Florida Bans Pornhub.

[Treeview]

Are you saying that spreading misinformation is a prosecutable offense? Please cite chapter and verse. How would the 35,000 documented lies of rumps first occupancy be considered prosecuteable?

 

[UltraChad]

Since when has Florida been considered Dem or Progressive?

It's not, nobody said it was.

You didn’t define ‘Common Sense’

I did, I'll do it again.

Are you ready? I'm going to put it in big bold letters so you don't miss it this time..........

I define "common sense" the same way most "progressives" do....shit that pisses "the other" off.

Did you catch it this time???

Laws need to be consistent.

Haven't been for decades....why start now?

This sure isn’t

Doesn't matter. Triggering leftist is the point.

 

[UltraChad]

Are you saying that spreading misinformation is a prosecutable offense?

No I'm saying Democrats DESPERATELY wish it was.

They openly advocate for the criminalization of "hate speech" and "misinformation".

 

[PaxNurgle]

How fucking illiterate do you have to be to not understand what I said?

It's just some common sense regulation. Which is what you guys claim when you are pushing for absolutely totalitarian regulations and control on everything but pedos and abortion.

And it's no big deal...which is what you guys say when you strip people of their human rights with your common sense regulations.

Let's hope the common sense regulations continue.

But whenever the government proposes "common sense regulation" about things like environmental protection, banning discrimination in the workplace, promoting health and safety, you are the first one to stand up and gripe about how it's "infringing on our freedoms." So when the government actually does do something that takes away people's freedoms, instead of griping about it, now you're defending it?!?

You people will never understand hypocrisy, because no matter how many times we point it out, you don't get it. You are as bad as the Hisarpy/Rebel5/multihandle guy in that respect. It's always like "Well, durr durr durr, da-ta-da-ta-taaaa, but butt but...."

It's NOT common sense regulation. Because you are almost ALWAYS AGAINST that. It's government restricting personal choices- which, I should add, is EXACTLY WHAT COMMUNIST GOVERNMENTS such as China do. Do you like China?

Incidently, Pornhub is already blocked in Utah and Idaho and has been since the start of 2024. People are already pretty upset. And yeah, Literotica could be next.

 

[UltraChad]

But whenever the government proposes "common sense regulation" about things like environmental protection, banning discrimination in the workplace, promoting health and safety, you are the first one to stand up and gripe about how it's "infringing on our freedoms."

Yes. Because I'm not a psychotic control freak.

So when the government actually does do something that takes away people's freedoms, instead of griping about it, now you're defending it?!?

No not really I'm just mocking lefties who think it's just COMMON SENSE REGULATION!!! When they roll out the "fuck you and your civil rights" policies.

You people will never understand hypocrisy, because no matter how many times we point it out, you don't get it. You are as bad as the Hisarpy/Rebel5/multihandle guy in that respect. It's always like "Well, durr durr durr, da-ta-da-ta-taaaa, but butt but...."

I'm literally doing the Democrat routine ...... it's not hypocrisy, it's mockery. I'm just holding a mirror up to you and the other "FUCK AMERICA" comrades.

It's NOT common sense regulation.

Why not?

It's ALWAYS common sense regulations when Democrats want to infringe on civil rights. ALWAYS. And anyone who doesn't just 100% accept that like the Democrat LORD N' SAVIOR Karl Marx himself commanded it is a fucking NAZI!!! LIKE LITERALLY HITLER!!!

Incidently, Pornhub is already blocked in Utah and Idaho and has been since the start of 2024. People are already pretty upset. And yeah, Literotica could be next.

I'm sure some boomers who don't know how to use the fuckin' internet are bigly mad.

Fuck em.

 

[Politruk]

Yes. Because I'm not a psychotic control freak.

Better a psychotic control freak than a psychotic libertarian, like Ayn Rand.

 

[UltraChad]

Better a psychotic control freak than a psychotic libertarian, like Ayn Rand.

Why?

Being persecuted by a mass murdering psycho isn't better than being left alone and free to do as you please.

Where do you and the other psycho's get the idea that it is?

And if it is, then why don't you go subject yourself to them???

 

[PaxNurgle]

So, you think it is bad, like some big infringement on personal liberties when the government tells big oil companies they cant dump crude oil or other industrial waste into the rivers, which is our drinking water. Or that it is "infringing on peoples rights" when they aren't allowed to have "No coloreds" signs, or aren't allowed to refuse service to black people. Okay, got it.

But when the Government turns "Big Brother" and says you can't look at adult websites anymore, you are all gung ho, go Big Government!

Got it. durr durr durr, blah-de-blah-de-blah.

You are talking about infringing on personal individual rights. I am talking about protecting people from abuse of big corporations that have the ability to cause widespread damage to many people. That is reasonable regulation. The first is not. Big difference there.

 

[Politruk]

Why?

Because Bernie Sanders is a control freak by your standards and he's better than Rand, and it's better to have his kind in charge of things than her kind.

 

[UltraChad]

So, you think it is bad, like some big infringement on personal liberties when the government tells big oil companies they cant dump crude oil or other industrial waste into the rivers, which is our drinking water.

Nope. That's the leftist fantasy they use to sell a totalitarian Karen state, because there is NOTHING between the two.

Or that it is "infringing on peoples rights" when they aren't allowed to have "No coloreds" signs, or aren't allowed to refuse service to black people. Okay, got it.

It's ok when Democrats do it to white males.....why not the coloreds??

Why is overt institutionalized racism and sexism GOOD PROGRESS when Democrats do it?? But bad for anyone else..... totally not hypocritical.

But when the Government turns "Big Brother" and says you can't look at adult websites anymore, you are all gung ho, go Big Government!

Well that's not what is happening.

And I'm mocking leftist, who SUDDENLY have a problem with the government regulating.

I'm not actually supporting big government.

How many times will I have to tell you that before you figure it out??

I am talking about protecting people from abuse of big corporations that have the ability to cause widespread damage to many people.

You mean like keeping kids off of adult content sites??

OHHH when you don't like it then suddenly it's different .....BECAUSE REASONS...right?? LOL

Nothing triggers democrats like restricting kids from pornography. Wonder why that is???

You don't even see the hypocrisy do you?

That is reasonable regulation. The first is not. Big difference there.

Right it's reasonable when YOU support it. Like I've been saying this whole time.

Your COMMON SENSE REGULATIONS are valid because YOU like them and FUCK THAT CORPORATION!!!

But when someone does that to you and a corporation you like...REEEEEEEEEEEE!!! REEEEEEE!!!!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I'M A VICTIM REEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! REGULATION IS ONLY GOOD WHEN WE DO IT!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE DEMOCRACY BAD REEEEEEEEE!!

LOL

 

[UltraChad]

Because Bernie Sanders is a control freak by your standards

Yes people who want to take all my shit, micromanage my entire life from cradle to grave and charge me a premium for the privilege are control freaks.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Florida didn’t ban Pornhub. The company that operates Pornhub, Ayla, banned Pornhub. Florida has an age verification requirement that becomes effective in January. Aylo agrees that making it hard for children to access porn is a worthy thing to do. They just disagree with the way the state is requiring porn site operators to implement age verification. Aylo’s ban is a form of protesting the required age verification methodology and process. They support device level age verification which they think is a much more effective way to do it.

If device level age verification is the most effective approach, the state of FL should consider amending the law.

 

[UltraChad]

Florida didn’t ban Pornhub. The company that operates Pornhub, Ayla, banned Pornhub. Florida has an age verification requirement that becomes effective in January. Aylo agrees that making it hard for children to access porn is a worthy thing to do. They just disagree with the way the state is requiring porn site operators to implement age verification. Aylo’s ban is a form of protesting the required age verification methodology and process. They support device level age verification which they think is a much more effective way to do it.

If device level age verification is the most effective approach, the state of FL should consider amending the law.

But ANY sort of restrictions on minors from hardcore pornography = book burning Nazis!!!!! A horrifying fascistic attack on MAP rights!!!

Only they get to regulate.......only their "democracy" counts. Ultra-red states have to cater to blue fee fees, otherwise they're victims.....

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yes people who want to take all my shit, micromanage my entire life from cradle to grave and charge me a premium for the privilege are control freaks.

Like people who want to control what websites an adult can go to?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

But ANY sort of restrictions on minors from hardcore pornography = book burning Nazis!!!!! A horrifying fascistic attack on MAP rights!!!

Only they get to regulate.......only their "democracy" counts. Ultra-red states have to cater to blue fee fees, otherwise they're victims.....

No one has said anything close to that.

 

[UltraChad]

Like people who want to control what websites an adult can go to?

Sure, who's doing that though??

No one has said anything close to that.

Whatever lies you need to tell yourself.

 

[Politruk]

But ANY sort of restrictions on minors from hardcore pornography = book burning Nazis!!!!! A horrifying fascistic attack on MAP rights!!!

Only they get to regulate.......only their "democracy" counts. Ultra-red states have to cater to blue fee fees, otherwise they're victims.....

You had best be very careful in the future to avoid all forms of hyperbole. It is a legitimate rhetorical tactic -- but you can never pull it off without looking like an idiot.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

TF?? That doesn't even make sense.

Sure it does, it's common sense.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Sure, who's doing that though??


Whatever lies you need to tell yourself.

Then let’s see the receipts of people saying that. I’ll wait….

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Then let’s see the receipts of people saying that. I’ll wait….

Does posting links of him saying it count?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Does posting links of him saying it count?

Who knows what counts in his mind.

 

[glamorilla]

Florida didn’t ban Pornhub. The company that operates Pornhub, Ayla, banned Pornhub. Florida has an age verification requirement that becomes effective in January. Aylo agrees that making it hard for children to access porn is a worthy thing to do. They just disagree with the way the state is requiring porn site operators to implement age verification. Aylo’s ban is a form of protesting the required age verification methodology and process. They support device level age verification which they think is a much more effective way to do it.

If device level age verification is the most effective approach, the state of FL should consider amending the law.

According to sources Lit is going to get shut down in 2002.

Vote dem or lose your porn!

 

[Politruk]

According to sources Lit is going to get shut down in 2002.

Vote dem or lose your porn!

No, the Dems ain't quite reliable enough. We need a third party -- the Porn Party!

Hey, it's no sillier than the Pirate Party, and that's real!

 

[UltraChad]

Then let’s see the receipts of people saying that. I’ll wait….

Oh look SgtPedoShill is demanding receipts again....
https://media.tenor.com/iv_gVuhCZLQAAAAM/jerk-ken-jeong.gif

 

[glamorilla]

No, the Dems ain't quite reliable enough. We need a third party -- the Porn Party!

Hey, it's no sillier than the Pirate Party, and that's real!

Of course they aren't.

It's kind of like posting part of an article and running with it while ignoring everything else.