Ever try to talk with a Liberal? Don't...

amicus

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
14,812
...because it is impossible.

Liberals, from your common swamp water Democrats to a hard boiled Marxist, are all, each and every one, 'true believers', with apologies to Etic Hoffer, like Jesus Freaks, they have their faith and nothing with reason, logic or rationality can breach the wall of simpering socialism.

The first reason why one cannot converse with them is that they have no moral foundation. Not only that, but they are proud of it. Even worse, for those with a moral fondation, they hnder and harass anyone who dares claim a moral imperative as a truth. To them, there are no truths, self evident or not.

"We just disagree", not a bad song, but it is the theme song of the left, "There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys...."

No moal foundation, no right or wrong, no good or evil, no black and white....only shades of grey. They can butcher a baby for fuck their brother in the ass and who is to say it is right or wrong?

Any person with morals and ethics; that's who can say it is evil. And explain why.

If they have the courage to confront me at all, they will come whining and claim that they do have a moral system but it depends on where you are in your monthly curse as to whether it is right or wrong; and that it is relative and subjective and everyone has their own code of conduct and none is better than the other.

Truly sad.

So...the first reason you can not and should not talk to a liberal lefty is that they have no honor at all, because they have no values, because values depend upon right and wrong, good and evil. So don't even try to talk with them, not worth the effort and you will get no where.

The second reason....the entire left of the spectrum of political thought 'believe' that the conduct of an indiviudal or a group within a social arena is determined by what is best for the group as a whole.

That is to say that in China, forced abortion is moral, in Britain and Canada, rationing medicine to the old is right and moral because it serves the greater good of the group.

In America is is moral to give an eight year old child a condom without parental consent. For the overall good of society, of course. I mean they are gonna have sex at ten anyway, so why not make it safe sex for the kiddies? Group or social, 'values', determined by the needs of the group or society.

What is wrong with that picture?

Groups have no values, they are mobs. Society is an abstract, it does nol exist in reality. No? Touch it, asshole!

Values, morals, ethics, right and wrong, good and bad are all, and only, defined by the individual with the fundamental value being life itself...individual life.

The Left are cowards; all of them. With no rules of moral conduct, they can never be held responsible for their own actions; they always blame it on social conditions and environments, never themselves.

How can one compromise with these people in order to coexist?

You can not.

They have to go.

Amicus Veritas
 
How can one compromise with these people in order to coexist?

You can not.

They have to go.

are-you-scared-title.jpg
 
Every good Litcon should make references to 70's top 40 radio.
 

~~~

You should be... a shortage of electricity looms just ahead because you idiots forbid construction of new plants as consumption and demand continued to rise.

Three days food supply in your supermarket, no light, no heat, no micro wave, no refrigerator, no computer...and you don't even have a gun to fend of the barbarians at your door.

Scared?

Amicus
 
~~~

You should be... a shortage of electricity looms just ahead because you idiots forbid construction of new plants as consumption and demand continued to rise.

Three days food supply in your supermarket, no light, no heat, no micro wave, no refrigerator, no computer...and you don't even have a gun to fend of the barbarians at your door.

Scared?

Amicus

I can see why you are.
 
Republicans sure are an angry lot these days.

~~~

Wouldn't know, never been a Republican, I am and always have been an American, political parties are for girls.

For your ilk, if you knew that tomorrow morning, abortion will be murder, homosexuality a mental disorder and sodomy a felont, as they were not so long ago, what would you feel?

Am I angry that liberal slime has sullied a once beautiful concept of human liberty?

Yes, 30-06 and a hundred clips angry.

Amicus marksman...:cool:
 
You should be... a shortage of electricity looms just ahead because you idiots forbid construction of new plants as consumption and demand continued to rise.

Three days food supply in your supermarket, no light, no heat, no micro wave, no refrigerator, no computer...and you don't even have a gun to fend of the barbarians at your door.

Scared?

Here are two things that scare you:

hoveround-guy1.png


...a black man in the same mode of transport you'll be resigned to in a few months.

It'll take you where you wanna go...where will it send you? :cool:
 
~~~

Wouldn't know, never been a Republican, I am and always have been an American, political parties are for girls.

For your ilk, if you knew that tomorrow morning, abortion will be murder, homosexuality a mental disorder and sodomy a felont, as they were not so long ago, what would you feel?

Am I angry that liberal slime has sullied a once beautiful concept of human liberty?

Yes, 30-06 and a hundred clips angry.

Amicus marksman...:cool:

So to clarify, your definition of human liberty includes denying people the freedom to marry whomever they wish or make decisions regarding their own bodies?
 
Just like your religious counter parts who burn witches at the stake, persecute every person of knowledge and set the history of man back a thousand years because of faith and belief, they too would not defend their actions.

I have never expected any of you pukes to have the courage or the knowledge to defend your sick socialist religion.

I do expect, however, that those on the sidelines will see how vacant your ideas are and how shallow your pithy little barbs are.

There really are not adequate words to describe the filth and degradation of the left, democrats all the way gauche.

Those who used to espouse socialism were beaten down so badly they don't dare stick their heads out of the toilet anymore.

Stay there.

amicus
 
Very very bitter....

He'll die alone.

Ironically, in that regard, he'll have plenty of company from here.

No way folks like JAMESBJOHNSON and renard die while surrounded by loved ones. No way.

Sad.
 
So to clarify, your definition of human liberty includes denying people the freedom to marry whomever they wish or make decisions regarding their own bodies?

~~~

Hello...was hoping to hear a new voice now and then. But then, a loaded, baited question, how many times did you fuck your dog today, implies that you fuck dog, but I am sure you do not.

Marriage is and always has been, in civilized societies, described as a union between a man and a woman, the purpose of which is to establish a legal responsibility for any children produced and support the woman during her time of nurturing.

If you are a same sex lover, I don't want you in my neighborhood. I don' want you around children at all, for any reason.I do not want you in any position to influence political or social thought or acttion.

However, behind closed doors you can do whatever you wish with whomever you wish.

Women doing whatever they want with their own bodies. Like prostitution? That kind of thing?

Oh, abortion, killing a child inutero? That? Simple little politcal doctrinee, that of a self evident truth that each has the right to his own life. Add to that the medical science that says life begins at the instant of conception, for it can be nothing else.

Consider that abortion was first degree, premeditated muirder and illegal in 1970 and that Homosexuality, male and female, was, by the medical profession, determined a mental disorder in 1970 and like abortion was always that way prior to 1973.

What is the total now in the US, fifty million babies aborted?
\
If homosexuality remained a mental disorder and was treated as such, perhaps the tens of thousands of little boys sodomized by Catholics would still be innocent.

They won't even admit the tens of thousands of young girls victimized by catholic lesbian nuns, but they are out there.

Now...I have offered a rational, easy to understand explanation of my position on those two subjects.

Would you please return the favor and defend your positions?

Thank you.


Amicus
 

~~~

Is that, Seven Days in May" Or Dr, Strangelove and how to love the bomb? or sumpin? these younuns' most likely don't recognize the photo...or know the film, bad choice.


amicus
 
Good ole Amicus, standing up foursquare for marriage.....

How many times have you been married, hmmmm?
 
Last edited:
Rob, if you just posted his real name and he hasn't made it public, please edit. He's a douche, for sure, a Rush Limbaugh wannabe, and not as good at the game as Rush, and his politics are full of hate, but please color inside the lines?
 
Rob, if you just posted his real name and he hasn't made it public, please edit. He's a douche, for sure, a Rush Limbaugh wannabe, and not as good at the game as Rush, and his politics are full of hate, but please color inside the lines?

Agreed.
 
don't get me wrong wit the man upstairs, i hate jesus freaks, so i feel you on that.
 
~~~

Hello...was hoping to hear a new voice now and then. But then, a loaded, baited question, how many times did you fuck your dog today, implies that you fuck dog, but I am sure you do not.

Marriage is and always has been, in civilized societies, described as a union between a man and a woman, the purpose of which is to establish a legal responsibility for any children produced and support the woman during her time of nurturing.

If you are a same sex lover, I don't want you in my neighborhood. I don' want you around children at all, for any reason.I do not want you in any position to influence political or social thought or acttion.

However, behind closed doors you can do whatever you wish with whomever you wish.

Women doing whatever they want with their own bodies. Like prostitution? That kind of thing?

Oh, abortion, killing a child inutero? That? Simple little politcal doctrinee, that of a self evident truth that each has the right to his own life. Add to that the medical science that says life begins at the instant of conception, for it can be nothing else.

Consider that abortion was first degree, premeditated muirder and illegal in 1970 and that Homosexuality, male and female, was, by the medical profession, determined a mental disorder in 1970 and like abortion was always that way prior to 1973.

What is the total now in the US, fifty million babies aborted?
\
If homosexuality remained a mental disorder and was treated as such, perhaps the tens of thousands of little boys sodomized by Catholics would still be innocent.

They won't even admit the tens of thousands of young girls victimized by catholic lesbian nuns, but they are out there.

Now...I have offered a rational, easy to understand explanation of my position on those two subjects.

Would you please return the favor and defend your positions?

Thank you.


Amicus

It's true; I was a little defensive, but that's probably because the OP suggested that I am a coward lacking in honour, values, and principles. And thank you - I don't think that you fuck your dog either.

Why does it matter what marriage has been in the past? If an institution is outdated and discriminatory, we nix it or fix it. Would you have sided with slavery during the civil war because that's how it had always been? I also find your proposed justification silly, as it completely discounts heterosexual couples who choose not to have children.

To me, human liberty suggests that anyone can live wherever they choose (including next door to you, if that individual is terribly unlucky) and exercise their rights and freedoms to influence their governments and societies. You do not get to decide to whom human liberty applies based on your own biases.

And no, it's not rational to cling to an ethos from 40 years ago. You're dead wrong in your opinions on homosexuality, but I recognize that nothing I say will change that (thought I am curious as to your rationale - I thought homophobia typically stemmed from religious beliefs, but that does not appear to be the case).

Abortion is an irrepressible market. Women will seek out abortions regardless of their legality. I'd rather it be safe and regulated. Would you disagree? If you wish to reduce the number of abortions, then encourage education about and access to birth control.
 
...because it is impossible.

Liberals, from your common swamp water Democrats to a hard boiled Marxist, are all, each and every one, 'true believers', with apologies to Etic Hoffer, like Jesus Freaks, they have their faith and nothing with reason, logic or rationality can breach the wall of simpering socialism.

The first reason why one cannot converse with them is that they have no moral foundation. Not only that, but they are proud of it. Even worse, for those with a moral fondation, they hnder and harass anyone who dares claim a moral imperative as a truth. To them, there are no truths, self evident or not.

"We just disagree", not a bad song, but it is the theme song of the left, "There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys...."

No moal foundation, no right or wrong, no good or evil, no black and white....only shades of grey. They can butcher a baby for fuck their brother in the ass and who is to say it is right or wrong?

Any person with morals and ethics; that's who can say it is evil. And explain why.

If they have the courage to confront me at all, they will come whining and claim that they do have a moral system but it depends on where you are in your monthly curse as to whether it is right or wrong; and that it is relative and subjective and everyone has their own code of conduct and none is better than the other.

Truly sad.

So...the first reason you can not and should not talk to a liberal lefty is that they have no honor at all, because they have no values, because values depend upon right and wrong, good and evil. So don't even try to talk with them, not worth the effort and you will get no where.

The second reason....the entire left of the spectrum of political thought 'believe' that the conduct of an indiviudal or a group within a social arena is determined by what is best for the group as a whole.

That is to say that in China, forced abortion is moral, in Britain and Canada, rationing medicine to the old is right and moral because it serves the greater good of the group.

In America is is moral to give an eight year old child a condom without parental consent. For the overall good of society, of course. I mean they are gonna have sex at ten anyway, so why not make it safe sex for the kiddies? Group or social, 'values', determined by the needs of the group or society.

What is wrong with that picture?

Groups have no values, they are mobs. Society is an abstract, it does nol exist in reality. No? Touch it, asshole!

Values, morals, ethics, right and wrong, good and bad are all, and only, defined by the individual with the fundamental value being life itself...individual life.

The Left are cowards; all of them. With no rules of moral conduct, they can never be held responsible for their own actions; they always blame it on social conditions and environments, never themselves.

How can one compromise with these people in order to coexist?

You can not.

They have to go.

Amicus Veritas

Charlie-Brown.gif
 
He's whoring his book under his real name in his signature line, but in the interest in board kumbayah I edited my post to remove his name.

As an aside, he's got a very interesting arrest record.
 
Back
Top