subdued_passion
Meh
- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Posts
- 10,371
My comment “One thing I've noticed about this place, no matter what kind of story or how poorly written, there is always a readership.” Was in direct response to Lynn’s comment, “What about the readers, though? Do you want them to enjoy the story, too?”
I can see a few posts here addressing that comment as if it means that I don’t want your opinion whereas the point I was making was that, what readers enjoy is not necessarily a good indication of what is good or even popular. Point in fact, More than Friends. I have got more people reading, voting, favouriting the story as well as me as the author than any of the stories I’ve posted here. But I was not happy with it and so I made a thread asking for feedback.
More than Friends is a writing experiment for me. I wanted to see if I could try to write a straightforward story. So, yes I need to stick with the structure. I’ve already explained why I chose narrative over dialogue but the reason why I chose not to introduce information in the narrative as an where relevant was because I wanted to present the facts that explain people's behaviour's rather than typing the person’s motivation at the relevant juncture in the story. Rather than arguing about my choice (which really boils down to individual preference) of structure it would be useful if I could read re-write of the start (remember- don’t want to drag out the backstory with more dialogue).
---------------
Good Vs Crap- I evaluate my work/performance as either good or not good/crap. After reading some of the posts I can understand why JBJ thought I was seeking praise. Please don’t waste time patronizing me, instead give me something I can use to write better. I’m asking for the kind of feedback that I can work with and measure improvement. Telling me to read more, or that the narrative doesn’t flow, doesn’t really help.
I know I must sound impatient it's because I am.
-------------------------
This made me so happy (I'm telling myself that your reaction is because I wrote a character that sounds convincing enough- don't ruin it for me for saying otherwise).
I can see a few posts here addressing that comment as if it means that I don’t want your opinion whereas the point I was making was that, what readers enjoy is not necessarily a good indication of what is good or even popular. Point in fact, More than Friends. I have got more people reading, voting, favouriting the story as well as me as the author than any of the stories I’ve posted here. But I was not happy with it and so I made a thread asking for feedback.
More than Friends is a writing experiment for me. I wanted to see if I could try to write a straightforward story. So, yes I need to stick with the structure. I’ve already explained why I chose narrative over dialogue but the reason why I chose not to introduce information in the narrative as an where relevant was because I wanted to present the facts that explain people's behaviour's rather than typing the person’s motivation at the relevant juncture in the story. Rather than arguing about my choice (which really boils down to individual preference) of structure it would be useful if I could read re-write of the start (remember- don’t want to drag out the backstory with more dialogue).
---------------
Good Vs Crap- I evaluate my work/performance as either good or not good/crap. After reading some of the posts I can understand why JBJ thought I was seeking praise. Please don’t waste time patronizing me, instead give me something I can use to write better. I’m asking for the kind of feedback that I can work with and measure improvement. Telling me to read more, or that the narrative doesn’t flow, doesn’t really help.
I know I must sound impatient it's because I am.
-------------------------
I'm not sure I would finish "Complicated," as I didn't want to read about a man as apparently abusive as Max,
This made me so happy (I'm telling myself that your reaction is because I wrote a character that sounds convincing enough- don't ruin it for me for saying otherwise).