Exhibitionism

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[Chicklet]

this masochist doesn't

 

[Etoile]

Words can be so imprecise. I would say that "some" do, not "many."

 

[myinnerslut]

Do many couples to "Forced" exhibitionism for the masochist?

i would think that couples do "forced" exhibition FOR the exhibitionist, not the masochist.. sometimes there is a big diffrence

 

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[myinnerslut]

i think i was getting at the fact that one would do exhibition would most likely be an exhibitionist to begin with, not neccesarily a sadist or a masochist... that and many involved in BDSM would argue that a D/s couple does things FOR the PYL (to please or make him/her happy), not FOR the pyl.

 

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[Chicklet]

pick your label - dom, sub, masochist, master, sir, daddy, daughter, little one, sweetheart, bitch, lord, lady, etc.

 

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[@}-}rebecca----]

When you say 'exhibitionist' are you alluding to displays within the general public please ?

 

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[@}-}rebecca----]

yes, where one leads the other to various forms of display in public. As in I take her out and I decide what she wears (such as a skirt and stay up stockings) and I instruct her to remove her panties in a public place and allow others to view her in that state of undress...

Also, I have heard stories of subs being stripped naked in public except for a collar and leash (or some variant) and then led to a public restroom, or such, and back.

So your comfortable with the general public participating in your 'scene' without prior consent that they are in any way embracing your fantasy realised ?

 

[shy slave]

I find this idea terrible.

No-one in the vicinity of where you do this has agreed to participate in this display.

Regardless of who and what age those people are, you are involving them in something that is outside of acceptable society norms for where you live.

In the UK it is very likely you would be reported to the police and she would be charged with 'lewd acts in a public place' and you would be charged with being a moron.

 

[CutieMouse]

yes, where one leads the other to various forms of display in public. As in I take her out and I decide what she wears (such as a skirt and stay up stockings) and I instruct her to remove her panties in a public place and allow others to view her in that state of undress...

... Also, I have heard stories of subs being stripped naked in public except for a collar and leash (or some variant) and then led to a public restroom, or such, and back.

I believe such ideas generally fall under the catagory of fantasy/porn/erotic literature, and this is an instance where one should not always believe what one sees and/or reads.

Seriously- think about how rude it is to involve anyone who is forced to view your activities without consent - would YOU like to see someone in a state of undress, just because you popped out to get a gallon of milk? Next consider the odds that someone will be offended enough to contact the police, and what laws you would be breaking (public indecency, nudity, etc, etc, etc.) Not to mention the risks involved to the submissive, should said activities (partially or completely undressing and led about exposed) occur in an area where you could not garuantee her safety- which you couldn't if you were involving the general public, without their consent.

 

[PsyDocG]

.....

 

[@}-}rebecca----]

Well there then, I believe I have my answers. I do not intend to harm anyone, I was merely inquiring about erotic thoughts/fantasies I've heard. I am not experienced in BDSM and therefore turn to those in the know. I appreciate your candor and passion, and I agree that violation of those not concenting could be and likely would be harmful. Bless you for responding and I really appreciate you!

Ummmn.......hang on.....damn have work to do.....there are degrees that can be attained though I would not attribute them to BDSM exclusively. I was really trying to ascertain to what degree you aspire to these pursuits and the more reliable context of where etc etc.

Having said that if your answers are 'overt displays' and 'anywhere I please' then I would hold the same dim view that several posters above have. I'll come back to this later today when I have more time.

 

[CutieMouse]

Well there then, I believe I have my answers. I do not intend to harm anyone, I was merely inquiring about erotic thoughts/fantasies I've heard. I am not experienced in BDSM and therefore turn to those in the know. I appreciate your candor and passion, and I agree that violation of those not concenting could be and likely would be harmful. Bless you for responding and I really appreciate you!

I believe you will find the issue of consent to be quite a hot button in BDSM- hence the responses.

There *are* ways to incorporate "exhibitionism" into a relationship that only the two persons involved know about, and exhibitionism doesn't have to be a BDSM thing. However your posts appeared to be concentrating on the "overt displays" / "anywhere I please" train of thought, and you were responded to in kind. (see "consent" comment, above)

 

[Kajira Callista]

Do many couples to "Forced" exhibitionism for the masochist?

Coerced sounds so much more fun.

 

[JMohegan]

I would say that "some" do, not "many."

This is my observation as well.

I've never heard of a sub stripped down to the collar and leash in public, but I have heard of subs ordered to do things like exposing themselves briefly for purposes of humiliation.

This sort of thing has never interested me, and I understand the objections pertaining to the involvement of non-consenting third parties. However, in the overall scheme of things I personally have a hard time mustering a lot of outrage over the behavior. In a way, it reminds me of the behavior described on this thread:

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=451051

Disinterested adults can simply ignore the behavior. If children are present, a response comparable to AA's advice in post 5 seems eminently practical.

 

[Evil_Geoff]

There are "public" displays and then there are "public" displays. And yes, some PYL are quite happy to make their pyl very uncomfortable, humiliated, hot, horny, happy, terrified, turned on, or what ever through "forced" display.

Behavior in the setting of a large play space, with a large crowd of BDSM practitioners, such as wearing skimpy or no clothing, walking around wearing collar and leash, stripping in front of other people, etc, could be considered (and usually would be by the person being so displayed) as "public". In otherwords, it is being done in front of others in a location that is probably not a "private residence."

Take that same behavior to your local shopping mall or a downtown street and you might find yourselves running afoul of the local constabulary. Some behaviors (like walking around in collar and leash, wearing very slinky, revealing but street legal clothing) might not be "arrestable", others (like public nudity, urination, sexual acts, etc) will get you tossed in the pokey quite quickly.

For some, public means just that, in front of God and everyone, and yes, there are people who have that as a fetish. It's not my kink. I'm an exhibitionist, I _LOVE_ an audience when I play, I get high on the energy they share with me in the scene. But I want my audience there voluntarily, knowing and consenting, to share that intimacy. So my "public play" is with an audience, but in what I would consider an appropriate venue.

 

[PsyDocG]

.....