issues.
The article is very good and I can recommend it as one that may enlighten AH'ers to why you can't win even if you're on the same side.
