FaceBook ALERT!

MeeMie

No Spam Here
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Posts
7,328
Did you know that FaceBook has been invading your privacy by monitoring all of your browsing activity by tracking user data through cookies even after you logged out?


Facebook has admitted that it has been watching the web pages its members visit – even when they have logged out.

In its latest privacy blunder, the social networking site was forced to confirm that it has been constantly tracking its 750million users, even when they are using other sites.

The social networking giant says the huge privacy breach was simply a mistake - that software automatically downloaded to users' computers when they logged in to Facebook 'inadvertently' sent information to the company, whether or not they were logged in at the time.

Most would assume that Facebook stops monitoring them after they leave its site, but technology bloggers discovered this was not the case.

In fact, data has been regularly sent back to the social network’s servers – data that could be worth billions when creating 'targeted' advertising based on the sites users visit.

when you sign up to Facebook it automatically puts files known as ‘cookies’ on your computer which monitor your browsing history.

This is still the case. But Facebook claims the cookies no longer send information while you are logged out of its site.

If you are logged in to Facebook, the cookies will still send the information, and they remain on your computer unless you manually delete them.

They send Facebook your IP address - the 'unique identifier' address of your PC - and information on whether you have visited millions of websites.

‘Even if you are logged out, Facebook still knows and can track every page you visit. ‘This is not what "logout" is supposed to mean’.


‘The only solution is to delete every Facebook cookie in your browser, or to use a separate (web) browser for Facebook interactions.



It's just the latest privacy issue to affect a company that has a long history of blunders relating to user's private information.

The admission is the latest in a series of privacy blunders from Facebook, which has a record of only correcting such matters when they are brought to light by other people.





. .
 
Last edited:
facebook will come to your house at night and let the air out of your tires.
 
Gmail - Hotmail... they all do it one way or another. Type an email and use words like Hawaii, vacation, renting a car or whatever and then watch the ads on your sidebar change to those related subjects after you send it. How did they know to suddenly put up related advertising?

At work we remove malware/spyware/viruses all the time. It amazes me what people are willing to pay instead of educating themselves and my computer tech guy doesn't share much info on what he's doing to simply fix these 'slow' computers that have plenty of memory.
 
So facebook knows you scour the interwebs all day and night for right wing propaganda and Obama hate speech.

Big fucking deal.
 
Is this worse than having your crotch groped by government goons when you fly commercial?
 
"Social media", like "tolerant liberal", is an oxymoron.

Invasion of privacy is tolerated and excused as trivial by the loonies, in the same manner of when ever-so-tolerant liberals abused web alert mechanisms to censor those with differing political opinions during Obama's past presidential campaign.

It's all good as long as it benefits their cause.


These are the same jokers who accused President Bush of freedom of privacy violations over the Patriots Act designed to protect the country.... their hypocrisy is appalling.
 
Hands up all those that think MeeMie has been surfing kiddie porn and is now shitting himself?
 
"Social media", like "tolerant liberal", is an oxymoron.

Invasion of privacy is tolerated and excused as trivial by the loonies, in the same manner of when ever-so-tolerant liberals abused web alert mechanisms to censor those with differing political opinions during Obama's past presidential campaign.

It's all good as long as it benefits their cause.


These are the same jokers who accused President Bush of freedom of privacy violations over the Patriots Act designed to protect the country.... their hypocrisy is appalling.

The classic loonie debate:

• loonie gang bang
• fault the source
• point finger elsewhere
• namecalling
• insult integrity and intelligence
• answer a question with another question
• refuses to read info stating already knows what's in it
• Deflect, Deny, Divert
• BLAME BUSH!

It's a pattern easily recognizable, used in varying degrees, simultaneously and/or one jab at a time

You lose, fuck face.
 
"Social media", like "tolerant liberal", is an oxymoron.

Invasion of privacy is tolerated and excused as trivial by the loonies, in the same manner of when ever-so-tolerant liberals abused web alert mechanisms to censor those with differing political opinions during Obama's past presidential campaign.

It's all good as long as it benefits their cause.


These are the same jokers who accused President Bush of freedom of privacy violations over the Patriots Act designed to protect the country.... their hypocrisy is appalling.

You could demand government regulations to rein in private businesses which have found a way to exploit their investment in new ways. Private information is a byproduct of the production of their main product, which is easy access to large numbers of people.

These are privately owned companies who do business with willing customers. If you don't want to participate, don't use their service.
 
go to security settings. click on https . no cookies.

That's true ... that and not going to FaceBook at all ... because, if you won't accept their cookies, you don't get on.


This thread was posted as a 'heads up' for all of those FaceBook users who didn't know that that they were spied on without their knowledge and without their consent.




But, it's okay. Just look at all the GB loonies, in this thread alone, dismissing that it was an invasion of privacy.


Afterall, it's the liberal way....

Concerns about political favoritism are no doubt rooted in a recognition that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and the company he runs both have liberal political streaks. Zuckerberg has publicly declared himself an Obama supporter. Chris Hedges, one of the site's co-founders, managed the Obama campaign's online organizing.
 
I really don't care if they know I was looking for Shanna McCullough threesome cum swapping videos.
 
And yet here you are using the Internet.

Unplug and be safe.
 
That's true ... that and not going to FaceBook at all ... because, if you won't accept their cookies, you don't get on.


This thread was posted as a 'heads up' for all of those FaceBook users who didn't know that that they were spied on without their knowledge and without their consent.




But, it's okay. Just look at all the GB loonies, in this thread alone, dismissing that it was an invasion of privacy.


Afterall, it's the liberal way....

Concerns about political favoritism are no doubt rooted in a recognition that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and the company he runs both have liberal political streaks. Zuckerberg has publicly declared himself an Obama supporter. Chris Hedges, one of the site's co-founders, managed the Obama campaign's online organizing.

here is some helpful information, miemee, by an organization that has fought to protect your privacy rights for decades: http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/internet-privacy
 
With that avatar and this thread, I keep picturing Chicken Little now.
 
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=38674289&highlight=identity+theft#post38674289

Still some dumb fucks unable to comprehend how the invasion of privacy by social networking puts them at risk.

It's outlined pretty well in the first post of that thread.



What many compare to 'cookies' from all sorts of website to what FaceBook is doing doesn't address that those warned about in this thread actually track users traffic through their history wherever they go.

You're alright with that? Seriously?

It must be okay because Big Brother says it is.
 
I'm not alright with what they are doing.

Bastard Fucktards.
 
If it is not Facebook, it will be some schmoe with a packet sniffer, some advertising company collecting info, your ISP keeping logs, the government huntin' for terrorists (Obama wants to git them right wing fringe people, right?)...

Unplug and be safer.
 
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=38674289&highlight=identity+theft#post38674289

Still some dumb fucks unable to comprehend how the invasion of privacy by social networking puts them at risk.

It's outlined pretty well in the first post of that thread.



What many compare to 'cookies' from all sorts of website to what FaceBook is doing doesn't address that those warned about in this thread actually track users traffic through their history wherever they go.

You're alright with that? Seriously?

It must be okay because Big Brother says it is.

So, government regulations, or not?

What do you want to do about it? Do you want to tell private business what they can or can't do?
 
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=38674289&highlight=identity+theft#post38674289

Still some dumb fucks unable to comprehend how the invasion of privacy by social networking puts them at risk.

It's outlined pretty well in the first post of that thread.



What many compare to 'cookies' from all sorts of website to what FaceBook is doing doesn't address that those warned about in this thread actually track users traffic through their history wherever they go.

You're alright with that? Seriously?

It must be okay because Big Brother says it is.
Umm, how am I at risk, retard? Apart from drowning in spam, obviously.
 
If it is not Facebook, it will be some schmoe with a packet sniffer, some advertising company collecting info, your ISP keeping logs, the government huntin' for terrorists (Obama wants to git them right wing fringe people, right?)...

Unplug and be safer.

Supermarket club cards keyed to your phone number.
 
So, government regulations, or not?

What do you want to do about it? Do you want to tell private business what they can or can't do?

He doesn't know what he wants. That's why he's resorted to name calling and attacks. Ya know, exactly the things he berates other posters for doing.

Credibility isn't high on his priority list.
 
Back
Top