Bodington
Virgin
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Posts
- 260
I came across a humorous article on Fox News as cited below. Apparently 12 federal district court judges upon the condition of anonymity voiced concern to NBC News that they were alarmed how frequently their rulings are overturned by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). 10 of those judges (all appointed by Dem Presidents) argued the Supreme Court should offer more explanation when overturning such decisions, saying emergency rulings in such cases imply poor work on the part of lower court judges. You think? I guess it did not dawn on these Judges that perhaps their rulings were so patently absurd that SCOTUS did not find the need to cross the ‘tees’ and dot the ‘eyes’ in overturning their rulings.
See:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fe...court-overturning-decisions-emergency-rulings
See:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fe...court-overturning-decisions-emergency-rulings